General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders Raises $3 Million In Four Days - Sam Stein/HuffPo
Bernie Sanders Raises $3 Million In Four DaysSam Stein - HuffPo
Posted: 05/06/2015 1:59 pm EDT Updated: 27 minutes ago
<snip>
With the help of a crew of former aides to President Barack Obama, Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) campaign has raised $3 million in four days for his presidential campaign -- a dramatic indication that he wont be confined simply to a long-shot role in the Democratic primary.
Sanders, who is running for president as a Democrat, announced on Wednesday that he has retained the services of the firm Revolution Messaging to run digital ads and online fundraising. The staffers with the firm who will be working on Sanders campaign include Revolution Messagings founder, Scott Goodstein, who ran the 2008 Obama campaign's social media and mobile programs; Arun Chaudhary, who was the first official White House videographer; Shauna Daly, who served as deputy research director on Obamas 2008 campaign; and Walker Hamilton, who was a lead programmer for that campaign.
"Like a lot of Obama supporters, we were looking for a candidate with a track record of doing the right thing -- even if it meant taking on Wall Street billionaires and other powerful interests. A candidate who could inspire a movement," said Goodstein. "Bernie Sanders is that candidate."
Due to his long-standing criticism of the influence of big-money interests on government, Sanders has strong online and grassroots appeal, which he hopes to leverage to raise the money needed to fund a presidential campaign. And so far, the strategy looks savvy. The campaign has received roughly 75,000 contributions, and the average amount is $43. According to a campaign adviser, 99.4 percent of the donations have been $250 or less, and 185,000 supporters have signed up on the website BernieSanders.com.
Bringing on former Obama aides to help amplify that momentum...
<snip>
Link (w/Video): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/06/bernie-sanders-campaign_n_7224630.html
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)by this.
How does WAKING up the sleepy be bad for anybody but the criminals.
The criminals are all republicans, all teaparty.
Think about the people who are going to register to vote, who wouldnt otherwise.
Many will still be voting in November no matter who is on the ballot.
This is win win for anybody who isnt a rightwing merchant of death
cali
(114,904 posts)NBachers
(19,438 posts)I love watching the Bernie phenomenon happen. We can only all be better for it.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Remind people that many financial experts predict a MAJOR DISASTER very soon.
Thom Hartmann all but guarantees it, and it is the banksters who will do it, of course.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)I am sticking with Hillary, we cannot afford the GOP in the white house, they
will send this country into war!
Not only is she the Dem's best hope, she is the most quailed.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)who can win. Epic fail on both points.
you are free to cast your vote any way you please but please don't preach the RW crap.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Vincardog
(20,234 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)He didn't even call his mortal Dad!!
progressoid
(53,179 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)and she brags of their being no daylight between herself and Netanyahu on Iran, so there too.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)imnew
(93 posts)uppityperson
(116,020 posts)imnew
(93 posts)I thought it funny the posters main concern was to prevent war and the choice obviously to him or her is Hillary.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)They watched Cheney loot the treasury for years with no bid contracts.
They wants some of that for themselves, the want this Iran war, Cotton says
American can take Iran in 7 days. ( 70million people In Iran)
He is crazy and dangerous.
The GOP must be stopped in 2016!!
imnew
(93 posts)Just a thought...
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Hillary is the anti war candidate, and she is qualified to be President!
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)She voted to support the President, there was no vote on the Iraqi
war: and war was not declared, and just because you might have to vote
for war doesn't make one pro war: Just like having an abortion doesn't make
pro abortion. It's hard choice, but the sometimes necessary, and sadly
a correct decision.
Hillary is not pro war: far from it! and her vote was neither here nor there as we
all learned, the GOP planned this war before they were elected. Bush had all
the votes for the before he was elected.
Bernie's vote was easy one, it had no consequences, he has only 600,000 people in
his state almost all liberal.
