General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, yeah, here's a big heaping helping of "Shut The Fuck Up"
to those puling about "He's not a Democrat!"
...and an invitation to get on board.
Jump on. Jump in.
Jump. You are fresh out of excuses.
Bernie Sanders to Run for President as a Democrat
http://www.ecowatch.com/2015/04/29/bernie-sanders-run-president-democrat/
Let's do this.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)I like Bernie, I'm glad he's running...but there are quite a few people here who think people are objecting...at least they think there's a lot more than there actually are...
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Super powers. I haz 'em.
Warren, Sanders, anybody but another Clinton or Bush.
KTHXBAI
ashling
(25,771 posts)I assume from the fact that you put Bush in that dichotomy that you were not referring to the Democratic primary, but to the whole shebang.
So, your "anybody" would include Christy, Walker, Jindal, Cruz, Paul, Carson, et al.
How is that helpful?
How is that a good thing?
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)"the popular notion"
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)And that the Hostile behavior the last two weeks has been " Over the top " toward All those who didn't jump on the feel good moment . Now there is a viable option and the devoted Clinton supporters, don't have to but should listen to the cheers for another candidate.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)When I say anybody but Clinton, I'm talking about who I think can beat that bunch.
Sheesh.
Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #219)
orpupilofnature57 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ashling
(25,771 posts)I was responding to your statement"
Warren, Sanders, anybody but another Clinton or Bush.
I wasn't aware that Bush was running in the Democratic primary.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Because that strawman hasn't surfaced.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Like it or not it's not a football game, cloaked statements sound like a diversion tactic .
Orsino
(37,428 posts)A politician says he's suddenly a Democrat, so shut the hell up, anyone pointing out that he wasn't one three days ago.
Me, I wish the Democratic Party would catch the hell up to Sanders. If they don't marginalize him instantly, I'll be impressed.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)Is there a way to say it gradually?
--imm
deutsey
(20,166 posts)The initiation process is very hush hush and shrouded in mystery...
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Hekate
(90,560 posts)Please let us know if you matured or if you sprang fully-formed from the head of Zeus like Athena.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Then I came out.
Now I'm a democratic socialist.
I guess I've evolved even more than "H".
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Apparently, though, it's not been an evolution Sanders has been willing to make until this week (or this year). While I'd love to believe that party affiliation isn't important, or that Sanders' entry will push the party leftward, there must be some Dems asking why this Socialist/Independent suddenly climbs aboard the Party Train.
Sanders needs a good story, at least early on, because if we don't ask, Sec. Clinton sure as hell will.
One great sign is his gear for sale at the DemStore.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)From the Republicans it will be total glee that they can say it.
From the ConservaDems it will be
Orsino
(37,428 posts)i would like to hear him speak on the subject of how he became a Democrat, when and why. These are good interview questions for anyone wanting to lead our party.
I think I'd even be okay with an answer like, "So I could run for president without helping a Republican get elected." I imagine that many or most Dems would want him to expound on trafitional principles that he suddenly realized we embody, or something.
With luck, his announcement will address all this.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Hekate
(90,560 posts)Please let us know if you matured or if you sprang fully-formed from the head of Zeus like Athena.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Hekate
(90,560 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Hekate
(90,560 posts)Saying HRC was a Goldwater Girl and expecting that to invalidate the next 50 years of her life is one of the shallowest and dumbest arguments I have ever heard in my life, and it is all over this board.
It ain't simple and it ain't a game.
Bernie is a great guy, as I have said repeatedly. If he gets the nomination, I will support him, as I have said repeatedly. I have not trashed him and I will not trash him -- it would be nice if the other Dems on this board would extend the same courtesy to the other candidates, such as Hillary.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Many like to point out that Warren was a Republican and that Bernie is not a Democrat but forget that Hillary was once a Republican. I thought that one of our prime missions was to convert Republicans to Democrats, but it seems many think it is more fun to trash them. But what do I know I don't even try to hide the fact that I'm not a Democrat. But if the primaries are close when New York's time comes I may have to rejoin the party.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)I'm with Sanders. Hopefully he can make that -D mean something more than "Republicans, hold the fundie."
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bernie's cool.
TBF
(32,006 posts)(full disclosure - I was juror #1)
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Wed Apr 29, 2015, 06:11 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
So, yeah, here's a big heaping helping of "Shut The Fuck Up"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026591352
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This thread title is over the top. There is no way that it's okay to tell other members of a discussion board to "shut the fuck up". Sorry WillPitt but this just isn't okay.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Apr 29, 2015, 06:16 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't see an issue with this post.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: bonus points for 'puling' word, I love you!
