Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
Sun May 10, 2015, 06:50 PM May 2015

Jeb Bush: ‘I would have invaded Iraq’ like my brother did

In an interview to be broadcast Monday evening on The Kelly Files, possible 2016 Republican presidential nominee Jeb Bush admitted he would have also invaded Iraq as his brother did during his administration.

“Knowing what we know now, would you have authorized the invasion?” host Megyn Kelly asked the former Florida governor.
“I would have and so would Hillary Clinton,” Bush replied. “Just to remind everybody, so would everybody that was confronted with the intelligence that they got.”

Bush’s response was odd, since Kelly prefaced it with based upon “what we know now,” with most believing the invasion and following war to be a disaster.

...

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/jeb-bush-i-would-have-invaded-iraq-like-my-brother-did/



Knowing what we know now, he still would have invaded. Well, there go his chances.
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb Bush: ‘I would have invaded Iraq’ like my brother did (Original Post) AgingAmerican May 2015 OP
At least he owns it. n/t Exilednight May 2015 #1
That's the strategy: you can't deny it, so you use a lot of earnest lying to convince winter is coming May 2015 #6
He has Karl Rove's play book bahrbearian May 2015 #17
I believe that enough has come out to put Exilednight May 2015 #18
Not admiring it was a mistake is worse than "owning up to it". The bush still_one May 2015 #27
I suspect the CIA manufactured and planted the yellow cake letter for others to find on point May 2015 #35
and I suspect the bush administration was up to their neck in that manufactured story. The outing still_one May 2015 #41
Oh, goody, Fox will be spending the next several months trying to convince us that winter is coming May 2015 #2
Of course he would have - he is part of big oil as much as the rest of them. As to his comment jwirr May 2015 #3
she didn't "make a mistake...." mike_c May 2015 #7
Not only that, Art_from_Ark May 2015 #47
She didn't say it was a mistake AgingAmerican May 2015 #12
Except all the other Democrats that voted against it? BrotherIvan May 2015 #13
Yep AgingAmerican May 2015 #16
It's a very poor one BrotherIvan May 2015 #22
Yup. bigwillq May 2015 #30
That makes her incompetent. I knew the data was fake at the time. on point May 2015 #36
he is trying, desperately, to preserve his brother's legacy Terra Alta May 2015 #4
That's not an Caretha May 2015 #21
She is either the biggest chump in U.S. political history or something far, far worse. - nt KingCharlemagne May 2015 #32
The facts were long out and she held firm, only after it bit her on the ass did she quietly walk it TheKentuckian May 2015 #59
proceed, ex-gubnor spanone May 2015 #5
Jebbie now considers himself the spokesman for HRC. lpbk2713 May 2015 #8
Yeah, I noticed that AgingAmerican May 2015 #9
And he's the "smart one"? He wants to be a war criminal too? BFEE. nt Mnemosyne May 2015 #10
Well, scratch that SOB off the list... kentuck May 2015 #11
Raise your hand if you think this makes Clinton extremely vulnerable in the general BrotherIvan May 2015 #14
Easy. IWR was in Oct 2002. The intent was to get the UN Weapons inspectors into Iraq. The UN stevenleser May 2015 #33
My suggestion would be to actually hit him with that strongest hammer... JHB May 2015 #45
It just won't work though BrotherIvan May 2015 #53
That's against Obama, not Jeb "George was right" Bush JHB May 2015 #54
But she can't because she voted for it BrotherIvan May 2015 #55
Sez who? Of course she can! We're not--at least I'm not--talking about the whole campaign here... JHB May 2015 #56
Yeah, no BrotherIvan May 2015 #57
It's not either one, it's politics. JHB May 2015 #58
I think it's more than politics BrotherIvan May 2015 #60
She'll almost certainly avoid this subject precisely because of her vote. Daniel537 May 2015 #62
Same shit at ususal BrotherIvan May 2015 #65
“I would have and so would Hillary Clinton,” So that's how he answers the question? YOHABLO May 2015 #15
That just cost him the election. Baitball Blogger May 2015 #19
In a sane world, it would. JHB May 2015 #46
An honest Bush? 99Forever May 2015 #20
No Jebby, not everyone did, or would have voted for it, and you hired the architechs! TheNutcracker May 2015 #23
But but but...the BFEE is tee hee giggles doncha know! Rex May 2015 #24
Doubling down on stupid Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2015 #25
That's a chess move on Hillary BeyondGeography May 2015 #26
And he'll invade Iran and Pakistan when elected. Initech May 2015 #28
No more Bush, please. bigwillq May 2015 #29
Of course he would. GoCubsGo May 2015 #31
I think he's dead Yorktown May 2015 #34
His party has spent 7 years desperately trying to pretend W didn't even exist. Frank Cannon May 2015 #44
Jeb Bush: Doubles down on stupid war crime. Exit stage right on point May 2015 #37
Please, people gratuitous May 2015 #38
So far, Jeb is running a terrible campaign. dawg May 2015 #39
He lives within the right wing 'information' bubble AgingAmerican May 2015 #42
bfee PowerToThePeople May 2015 #40
I wish they would blurt out what the real intention of this operation was / nt jakeXT May 2015 #43
it's in the family genes . . . (or perhaps more accurately, in their jeans) DrDan May 2015 #48
So long Jeb, anymore clowns want to say the same? B Calm May 2015 #49
Jeb is trying to sound honest AgingAmerican May 2015 #50
"authorized the invasion"? "AUTHORIZED"? OMG what a way to put it. Gidney N Cloyd May 2015 #51
How does he think he can say what Hillary Clinton would do? Sanity Claws May 2015 #52
He want's to be 'the decider' AgingAmerican May 2015 #64
This doesn't make any sense. Even Joe Scar took him apart today on Morning Joe for CTyankee May 2015 #61
Despite all the hoopla about "isolationism", a majority of GOPers are still prowar Daniel537 May 2015 #63
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, eh? bobjacksonk2832 May 2015 #66