Hillary, had the state of New York, over 8 million people: New Yorker were in favor
of the vote. \
uncleverusername
(37 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)She nagged Obama to commit troops to Syria and Libya. She also brags of being one with Netenyahu on Iran. Nobody can mistake her for a peacenik.
think
(11,641 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)Tis the season, I guess.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)A lot of Republicans are yearning for a candidate who tells the truth and cannot be bought just like we are. I think there's a good chance that Bernie would get more Republican votes than Hillary would. And there's nothing wrong with nominating a candidate who would attract Republican votes in the general election. It's called winning.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Tou believe what Rush has to say and are supporting Hillary. You just made my choice easier.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Hillary is a war supporter. A hawk. Her actions support this. Obviously Candidate Hillary will tone it down to get elected but she is in the pocket of the military surveillance industrial complex.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)He is not a spoiler.As was mentioned Bernie will bring out the voters to register that otherwise would not.
Bernie can win. Now ask me what I think about all this after Iowa or NH and I might back down but Bernie Sanders is going to surprise one hell-of-a-lot-of Hillary supporters. ..He is the Cinderella team we can believe in.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)And he would drag down the Party and lose the white house!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Politics is game best played in the real world!
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)That is what happen to Gore: his lost got us Bush!!
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)should be. It takes a special kind of stupid to actually believe so many lies.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)It must shock to you to no, that their liberals whom are not in love with
Sanders. He is a politician too!!
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I would stack Bernie Sanders record against any sitting congressperson and probably a lot of historic ones as well. The only Senators that match him are Franken and Warren these days and Teddy Kennedy and Paul Wellstone of old.
We all know who you seem to be standing for, my question is "what" you are standing for.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)Until then you're just making yourself look bad.
Response to lewebley3 (Reply #55)
neverforget This message was self-deleted by its author.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)INdemo
(7,024 posts)they must be a Republican or a Republican lite. Or put another way,its Wall Streets choice or the corporate mafia's choice who occupies the White House because real Democrats (liberals) need not apply.??
I disagree about the Nader/Kucinich theory. If Bernie wins the nomination the voter turn out would set records because liberals would vote...
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)If he lost the general you Hillary dems would be playing the role of Naderites because you won't vote for the nominee, no matter what, and don't care that the gop way more evil.
INdemo
(7,024 posts)Except for a very few Democrats...The Democratic Party is nothing more that a Republican Party II. Republican lites (I call them)
or Corporarats. Oh yes they go on those Sunday talk shows and pretend they are really defending the middle class interests but in reality their rhetoric goes just as far as what their corporate mafia bosses will allow.
Hillary is a good example of that..She wont come right out and state her position on the TPP because her Wall St funding partners are for it..Oh she says she would have to read it but hey she helped to write the damn thing.
Bernie Sanders is the Democrat of what the Democratic Party use to stand for until they were taken over by likes of the corporate mafia.
You should do some research about the Democratic Party of FDR or Harry Truman or Hubert Humphrey.
That's the Democratic Party I'm talking about.
I get really tired of hearing " One must be in the middle or middle right in order to win" Guess that statement came after the Democratic Party was bought by Wall St interests.
So NO Bernie Sanders will not bring down the Democratic Party he is reminding voters what the Democratic Party stood fpr before they were bought. Bernie Sanders will bring out the liberal voters that have sat out the last two elections.
If you truly disagree with Bernie Sanders supporters as you have stated then you are not a Democrat.
Nay
(12,051 posts)Not to mention your hilarious political comments.
cali
(114,904 posts)Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)she may be the most "quailed," but certainly not the most qualified. That's what happens when you listen to Rush.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)As, for qualified , its a fact that she is: Bernie is nice man right on issues with no accomplishments,
(Hillary and Him are the same on almost everything)
I have learned it over the years of watching her work in the pubic eye for the public.
I can count the office alone she was worked in, that have given her the experiences and
knowledge needed to lead this country. On top of all that she has been a loyal Dem!!!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)She and Obama will be leading the party again 2016.
Warren and Sanders, should be the leaders in the Senate!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)A "Loyal" Dem does not adopt/support Republican policies in order to accomplish that goal...