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Silly alert.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: i don't have an issue with it. El Bryanto
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see nothing here but enthusiasm. The alerted is going to have a rough ride. Remember to breath, it's a discussion forum after all.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I haven't posted a word about Hillary, Warren or Sanders so far. But this kind of post makes me not want to get on board.
That was kinda weird, that alert. People love saying STFU. They just don't always spell it out.
TBF
(32,006 posts)it is her carte blanche to move left. When the investment bankers complain she can say it's out of her hands because she has been challenged and needs to satisfy the base.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and even the general. And then swings right again when it's time to actually govern?
She helped write TPP. She's arm in arm w/wall street and the banksters.
bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)TBF
(32,006 posts)I will take Hillary over Jeb Bush though.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)and rather surprising that many DUers are willing to be so clearly duped.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)which is identical to what used to be called a Rockefeller Republican.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)She swings both ways. Just like Obama. Starts on the upswing on the left, and ends on the upswing on the right.
But at least there is someone to force her to show herself as a hypocrite (not saying she will be, but it makes it easier). Like Obama, he will never shake off his abandonment of closing Gitmo, the Public Option for health insurance, extending the Bush Tax cuts for the wealthy etc.
Otherwise she could just run on a Republican light platform staying just barely to the left of whoever is the Republican front runner. I'm sure that's what she'd prefer as she'd get much more of the wishy washy moderate on-the-fence voter to support her. And then once elected she could just point to her primary run and point out that she never promised any economic or military liberal platforms, and shut up us "liberal retards".
But, call me an easy mark, I'm willing to give both Hillary and Bernie a shot at the moment. Clean slate. Let them battle it out in the public arena. Either one is still better than anything the GOP will present.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)He made good on his pledge not to be a spoiler by running as a Democrat. More power to him - his joining the Democratic field only makes the Party more legitimate...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)at this point I don't give a single owl pellet whether he's running as the Man in the Moon Party candidate. I am sick to death of half-loaf corporatists who don't even deliver the half a loaf.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Hekate
(90,560 posts)...that would come along.
Or don't you understand that each Party has a Platform and that they are substantially different?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I don't know even know how you could arrive at that conclusion.
Hekate
(90,560 posts)My point is that the D and R actually have objective meaning when it comes to Presidential candidates. Each political party has a Party Platform, and their nominee is pledged to run on that platform.
Sure your hero could run as a Republican and you would love him just the same after you got over the initial shock. But it would have real-world consequences in that everybody else would take a look at the GOP platform and conclude he was really with that program.
So I am a bit confused that you would even make an offhand comment like that.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I don't understand your confusion. Mr. Sanders an independent which according to your logic means he doesn't buy into the Democratic party's agenda lock, stock and barrel either.
Apparently you believe that I just landed on the planet and am unaware that there are plenty of Republicans that are pretending to be Democrats. Many call themselves Blue Dog Democrats but are known as DINOs (Democrats in Name Only) by most liberals.
I feel fairly certain that it is safe to say, that there are conservatives out there that believe there are Republicans that are RINOs too.
So the political parties are not just limited to the box you attempted to portray them in to me.
I believe that Mr. Sanders doesn't live in your box and that he has the integrity that both the Democratic and Republican party lack. I like his record (8 terms in House, 2 in the Senate). I like his honesty and his belief that Government should work for all people and not just for those that can afford to buy it.
Mr. Sanders has stated that he is running as a Democrat because there is no infrastructure in the states set up to support an Independent. So I don't believe he's running Democratic because he agrees with the Democratic platform whole heartedly.
I said what I said because I believe that he's probably the only candidate between both parties who isn't beholding to those who have purchased him. I think that many people will like and admire him for that including many Republicans.
TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts)smokey nj
(43,853 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,821 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)whether Bernie has a chance or not - I will vote for him in the Primary. Anybody that doesn't want to vote for him doesn't have to do so, but I will.
It's called a primary for a reason - you weed out candidates that don't represent the party, and vote for those whose ideals and message resonate with you.
You don't have to be in love with Hillary or Bernie to be a Democrat. You are a Democrat because you want to see our party put forth the best candidate and lead our nation.
eomer
(3,845 posts)That would be the head of the Democratic Party who says he's effectively a moderate Republican, President Obama.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)I dont regret voting for McGovern and several other people I share ideals with .
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Chicken Little needs to cough up some links.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)There are a few in this thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6585878
And this one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6583686
And this guy, who I included for comic relief
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6590118
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Expecting someone to declare as a DEMOCRAT in order to enter the DEMOCRATIC primary.
