General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (sufrommich) on Fri Apr 17, 2015, 11:36 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
tridim
(45,358 posts)I don't watch Dr. Oz, but I do know that he is probably a huge enemy of big pharma since he suggests people improve their diet and exercise to improve overall general health INSTEAD of taking pills that do nothing but mask symptoms.
That is a GOOD THING for people who enjoy being as healthy as possible, and a nightmare for big pharma.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And keep in mind, the "case studies" they were looking for could be in pay-to-publish journals.
In other words, Dr. Oz lies to desperate people in order to profit from them.
Now, what exactly was it you were complaining about "big pharma"? That they might be exploiting desperate people?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)signed the letter of protest are all Snidley Whiplash villains of Big Pharma. Dr. Oz is a hack.
Response to sufrommich (Reply #4)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
mopinko
(73,801 posts)frauds like him need to be called out by actual doctors.
he broke the hippocratic oath long ago. repeatedly.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)In addition to the Hoover institution crowd, we have the American Council on Science and Health
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Council_on_Science_and_Health#Controversies
Something sinister is afoot.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I guess I should have researched the group before posting.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Shills for the big corporate crowd going after a shill for the woo-based alternamed industry.
more on 'Doctor' Gill's organization:
In the early 1990s, ACSH decided to stop reporting its funding.[32] Their 1991 report shows that many corporations contributed funds.[32] As of 2005, they had received $90,000 from ExxonMobil.[33] Whelan told John Tierney (journalist) of the New York Times in 2007 that "ACSH has a diverse funding base - we receive donations from private foundations and individuals and unrestricted (usually very small) grants from corporations. The fastest-growing segment of our funding base is individual consumers who are sick and tired of the almost daily baseless scares - and they write us checks to help support our work."[34] In 2010, Whelan told The New Yorker that about a third of the organization's two million dollar annual budget comes from industry.[35]
But in 2013, Mother Jones magazine received leaked internal financial documents from ACSH, which revealed that 58% of the organization's donations in the period from July 1, 2012, to December 20, 2012 came from corporations and large private foundations, many of which themselves had close ties to industries with financial stakes in the specific issues on which ACSH issues industry-favorable opinions.[2] In addition, the documents revealed that the organization had on numerous occasions directly solicited donations from industry sources on the basis of projected reports on the specific issues in which those companies and industry organizations had such a stake.[2] Similarly, in a 1992 internal memo by Whelan disclosed by Consumer Reports, Whelan directed her staff to ask McNeil Specialty for $10,000 toward sweetener paper and disclosed that her staff would seek more CCC [Calorie Control Council] money ... to help us get new sweetener booklet out.[36] McNeil Specialty Products (now McNeil Nutritionals) owns the U.S. marketing rights to Splenda, the branded name of the artificial sweetener sucralose; the Calorie Control Council is an industry trade association for producers of artificial sweeteners, fat substitutes, and low-calorie foods. The same memo instructs that staffers give special attention" to "Mr. McDermott at Searle about meat money."[36] Thomas McDermott was shortly to become director of biotechnology communications for the agricultural biotechnology firm Monsanto; G.D. Searle was a Monsanto subsidiary, subsequently acquired by Pfizer.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)pride myself on not getting taken in by right wing ruses.I stand corrected,thanks.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Complaining about personally profitting from what gets sold to patients. LOL!
I had a friend who is a sales rep to doctors offices. The perqs doctors get for prescribing drugs is out of control.
They are just jealous.