Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 06:21 PM Apr 2015

In today's email from Elizabeth Warren: No vote on FT until TPP made public



Have you seen what’s in the new TPP trade deal?

Most likely, you haven’t – and don’t bother trying to Google it. The government doesn’t want you to read this massive new trade agreement. It’s top secret.

Why? Here’s the real answer people have given me: “We can’t make this deal public because if the American people saw what was in it, they would be opposed to it.”

If the American people would be opposed to a trade agreement if they saw it, then that agreement should not become the law of the United States.

Let’s send a loud message to our trade officials: No vote on a fast-track for trade agreements until the American people can see what’s in this TPP deal. Sign this petition right now to make the TPP agreement public.


The Administration says I’m wrong – that there’s nothing to worry about. They say the deal is nearly done, and they are making a lot of promises about how the deal will affect workers, the environment, and human rights. Promises – but people like you can’t see the actual deal.

For more than two years now, giant corporations have had an enormous amount of access to see the parts of the deal that might affect them and to give their views as negotiations progressed. But the doors stayed locked for the regular people whose jobs are on the line.

If most of the trade deal is good for the American economy, but there’s a provision hidden in the fine print that could help multinational corporations ship American jobs overseas or allow for watering down of environmental or labor rules, fast track would mean that Congress couldn’t write an amendment to fix it. It’s all or nothing.

Before we sign on to rush through a deal like that – no amendments, no delays, no ability to block a bad bill – the American people should get to see what’s in it.

Sherrod Brown has been leading this fight, and he points out that TPP isn’t classified military intelligence – it’s a trade agreement among 12 countries that control 40% of the world’s economy. A trade agreement that affects jobs, environmental regulations, and whether workers around the globe are treated humanely. It might even affect the new financial rules we put in place after the 2008 crisis. This trade agreement doesn’t matter to just the biggest corporations – it matters to all of us.

When giant corporations get to see the details and the American people don’t, we all lose. Let’s level the playing field: No vote on fast-tracking trade until the public can read the TPP deal.

We’ve all seen the tricks and traps that corporations hide in the fine print of contracts. We’ve all seen the provisions they slip into legislation to rig the game in their favor. Now just imagine what they have done working behind closed doors with TPP.

We can’t keep the American people in the dark.

Thank you for being a part of this,

Elizabeth


















13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In today's email from Elizabeth Warren: No vote on FT until TPP made public (Original Post) Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 OP
K&R DJ13 Apr 2015 #1
More properly called the obama trade pact. he called her wrong, not "the admintration" nt msongs Apr 2015 #2
K and R bigwillq Apr 2015 #3
She is one fearless fighter. He summarily dismissed her with a chuckle and "She's wrong." libdem4life Apr 2015 #4
Which I take to mean that she is actually 100% right hifiguy Apr 2015 #5
That would be my opinion. libdem4life Apr 2015 #6
I vote never even then, these agreements should be going through the actual treaty process TheKentuckian Apr 2015 #7
Precisely! Thanks for the post. JDPriestly Apr 2015 #10
Thank You Elizabeth Warren! NBachers Apr 2015 #8
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #9
In My Book..... raindaddy Apr 2015 #11
kick. midnight Apr 2015 #12
At this point, I'm guessing a certain Chief Executive may be thinking bullwinkle428 Apr 2015 #13
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
4. She is one fearless fighter. He summarily dismissed her with a chuckle and "She's wrong."
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:01 PM
Apr 2015

She's Baaaaaaaaack !! People trust her. She tells it like it is and like they don't want to hear it. I'm so glad she's NOT running for President. She can just focus on the most important issue of our time...the economy, our money, who gets it, and how the little folk can keep a bit more.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
7. I vote never even then, these agreements should be going through the actual treaty process
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 07:13 PM
Apr 2015

prescribed in the Constitution not given a lower hurdle than naming a fucking post office.

Makes it too hard to pass one at all you say? Good, things of such sweeping scope aren't supposed to be easy to pass no matter how much the TeaPubliKlans and the Chamber of Commerce have a hard on for it.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. Precisely! Thanks for the post.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 08:45 PM
Apr 2015

Either get a new Constitution or follow the old one. President Obama, don't cherry-pick which parts of the Constitution you want to follow and which everybody else is supposed to comply with.

2/3 of the votes in the Senate to ratify the TPP. And I hope it never gets that many. And lots of debate before it is adopted.

If we followed those rules, then it would never get through Congress. And that would be a good thing.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
13. At this point, I'm guessing a certain Chief Executive may be thinking
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 09:17 PM
Apr 2015

"Perhaps I should have just made her head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau like she wanted in the first place!"

K&R.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In today's email from Eli...