I'm glad Bernie got the DNC rule book and decided to follow the rules. And I wish him the best of luck. He is truly one of the good guys. The jury is decidedly still out on his supporters though.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)First of all, correcting the billgerent claims by Sanders supporters INSISTING he can run in a DEMOCRATIC primary without declaring as. DEMOCRAT is not in any way, shape or form, an attack. It's simply stating the DNC rules. They are common sense rules and there is nothing new about them.
Secondly, it's not "baseless" at all. He was quoted numerous times as saying he was undecided about declaring as a DEMOCRAT. Glad he got the memo about the rules.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)The only thing you did was expose yourself as a bully. And yes, you did compare Bernie Sanders to Ralph Nader, which was why I posted the link to the thread.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Go figure, huh?
I will say, so far his supporters don't represent him very well.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)A thread that was started because people were complaining that Bernie saying he's running in the Democratic Primaries wasn't quite Democratic enough. And, you did compare him to Ralph Nader and Joe Lieberman - you're definitely not right about that.
Now I'm really tired of this conversation, so have a good night.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)... As a Democrat. I assume he did that because it was made clear to him that the DNC rules state he has to declare he is running as a Democrat. Nice to see that Bernie gets it even if his supporters can't seem to grasp that simple concept.
Not a single person said he wasn't "Democrat enough". Just that he can't run in the DEMOCRATIC primary as an INDEPENDENT.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Just look at the titles of the MULTIPLE OPs they started. That says it all! My favorites were the folks who don't know the difference between state party registration and DNC requirements. As if that exempted him from DNC rules. Hilarious when people are so dogmatic while being 100% incorrect.
You have a good evening too! (sincerely).
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)If you have links that show what you're claiming (not just links you believe shows what you're claiming), then I'll listen.
D
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Maybe you should ask Will Pitt. He apparently saw them and had a meltdown.
They are in GD and the title of the OPs both declare that since Bernie can't "register" for a party in Vermont it doesn't matter if he declares as a Democrat. Apparently they believe the DNC allows people of any party to run in our presidential primary.
Fricking ridiculous.
demwing
(16,916 posts)not a damn thing
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Which folks would that be, exactly?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)... who live in an imaginary world of persecution. For instance, see the OP of this thread.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)that just happen to disagree with you?
We are more than capable of disagreeing with one another without starting to use "us vs. them" language here on DU.
I know it, because I care about this community. I've put in my time to foster it as a place where people can freely exchange ideas.
You can participate, be a polite contributor, and help make this a great place to post.
You can do otherwise, and foment discord. That way leads to harm for everybody else, disruption of the community, and ugliness that we do not need on DU.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)This has become HRC bash and snarling Warren / Sander supporter central. The OP here is a perfect example. What? Do you think I jumped into Will Pitts head and forced him to declare we all STFU?
I've never had an interaction with him in my life.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'm seeing disagreement, and that is healthy. What isn't healthy is claiming that people are "snarling" when it is just a difference of opinion.
The hyperbole you are using is rather ... well, odd, and designed to incite.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)STFU is billigerent and snarly. And sadly, is starting to appear representive.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)of supposed Bernie supporters whinging about how poor Bernie is being unfairly attacked by mean DU'ers even though he is being almost universally accepted and appreciated?
REALLY?
My irony meter just broke.
You posted on a thread that tells other DU'ers to SHUT THE FUCK UP and say "You can do otherwise, and foment discord. That way leads to harm for everybody else, disruption of the community, and ugliness that we do not need on DU."
Response to MaggieD (Reply #95)
rhett o rick This message was self-deleted by its author.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)As I have repeated about 100 times now, I welcome ALL Democrats in the race. I don't believe in bashing any Democrat. I know you do, but I do not share your view.
I will donate to every Dem in the primary (with the exception of Chafee if he runs). I believe in a robust primary process. The nomination is decided by the time my state holds one. I wil vote for the Democratic nominee in the general.
And now I will journal this so I can cut and paste it when "you folks" snarl at me because I won't pledge my fealty to your preferred candidate.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)There are two major "sides" in the Democratic Party.
One side supports: ------------------ The other side supports:
Regulating fracking-----------------------Unregulated fracking ("a bridge to a new energy future"
Fair Trade Agreements------------------- So-called Free Trade Agreements
Rolling back the Patriot Act----------------Strengthening the Patriot Act (current Admin)
Regulating Domestic Spying---------------Giving the NSA/CIA Security State unlimited power and budget
Cutting back the wars in the M.E.---------- More troops in the M.E. (neocons agree with this side)
Ending illegal drone killing-------------------Drone killing
Raising the SS cap--------------------------Saving SS via the chained CPI
Bringing back Glass-Steagall----------------Ok with unregulated banks
Spending money on our infrastructure------Ambivalent about our infrastructure.
