General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders: I CAN BEAT Hillary Clinton
Bernie Sanders, Vermont's independent senator and a self-proclaimed Democratic socialist, says he can beat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in 2016. On CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday, Sanders said he thinks he can oust the former secretary of state because, "there is, in my view, massive dissatisfaction in this country today with corporate establishment and the greed of corporate America and the incredibly unequal distribution of wealth and income, which currently exists." And Sanders said his record on that issue over the past 25 years shows that he has led the way in standing up for working families and taking on "the billionaire class," Wall Street, private insurance companies and drug companies. Sanders is hesitant to criticize Clinton, saying that he respects and admires her. But pressed on the question of why he would make a better Democratic nominee, he points to three things: his opposition to the Trans Pacific Partnership, a massive Asia-Pacific trade agreement being negotiated, his vote against the war in Iraq and leadership fighting against it, and the work he has done opposing the Keystone XL pipeline.
"I'm not quite sure Hillary Clinton has come out with a position on that," he said. In a separate interview on "Face the Nation," Democratic strategist Stephanie Cutter said it is still "pretty likely" Clinton will be the Democratic nominee, but that Sanders "has a role to play" in the debate. "I think that there's nobody in the race right now who presents a real challenge to her in terms of taking the nomination away. But it's important to remember and we've been through this process many times, that we are many, many months away from the nomination, never mind the election," she said.
cont'
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-i-can-beat-hillary-clinton/
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Of course he has to say that. May the best candidate win.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)He can't say well my chances are slim but we will see how it plays out. That would be a horrible strategy.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)If he says he can beat HRC he means it.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)He has no accomplishments, he has not lead, he works for a state
that has only liberals and a population of 600,0000.
And, I am sorry to be the one to tell you he is a politician too!
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)perhaps we need to try something else.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)He has sat congress for years doing nothing!
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)he may have a good chance...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)I think it's more likely she'll make some equivalent of a "47%" remark, something that goes viral and exposes her as being out of touch with voters.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)still_one
(98,883 posts)If we had more people like Jon Stewart asking the questions, we might actually get into the real issues
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Doesn't seem like you're a Democrat.
Response to cyberswede (Reply #183)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)RiverNoord
(1,150 posts)So it's somehow notable that a candidate for the Presidency claims he can win, some... 17 months before the election?
In other news, the planet earth continues to exist...
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)33 to 1, if he believes it he should lay some money on it.
http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/us-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=482040
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Bernie was right when he said our current situation requires serious discussions about serious issues. Nyah, nyah you can't raise enough money you loser! is not quite what he was talking about.
imthevicar
(811 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)imthevicar
(811 posts)I support Mr. Sanders and if he Falls out of the race than I stay home The lesser of two evils is still evil.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Even if one of the lesser pushes to stop protecting voting rights?
Even if one of the lesser works to eliminate the EPA, public schools, regulations of polluters?
Even if one of the lesser works to encourage discrimination and hatred of Gay folks?
I could go on, but somehow I suspect most who take your position arent effected by this stuff.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)that would be the other candidate. You know, the one that was broke when she and her husband left the White House, and 5 speeches later was a millionaire.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Why do people think elections are gambling events?
This really ticks me off to no end!
The economy is so bad that now people want to bet on freakin' elections.
When will the garbage end? Probably not until I am dead!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Sell out is what it is.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Do you have any soles for them?
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)Of course there's wagering
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And have forgot that in the end it is votes.
The garbage will end when we end it by not playing that game...a game that is rigged and we can never win.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)And makes her decisions where her money is.
840high
(17,196 posts)hootinholler
(26,451 posts)For 100. But the US is outside their terms of service.
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,852 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)dafuq is this shit?
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)n/t
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)But she is not even running...
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)Even people not on that list.
You were able to place a bet on either Clinton or Sanders before they announced. And you would have gotten much higher odds too.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)He can work on it.
blm
(114,658 posts)Exactly who he is.
Saying exactly what more people need to hear in a voice that resonates with everyday Americans.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Bernie's has not!
He has remained consistent, and he is honest. I know many people. RepubliCON people, who, even though they disagree with many of Bernie's ideas, would vote for him just for his consistency and honesty!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Because people want corporations to continue to get huge tax breaks?
