General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow will Hillary defend the Nato bombing of Libya now that people are drowning in the Mediterranean
Really the Nato bombing of Libya has to be the most tragic mistakes this administration made and it is on her. She bragged of pushing Obama to do this for months.
Europe
Europe Faces Crisis as Hundreds of Migrants Die in Mediterranean Sinkings
ROME European leaders were confronted on Monday with a full-blown humanitarian crisis in the Mediterranean, as estimates that as many as 900 migrants may have died off the Libyan coast this weekend prompted calls for a new approach to the surging number of refugees crossing from Africa and the Middle East.
Even as efforts continued to collect the bodies from the sinking off Libya late Saturday and early Sunday only 28 survivors have been found Italian rescue ships responded to new distress calls from other vessels. A second migrant ship crashed near the Greek island of Rhodes, underscoring the relentless flow of people fleeing poverty, persecution and war.......................
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/21/world/europe/european-union-immigration-migrant-ship-capsizes.html?_r=0
Since Richard Engels kidnapping has been outed as a fraud, the Syrian excellent adventure is becoming equally tragic.. Let's not forget all the Nazi love from the Ukrainian regime. All inspired by neocon holdovers that Hillary rescued.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)How in the hell do you hold Hillary responsible for the migrants drowning. It is shameful this has occurred. Blaming Hillary for this is akin to Pat Robertson saying Katrina hit New Orleans because of the gays.
brooklynite
(94,517 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)FarPoint
(12,351 posts)Tell us more.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)know little about? We have a long an illustrius track record of doing far more harm than good. Libya, Syria and the Ukraine are just adding to the mess that started when Bush took us into Iraq. Electing a dem should have changed things. Unfortunately New Dems just want to tweak shitty ideas rather than chart a different course.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Truly bipartisan, unfortunately. All has to do with keeping the MIC intact and the warmongers rich.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Both wars have done nothing but fuel ISIS. There were no refugees before we incited them.
Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)
betterdemsonly This message was self-deleted by its author.
tritsofme
(17,377 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)more faux scandals.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Thank you.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Than moveon to their kissing cousins, the socalled liberal hawks like Samantha Power and Susan Rice.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)This OP should be locked and you should re-post in CT.
btw - Did you forget that Samantha Power called Hillary "a monster".
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)You are saying UN Ambassador Samantha Power called Hillary a monster? Do you have a link?
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)JI7
(89,248 posts)Wasn't the issue over who was behind it ?
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)i posted on this the other day. Dead silence on how this fueled the rush to war against Assad.
JI7
(89,248 posts)The place was already at war
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Who have revealed themselves as Al Qaeda. They are now killing non wahhabis with American weaponry.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)and then Hillary-et-al decided to
kick Ghadaffi out of Libya.
which gave encouragement to the
so-called 'rebels' in Syria,
in addition to weapons that
went all over Africa
and the middle east.
Add to that, Mali and Yemen.
JI7
(89,248 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)without which the war wouldn't be nearly so nasty or danderous. Noone with common sense would want isis to win. People at the time were warning the adminstration that the Syrian moderates were Al Qaeda but they wouldn't listen. They were more interested in appeasing neocons.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)and wouldn't be producing near as much death and destruction. Isis would never have gotten off the ground without us. Arab spring didn't make us bomb anything or give isis weapons.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Keep trying.
Sid
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)and I hope she is made to answer for it in the primary debates. Maybe it will remind people of her IWR vote and other foreign policy errors.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Keep going.
I'm sure eventually you will find something that sticks,
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)be prevented from attempting to cross the Mediterranean and either drowning or, more likely, becoming refugees in Western countries which increases the popularity of the far-right, anti-immigrant political parties.
Friendly dictators, like Gaddafi, do a good job of controlling their countries and preventing unseemly things like throngs of refugees from Syria, Sudan, Nigeria, etc. from escaping their suffering. Friendly dictators have been a staple of American foreign policy for decades. I would hope we can one day transition away from that policy.
Gaddafi was being paid quite handsomely by the EU to prevent immigrants from transiting through Libya. And he gave them their money's worth. He was quite good at stopping refugees. I suppose Europeans knew that the departure of Gaddafi would start the flow of refugees again.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Seems obvious that civil war and all that follows from it would create a flood of refugees.
Not only the direct NATO bombing, but also flooding the place with weapons. It also destabilized northwest African countries like Mali. Sad to see so many unable to fit these puzzle pieces together.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)They insisted that this be done and even wanted boots on the ground...or Obama administration would have been the most anti-American, pro-Islam administration in history. Another Bibi triumph...much like what is about to happen with Iran if Obama doesn't stop it.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)should have said tuff poop!