While both sides are agreeable on most social equality issues they are a long way apart on many other issues. I think the current candidates differ on the above mentioned issues.
I think you have a good idea which side you are on.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)It's just whatever your imagination wants to believe.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)That is an untruth. I know because I did not vote for Nader....
Zorra
(27,670 posts)TBF
(32,006 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)There seems to be some hardliners that are super invested in a Clinton win. I just hope the third way get's on board and does the right thing. Don't split the party, third way.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)Check out the article cali linked to here. Matt Taibbi hits the nail on the head.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026589722
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I'm all about that ticket
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... acting like a Democrat in all things he does. A PROVEN history of being on the side of We the People above moneyed corporate oligarchs.
With Bernie, we finally have a voice again, one that won't just campaign "*to the left*", he actually is one of us and will carry that fighting spirit into the Oval Office.
Not cheap focus group tested rhetoric, action and results.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Words don't mean shit anymore...actions always speak the truth.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Victor and I are so excited and, btw, we encouraged him to run by email and donations.
I've JUMPED!
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)blue neen
(12,319 posts)Ordinary questions.
I, for one, want to know if Bernie Sanders will be eligible to be on the ballot on my state of PA. If he is unable to be on the ballot, he can't get any delegates. If he can't get any delegates, he can't win the nomination.
This legitimate and important question has been asked on other threads, and so far I've yet to see a definitive answer. If it has been answered, please feel free to show me.
There are a number of people here who are truly welcoming other candidates into this race and are truly undecided as to who they want to support. As a supporter of Bernie, wouldn't it behoove you to find out his ballot status in states like PA rather than spend your time hurling ugly taunts?
bvf
(6,604 posts)And why wouldn't he be eligible?
He'll be on your ballot. I'll bet anything.
blue neen
(12,319 posts)In PA, only Democrats and Republicans are involved in the primary process. When you register to vote in PA, you must declare as Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, No Affiliation, or Other. This seems to read that Bernie would not be eligible in the PA Primary as things currently stand. If someone here knows the actual ruling in PA, please clarify for us.
If Bernie is running for President, it is not premature at all to make sure he will be eligible to be included in the primaries in all states. You want to make sure he gets all the delegates he can, right?
bvf
(6,604 posts)I take that to mean he'll switch party affiliation.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and can't do so in his home state, since they don't register as a party there. So where would he "register?" He can run as a Democrat by running as a Democrat.
former9thward
(31,941 posts)the voters in the last election. It will be the same requirement for Sanders, Clinton or anyone else. Why do you think Sanders would not be eligible for the ballot?
http://www.co.armstrong.pa.us/departments/public-services/elections-votersregistration/running-for-public-office
blue neen
(12,319 posts)I think.
former9thward
(31,941 posts)Nomination papers normally do not ask if a candidate is a party member. They ask what office they are running for and which party. Nomination petitions require the voters who sign to be party members. Sanders will not have an issue getting on the PA ballot as a Democrat.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That form is a candidacy declaration form, and Sanders has fifteen days to file it after he announces.
The last time he filed the form (for his senate run) he said he was an "I" -- Independent.
former9thward
(31,941 posts)The FEC is just for campaign expense reporting. They do not make the ballot access rules for the state.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The FEC is not just for reporting--it's also for gaining access to 'matching funds.' That's a key element for campaigns that don't have deep pockets.
And the Democratic Party isn't going to "take him on" and call him to the podium to accept the nomination in Philadelphia in July 2016 unless he files as a Democrat.
He could get all the votes in the world, but if he gets them as an INDEPENDENT and not as a Democrat, then the Democratic Party, at their convention, is not obligated to put him forward as "their" candidate. They don't owe him a thing in that instance.
Until he identifies himself as a Democrat to the Federal Election Committee, he's not a Democrat. When he does, and FWIW I assume he will, if the DNC is handing out money to all their primary candidates, he'll get a taste.
Further, in order for his name to be placed on the ballot in Vermont, he has to identify his party affiliation as part of the process to collect a bunch of signatures. The signature form requires that he identify the party with which he wants to be identified -- the petition form is very clear-cut. He can't wiggle around on this matter--he has to state his party affiliation on the form. This is the precise language of the petition form:
PETITION FOR NOMINATION TO PLACE NAME ON THE BALLOT
PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION, MARCH 1, 2016
I join in a petition to place on the presidential primary ballot of the ______________________ Party,
the name of ________________________________________________, whose residence is in the
(city, town) of _______________________________ in the county of _______________________ in
the state of _____________________________, for the office of President, to be voted for on
Tuesday, the 1st day of March, 2016; and I certify that I am at the present time a registered voter
and am qualified to vote for a candidate for this office.
