Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:46 PM May 2012

No President has aggressively implemented pro-immigrant policies during their 1st term as President

Written by DeeDee Garcia Blasé (Tequila Party): Many of us liked Ronald Reagan and some of the policies he implemented regarding immigration … but we are now coming to a time during the contentious Presidential election cycle where we have to evaluate the history of American Presidents and their immigrant-friendly stances.

The Republican Party has indeed changed from the Party of Abraham Lincoln, the Party of Ronald Reagan and certainly from the Party of Harrison.

Ronald Reagan was a President that Latinos warmed up to because he gave amnesty; however, the Republican Party (no thanks to the likes of Russell Pearce, Joe Arpaio and Mitt Romney) has veered off into a protectionist, isolationist and Dixiecrat direction. I especially have a bone to pick with Mitt Romney because I systematically watched him move Senator John McCain far to the right on matters affecting immigration during the 2008 GOP Presidential Republican primaries. If it had not been for Mitt Romney, Latinos may have felt more comfortable in voting for John McCain. Romney’s divisiveness during 2007 and 2008 was a time in which he pulled out all stops. ... On the other hand, one can never predict Romney and his power-hungry agenda as he seems to embrace the epitome of crony Capitalism. Of course it does not help Romney with Latinos when he decided to align himself with Kris Kobach who is the architect of anti-immigrant legislation across the United States.

The last pro immigrant friendly Republican President that took bold immigrant steps (before Ronald Reagan) via Ellis Island was former President Benjamin Harrison (our 23rd President of the United States). (This was in the 1890's. Republican presidents after him went for restrictive immigration legislation, notably in 1921 and 1924, until Reagan.) President Harrison is also recognized for the advocating for federal education funding and legislation to protect voting rights for African Americans.

People say we can learn from American history. The last President I am aware of that promoted immigration efforts was Benjamin Harrison and he did not get re-elected. Ronald Reagan did not address immigrant amnesty until he won his second term as President, and finally … even President George W. Bush waited until after he was re-elected before attempting to change immigration.

Where will Latinos place their “chips” during the 2012 Presidential election cycle? Do you believe they will vote for a second term President? Or do you think the majority of Latinos will gamble away their vote on someone like Mitt Romney who made a deal with the anti-immigrant devil via Kris Kobach as he attempts to enter his first term?

http://tucsoncitizen.com/hispanic-politico/2012/04/23/no-president-has-aggressively-implemented-pro-immigrant-policies-during-their-1st-term-as-president/

Written by DeeDee Garcia Blase is the foundress of the largest Hispanic Republican group in the nation that began in Arizona and later grew out of crisis during an anti-immigrant fevered pitch era. She dropped her Republican registered voter affiliation, stepped down as the President of SOMOS REPUBLICANS and switched to the Independent Party and is now the Co-President of a non partisan National Tequila Party Movement. Leadership consists of Democrats, Independents and Republicans with a mission of getting out the Latino Vote for the purpose of promoting immigrant friendly politicians. The Tequila Party is a FEMALE-LED counter movement to extreme Tea Party Republicans. The Tequila Party hopes to provide pro-immigrant political covering to politicians in high Hispanic populated states and key Presidential election swing states.

Sounds like the author still has a fond memories of Reagan and possibly McCain, but she certainly seem to distain Romney both for his positions of immigration in the current campaign and for the effect he had on the republican nominating process in 2008. She is not a Democrat but her view of Romney from an ex-republican perspective is interesting.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No President has aggressively implemented pro-immigrant policies during their 1st term as President (Original Post) pampango May 2012 OP
Immigrants... Ron Obvious May 2012 #1
Good point customerserviceguy May 2012 #2
^ This. ^ Edweird May 2012 #3
Driving down wages and standard of living for your constituents isn't a bright re-election strategy. Edweird May 2012 #4
I am no longer fond of McCain DeeDee Blase May 2012 #5
Welcome to Du. Keep reading and asking questions, there is alot to learn here. uppityperson May 2012 #6
 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
1. Immigrants...
Sat May 5, 2012, 03:11 PM
May 2012

When you say "pro-immigrant", do you mean "pro-illegal-immigrant"? As a legal immigrant, I'm getting a little annoyed at being lumped into the same category as them, you know.

Illegal immigrants and amnesty for them are tools of the right wing to destroy labour. Why do you think Reagan and Bush championed amnesty? Look at what's happened to, say, construction and meat-packing in recent decades. Those used to be jobs that paid good, middle class wages -- a step up to the middle class for many people and, especially, for their children, a form of upward mobility. Now they pay subsistence wages at best. Illegal immigration lowers wages in a race to the bottom as much as outsourcing does.

Every country on earth protects its borders. Being pro-illegal-immigration is to be anti-labour. Besides, illegal immigrants from central America into Mexico should wish they have it as good as those in the US.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
2. Good point
Sat May 5, 2012, 03:43 PM
May 2012

I'm a legal immigrant, too.

One of the reasons that many Americans do not support a new amnesty is that they see the failures of the last one. Today, we live in a United States where ordinary citizens have to jump through hoops to get employed, yet the Reagan-signed law of a quarter century ago has done nothing to dissuade illegal immigration.

Why should we think that a new one will not just be a further magnet to illegal immigration? Hang out for a few decades, and you'll be forgiven for breaking any law we enact. How is keeping the status quo any worse than that?

 

Edweird

(8,570 posts)
4. Driving down wages and standard of living for your constituents isn't a bright re-election strategy.
Sat May 5, 2012, 03:55 PM
May 2012

DeeDee Blase

(1 post)
5. I am no longer fond of McCain
Sat May 12, 2012, 11:43 AM
May 2012

McCain voted against the DREAM Act of December 2010, and he is an ex-amigo.

But I did give my opinion and report on how Romney's anti-immigrant position cost McCain the election. I believe that is the truth. I will not vote for Romney and it looks like I will be voting for a Democratic President for the very first time in my life this year. It is a gamble for me but at least I will have put my chips in a 2nd term President who doesn't have to worry about being re-elected anymore vs. an incoming 1st term president. American History points that Reagan and Bush did not discuss immigration reform until their 2nd term -- and the one president that did support immigration via Ellis Island did not get re-elected.

I am a registered independent voter and my decision is solely based on immigration and taking calculated risks.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
6. Welcome to Du. Keep reading and asking questions, there is alot to learn here.
Sat May 12, 2012, 01:28 PM
May 2012

Bunch of snarking of course, and strongly worded opinions, but a lot to learn also. Welcome

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No President has aggressi...