Because people want income inequality?
Because people want to pay the most in the world for healthcare?
Because people want to be in debt for forty years or so for student loans?
Because people want corporations to keep their overseas tax havens?
Because people want more war?
Because people want global climate change?
I believe that you are quite mistaken.
He keeps telling the same thing, and it keeps winning him elections. The last time he ran, he got 71% of the vote. I believe that he can do at least that good, because people want honesty, consistency, and someone who speaks for WE THE PEOPLE, not them, the corporations.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)A bellweather State for the national electorate?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)There is a good mix of people there. The neighboring state, New Hampshire is often a bellwether state when it comes to national elections. Why not Vermont?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Is this how you know?
Goodluck!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)because you have been to presidential primaries?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Doe that help?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Doe a deer, a female deer
Re, a drop of golden sun.
Mi, a name, I call my self
Fa, a long long way to run....
But it does help in that I know that you have a certain bias, because you personally know a US Senator.
Thank you for that information.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...and because of that I do tons of research about their electoral prospects and the political landscape in their States.
I'll also direct you to Gallup's analysis of States by Liberalism - Conservativism.
Vermont: 32.4% Liberal 59.2% non-Liberal
New Hampshire: 25% Liberal 72.5% non-Liberal
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)without using the term conservative please.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I have been involved with LOCAL stuff here in Ulster County. I moved up from Brooklyn 35 years ago. So I know Brooklyn, and I know the people there, as well as their attitudes. I am a Brooklynite by birth. Born and raised there, just like Bernie! (only my family was poorer. We lived in E. 71st and Ave. X for a long time, then lived in the projects on E. 108th St and Flatlands.)
I have lived in Flatbush, Midwood, Bensonhurst, Canarsie, Coney Island, Sheepshead Bay and Bay Ridge when I moved out of my parents place. I had to. I used to use my bicycle to get around when I lived there.
Now in the Hudson Valley, I have been active with the organizations who want to make sure that our Hudson River remains clean, and accessible to all. I have worked with Clearwater, Riverkeeper, and Scenic Hudson. I have been an active member in my town Democratic Party for 20 years, and a member of the Ulster County Democratic Woman for about 10 years (even though I am not a woman). I have met senators, congress critters, as well as many local politicos.
I know that these mainstream media outlets like Gallop have polls that come out the way that they expect them, because they engineer the questions to do so, so I do not believe any of them. As far as I am concerned, people are people. We all have pretty much the same needs. We all pretty much have the same goals.
I have met both Mrs. Clinton when she was running for Senate in NY, and Senator Sanders at a function that a cousin invited me to in Vermont. I have to say that Bernie is a more personal, and genuine individual. That is just what I see. Maybe it's because we both came from the same place at roughly the same time, maybe it's not. Sometimes you just get a feeling when you meet a person.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...but a national election campaign doesn't allow most voters to meet each candidate personally. Outside of early days in New Hampshire or Iowa, retail campaigning is virtually impossible. That leaves debates (which have a limited audience outside political junkies) and paid advertising as the primary ways to convey a message. And I don't see how Sanders is able to afford a national campaign team and paid media given his likely limitations in fundraising.
In any event, this discussion started with the assertion that Sanders' 71% vote share in Vermont was in some way reflective of his performance elsewhere. Given the higher conservative (self-identified) share of voters in NH AND given the fact that Clinton won against an arguably more liberal Obama in 2008, I'm not seeing a path forward for him.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Most people will find out about Bernie on social media and by word of mouth. Like I have previously said elsewhere, people do not watch tv any more. People engage in social media and with each other. With enough volunteers, small donations, continued exposure in social media, I do not see that the old paradigm of lots of money for huge paid staff, and a lot of mainstream media advertising holds true in this case.
You certainly are entitled to your opinion, but you must realize that there are changes happening in society today, and the old ways may not be as valid as they have nice were.
Pyrzqxgl
(1,356 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I guess that English must be your second language, so here's an explaination.
Dough is slang for money, or what ends up being baked in the oven to become bread. (Note: "Bread" is sometimes used for a slang for money)
Doe is a female deer. Do, re, mi, is a song to help beginners learn musical scales, which is what my poem was.