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
6. That's the strategy: you can't deny it, so you use a lot of earnest lying to convince
Sun May 10, 2015, 06:58 PM
May 2015

others that what you've done is a good thing. It's the flip side of what they did with Kerry's war record on '04.

Gonna be a whole heap of earnest lying in this election.

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
18. I believe that enough has come out to put
Sun May 10, 2015, 07:36 PM
May 2015

The truth out there. The swing voter knows, I would hope, that it was cherry picked intel that lead to the largest fiasco in U.S. history.

still_one

(92,189 posts)
27. Not admiring it was a mistake is worse than "owning up to it". The bush
Sun May 10, 2015, 09:04 PM
May 2015

administration absolutely planted the fake evidence of WMDs and fed it to the MSM utilizing the CIA, and silencing the voices who reported otherwise

The interview Jon Stewart did with Miller exposed that, even to the point where she said Arnitage's view that the tubes for nukes by Iraq was incorrect, and was not printed by the NY Times because of lack of space. The audience actually gasped when that statement was made with a straight face by Miller

Wilson was ridiculed, and his wife's CIA credentials were smeared by the bush administration

No it was a deliberate attempt to mislead

on point

(2,506 posts)
35. I suspect the CIA manufactured and planted the yellow cake letter for others to find
Sun May 10, 2015, 11:25 PM
May 2015

It has never been explained who created and planted that fake document. I suspect the CIA to make the war conspiracy come full circle.

But once their secret buddies in the UK 'processed' the letter to say that Saddam was pursuing yellow cake, they were all to eager to eat up the fake letter.

still_one

(92,189 posts)
41. and I suspect the bush administration was up to their neck in that manufactured story. The outing
Mon May 11, 2015, 12:22 AM
May 2015

of Valere Plame, and the concerted effort by the bush administration to discredit Wilson only confirms in my mind their involvement


winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
2. Oh, goody, Fox will be spending the next several months trying to convince us that
Sun May 10, 2015, 06:53 PM
May 2015

everything W did was right. Not enough lipstick in all of time and space to make that happen.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. Of course he would have - he is part of big oil as much as the rest of them. As to his comment
Sun May 10, 2015, 06:55 PM
May 2015

about Hillary I think she has already said she made a mistake. Speak for yourself Jeb.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
7. she didn't "make a mistake...."
Sun May 10, 2015, 06:59 PM
May 2015

Let's not diminish what she did. She authorized crimes against humanity, presumably for political expedience since none of the democrats who voted against the IWR ever suffered any discernible consequences for it. Wars of aggression are not just "mistakes." That's like saying "Oops, I helped kill a million innocent civilians. Better luck next time!"

