The right’s “cake” insanity: You won’t believe how it’s trying to deflect the Indiana backlash
How absurd have Republicans gotten in their defense of "religious freedom" laws? They now argue "cake is speech"JOAN WALSH
“Cake is speech.”
That’s what Indiana Baptist pastor Tim Overton told NPR’s Steve Inskeep Thursday morning, defending his state’s controversial “religious freedom” law. I thought it was so funny, I immediately tweeted it.
But as the day went on, it became clear that Overton’s argument wasn’t some fringe theory: It’s shaping up as a core tenet of one “compromise” approach to religious freedom laws that’s under consideration, in the wake of the backlash to the Indiana law, which Overton fervently supported as written. It’s at the heart of the fix to the law Jeb Bush pushed Wednesday night with pro-gay rights Republican donors.
Here’s how the pastor tried to explain it: Critics who say Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act would let businesses routinely deny service to LGBT Americans are wrong. “I don’t think any RFRA anywhere would say, ‘I’m not gonna give you a hotel room, I’m not gonna give you a hamburger, or gasoline or groceries,’” Overton told Inskeep. “That’s outside the bounds.”
But just as a religious leader should be able to decide, according to the tenets of his or her faith, whether to preside over gay marriages, Overton argued, so should a florist or a baker get to decide whether his or her “artistic ability” should be part of a gay wedding.
I think most Americans would agree that a pastor like myself should not be compelled by the government to use my speech to support someone else’s perspective. I think that has parallels to the cake maker. The cake maker is using his or her artistic ability to make a cake and that cake communicates something. I think that cake is speech, that says ‘we celebrate this union.’ I just don’t think they should be forced by the government to use their speech to support someone else’s perspective….I would like the line to be drawn in services that involve speech.
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/03/the_rights_cake_insanity_you_wont_believe_how_its_trying_to_deflect_the_indiana_backlash/
= new reply since forum marked as read
THIS?
BOOM! Hamburger cake!
TlalocW
But next month, who knows what will be "speech".
Honestly, they may be trying to turn back the clock on everything.
Before long, they'll say it isn't just "teh gayz", it will be minorities of all stripes, women etc.
I'm already seeing the arguments from so-called libertarians (who have never met a Teapublican they won't vote for) arguing that all civil rights legislation is wrong because...freedom!
Sadly, my brother is one of these. He loves to explain that it is him, a white, heterosexual man, who is really oppressed because he has to work with people of other races (who, in his mind, are all inferior in every way, even the few "good ones"
. He is oppressed because his company has a few female drivers who are also inferior to him in his magnificence as a white man.
We should, he tells me, go back to the "good old days" when minorities and women knew their place and were properly respectful to people like him.
Ugh. My own brother makes my skin crawl. Which makes me feel guilty for not wanting to see him. I'm glad he lives far enough away that visiting is not really an option.