I hope this helps you learn the English language.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)I've lived in Ohio, Indiana, Michigan and Florida. Ever been to any of those states?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I've worked on Presidential and Congressional campaigns in Ohio and Florida; and I know the head of the ODP.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)according to your interlocutor Vermont is a bellwether state.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)To your interlocutor: Though I've never been there, I can say with certainty that Vermont is utterly irrelevant in the context of national elections. Dayton, Ohio - the country's test market, the Crossroads of America - an industrial wasteland with a roughly 50/50 split between whites and minorities - is a bellwether.
Have you ever been here?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I do not know the people there though.
I do feel that Bernie's message will resonate with these people there, whose industry picked up and moved overseas, due to the good work of Mrs. Clinton's husband.
Those polls of the past do not work too well today either.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)The last two remaining Fortune 500 headquarters burnt rubber recently - NCR to Atlanta in 2009 and Mead to Richmond, VA in 2006. Sadly, you can't blame "Mrs. Clinton's husband" for any of that.
The largest employer in the county is Wright Patterson AFB.
No. Sander's message will not resonate here. And we're still a pretty solidly Democratic city.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)It will not.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Being president. Hillary and Bernie are in the same position on many issues, I really doubt Bernie willingness to handle national security issues.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I think that the two candidates differ a lot on things like trade and finance.
These are big issues.
As far as Bernie's willingness and ability to handle national security issues I have great faith. He does have the experience, as well as the qualifications to be our next president. If people see what he is really made of, he shall be.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)that it's not just something he focus-grouped before jumping into the race. His biggest weakness is being a comparative unknown.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Most votes wins. Bernie is not anointed to the nomination, he will have to win.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)climate in America. As Hillary knows, else she wouldn't be "reintroducing" herself to us as a populist.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Getting raises. She has been an advocate for children for years, early education, women's issues, this could go on for a while. She does not need to reintroduce herself as a populist except for those who listens to talking points that are not factual.
With those who cry Hillary has name recognition means she is already introduced, looks like Bernie is the one who will have to introduce himself.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)and his record they SHALL nominate him!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)that you would exchange freedom for security?
Isn't the environment national security?
Isn't having jobs in the US national security?
Isn't having good quality air, and water national security?
You do know that there is no Plan(et) B when it comes to the Earth, don't you?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)your doors at home, do you attempt to secure your personal assets? Why are you giving up your freedom to just walk into your residence without having to use a key? Do you depend on the local law enforcement to respond when you call, you know you are giving up freedoms in driving as fast as you want, etc. Yes we give up freedoms for security. Do I want our children to go to school and feel safe? Yes I do and hopefully there will never be another Sandy Hook.
stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)Voted YES on allowing firearms in checked baggage on Amtrak trains.
Voted YES on prohibiting foreign & UN aid that restricts US gun ownership.
Voted YES on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers.
Voted YES on prohibiting suing gunmakers & sellers for gun misuse.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)That's nice.
stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)all those years and something has to have changed or you're not thinking.
No R will vote for what they consider a communist because they are "honest."
The right wing is just as confident that if only people heard the message, they would realize it was right. That's when we get so tied to our own opinion, we think we are so right that other people will just go along.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)above all, honest. Truman was a bit conservative for his time, especially on foreign policy, but Sanders and he would probably see eye to eye on the main issues of the day.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Hillary - I want to be president
Bernie, O'Malley, et al. - Oh! Okay!
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)by every anti-Hillary poster but is purely mythic.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)"I'd rather Clinton spend time and money speaking out against Republican policy, not fighting off pests in the party."
cui bono
(19,926 posts)That poster really believes we should not have a primary.
Democracy be damned!
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)shoulders and are just plain jerks. Thankfully, there are only a few here on DU. Most are supportive of Hilary and respectful of the process and other candidate. The jerks could learn something from them.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)boston bean
(36,931 posts)maybe it slipped by me.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)How'd that slip by you? Selective hearing, or just fingers in ears going lalalalalalala?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)If he ever make's up his mind
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)blm
(114,658 posts)I have trashed Clintons here at DU since DU's first primary cycle (2002-2004). I am with Bernie - you can discuss the issues going on today without trashing Clinton to do it.