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
47. Not only that,
Mon May 11, 2015, 07:32 AM
May 2015

Hillary was the one who talked about the "vast right-wing conspiracy" years before, and yet she still signed on with the right-wingers for the IWR

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
12. She didn't say it was a mistake
Sun May 10, 2015, 07:12 PM
May 2015

She said that, based on the information she was given by the Bush administration at the time, there was no other recourse. On hindsight, the information she was given was made up out of whole cloth.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
13. Except all the other Democrats that voted against it?
Sun May 10, 2015, 07:20 PM
May 2015

That excuse does not work when anyone with a brain knew it was a lie. In her speech, she admits there was NO intelligence that linked Saddam with 9/11. But then voted yes anyway.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
22. It's a very poor one
Sun May 10, 2015, 08:09 PM
May 2015

And in another thread we are discussing/arguing Hillary being against Citizen's United while taking money hand over fist for her campaign and PAC. It is this kind of hypocrisy and double dealing that pushed Obama to victory and it may be her undoing again. People might be dumb but they aren't all stupid and they can feel when someone is lying to them (Democrats any way, Republicans love it).

on point

(2,506 posts)
36. That makes her incompetent. I knew the data was fake at the time.
Sun May 10, 2015, 11:29 PM
May 2015

She needs a better explanation.

Actually, I suspect she voted for it to look 'tough', because it fed her political ambitions. She did it because she was corrupted by power lust.

Or perhaps she was craven, and afraid of the results. But she NEEDS to explain this. The info at the time excuse just means she is incompetent and should never set foot in the whitehoouse.

Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
4. he is trying, desperately, to preserve his brother's legacy
Sun May 10, 2015, 06:57 PM
May 2015

while positioning himself to run for President at the same time. Too bad neither will work.

Also, I doubt Hillary would have voted to invade Iraq, knowing what we know now. She made a mistake in her vote for the war, but I think she regrets that mistake.

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
21. That's not an
Sun May 10, 2015, 08:03 PM
May 2015

Oopsie....I made a mistake! WTF? That was a fucking tragedy, no mere mistake.

If she was easily lied to, led or whatever hell other excuse she has, she isn't qualified to be the President of her High School class much less the President of the United States.

You don't "accidentally" kill, maim, or displace over a million people.


There is no FORGIVENESS anyone can grant you for that mistake.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
59. The facts were long out and she held firm, only after it bit her on the ass did she quietly walk it
Mon May 11, 2015, 10:52 PM
May 2015

back.

Plus, every action in this arena since has supported a hawkish worldview. All she learned is that the vote could bite her butt in a Democratic primary so she finally sought shelter many years after the fact while cheering on the neocons at about every possible turn since.

I could forgive someone who had actually CHANGED but she hasn't even this year she couldn't get on TV fast enough to get on Obama's right regarding arming "moderates", she is on the record cackling about destabilizing Libya, she publicly threatened to "obliterate Iran", by all accounts she was tag teaming with Betrayus on Team Hawk in administration, and her hands are dirty in South America.

That vote was in character 110%, she has not gone forth and sinned no more she has doubled and tripled down expressing even the tiniest regret when she had no other choice and the facts overwhelming and in massive quantity before she backed off an inch.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
9. Yeah, I noticed that
Sun May 10, 2015, 07:02 PM
May 2015

He believes Hillary would invade knowing the intel was wrong and a million people dead.

The whole Bush family are psychopaths. From the mom down to the hamster.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
14. Raise your hand if you think this makes Clinton extremely vulnerable in the general
Sun May 10, 2015, 07:21 PM
May 2015
“I would have and so would Hillary Clinton”


How can she hit him with the strongest hammer in the shed when she voted for the damn thing too.
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
33. Easy. IWR was in Oct 2002. The intent was to get the UN Weapons inspectors into Iraq. The UN
Sun May 10, 2015, 10:42 PM
May 2015

voted on UN Security Council Resolution 1441 in November 2002 declaring Iraq in breach of various UN resolutions, mostly dealing with WMD and demanded weapons inspectors be allowed back into Iraq. Weapons inspectors arrived in Iraq December 2002 and immediately started inspections and issuing reports. There were reports in late December, reports in January, reports in February and their final reports on March 7 2003 twelve or so days before the war.

