Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGag-worthy from Politico. Obama aides: Warren 'baseless' on trade.
This is SO disgusting.
Obama has already called Warren wrong on trade. But in private, administration officials fume in much more colorful terms over Warrens attacks, calling them baseless and desperate, with no bearing or relation to anything we are doing. They also suggest the Massachusetts senator knows going after trade deals will only further energize the Draft Warren movement that desperately wants her to run for president.
The Massachusetts Democrat has been a thorn in the side of the administration on other issues, including recently torpedoing the presidents nomination for a top Treasury Department post. But the stakes are far higher on the trade deal. The fast-track bill still lacks the estimated 20 to 40 Democratic votes necessary for passage in the House, creating the very real possibility that the presidents own party will deny him what he considers a key legacy-building achievement.
This week, Obama has increased his efforts to sell the deal to his own party.
Are [Warrens] arguments a sign of desperation given the tide shifting among the public, particularly Democrats? one person close to the White House said, citing recent poll numbers showing the public growing less wary of possible negative effects of international trade accords.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/obama-aides-elizabeth-warren-trade-117703.html#ixzz3ZUUtQ5Ru
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 551 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gag-worthy from Politico. Obama aides: Warren 'baseless' on trade. (Original Post)
hedda_foil
May 2015
OP
I hate that "legacy" thing. The "trade" agreements look to mess up peoples' lives.
djean111
May 2015
#2
arcane1
(38,613 posts)1. And Paul Ryan's people agree:
Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Ways and Means Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who is leading the trade push in the House, was more blunt about Warren: I dont know which is worse: If she actually believes this nonsense or that shes just so willing to spread misinformation.
Rex
(65,616 posts)3. 'Misinformation can be very important'
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/18/1248682/-Lessons-from-Rand-Paul-Misinformation-can-be-very-important
WHAT a strange thing for Mr. Assholes group to say! Do you think there is ANYTHING in this world, Paul Ryan will NOT be a big pile of steaming hypocrite about?
EDIT - OOpps...wrong asshole, still...if misinformation is a GOOD thing to GOP assholes...
WHAT a strange thing for Mr. Assholes group to say! Do you think there is ANYTHING in this world, Paul Ryan will NOT be a big pile of steaming hypocrite about?
EDIT - OOpps...wrong asshole, still...if misinformation is a GOOD thing to GOP assholes...
djean111
(14,255 posts)2. I hate that "legacy" thing. The "trade" agreements look to mess up peoples' lives.
All for a legacy? That would be hubris, indeed.
polichick
(37,152 posts)4. Somebody's desperate, but it might not be EW.
Elwood P Dowd
(11,443 posts)5. Sounds just like Mickey Cantor and Robert Rubin back in 1993 (NAFTA).
The more things change, the more they stay the same.