A "Loyal" Dem does not abandon the polices that held the DEMs in Congress for 40+ years...
A "Loyal" Dem does NOT entertain cutting back on Social Security benefits...
Or joining with Pete Peterson to do so...
Or Expanding the Police State...
Or agreeing with "Free" Trade Deals that kill of the Middle Class...
A "Loyal" Dem fights against ALL of those things...
A "Loyal" Dem does not vote for a war they probably knew were based on a lie... getting millions killed or injured...
erronis
(23,875 posts)elzenmahn
(904 posts)This is PRECISELY why there is so much interest in Bernie's campaign.
"Loyal Dems" are NOT Third Wayers. They're like Bernie!
hedda_foil
(16,985 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)Are you alluding to something that right wing strategists are planning on springing on us in October about Hillary and Dan's ...um.... private lives? Does Bill even know about this yet?
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)one becomes automatically "most quailed."
chknltl
(10,558 posts)I'm leaning to 'most quailed' as being something kinky. Kids these days are into lotsa stuff with funny sounding names like this that we old fellers are simply clueless about.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)she is the most quailed, DUZY nomination.
Don't ever stop what you are doing, comedy gold.
Rockyj
(538 posts)SO if Hillary wins the Primary Bernie can't RUN as a Democratic PRESIDENT candidate?
SO WTF are you Hillary fanatics worried about?
Especially since if Bernie looses the Primary and his supporters will vote for her anyway?
CALM the F DOWN!
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)We have a chance to have a liberal court for almost 35 years if the Dem's are
successful. Sanders followers are hurting that effort, there seem to
value there pet ideologue issues.
Sanders is already dividing the party, the Sanders seem to have a nasty streak
toward bashing Hillary, the should be bashing the GOP, they are responsible
for most of the damage to this country starting with Regan.
Sanders people seem to want to date Sanders, not see him as Presidential candidate,
and he is a nice man: however he can only do harm to the party by dividing and leaving scars.
I think Hillary has earned the nomination a long time ago, and should run as almost
a stilling President with Obama's help. The electable rate is very high for sitting Presidents,
because there parties are already behind their candidate. Carter lost mostly because of
Ted Kennedy, a figure just like Sanders. Kennedy, did a hatchet job, and Carter never recovered:
so America was stuck with Regan, whom destroyed this country just like Bush in his
way. Remember, Bush was the result of Nader, Nader was not the linch pin to Gore's
loss, but Nader help Gore lose.
Lets learn from history, Dem can only when if they work as a team: Dem's would be head of
the game if they started out as a team. Hillary would sign any bill Warren or Sanders
would craft, Hillary is not an Ideologue she is a loyal Dem that wants to get things done!
Primaries do matter!!
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Read the front page of the NY times, granted a bit of a rag,
but they are claiming that Jeb's , right wing rising pact is funding
the Sanders campaign, and is hiring people to pretend to
be Sanders supporters to attack Hillary.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)Bernie all the way.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Read the story on the front a page of the DU, the GOP plan to use
Bernie Sanders supports take down the Hillary's numbers.
Sanders, is doing nothing but helping the GOP.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Autumn
(48,962 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Now we have to keep it up. Hey, he's already about 18% of the way to his goal of $50 million for the primaries- if you count what he already has in his Senate war chest
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)City Lights
(25,826 posts)I plan on donating soon.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)to who raises what in what amount of time. I remember Obama being a especially good at raising money--only because they talked about it on the telly all the time.
Is what Bernie raised a good/above average amount to be raised?
I want all our guys/gals to do great. I want to decimate the pukes.
cali
(114,904 posts)And unlike ALL other candidates it's only small donations, no corporate money, no bundling, no super pac
one_voice
(20,043 posts)thanks!
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)the problem is that even if he continues to raise money at the current rate he will only raise $250million come primary time... Hillary will likely be close to $1billion. A 4/1 spending advantage for HRC will be hard to overcome.
sP
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Over the years, Bernie's biggest donors have been unions.
