Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

avebury

(10,952 posts)
Fri May 1, 2015, 02:31 PM May 2015

A very interesting take on Mosby's strategy.

It all starts out with the fact that there was no probable cause to arrest him in the first place and thus no probable cause to take him into custody. According to Ari Melber (just on MSNBC) both acts are illegal.

Now my analysis from that point is that most states have laws that if someone is killed during the commission of a crime (i.e. an illegal activity), the person (or persons) committing that crime may be charged for the death of the victim. Since Grey died as a result of the illegal actions of the Baltimore cops then I think that a prosecutor like Mosby can make a very credible case that all six officers are liable for Grey's death with the driver having the greatest role in Grey's death.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A very interesting take on Mosby's strategy. (Original Post) avebury May 2015 OP
That's not really how this is working alcibiades_mystery May 2015 #1
I think that they are hoping that one of the cops avebury May 2015 #2
What are the triggers for the $200K cap on liability? Downwinder May 2015 #3
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
1. That's not really how this is working
Fri May 1, 2015, 02:38 PM
May 2015

Each officer is being charged with independent acts. The kind of statute you're talking about is a felony murder statute. It means that people involved in specified felonies during the course of which somebody is killed can all be charged with a felony murder. Here's why it doesn't apply here:

1) Felony murder in Maryland is a first degree murder. None of the officers were charged with first degree murder. Therefore, none were charged under a felony murder statute.

2) None of the prerequisite charges qualify for a felony murder charge in Maryland. Maryland has a very specific and limited set of initial felonies that would then qualify one for a felony murder charge (rape, robbery, kidnapping, etc.). None of the officers were charged with any of the felonies on the Maryland felony murder qualifying offense list.

Several were charged with false imprisonment, which is the essence of your argument in the OP. But false imprisonment isn't on the Maryland qualifying offenses list for felony murder.

Put simply, it's a nice idea, but you're incorrect on Mosby's strategy. She is not charging them under a felony murder statute. She's charging each of them with specific crimes not premised on other crimes.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
2. I think that they are hoping that one of the cops
Fri May 1, 2015, 02:49 PM
May 2015

will flip on the others. You better believe that there is a lot of pressure on all six to stick together and not make a deal.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A very interesting take o...