General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeb Bush: ‘I would have invaded Iraq’ like my brother did
In an interview to be broadcast Monday evening on The Kelly Files, possible 2016 Republican presidential nominee Jeb Bush admitted he would have also invaded Iraq as his brother did during his administration.
Knowing what we know now, would you have authorized the invasion? host Megyn Kelly asked the former Florida governor.
I would have and so would Hillary Clinton, Bush replied. Just to remind everybody, so would everybody that was confronted with the intelligence that they got.
Bushs response was odd, since Kelly prefaced it with based upon what we know now, with most believing the invasion and following war to be a disaster.
...
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/05/jeb-bush-i-would-have-invaded-iraq-like-my-brother-did/
Knowing what we know now, he still would have invaded. Well, there go his chances.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)others that what you've done is a good thing. It's the flip side of what they did with Kerry's war record on '04.
Gonna be a whole heap of earnest lying in this election.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)The truth out there. The swing voter knows, I would hope, that it was cherry picked intel that lead to the largest fiasco in U.S. history.
still_one
(92,189 posts)administration absolutely planted the fake evidence of WMDs and fed it to the MSM utilizing the CIA, and silencing the voices who reported otherwise
The interview Jon Stewart did with Miller exposed that, even to the point where she said Arnitage's view that the tubes for nukes by Iraq was incorrect, and was not printed by the NY Times because of lack of space. The audience actually gasped when that statement was made with a straight face by Miller
Wilson was ridiculed, and his wife's CIA credentials were smeared by the bush administration
No it was a deliberate attempt to mislead
on point
(2,506 posts)It has never been explained who created and planted that fake document. I suspect the CIA to make the war conspiracy come full circle.
But once their secret buddies in the UK 'processed' the letter to say that Saddam was pursuing yellow cake, they were all to eager to eat up the fake letter.
still_one
(92,189 posts)of Valere Plame, and the concerted effort by the bush administration to discredit Wilson only confirms in my mind their involvement
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)everything W did was right. Not enough lipstick in all of time and space to make that happen.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)about Hillary I think she has already said she made a mistake. Speak for yourself Jeb.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Let's not diminish what she did. She authorized crimes against humanity, presumably for political expedience since none of the democrats who voted against the IWR ever suffered any discernible consequences for it. Wars of aggression are not just "mistakes." That's like saying "Oops, I helped kill a million innocent civilians. Better luck next time!"
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Hillary was the one who talked about the "vast right-wing conspiracy" years before, and yet she still signed on with the right-wingers for the IWR
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)She said that, based on the information she was given by the Bush administration at the time, there was no other recourse. On hindsight, the information she was given was made up out of whole cloth.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)That excuse does not work when anyone with a brain knew it was a lie. In her speech, she admits there was NO intelligence that linked Saddam with 9/11. But then voted yes anyway.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I agree completely, but that was her excuse.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And in another thread we are discussing/arguing Hillary being against Citizen's United while taking money hand over fist for her campaign and PAC. It is this kind of hypocrisy and double dealing that pushed Obama to victory and it may be her undoing again. People might be dumb but they aren't all stupid and they can feel when someone is lying to them (Democrats any way, Republicans love it).
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)on point
(2,506 posts)She needs a better explanation.
Actually, I suspect she voted for it to look 'tough', because it fed her political ambitions. She did it because she was corrupted by power lust.
Or perhaps she was craven, and afraid of the results. But she NEEDS to explain this. The info at the time excuse just means she is incompetent and should never set foot in the whitehoouse.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)while positioning himself to run for President at the same time. Too bad neither will work.
Also, I doubt Hillary would have voted to invade Iraq, knowing what we know now. She made a mistake in her vote for the war, but I think she regrets that mistake.
Caretha
(2,737 posts)Oopsie....I made a mistake! WTF? That was a fucking tragedy, no mere mistake.
If she was easily lied to, led or whatever hell other excuse she has, she isn't qualified to be the President of her High School class much less the President of the United States.
You don't "accidentally" kill, maim, or displace over a million people.
There is no FORGIVENESS anyone can grant you for that mistake.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)back.
Plus, every action in this arena since has supported a hawkish worldview. All she learned is that the vote could bite her butt in a Democratic primary so she finally sought shelter many years after the fact while cheering on the neocons at about every possible turn since.
I could forgive someone who had actually CHANGED but she hasn't even this year she couldn't get on TV fast enough to get on Obama's right regarding arming "moderates", she is on the record cackling about destabilizing Libya, she publicly threatened to "obliterate Iran", by all accounts she was tag teaming with Betrayus on Team Hawk in administration, and her hands are dirty in South America.
That vote was in character 110%, she has not gone forth and sinned no more she has doubled and tripled down expressing even the tiniest regret when she had no other choice and the facts overwhelming and in massive quantity before she backed off an inch.
spanone
(135,831 posts)lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)He's just another Bush.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)He believes Hillary would invade knowing the intel was wrong and a million people dead.
The whole Bush family are psychopaths. From the mom down to the hamster.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)kentuck
(111,092 posts)He has disqualified himself, in my humble opinion.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)How can she hit him with the strongest hammer in the shed when she voted for the damn thing too.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)voted on UN Security Council Resolution 1441 in November 2002 declaring Iraq in breach of various UN resolutions, mostly dealing with WMD and demanded weapons inspectors be allowed back into Iraq. Weapons inspectors arrived in Iraq December 2002 and immediately started inspections and issuing reports. There were reports in late December, reports in January, reports in February and their final reports on March 7 2003 twelve or so days before the war.
