Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,056 posts)
Sun May 6, 2012, 09:44 AM May 2012

On Warren Buffett and Stephen King

On Warren Buffett and Stephen King
By Clive Crook

May 4 2012, 2:48 PM


The continuing argument about plutocrats who want to be taxed more heavily is puzzling to me. It seems to cause confusion where there really shouldn't be any. There are those who say: If Warren Buffett wants to pay more tax, he should shut up and just send a check to the IRS. And there are those who find that idea ridiculous and irrelevant: Buffett's saying the tax code is unfair, and he can't put that right by sending in a donation.

Two of The Economists' bloggers (here and here) have been debating Stephen King's recent contribution to the tax-me-more literature. King's with Buffett.

I want (the rich) to acknowledge that in America, we all should have to pay our fair share. That our civics classes never taught us that being American means that--sorry, kiddies--you're on your own. That those who have received much must be obligated to pay--not to give, not to "cut a check and shut up," in Governor Christie's words, but to pay--in the same proportion. That's called stepping up and not whining about it. That's called patriotism, a word the Tea Partiers love to throw around as long as it doesn't cost their beloved rich folks any money.


One of The Economist's bloggers found this impressive--mainly, so far as I can tell, because King had chosen the right side. Apparently, all right-minded people want the "if-you-want-your-taxes-raised-why-don't-you-send-the-IRS-a-bigger-cheque" meme finally dead and buried.

All right, but before we bury it let's see if we can understand it. I think it's childishly simple once you recognize that two separate questions are involved.

Would IRS donations by Warren Buffett and Stephen King make the tax code fairer? No.
Would IRS donations by Warren Buffett and Stephen King help to remedy the inequity they say the tax code causes? Yes.


In other words, Warren Buffett and Stephen King should write generous checks to the IRS and not shut up, but keep demanding the fairer system they say they want.

more...

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/05/on-warren-buffett-and-stephen-king/256754/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On Warren Buffett and Stephen King (Original Post) babylonsister May 2012 OP
This meme has always bothered me. katsy May 2012 #1
Think about what you said Progressive dog May 2012 #2
Buffett and King give their money to real causes, not throw it into the IRS Black Hole lunatica May 2012 #3
So, why should the rich be forced to give more to a 'black hole' IRS? Zax2me May 2012 #4
I think a large part of it is a black hole lunatica May 2012 #6
Voting and saying things the progressive way get you a long way. Zax2me May 2012 #5
Being wealthy is not evil lunatica May 2012 #7

katsy

(4,246 posts)
1. This meme has always bothered me.
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:48 AM
May 2012

"Put your money where your mouth is" is what they are suggesting.

My problem with that is that it effectively raises the taxes of the group of people who understand the social value of a progressive tax code and leaves the greedy untouched.

I'm pretty sure that in the battle of titans, I want our side as well financed as the other. Tax them equally. That would be a level playing field.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
2. Think about what you said
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:14 AM
May 2012

Taxes are not voluntary and shouldn't be.
Has there ever been a government financed by voluntary contributions? If there has, it certainly didn't last long.
How does it improve fairness in the tax code to have voluntary contributions from a handful of people? How does it increase government revenue to allow the rich to choose how much tax to pay?
Do I get to choose too?

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
3. Buffett and King give their money to real causes, not throw it into the IRS Black Hole
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:28 AM
May 2012
http://www.looktothestars.org/

Warren Buffet supports charities

Warren Buffett has supported the following charities:

Animal Rescue Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Girls Inc.
Glide
James Redford Institute for Transplant Awareness

Make-A-Wish Foundation
Music Rising
NoVo Foundation
Smile Train

Causes supported

Animals, At-Risk/Disadvantaged Youths, Blood, Marrow & Organ Donation, Cancer, Children, Creative Arts, Disaster Relief, Education, Family/Parent Support, Health, Homelessness, Human Rights, Miscellaneous, Poverty, Unemployment/Career Support, Women

***************
Stephen King

Stephen King has supported the following charities:

Heifer International
Jimmy Fund

STK Foundation

AIDS, Animals, Cancer, Children, Health, Human Rights, Hunger, Poverty


 

Zax2me

(2,515 posts)
4. So, why should the rich be forced to give more to a 'black hole' IRS?
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:47 AM
May 2012

Some of the worst right wing corporate fat cats have similar impressive donation records.
The IRS is not a black hole.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
6. I think a large part of it is a black hole
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:02 PM
May 2012

And I commend anyone who gives to causes, but I think more of our taxes should do the same. But instead everyone acts like there's just not enough money so those in need pay the most. There's more than enough money to take care of every single problem we have, including investing in the future in renewable energy. War isn't a 'necessary evil'. It's a moneymaker for corporations and warmongers.



 

Zax2me

(2,515 posts)
5. Voting and saying things the progressive way get you a long way.
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:51 AM
May 2012

But in the end, Buffett's and King's net worth still land in the top 1%.
They will become part of the financial 99% when you pry it from their cold, dead fingers.
I'll take their votes.
Better than nothing.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
7. Being wealthy is not evil
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:05 PM
May 2012

Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have pledged to give half their money to charity. Lots of people are better off for having these people be wealthy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On Warren Buffett and Ste...