In fact, I think some of our more recent members here at DU can benefit from the warning - Do NOT allow corpmedia to control the narrative. Even when you THINK there is something there - research further and apply CONTEXT.
Corpmedia is NOT to be trusted.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Only Bernie has never had a negative campaign, and shall not bash Mrs. Clinton. Instead he will talk up his points, as he always has.
THIS is something that people are glad to see. This shall get him independent as well as RepubliCON votes.
And I also see him stating that he is a democratic socialist, and not a socialist. This early on, the media is trying to trash even him, but Bernie just keeps explaining what he means by democratic socialism, and his views for WE THE PEOPLE. Always consistent, always honest, because he votes the way he speaks. People love this, even if they disagree with his politics. With Bernie, what you see, is what you get.
treestar
(82,383 posts)which is what his supporters rely on.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Hillary is just Romney in a pant suit driving around in a Scooby Doo van.
OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)Amiright?
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Sorry, that was a bit harsh.
eloydude
(376 posts)I am one too. A proud member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
www.dsausa.org
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)'Democratic Socialist.' The former believes capitalism can work with tweaks and regulations; the latter believe the means of production should be publicly owned and operated.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)He respectfully asked us to call him a Democratic Socialist and we should do so. His wishes trump all.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Initech
(108,783 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)ladyVet
(1,587 posts)I will finally be able to cast my ballot for someone I believe in. This makes me one very happy old lady! I'd pretty much made up my mind to skip the election, if all I had was Hillary and some guys I never heard of.
pocoloco
(3,180 posts)
?1429127468
somebody got nose up elephant's ass
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)Sometimes he can come off a little hot/angry instead of cool/reasonable. Maybe he's getting some advice (and taking it) because it's clearly the latter here.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And he has to prove that to many many democrats that already believe that Hillary WILL WIN the General Election over any Republican.
Bernie and his supporters have to realize this, or he has no chance to win the nomination..
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)People want someone with consistency, honesty, and walks the walk as well as talks the talk.
I know of many RepubliCON voters who say, for these reasons alone, even though they disagree with much of Bernie's platform, would vote for him.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)HRC can't prove she can win either.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Go talk to run of the mill Democrats. Not just the DU bubble.
Your average Democrat does not, under any circumstances, want to let the GOP win.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)he could win.
I don't want the GOP to win either. That's why I'm supporting Bernie because he has a good chance of winning.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Bernie currently has a relatively small base of followers who, like you, believe is has a "good chance of winning". Great.
Meanwhile, Hillary already has a large group of people who believe that she WILL beat any GOP challenger.
You need those people to SWITCH to Bernie.
And telling them that you dislike Hillary, or you dislike Bill, or you think they are stupid, or DINOs, or 3rd Way hacks, won't help strengthen Bernie's position in their eyes.
The first three primary states are critical. If Bernie wins a few of those, he's got a shot.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)And that's one of the rules at the Bernie group. We sing the praises of Bernie but we don't tear down other Democrats.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... but on DU outside the Bernie group ... that's not quite how its working.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)enthusiastically vote for her if she gets the nomination. And I think it's high time we broke the glass ceiling and elected a woman president.
But in this case I have decided to endorse Bernie Sanders mainly because he is not accepting large donations from millionaires and billionaires and he will not be using a PAC. That is a welcome breath of fresh air in this era of Citizens United and long overdue. Call me naive if you want to but I think it's time somebody took a stand and I'm glad Bernie did it.
Regarding others outside the Bernie group, most I'm sure are good people but some of the most negative stuff could be coming from disruptors with their own agenda. There is always going to be a certain amount of that.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)by name recognition. We were told Hillary "would win" in 2007 and she couldn't even manage the nomination.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)btw ... in 2008 Hillary took the caucus states for granted ... think she'll do that again?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Nor should it become one.
But Sanders has a shot. No one should count him out.
Even if I agree with others that it's a long shot, it's still non-zero, and I have little respect for those saying it's a zero chance.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)re-Read my post and find where I said he can't win.
If Bernie and his supporters don't convince average Dems that he would definitely win, he won't beat her in the primary.