Their reports always indicated they found no WMD.

No Democratic President in that position goes to war in that scenario. Not Hillary, not John Kerry, not Bill, etc.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
45. My suggestion would be to actually hit him with that strongest hammer...
Mon May 11, 2015, 06:53 AM
May 2015

...and openly push back. The original question was "knowing what we know now...". "Don't bring me into it when you dodge a question."

But I'm not exactly on staff in HHQ.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
53. It just won't work though
Mon May 11, 2015, 01:28 PM
May 2015

They all knew it was a lie, Hillary more than most. Yet droves of Democrats voted against it. Sanders even predicted the rise of ISIS. Millions of people around the world protested. Not one person can give the excuse that they didn't know. It makes her very weak and it is one of the main reasons why Obama won.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
54. That's against Obama, not Jeb "George was right" Bush
Mon May 11, 2015, 08:14 PM
May 2015

I don't have to be a Hillary fan to want her to counterattack Republicans.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
55. But she can't because she voted for it
Mon May 11, 2015, 09:12 PM
May 2015

Republicans don't care that HE voted for it but a lot of Democrats care that SHE did. Big difference.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
56. Sez who? Of course she can! We're not--at least I'm not--talking about the whole campaign here...
Mon May 11, 2015, 09:20 PM
May 2015

...just taking a potshot at a Republican who so thoughtfully set one up for her.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
57. Yeah, no
Mon May 11, 2015, 09:26 PM
May 2015

If she does she'll sound either stupid for having fallen for the chimp's lies or a hypocrite the size of Mt. Rushmore. Why do you think Jebba is doing it??? Because he knows she can't say a damn thing about it. He is neutering the biggest points against him right out of the gate. This is chess, not checkers.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
58. It's not either one, it's politics.
Mon May 11, 2015, 10:01 PM
May 2015

Consider the scenario: Hillary puts out a "they handed us horseshit" line: How many people will accept that in the face of a Republican opponent spouting "and I'd do it again too!"? Versus how many people will unswervingly refuse to countenance and soft-peddling of her blatantly political calculation in that vote, no matter any other issues involved in the election?

"Why do I think Jebba is doing it?" Because he thinks he can get away with it, which is the entire reason I suggest she send it right back at him, right between the eyes. However much you think she'd lose from acting like a hypocrite, she'd win more by showing some fight.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
60. I think it's more than politics
Mon May 11, 2015, 11:31 PM
May 2015

I think what politicians do effects the country, like deciding to go to war. I think other people do too. I think that given a choice between the two, a lot of people will just stay home. I think people are really sick of politicians playing games.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
62. She'll almost certainly avoid this subject precisely because of her vote.
Tue May 12, 2015, 09:41 AM
May 2015

The focus will shift to fighting ISIS, overthrowing Assad, pumping Israel with more weaponry, and saber-rattling against Iran. The debate between Hillary and Jeb will be about which one is "stronger" and more willing to take preemptive action. Same shit as usual.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
15. “I would have and so would Hillary Clinton,” So that's how he answers the question?
Sun May 10, 2015, 07:24 PM
May 2015

That decision to invade Iraq has cost American lives, innocent Iraqi lives, and a trillion dollars and now we have nothing but conflict in the region (ISIS) The Bush administration were criminals, and they got off without a hitch. And now he wants us to put another Bush administration in charge? Go to hell Jeb. Go straight to hell.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
46. In a sane world, it would.
Mon May 11, 2015, 06:55 AM
May 2015

This one, I'm much less certain. But it's something to use against him, if there's follow-through.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
20. An honest Bush?
Sun May 10, 2015, 08:03 PM
May 2015

Will wonders never cease? And he's correct, Hillary Clinton would have indeed, invaded Iraq. Her vote to do exactly that, is the smoking gun that proves it.

GoCubsGo

(32,081 posts)
31. Of course he would.
Sun May 10, 2015, 09:13 PM
May 2015

It's not his demon spawn that would be used for cannon fodder.