SIGNATURE (Your signature will
NOT count if it cannot be read by the
officer where the petition is filed.)
PRINT NAME HERE
TOWN OF RESIDENCE
(Where you physically reside &
where your name is on the voter
checklist.)
Also, and more to the point, voters in, say, Vermont, don't declare a party affiliation, but Vermont does have a Vermont Democratic Party infrastructure. These are the people who "input" into the ballot process along with other actors like the Secretary of State.
former9thward
(31,941 posts)At no place does it say the person must be a member of that party. There are no convention rules saying he must be a Democrat. And the DNC does not anoint candidates. Delegates do.
MADem
(135,425 posts)When the candidate hands in the thousand or whatever signatures and the two thousand bucks filing fee, he's got to fill out another form as well. It's called a consent form and it details how the candidate's name will appear on the ballot (see the 2nd page of that link to the petition form). https://www.sec.state.vt.us/elections/candidates/presidential-candidates.aspx
CONSENT OF CANDIDATE FORM (17 V.S.A. §2702)
PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION
Each candidate for office in a Presidential Primary on March 1, 2016, must file a consent form with
the filing officer in order to authorize the printing of his or her name on the primary ballot.
OFFICE WHERE TO FILE
President Vermont Secretary of State
Attn: Elections
128 State Street
Montpelier, VT 05633-1101
Please complete this form carefully. This form is required by law to establish exactly how each candidates
name, state of residence, and party will appear on the ballot. The law also requires that each candidate
provide us with a mailing address. You may include initials or nicknames in your name; however, titles (i.e.
Doctor, Esquire, etc.) cannot appear on the ballot. It will be most helpful if you limit your name including
spaces to no more than 24 characters.
This form is due in the Office of the Vermont Secretary of State no later than 5:00 p.m. on
MONDAY, January 11, 2016.
I consent to having my name printed on the ballot for the office of:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
in the State of
VERMONT
My name, state of residence, and party are as follows exactly as I want it to appear on the ballot:
(PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY)
Name: ______________________________________________
State of residence: ____________________________________
Party: ______________________________________________
Candidates signature: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________
Mailing Address:______________________________________
Town, State, Zip:_____________________________________
Daytime phone:______________________________________
Evening/weekend phone: ______________________________
One way or another, on one form or another, Senator Sanders is going to have to fish or cut bait. We will know, when he files these documents, if he's a Democrat, or if he's doing something else. The interview he gave with Wolf Blitzer today after declaring his intent to run makes me wonder--he dodged the specific question about party affiliation when asked. We'll just have to wait and see what he writes on these forms.
Who anoints the delegates, since we're getting into that end of things? VT has very specific rules about gender of delegates, and they also like to see a distribution of races and ethnicities--it's in the Vermont Democratic Party rulebook, there--not the DNC rulebook. The DNC doesn't jump in until the nominating process in Philadelphia.
former9thward
(31,941 posts)You posted a different form in the post I replied to. Do you think no one would notice that? Also you keep talking about the Vermont. This sub-thread was about PA ballot access not Vermont.
MADem
(135,425 posts)This conversation is in aid of establishing what PARTY the Senator will affiliate with--no?
The first form is the FEC form. The candidate must fill in Block 4, identifying his party.
The second form is the petition form required by the state(s). These also require that the party be identified. I didn't try to "game" you that the form was different--it was in ADDITION TO the first form that I provided this, to demonstrate that Sanders will have to decisively STATE his party affiliation when he gathers signatures in the STATES.
There is a THIRD form--that goes along with the second form, usually called a "consent form." In this form, the candidate is required to tell the state--and it doesn't matter what state, they all have similar guidelines--how he or she wants his or her name to appear on the ballot, exact spelling, nickname, and PARTY AFFILIATION.
But at the end of the day, it only matters what the candidate himself says, and what the affected party chair says. Sanders has said he will run as a Democrat:
"After a year of travel, discussion and dialogue, I have decided to be a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president," he wrote in the email, highlighting economic inequality, climate change and the Citizens United Supreme Court decisions as key issues spurring him to run.
Sanders first confirmed to the Associated Press in a story published Wednesday that he plans to run for the Democrats' 2016 presidential nomination.
And Debbie Wasserman Schultz has welcomed him, in a measured way, to the fold:
"Sanders is well-recognized for his principled leadership and has consistently stood up for middle class families," DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said in the statement. "Throughout his service in the U.S. House and Senate, Bernie Sanders has clearly demonstrated his commitment to the values we all share as members of the Democratic Party."
