Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:42 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
Is there DU interest in Starting a Martin O'Malley group?Last edited Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:13 PM - Edit history (1)
In recent weeks a lot of DU'rs have expressed interest in learning more about him and his positions.
He may or may not run for the Presidential nomination, and he may be even more viable as a VP candidate. So often, when his name is floated, there seems to be a lot of people that would like to know more about him, and I asked in AtA if it was possible if there is interest. http://www.democraticunderground.com/12597719 My intent, for the record, is NOT to be divisive now that Hillary Clinton has entered the race. I believe it might be good for informational purposes. 
Edited to fix a typo… 
|
60 replies, 2341 views
 60 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Is there DU interest in Starting a Martin O'Malley group? (Original post) |
Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | OP |
| still_one | Apr 2015 | #1 | |
| kelly1mm | Apr 2015 | #26 | |
| djean111 | Apr 2015 | #2 | |
| greatauntoftriplets | Apr 2015 | #3 | |
| marym625 | Apr 2015 | #4 | |
| kelly1mm | Apr 2015 | #28 | |
| elleng | Apr 2015 | #50 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #51 | |
| elleng | Apr 2015 | #52 | |
| marym625 | Apr 2015 | #54 | |
| mmonk | Apr 2015 | #5 | |
| NCTraveler | Apr 2015 | #6 | |
| Agschmid | Apr 2015 | #7 | |
| LovingA2andMI | Apr 2015 | #8 | |
| Agnosticsherbet | Apr 2015 | #9 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #13 | |
| boston bean | Apr 2015 | #10 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #53 | |
| DavidDvorkin | Apr 2015 | #11 | |
| hrmjustin | Apr 2015 | #12 | |
| herding cats | Apr 2015 | #14 | |
| FSogol | Apr 2015 | #15 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Apr 2015 | #16 | |
| mylye2222 | Apr 2015 | #17 | |
| snooper2 | Apr 2015 | #18 | |
| kelly1mm | Apr 2015 | #32 | |
| snooper2 | Apr 2015 | #34 | |
| appalachiablue | Apr 2015 | #19 | |
| kelly1mm | Apr 2015 | #33 | |
| appalachiablue | Apr 2015 | #37 | |
| DemocratSinceBirth | Apr 2015 | #20 | |
| madinmaryland | Apr 2015 | #21 | |
| Jim Lane | Apr 2015 | #22 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #25 | |
| Jim Lane | Apr 2015 | #29 | |
| snooper2 | Apr 2015 | #35 | |
| Jim Lane | Apr 2015 | #48 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #38 | |
| Jim Lane | Apr 2015 | #43 | |
| one_voice | Apr 2015 | #23 | |
| rgbecker | Apr 2015 | #24 | |
| whatchamacallit | Apr 2015 | #27 | |
| leveymg | Apr 2015 | #30 | |
| KMOD | Apr 2015 | #31 | |
| upaloopa | Apr 2015 | #36 | |
| KittyWampus | Apr 2015 | #41 | |
| upaloopa | Apr 2015 | #45 | |
| greatauntoftriplets | Apr 2015 | #46 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #47 | |
| KittyWampus | Apr 2015 | #39 | |
| Chan790 | Apr 2015 | #40 | |
| fadedrose | Apr 2015 | #42 | |
| Raine1967 | Apr 2015 | #44 | |
| elleng | Apr 2015 | #49 | |
| sabrina 1 | Apr 2015 | #55 | |
| FSogol | Apr 2015 | #56 | |
| elleng | Apr 2015 | #57 | |
| SMC22307 | Apr 2015 | #58 | |
| FSogol | Apr 2015 | #59 | |
| Raine1967 | May 2015 | #60 |
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:43 PM
still_one (87,279 posts)
1. I agree, but maybe better if he becomes a candidate
Response to still_one (Reply #1)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:29 PM
26. Did HRC have a group before she anounced as a cantidate last Sunday? I think she did. nt
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:46 PM
greatauntoftriplets (174,485 posts)
3. I can support that.
|
|
Response to marym625 (Reply #4)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:31 PM
28. Did Hillary have a group before she anounced? If so, why should that be a limitation
Response to kelly1mm (Reply #28)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:26 PM
elleng (122,858 posts)
50. It shouldn't be a limitation,
|
and yes, there's been a Hillary group for some time.