That's the only reason Obama beat her in 2008. He was able to cross that threshold. And he did not do it by attacking Hillary, or her supporters.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)If the debates are conducted seriously, with actual discussion of the issues, and not so much emphasis on personalities, and TV talking heads comments about "gravitas" and "electability" and those other mysterious qualities only TV talking heads seem qualified to judge. Bernie Sanders represents someone who is more direct, more honest, less subject to spinning and parsing than... ahem... some of the other candidates. So he has a chance to present himself as a "breath of fresh air." The problem is the media, and their love of soundbytes and soundbyte candidates. They like candidates who play to their tune, and they tend to marginalize candidates who attempt any sort of in-depth discussion. They also like it when candidates smear each other, and... ahem... one of the other candidates has a powerful campaign organization just itching to explore the possibilities of the label "socialist." I guess we can hope Sanders gets a fair shot, even though it seems unrealistic to expect he will be treated fairly.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I think there are people on DU detached enough from reality that they genuinely believe that.
But Sanders is nowhere near that dumb. He knows damn well that he can't beat Clinton but, like all politicians, he knows that he has to claim he can win, or no-one will vote for him.
As lies go, it's a white one, but the DUers claiming he doesn't tell even those have annoyed me slightly.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)latest Quinnipiac polling, he's polling at 18%, far ahead of Biden's 5% and O'Malley's 2%. During the same time frame, Hillary's support has actually declined a couple percentage points.
If we're talking little white lies, I think this statement might qualify:
Every Socialist I know despises Hillary.
Segami
(14,923 posts)nothing new surfaces with Hillary because if the public impression is that she's covering up or hiding dirt on anything, or she has a 'Mitt Romney 47% moment', those percentage numbers will begin to tank.
Lets see what she's polling in a month.
Logical
(22,457 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)pocoloco
(3,180 posts)Hillary could win a Presidential election!
Ever wonder why so many repugs are throwing their hats in the ring to get
the chance to run against her??
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I think the odds are so heavily against Sanders that "he can't win" is a fair summary.
I think that the number of republicans seeking the nomination is no more evidence that Clinton is a weaker candidate than usual than the level of rainfall in Ohio in the last 10 weeks is.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Repubs want it to be Hillary so badly. She will motivate the republican voters like no one else could. Money will flow to the repub nominee and I am not at all convinced Hillary would win.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)there hasn't been the last few election cycles. It's more realistic to believe Hillary could win a Presidential election than Bernie, based on polling alone. If we're detached from reality, Sanders supporters are off in space.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)says he can win he means it.
hootinholler
(26,451 posts)Got another?
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's kind of funny too how it's the same people who were so "disappointed" in Obama. And weren't able to trust any politician again.
Vinca
(53,994 posts)If he is the Democratic nominee I think he wins the election.
imnew
(93 posts)is a disgrace to the term Democrat .
That's FACT
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)imnew
(93 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Since WWII, there has only been one period (1980 - 1992) where one party held the presidency for more than 8 years; incumbency is a serious millstone to overcome, whoever the Democrats select.
However, if Sanders wins the primary, the Republicans are certain to win.
sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)I sure hope there are others who will speak out.
CentralMass
(16,971 posts)in a long time. He has my support
imnew
(93 posts)Is it because they feel she's entitled to it after losing to Obama her first try..
Is it because she's a female???
Without me stepping over the line as a new member
which I don't want to do but tome Clinton is closer to a moderate republican
than a Democrat in many of her views .
I don't get this devotion to her by some DU members
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)One person is a Democrat and the other is Johnnie come Lately.....you tell me.
imnew
(93 posts)of her name.
I guess that's the way it is here..
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I crunch a lot of data on the prospects of political candidates I'm thinking of supporting, and I see a strong prospect that Clinton beats any likely Republican. Give me an explanation of how Sanders assembles 270 Electoral Votes.
treestar
(82,383 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)nonsense about 'socialist' to clarify that he's really touting 'Social Democracy' of the Scandinavian countries (at the 0:43 mark).
Progress for us Socialists comes in small steps, but come it does! Better red than dead!