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Try to get excited about that.
https://www.hillaryclinton.com
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)If she does become the nominee, I hope she excites somebody, but it won't be me.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Whoever gets the nod will in the end be a far better choice than anyone in the clown car.
Meanwhile, I'm excited about Bernie, and will work for him. We'll see what happens.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I just hope we can all shake hands and be friendly and get behind whomever the nominee ends up being.
bvf
(6,604 posts)What's painful to me is to read comments from people implying they'd sit out an election rather than vote for X.
That just strikes me as petulant and dangerous.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Hopefully, we can keep the presidency in the hands of the Democratic party even if it means working for a candidate we might not be 100 percent crazy about in every way.
bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)think of currently who even holds a candle to any Dem (at least at the national level). That's how far over the edge the Republicans have gone into the dark, swampy morass of demagoguery, charlatanism and anti-intellectualism.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)...and will vote for Senator Sanders to prevent it!
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think it's great that Sanders is running. It will get folks talking about some serious issues that need to be talked about.
That being said, he has no chance to get the nomination.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)But until then I refuse to be assimilated...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Let's hope we can all come together on the other side and work towards getting our nominee elected president, whoever she or he may be.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)He's not a socialist.
But other than that,
Run Bernie, Run!
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)HRC is one.....
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)I was mimicking your post, which I found annoying at the time because I had a bad day. There's nothing more to it, my bad.
Hekate
(90,560 posts)Did you mature or did you spring fully formed from the head of Zeus like Athena?
MADem
(135,425 posts)"Went out in the world and worked until late middle age as a Repubican" and then name a popular Democratic Senator who focuses on the excesses of Wall Street, but what point would any of that serve?
Hillary Clinton has been a Democrat for longer than many people on this board have been alive. She's certainly been one longer than many of the popular alternatives that have been floated. Longer than Liz Warren, longer than Jim Webb, and certainly longer than Bernie Sanders.
LuvLoogie
(6,921 posts)No excuses.
Then I'll vote for Bernie should he win the nomination. But he'll only win by attacking the GOP and pumping up the Democratic brand. He won't win by attacking Hillary. He should leave that to DU.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,157 posts)I'll be switching my wholehearted support to him from Vermin Supreme.
Just as well. The landlord doesn't allow us to keep ponies in the bedroom, anyway.
Oh, and for those few who trot out that BS about "he's not a Democrat!", I quote from the DNC Charter, Article Eight, Section 1:
Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)
Buzz Clik This message was self-deleted by its author.
mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)maybe the American public will finally fucking learn a thing or two..
LWolf
(46,179 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Van Halen-Jump Official Video:
The Wizard
(12,536 posts)more so than anyone else in politics.
MineralMan
(146,256 posts)I wouldn't vote for you, though. Telling people to "Shut the Fuck up" is a shitty argument for anything. Get over yourself. Sell your candidate. Don't insult DUers.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)if the Third Way crew, and the staunch Hillary supporters will back Sanders when he wins the primary.
Will they turn sour grapes like they did in 2004, or will they support the Democratic Party's candidate?
Lyric
(12,675 posts)However, I will be voting for whichever Democrat wins the nomination, because ANY Dem is better than one of the clown car denizens. And you know I adore you too, so there!
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)and the rest of the south he will not do well. It will, however, give all the Hillary haters six months of euphoria. Hopefully they will vote for the Democrat in the general.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I would be offended. Thing is, I didn't see anything like that. I never saw a Clinton supporter here on DU saying STFU.
I really don't think this helps DU.
Right now I am truly welcoming of every candidate that wants to be a part of the primary, I would never tell a supporter of whatever candidate I decided to choose to STFU.
As someone who listens to Sanders every week on Thom Hartman, I kinda believe that Sanders would not really like this sentiment either. He's not devisive.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)Let's play a game here: Let's use Hillary here:
to those puling about "Hillary is a corporatist Democrat!"
...and an invitation to get on board.
Jump on. Jump in.
Jump. You are fresh out of excuses.
Or Martin O'Malley
to those puling about "O'Malley is an unknown!"
...and an invitation to get on board.
Jump on. Jump in.
Jump. You are fresh out of excuses.
Yeah, that would go over real well.
I agree this isn't helpful, in fact I think it's rude.
I like Bernie, in fact I love Bernie. His supporters, not so much, they're enough to make me want to stfh=stay the fuck home.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I have been saying for a while that I want to wait and see how things play out.
This STFU attitude is really insulting to this that are on board for Clinton and people like me who are taking a wait and see approach. I like having a wealth of riches.