If we want to change Citizens United, we need to vote for Bernie. He is putting his money where his mouth is. Hillary says she opposed big corporate donations, but she raised a lot of her money from big corporations.
Bernie means real change with regard to campaign finance, while Hillary, regardless of what she claims, means more of the same big corporate money funding campaigns.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)AllyCat
(18,842 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)WOOT!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Sanders offers an implicit challenge to the current system of national electoral politics. With rare exceptions, campaign season is a time when the backroom favorites of financial interests are marketed to the population. Weighed down by highly regressive policy intentions, these candidates need huge laboratories of focus groups and image consultants to guide them as they grope around for a few lines they can use to sell themselves to regular working people. (Divernan's comment: ya know, how to triangulate for power & humongous profits!)
Sanders on the other hand has no constituency among the monied crowd. "Billionaires do not flock to my campaign," he quipped. So what his race is about is the reverse of the usual process: he'll be marketing the interests of regular people to the gatekeeping Washington press, in the hope that they will give his ideas a fair shot.
It's a little-known fact, but we reporters could successfully sell Sanders or Elizabeth Warren or any other populist candidate as a serious contender for the White House if we wanted to. Hell, we told Americans it was okay to vote for George Bush, a man who moves his lips when he reads.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/give-em-hell-bernie-20150429#ixzz3ZOgsiKcE
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Thanks to the media sycophants who refuse to ask tough questions, which Bernie can handle in his sleep, this country had to suffer through two terms of a coke-addled idiot drunk monkey who was goofier than a left-handed football bat and who could, left to his own devices, fuck up a two car funeral on a one way street even if you spotted him the hearse.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Just signed up today
arcane1
(38,613 posts)In two days!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Who gave the cash? He's the country's only hope, but Goldman, Citigroup, et al. typically give money to all. The Senator may need a billion dollars at least. Wouldn't be crazy (good) though if he could pull it off without a billion bucks? I have a dream, a new dream.
I regret my realpolitik comments sometimes.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)donnasgirl
(656 posts)LOL, it is refreshing to know that there are still some with integrity.
TBF
(36,668 posts)to do more. I plan to give that monthly. The corporations will give a lot more to their candidates, but there are many more of us. Even if each only gives $5 a month (or $2 - whatever we can) it adds up when it is millions of people. We can do this!
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)support and money his way.
$3 million in 4 days? wow good for him!
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)that this much money is coming in this early. It will enable the campaign to plan formidable advertising to get his message and name out in plenty of time. I hope millions of people sign up for monthly donations to keep the momentum going.
K&R
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Another 1000 days like this and he will raise half of what the heir apparent will have to spend.
cali
(114,904 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Which is why the DNC and HRC want them limited, IMHO.
TBF
(36,668 posts)via social media & with some money he can buy ads. He's talking seriously about class and we won't get that from other candidates. It will resonate with folks. You're not the only one who is "Flat Baroque".
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
frylock
(34,825 posts)Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)turbinetree
(27,546 posts)to have some of this discussion going on about Bernie and Clinton.............but
The big question to ask is,
Who will be on / in the respective staff-----look at the campaign contribution lists
And the possible four U.S. Supreme Court justices that are over the age of 75 and 80 years old
Who do you trust to appoint staff members to help you and me.
And who is going to nominate a U.S. Supreme court justice that is going to help you and me
I support Mr. Sanders on the above two issues and I was part of the 3 million plus donors of time and money--------------yeah
Why don't a corporation come out and do the same with Clinton?
Just asking...................
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Walkin' in, singin' a bar of "Alice's Restaurant" and walkin' out? Friends,
They may think it's a MOVEMENT, and that's what it is: THE ALICE'S
RESTAURANT ANTI-MASSACREE MOVEMENT! . . . and all you gotta do to join is to
Sing it the next time it comes around on the guitar.
Arlo Guthrie
WillyT
(72,631 posts)