|
Response to elleng (Reply #50)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:00 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
51. No, it should not. Warren never announced.
|
… and she has a group.
|
Response to Raine1967 (Reply #51)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:02 PM
elleng (122,858 posts)
52. Right, Raine.
|
Thanks!
|
Response to kelly1mm (Reply #28)
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 02:12 AM
54. Well there was no question she was going to run
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 12:47 PM
5. Since I joined O'Pac, I suppose you could count me in.
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 01:06 PM
9. Since Clinton (a declared candidate) and Warren (who is not running for President) has a group, yes,
Response to Agnosticsherbet (Reply #9)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 01:12 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
13. I had not thought of that.
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 01:06 PM
boston bean (35,339 posts)
10. Not for me, but I would support one. nt
Response to boston bean (Reply #10)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 09:02 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
53. Thank you and appreciated.
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 01:08 PM
DavidDvorkin (18,903 posts)
11. Yes
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 01:42 PM
herding cats (18,896 posts)
14. Since he's expressed serious interest in running, I support this idea.
|
It would be nice to have a place where one could go and get some current info one him where it's all condensed into on forum.
Good idea! |
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:11 PM
FSogol (43,678 posts)
15. Great idea. n/t
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:13 PM
18. Sounds good- Maybe Skinner can announce the new group when he announces he is running
|
Response to snooper2 (Reply #18)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:35 PM
32. The Hillary group has been around a long while, way before she anounce she was running
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:23 PM
appalachiablue (38,336 posts)
19. When he declares next month it would be good for the info.
 |
Response to appalachiablue (Reply #19)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:35 PM
33. Did Hillary have a group before she anounced? nt
Response to kelly1mm (Reply #33)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:49 PM
appalachiablue (38,336 posts)
37. Yes, Hillary's had a group for a while, Warren too although she says she's not running.
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:24 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,725 posts)
20. If you like him, go for it, why not?
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 02:27 PM
madinmaryland (64,213 posts)
21. Absolutely!
Response to Jim Lane (Reply #22)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:22 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
25. Are the other political groups safe? I think they are and as such
Response to Jim Lane (Reply #29)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:40 PM
35. I never clicked on the Hillary group till just now LOL
|
Funny-
SUPPORTERS ONLY! You Must Love her Highness! 50 people blocked, maybe I should get on the list 
Please read before posting in the Hillary Clinton Group. This discussion thread is pinned. Statement of Purpose Discuss the life, career, and accomplishments of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Supporters only. There is no wiggle room here, none whatsoever. Passive aggressive will also be dealt with swiftly. The Statement Of Purpose is pretty clear and violaters will not be warned before being blocked. If you do not understand the Statement of purpose please feel free to send me PM And I will be more than happy to elaberate on it. Thank you for your time in this matter. |
Response to Jim Lane (Reply #29)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 05:02 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
38. I Was thinking about the Maryland group discussing his past politics. Sorry I didn't clarify. eom
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:32 PM
30. So long as it doesn't have a code of silence surrounded by a protective moat like the Hillary group.
|
DU doesn't need another Idolatry Only Zone.
 |
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 04:46 PM
36. Is it one of those groups that ban people
|
Last edited Tue Apr 14, 2015, 05:49 PM - Edit history (1) |
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #41)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 05:50 PM
45. Sorry I don't see DU as home of anti discussion groups.
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #41)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 05:52 PM
greatauntoftriplets (174,485 posts)
46. Yes.
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #41)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 06:37 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
47. I agree.
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 05:07 PM
42. I think anyone who announces should have a group
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 05:28 PM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
44. This request for interest, I would like to kindly say was not meant
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Tue Apr 14, 2015, 08:04 PM
elleng (122,858 posts)
49. Sounds like a good idea,
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Wed Apr 15, 2015, 09:24 AM
FSogol (43,678 posts)
56. Kicking this again.
|
Just because I can....
 |
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Fri Apr 24, 2015, 08:10 PM
elleng (122,858 posts)
57. Kicking this AGAIN!
|
|
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 10:22 AM
FSogol (43,678 posts)
59. Time to kick this thread again. n/t
Response to Raine1967 (Original post)
Fri May 1, 2015, 10:21 AM
Raine1967 (11,563 posts)
60. We have a group!