I do not like seeing people being told to shut up.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)betsuni
(25,380 posts)It's childish.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)SMH. Strawmen, strawmen, everywhere.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Bernie Sanders is the Citizen Thomas Jefferson said we needed to make democracy survive the scoundrels that mean to usurp it .
quickesst
(6,280 posts)....looking over a fence admonishing someone else while completely ignoring the pile of crap they are standing on in order to do it. I have not seen any Clinton supporter tell the anti Clinton people to "shut the fuck up"........until now.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)....and no. Well, except me. With the exception perhaps of a different language, as far as I know there is only one way to say "SHUT THE FUCK UP", but even then it's still shut the fuck up. Period. Uh, not here. Up there.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Or allowed in a group, now if that wasn't telling me to " Shut the FUCK UP " i DON'T KNOW WHAT IS . Sorry her problems have nothing to do with us, they have to do with entitlement.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)....that's rich. Getting banned from a certain group for not following their rules is by no means telling anyone to shut the fuck up. If rules were made to be broken, alerts on this board wouldn't exist. Post what you did to get banned in general discussion where it belongs or in your own group, and unless you are just absolutely offensive, I can almost guarantee you will not be banned. Time and place for everything. The bad timing and placement is on you.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)And picking apart punctuation won't help her .
quickesst
(6,280 posts)...won't need my help except for my vote. as for the grammar thing, I was just goofing with you.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)corrupt corporate cash, hopefully won't be enough to outweigh the truth . She like all of us, is partially who she " Needs " .
quickesst
(6,280 posts)All of this is simple to me. I'm voting for Hillary in the primary. If Bernie can beat her, I'll gladly vote for Bernie. I'll vote for the Democratic nominee. I'm a Democrat. Logic and common sense dictate that I do what I can to keep a republican out of the white house.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)but oh my poor old back...
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)the TPP, tax shelters for the wealthiest Americans, and has integrity on his voting record .
tavernier
(12,369 posts)Two Dems fighting it out is perfect! Let's see what they have to bring.
My problem was another ticket bringing votes to Jebbie. (Yeah, like this didn't happen before...)
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)It's been discussed on this site for months that if Sanders ran, it would be as a Democrat. Is this really news to anyone?
Brushing aside the army of strawmen that have been erected here today - from "the HRC supporters are having a FIT over Bernie running!" to "the Hillary crowd is petrified of a Bernie run" - this seems like yet another call-out of people who, for the most part, don't exist.
I think you'd be hard-pressed to find an HRC supporter, a Warren supporter, an O'Malley supporter - and supporters of any other possibilities - who doesn't respect and admire Sanders, and doesn't welcome his participation in the process.
It would seem that the big heaping helping of STFU is over-kill in the circumstances, given that those "puling" are so few, a teeny teaspoon would more than suffice.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I have seen threads for Bernie where NOBODY jumped in and trashed him, nobody. I can't believe there has to be so much BS about this. It's like some here what to keep stirring the pot and make false comments in order to do so. Everyone loves Bernie who why not post positive things instead of negative. Sometimes I just can't understand the craziness on D.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Spiking the ball in a game no one but themselves were playing.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Along with exhortations to "SHUT UP!!!"
Not very democratic, nor very progressive, if you ask me.
But not unexpected!
MADem
(135,425 posts)Drama, fucks, whining, aggrieved defensiveness, and all!
I say "Run, Bernie Run!" Pound the podium, shake your fist, fire people up! Go to town!!!
He'll be an interesting voice, and better still, he'll take some of the heat, for a change.
The GOP has a hard time when there's more than one candidate--they have trouble focusing. They'll be bound to start saying nasty stuff, showing us their petulant asses... and that will benefit our team.
It's all good!
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)But there are some here who have a vested interest in stoking fires - real and imaginary - and any sort of fight that can be fabricated between supporters of different (D) candidates WILL be.
I am happy for the Bernie supporters who now have their long wished-for candidate in the race. It's their night to celebrate.
One can only wonder why some feel a need to remind us if the animosity - real and imaginary - between Democrats who are all happy to be supporting the candidate they believe in.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The more the merrier, let's get the party started.
Without telling people to shut the fuck up, preferably!
I guess that's too much to ask, though. Some actors just got to have that drama....
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie! Bernie!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)That's the mature approach. Unfortunately GD: tends to blow up during primaries. I'm going to vote for Bernie if he's on the ballot down here. No illusions about it though - Hillary's support is strong amongst latina women. In the end I think it's likely she'll be the nominee and then we all will vote for her.
Gore1FL
(21,100 posts)Our system is set up as two party and he caucuses with the Democrats. Only fools run as third party. I'm not sure what is news here.
Go Bernie!
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)I'd suggest you have plenty of Advil or Tylenol handy before reading it though.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)we have to fucking apologize for being democrat??
WTF?
