TPP:..."US would be REQUIRED to approve MORE fossil fuel exports"...

[RiverLover]

Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Fast Track to Disaster
EcoWatch

(Snip)...Multinational corporations—including some of the planet’s biggest polluters—could use the TPP to sue governments, in private trade tribunals, over laws and policies that they claimed would reduce their profits. The implications of this are profound: Corporate profits are more important than protections for clean air, clean water, climate stability, workers’ rights and more.

This isn’t a hypothetical threat. Similar rules in other free trade deals have allowed corporations including ExxonMobil, Chevron and Occidental Petroleum to bring approximately 600 cases against nearly 100 governments. Increasingly, corporations are using these perverse rules to challenge energy and climate policies, including a moratorium on fracking in Quebec; a nuclear energy phaseout and coal-fired power plant standards in Germany; and a pollution cleanup in Peru. TransCanada has even intimated that it would use similar rules in the North American Free Trade Agreement to challenge a U.S. decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline.

Remember how scientists and experts have warned that at least three-quarters of known fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground in order to stabilize our climate? A new study published in the journal Nature even spells out in detail which reserves must stay untapped, including almost all of Canada’s tar sands, all of the oil and gas in the Arctic, nearly half of global natural gas reserves, and 82 percent of global coal reserves. But do trade pacts like the TPP take that into account?

Not a chance. In fact, as a result of the TPP, the U.S. Department of Energy would actually be required to approve more fossil fuel exports. The deal would greenlight fracked gas exports to countries in the pact—including Japan, which is the world’s biggest importer of natural gas. A consequence would be more fracking, more pipelines, more export terminals and more climate pollution.

It has never been more urgent for countries to tackle the climate crisis. Now is the time to ensure that the rules of the global economy support climate action. Now is not the time to be rubber-stamping trade deals that could undermine our prospects for a better future and safer climate....

Please read more~
http://ecowatch.com/2015/03/09/trans-pacific-partnership-fast-track-disaster/

(xposted in Environmental & Energy Group)

[GoneFishin]

1. Of course. I don't need to see the text to realize that TPP serves the big money. And a lot of

big money is coming from big oil.

[RiverLover]

2. Yep. Its corporate rights vs peoples rights. Profit over People & Planet. Super-sized.

Its just wrong. We have to hope they can block in the House, because I read the senate has enough votes to pass it.

[NickB79]

3. That would explain Obama's tepid answers so far to Keystone XL

Which, BTW, is STILL not dead: http://www.climatecentral.org/news/keystone-xl-veto-not-death-blow-18698

Keep throwing out just enough platitudes to appease the less observant environmentalists in the short term, and then pass the TPP and run to that as cover when Keystone is finally approved and built.

[GoneFishin]

5. Highly likely scenerio. I suspect that some parallel version of that will play out with Net

Neutrality also. There are billions in profits to be reaped through exploitation using TPP.

Another thing to watch for is the existence of retroactive effective dates in TPP, which would be invaluable for corporations to challenge laws that are already in effect now. That would be a sign that they are already making plans to target specific law(s) or regulation(s) which are already in effect.

[hedda_foil]

4. Does humanity have a death wish?

That's not a rhetorical question