Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Fri May 8, 2015, 01:08 AM May 2015

The Nation: If You’re Wondering If Hillary Is Turning Populist, Just Ask Her Banker Friends

If You’re Wondering If Hillary Is Turning Populist, Just Ask Her Banker Friends
Hillary Clinton is trying to recast herself as the future president of the people—but she’ll need more than a PR campaign to erase her long-standing ties to Wall Street.

By Nomi Prins * May 7, 2015 * The Nation

The past, especially the political past, doesn’t just provide clues to the present. In the realm of the presidency and Wall Street, it provides an ongoing pathway for political-financial relationships and policies that remain a threat to the American economy going forward.

When Hillary Clinton video-announced her bid for the Oval Office, she claimed she wanted to be a “champion” for the American people. Since then, she has attempted to recast herself as a populist and distance herself from some of the policies of her husband. But Bill Clinton did not become president without sharing the friendships, associations, and ideologies of the elite banking sect, nor will Hillary Clinton. Such relationships run too deep and are too longstanding.

To grasp the dangers that the Big Six banks (JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley) presently pose to the financial stability of our nation and the world, you need to understand their history in Washington, starting with the Clinton years of the 1990s. Alliances established then (not exclusively with Democrats, since bankers are bipartisan by nature) enabled these firms to become as politically powerful as they are today and to exert that power over an unprecedented amount of capital. Rest assured of one thing: their past and present CEOs will prove as critical in backing a Hillary Clinton presidency as they were in enabling her husband’s years in office.

In return, today’s titans of finance and their hordes of lobbyists, more than half of whom held prior positions in the government, exact certain requirements from Washington. They need to know that a safety net or bailout will always be available in times of emergency and that the regulatory road will be open to whatever practices they deem most profitable.

http://www.thenation.com/article/206625/if-youre-wondering-if-hillary-turning-populist-just-ask-her-banker-friends
This article originally appeared at TomDispatch.com. To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest updates from TomDispatch.com. This piece has been adapted and updated by Nomi Prins from chapters 18 and 19 of her book All the Presidents’ Bankers: The Hidden Alliances that Drive American Power, just out in paperback (Nation Books).
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Nation: If You’re Wondering If Hillary Is Turning Populist, Just Ask Her Banker Friends (Original Post) 99th_Monkey May 2015 OP
I call on all the candidates to insist on more than six debates. NYC_SKP May 2015 #1
The more debates the better for Bernie 99th_Monkey May 2015 #2
Yes. JDPriestly May 2015 #4
Absolutely. Expose the rigged game. woo me with science May 2015 #8
I'm not wondering. Wall Street is confident this is nothing more than campaign rhetoric. So am I. merrily May 2015 #3
Yup. It takes some fervent and willful self-delusion woo me with science May 2015 #5
Self delusion and/or some motivation to try to delude others. merrily May 2015 #6
I'm Ready For Oligarchy - Are You? - Vote HRC - Wall Street's Best Friend cantbeserious May 2015 #7
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. I call on all the candidates to insist on more than six debates.
Fri May 8, 2015, 01:22 AM
May 2015

I'm serious, if they're serious about transparency and populist ideals, they'll do this.

Fuck the DNC ruling on six exclusive debates.

I'm gobsmacked by that.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
8. Absolutely. Expose the rigged game.
Fri May 8, 2015, 07:52 AM
May 2015

Shame the corporate puppets and the puppeteers for this silencing of real debate they are trying to shove down our throats.

Bernie and others should arrange real, substantive debates through the League of Women Voters, for example, and leave the corporate shills standing alone and shamed through sheer contrast by their pithy, vapid talking points on the DNC pageant stage.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6634315

merrily

(45,251 posts)
3. I'm not wondering. Wall Street is confident this is nothing more than campaign rhetoric. So am I.
Fri May 8, 2015, 01:43 AM
May 2015

So are, all DUers. Remember that.


Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street backers: We get it

Populist rhetoric, many say, is good politics — but doesn’t portend an assault on the rich.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/hillary-clintons-wall-street-backers-we-get-it-117017.html#ixzz3ZWVPXVkN

Axelrod said her biggest challenge will be to convince people she's authentic.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/david-axelrod-hillary-clinton-top-voter-challenge-116990.html

Her "trustability" ratings are down in the polls.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
5. Yup. It takes some fervent and willful self-delusion
Fri May 8, 2015, 03:05 AM
May 2015

to pretend that we don't already know what Hillary stands for.

It ain't the 99 percent.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
6. Self delusion and/or some motivation to try to delude others.
Fri May 8, 2015, 03:13 AM
May 2015

Neither campaign rhetoric of 2008 nor campaign rhetoric of 2016 is going to trump decades in the public eye, though.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Nation: If You’re Won...