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Bernie is the only honest politician he has met...
I have been on board...
hughee99
(16,113 posts)The party ideals than any "real" elected Democrat.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Go Bernie!
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Our dearest apologies for supporting a Democrat over an Independent (until just now) on a Democratic website.
MADem
(135,425 posts)lastlib
(23,159 posts)I could absolutely campaign for him.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Then the Hillary people will attack the Unions.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)Union leaders vow they wont be taken for granted in 2016.
Top officials at AFL-CIO are pressing its affiliates to hold off on an endorsement and make the eventual nominee earn their support and spell out a clear agenda. The strategy is designed to maximize labors strength after years of waning clout and ensure a focus on strengthening the middle class, but it could provide an opening for a candidate running to Clintons left to make a play for union support.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....and change any allegiance we may have had for another candidate and support him?
Do you REALLY think he can get 65+ million votes in the general election?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)And we need to have left wing candidates so that the eventual nominee looks middle of the road so as not to scare the independents. He can be this years Jesse Jackson/ Dennis Kucinich/ that guy from Alaska whose name I always forget but he did a great job of making all the other Dems look moderate in 2008.
As long as he doesn't get any smart ideas about running a third party splitter campaign in the general.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)A rotten in the sun for six months, putrefied horse.
PatrickforO
(14,559 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Yay, Bernie!
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Or is this more brave defiance against imaginary enemies?
I'm glad Bernie's running. Hell, I live in the bluest of blue so I might vote for him regardless.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)I just got this disgusting email from so-called "Democrats" who just can't handle Bernie's run.
Breaking 2016 news, IronLionZion: Senator Bernie Sanders just announced that he is running for president.
We're more than a year away from the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia -- when we'll actually choose our Democratic nominee and the 45th President of the United States. But we know one thing for sure: Having a wide range of progressive views in this race is good for the dialogue of our party and for our country.
And Bernie Sanders is a progressive champion. He's represented the people of Vermont for years in the Senate after 16 years in the House of Representatives. Throughout his career, he's been a fierce advocate for working families and has a strong record of supporting equal pay for women, working to raise the minimum wage, taking action on climate change, and fighting for an economy that works for the middle class. We couldn't be more excited to hear him to say he's in.
So can you take a second to show you're in for 2016 as well?
http://my.democrats.org/Bernie-Sanders
No matter what, Democrats share a set of principles that will ensure that President Obama's progress is defended and advanced. America will be a better place with a Democrat in the Oval Office, and this is a critical time in the race to support our party.
So welcome, Sen. Sanders, and thank you for saying you're in for 2016!
We'll keep you updated, IronLionZion.
Thanks,
DNC 2016
The Democrats who are against Bernie Sanders exist mostly in the minds of a few delusional haters around here. Some DUers desperately want to feel oppressed for some reason. whomp whomp
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)a third party ticket. And that's a dangerous move in the general election. We all know that. Yourself included. He's not and has a good chance of moving the conversation left on the Democratic ticket, thus relieving the very tell and legitimate concern some of us had.
But it's easy to dismiss and *super* dramatic to just serve us all a "heaping helping of shut the fuck up". So, whatever makes YOU feel superior, Will. Clearly that's what is important.
Triana
(22,666 posts)"Remember what happened when Nader ran!"
Bullshit.
Nader ran as an Indy
Bernie is running as a DEMOCRAT.
Not the same.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Old Language German word for a protector or a protecting force.
1) As a person, it always was used singularly and from older to younger.
2) As a force, it referred to a natural energy
Was also a specific shield design. The shield was shaped as a hour glass
1) The young boys puls was never far away
2) There seemed to be a puls about the forest.
de dadadadumbass 29 mars 2009
II. pul
literally, 'flame'.
but has a variety of connotations including:
N- buddy
Adj.- in good taste, sexy
a nonsensical expression of approval.
used religiously by AZNglo and arreks.
"sup, pul."
"puuuuuuul."
"those dunks are so pul."
de tdxalways 18 avril 2009
http://fr.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Puls
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)In fact, I like Bernie a lot. I'm happy and hopeful that we will have a robust debate during the primaries and you cannot have a discussion when you have only one person putting forth ideas. Bernie has a lot to offer to this process.
What I do object to is being told to "Shut The Fuck Up".
raven mad
(4,940 posts)Oops, I'm probably not allowed to say that. Registered Dem at age 18.......... I'm now 61!
Daemonaquila
(1,712 posts)My husband has pledged that for every person who genuinely whines about Bernie running because he's "unelectable" or "splitting the vote," etc., he's going to donate another $10. We finally have a candidate.
Hekate
(90,560 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)A candidate I can support!
Go Bernie!