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)This will win him the election as well. No negativity, but pivot on the question, and talk up his platform.
hootinholler
(26,451 posts)Thanks for posting the video I missed it this morning!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)another example of the media ignoring Sanders?
hootinholler
(26,451 posts)I think that's a good thing.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)AJH032
(1,129 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)lobodons
(1,290 posts)I am more concerned about Bernie beating the GOP candidate. They will hit him and hit him and hit him some more about being a Socialist and the GOP has the messaging thing down so it will work. Bernie will not get the Independents or GOP cross overs needed to win General. AND then we will be stuck with the GOP picking the next 2 SCOTUS. 6-3 or 7-2 Conservative SCOTUS for next 30 years. NO THANKS!!!!!
dgibby
(9,474 posts)We, and many of my Dem friends, are supporting Bernie in the Primary. If he doesn't win, I'll support the Dem in the general election. I'm 69 years old, and Bernie is that rare breed-an honest man. I just wish we had more like him.
A-Schwarzenegger
(15,812 posts)He's not afraid of the language.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)He needs to keep his own water source because you cannot trust the Fascists that surround us to play fair.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Then stomp whichever psycho the Teapublicans have driving the clown car in the general.
Response to 99Forever (Reply #78)
Post removed
navarth
(5,927 posts)I thought Bernie showed class all the way.
Scheiffer....I still get pissed off when I remember what he did to Ned LaMont. Scheiffer phones it in, every time.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)No shit.
"Nationalize the railroads"???
Hasn't he ever heard of "Amtrak"?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)kentuck
(115,406 posts)More for the corporations or more for the people?
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)Unintentional truth? The entire nomination process is a play put on for us.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Some are more believable than others.
totodeinhere
(13,688 posts)Contrast him with another candidate who is in the race.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)and thank God he's retiring soon, at least he didn't interrupt. His questions got a bit swarmy, but Bernie did a fine job. I see more TV interviews like this with thoughtful people, more volunteer sign-ups, more cash and HOUSE PARTIES would carry Bernie to the finish line in the primaries. If he wins the primaries, he wins the White House. Yeah!
yellowwoodII
(616 posts)That's enough for me. He's got my vote.
By the way, in case anyone forgot, Hillary voted for it.
Ron Green
(9,870 posts)And you?
And you?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)But thanks to neoliberals and neocons, it wasn't nearly as much as I would have liked.
And I have volunteered my time to his campaign. How about you? Are you volunteering your time to work for OUR movement?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Last edited Sun May 10, 2015, 10:31 PM - Edit history (1)
This guy has a lot of Ross Perot in him. Kinda looks like him too.
There are a lot of issues that our corporate bought politicians will never discuss. These politicians are not for the "majority of people" in this country. They are bought and paid for the 1%ers. So guess what the politicians will support? Yep, the 1%. Not everyone else. What Bernie is doing is as noble as anyone can do. He's trying to save this country. I personally feel this may be our last time to fix all the corruptness that has transpired in Washington, and you can start with Citizens United. He is the only one that has the balls to speak out and act upon all the things wrong with the store bought politicians. I know this next year and 1/2 will very interesting, since he thinks he can win. I personally think it is a monumental task, going against all that money.
As with every election, "We the people" have to get off our asses and get the word out. This man is the ONLY person looking out for us. No one, and I mean no one else, will ever support the lower and middle class like this guy. This is the message he has to portray to win. He's certainly got my vote. My job is now to convince my wife, that he's better than Hilliary. Wish me luck. I will survive!!!
Go Bernie Go!!!!
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)If I think he can do that come election time then I will vote for him and if I dont think he can then I will support someone else and vote for them and if thats Hillary then so be it.
quaker bill
(8,264 posts)If Bernie becomes large enough to beat Hillary, he will coast through the general. As in 2008, Hillary is the bigger contest.
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Not because I think they will be the best president ever but because the republican candidates are all so far to bat shit insane to be entrusted with the office.
quaker bill
(8,264 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)speech, in return she tells Wall Street that it's not their fault, forgives their fraud and sends more jobs to Asia.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Just give it time.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)But if we pull together in a good direction, we can start beating on our problems instead of each other.
Bernie's got the best answers to the big questions. It just comes down to how many of us agree.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And he would lose the general election in McGovern numbers.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Response to Segami (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)tick tock
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Get help.