If this country is stupid enough to elect/let this shitbag steal the election, they deserve what's coming to them. I only hope I can find a way out, because there would be no hope left for us.

 

Yorktown

(2,884 posts)
34. I think he's dead
Sun May 10, 2015, 10:57 PM
May 2015

Invading Iraq was a stupidity of cosmic proportions.

I was obvious then, even more so now.

Anyone unable to grasp that fact shouldn't run even for school parents representative.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
44. His party has spent 7 years desperately trying to pretend W didn't even exist.
Mon May 11, 2015, 05:25 AM
May 2015

His name was not even mentioned at the last RNC. And not a peep from the drunken dog artist until only recently.

Not even Republicans buy into this bullshit. If Jeb wants to save his political life, and even have a good shot at it, he's just going to have to come out and say what everyone knows to be true. But, of course, Poppy, Cheney, and the PNAC Gallery would never allow that. So, basically, he's screwed.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
38. Please, people
Sun May 10, 2015, 11:54 PM
May 2015

This hurts Jeb! only if the popular media decide it hurts Jeb!. Every major media outlet signed on to the cooked intelligence, the dodgy dossiers, and the patent nonsense. They wanted to see a lot of interesting explosions far away from the United States, be courageous war correspondents, win their Pulitzers, and spend the rest of their careers boring people with tall tales of dangerous duty in a war zone. Mention the name Chalabi on the nooz programs, and you'll be met with blank stares; nobody remembers the fellow who sat behind the First Lady at the State of the Union address in 2004.

By mutual agreement, the popular media have decided not to hold anyone responsible for anything that happened in U.S. foreign policy from 2001 to about 2007 or so. Jeb! can make the bone-stupidest comment anyone can imagine because nobody in big media will notice it. If you bring it to their attention, you'll get some bullshit excuse about how everyone at the time was operating with the same information, therefore you can't possibly fault anyone for any alleged mistakes that were ostensibly made.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
39. So far, Jeb is running a terrible campaign.
Mon May 11, 2015, 12:16 AM
May 2015

If he's not careful, the big money donors will yank his funding and line up behind Scott Walker. It's puzzling to me some of the things he has said recently. It's almost as if he wanted to sabotage his own campaign.

Maybe only a liberal would see it that way, though. I guess it's possible that this stuff is red meat for the Republican crowd.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
42. He lives within the right wing 'information' bubble
Mon May 11, 2015, 01:02 AM
May 2015

He probably doesn't hear any opposing viewpoints, thus believes everyone thinks as he does.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,835 posts)
51. "authorized the invasion"? "AUTHORIZED"? OMG what a way to put it.
Mon May 11, 2015, 11:16 AM
May 2015

How about 'dreamt up, trumped up, and pushed through'?

Sanity Claws

(21,847 posts)
52. How does he think he can say what Hillary Clinton would do?
Mon May 11, 2015, 11:45 AM
May 2015

He is not her spokesperson. He just wants to dirty her up. Fuck off Jeb.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
61. This doesn't make any sense. Even Joe Scar took him apart today on Morning Joe for
Tue May 12, 2015, 09:26 AM
May 2015

the dumbness of Jeb's remark. At first, I thought Jeb, in his arrogance, wasn't even listening to the question. Even so, it was a dumb remark. Sticking with the lies his brother went along with, even in the face of evidence now widely understood and accepted as true, tells me that there is still a very deranged RW mind in the GOP that is far outside the mainstream American voter.

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
63. Despite all the hoopla about "isolationism", a majority of GOPers are still prowar
Tue May 12, 2015, 09:46 AM
May 2015

They've never disavowed the Iraq war, much less had a debate about it, and are still pushing for war against Iran. Hell just look at the shit Rand Paul took for supporting Obama's shift on Cuba. GOP is still the party of chicken hawks and war criminals. Vote for these turds at your own peril, America.

 

bobjacksonk2832

(50 posts)
66. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, eh?
Tue May 12, 2015, 02:01 PM
May 2015

What a scumbag. He and his brother are probably the worst politicians in America today. Hope he never wins another election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jeb Bush: ‘I would have i...