Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon May 7, 2012, 09:14 AM May 2012

EPA, Department of the Interior announce additional fracking oversight

by Scott K. Johnson |

Drafts of new regulations relating to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas production were released for public comment Friday. This follows on the heels of the new rules for air emissions released two weeks ago. The US Environmental Protection Agency announced new guidance for obtaining permits when diesel fuel is included as a component of the fracking fluid used to fracture source rocks and free the gas trapped inside. As we laid out in a previous story, a 2005 amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act exempted fracking from regulation as an underground injection, except when diesel fuel is used. Despite that caveat, the industry continued using diesel fuel without reporting it, saying that the EPA had never explicitly provided a process for them to do so. That process is now laid out in the new guidance. This may become a moot point, however, as public pressure is forcing the industry to move to more innocuous alternatives.

The US Department of the Interior also announced new rules for fracking on federal and Indian land, greatly increasing oversight. Fracking must now be explicitly approved as part of the normal drilling permits companies apply for when operating on federal land. This will require them to submit details on the layers of rock they plan to frack and how they will manage and dispose of the spent fracking fluids. They will also have to submit documentation of tests performed to ensure integrity of the seal around the well before the actual fracking begins. After the process is complete, drillers will have to publicly disclose the chemicals used in the fracking fluid.

In the press release, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar says, “As we continue to offer millions of acres of America’s public lands for oil and gas development, it is critical that the public have full confidence that the right safety and environmental protections are in place. The proposed rule will modernize our management of well stimulation activities—including hydraulic fracturing—to make sure that fracturing operations conducted on public and Indian lands follow common-sense industry best practices.”

Several states (most notably Wyoming and Texas) already have some similar requirements on the books, and others may use the federal rules as a template in the future. The drafts of both the EPA guidance and DOI rules will be revised and finalized following the 60 day public comment period.

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/05/more-fracking-oversight-announced.ars

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA, Department of the Interior announce additional fracking oversight (Original Post) n2doc May 2012 OP
Wish this had been done 3 years ago. If, Gawd forbid, kestrel91316 May 2012 #1
We're working on it! GilbertEngageAmerica May 2012 #2
Gilbert Sounds like a PR Shill... jjewell May 2012 #3
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
1. Wish this had been done 3 years ago. If, Gawd forbid,
Mon May 7, 2012, 11:21 AM
May 2012

Rmoney should win in November he will undo this before it can even be implemented.

 
2. We're working on it!
Mon May 7, 2012, 04:01 PM
May 2012

These fracking regulations are a great way for us to be more progressive in our environmental progress. But at the same time, the transition to comply with these kinds of regulations is a rough one. The cost of complying with new regulations is astronomical (http://bit.ly/zgsTLu) not to mention that they change all the time and more often than not, one is forced to comply with new regulations when they just got used to a certain set. We need a better way to make regulatory policy and business practices work or else we don’t stand a chance in making any sort of headway with regard to fossil fuels that we still depend on.

jjewell

(618 posts)
3. Gilbert Sounds like a PR Shill...
Mon May 7, 2012, 04:24 PM
May 2012

for the right wing Heritage Foundation. His link is pure Heritage Foundation propaganda.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA, Department of the In...