Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs this the future?
http://nerdist.com/elon-musks-next-game-changer-is-a-battery-called-the-powerwall/<snip>
Last night in Hawthorne, California, Elon Musk unveiled the missing piece in the transition over to clean energy. The Tesla Powerwall, a large household battery (with industrial applications as well), was that piece.
In Musks mind, we orbit the key to weening the world off of fossil fuels. We have this handy fusion reactor in the sky called the Sun, he said to the crowd as his keynote. Solar energy then, relying on commercially available solar panels, is the first step in the weening process.
Weve long heard the promise of solar power, but the public hasnt viewed it as a real competitor to fossil fuels (at least the American public). However, the math is all there. Musk referred to a striking graph to make his point (shown below). The blue square is the total amount of surface area that would need to be covered by solar panels to take the US off the grid:
<snip>
The second part isnt so obvious. Solar panels cant collect energy at night, so its hard for them to reliably provide power like a coal power plant can. Batteries could theoretically solve the problem. During the day solar panels around the country would provide energy and store any excess energy that the grid cannot accommodate in large battery installations. And those large installations would only require a pixel of space, Musk explained.
...more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 858 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this the future? (Original Post)
kentuck
May 2015
OP
at about $1,000 at the most, a large household battery is the future. At $7,000+ no it's not.
Sunlei
May 2015
#3
Wouldn't it be great if there were a battery to collect all the energy we needed?
Octafish
May 2015
#4
Curious, that the car is a "Tesla" for the man who enabled the grid with A.C. current and
Eleanors38
May 2015
#5
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)1. I would gladly pay $3000 for a 10 year household battery
This Powerwall looks incredible!
The 7K daily cycle would get me
off the grid and provide plenty
of emergency backup
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)2. All I know is that if this turns out to be genuine
and I see that it is working in several businesses and homes, I am going this route, even if I use it as a back up.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)3. at about $1,000 at the most, a large household battery is the future. At $7,000+ no it's not.
I read next years hydrogen powered car will have sockets to plug in and power your house.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)8. It may be $7k now...
but the prices will drop. This happens with most new technologies- take hi def TVs for example.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)4. Wouldn't it be great if there were a battery to collect all the energy we needed?
Oh....Wow! Cool!
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)5. Curious, that the car is a "Tesla" for the man who enabled the grid with A.C. current and
won out over Edison's house-be-house D.C. generation approach. In the long road home, Edison may win out.
bobalew
(321 posts)6. Not really, if you want to sell soe juice back into the grid,
Guess what, AC transport much more efficiently, The DC transport has to be very short to reduce losses. that just a matter of plain physics.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)7. I understand. But Edison's plan was no grid because of DC's limitations.