Their reports always indicated they found no WMD.
No Democratic President in that position goes to war in that scenario. Not Hillary, not John Kerry, not Bill, etc.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...and openly push back. The original question was "knowing what we know now...". "Don't bring me into it when you dodge a question."
But I'm not exactly on staff in HHQ.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)They all knew it was a lie, Hillary more than most. Yet droves of Democrats voted against it. Sanders even predicted the rise of ISIS. Millions of people around the world protested. Not one person can give the excuse that they didn't know. It makes her very weak and it is one of the main reasons why Obama won.
JHB
(37,160 posts)I don't have to be a Hillary fan to want her to counterattack Republicans.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Republicans don't care that HE voted for it but a lot of Democrats care that SHE did. Big difference.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...just taking a potshot at a Republican who so thoughtfully set one up for her.
If she does she'll sound either stupid for having fallen for the chimp's lies or a hypocrite the size of Mt. Rushmore. Why do you think Jebba is doing it??? Because he knows she can't say a damn thing about it. He is neutering the biggest points against him right out of the gate. This is chess, not checkers.
JHB
(37,160 posts)Consider the scenario: Hillary puts out a "they handed us horseshit" line: How many people will accept that in the face of a Republican opponent spouting "and I'd do it again too!"? Versus how many people will unswervingly refuse to countenance and soft-peddling of her blatantly political calculation in that vote, no matter any other issues involved in the election?
"Why do I think Jebba is doing it?" Because he thinks he can get away with it, which is the entire reason I suggest she send it right back at him, right between the eyes. However much you think she'd lose from acting like a hypocrite, she'd win more by showing some fight.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I think what politicians do effects the country, like deciding to go to war. I think other people do too. I think that given a choice between the two, a lot of people will just stay home. I think people are really sick of politicians playing games.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)The focus will shift to fighting ISIS, overthrowing Assad, pumping Israel with more weaponry, and saber-rattling against Iran. The debate between Hillary and Jeb will be about which one is "stronger" and more willing to take preemptive action. Same shit as usual.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)You got it. Though I do believe she'll be able to run rings around Jebba.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)That decision to invade Iraq has cost American lives, innocent Iraqi lives, and a trillion dollars and now we have nothing but conflict in the region (ISIS) The Bush administration were criminals, and they got off without a hitch. And now he wants us to put another Bush administration in charge? Go to hell Jeb. Go straight to hell.
Baitball Blogger
(46,704 posts)JHB
(37,160 posts)This one, I'm much less certain. But it's something to use against him, if there's follow-through.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Will wonders never cease? And he's correct, Hillary Clinton would have indeed, invaded Iraq. Her vote to do exactly that, is the smoking gun that proves it.
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Pathetic, just like his enablers.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,957 posts)That's the BFEE way.
BeyondGeography
(39,371 posts)Problem is, it's a 12-year-old chess move.
Initech
(100,068 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Or Clinton.
GoCubsGo
(32,081 posts)It's not his demon spawn that would be used for cannon fodder.
If this country is stupid enough to elect/let this shitbag steal the election, they deserve what's coming to them. I only hope I can find a way out, because there would be no hope left for us.
Yorktown
(2,884 posts)Invading Iraq was a stupidity of cosmic proportions.
I was obvious then, even more so now.
Anyone unable to grasp that fact shouldn't run even for school parents representative.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)His name was not even mentioned at the last RNC. And not a peep from the drunken dog artist until only recently.
Not even Republicans buy into this bullshit. If Jeb wants to save his political life, and even have a good shot at it, he's just going to have to come out and say what everyone knows to be true. But, of course, Poppy, Cheney, and the PNAC Gallery would never allow that. So, basically, he's screwed.
on point
(2,506 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)This hurts Jeb! only if the popular media decide it hurts Jeb!. Every major media outlet signed on to the cooked intelligence, the dodgy dossiers, and the patent nonsense. They wanted to see a lot of interesting explosions far away from the United States, be courageous war correspondents, win their Pulitzers, and spend the rest of their careers boring people with tall tales of dangerous duty in a war zone. Mention the name Chalabi on the nooz programs, and you'll be met with blank stares; nobody remembers the fellow who sat behind the First Lady at the State of the Union address in 2004.
By mutual agreement, the popular media have decided not to hold anyone responsible for anything that happened in U.S. foreign policy from 2001 to about 2007 or so. Jeb! can make the bone-stupidest comment anyone can imagine because nobody in big media will notice it. If you bring it to their attention, you'll get some bullshit excuse about how everyone at the time was operating with the same information, therefore you can't possibly fault anyone for any alleged mistakes that were ostensibly made.
dawg
(10,624 posts)If he's not careful, the big money donors will yank his funding and line up behind Scott Walker. It's puzzling to me some of the things he has said recently. It's almost as if he wanted to sabotage his own campaign.
Maybe only a liberal would see it that way, though. I guess it's possible that this stuff is red meat for the Republican crowd.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)He probably doesn't hear any opposing viewpoints, thus believes everyone thinks as he does.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)War criminal wannabe.
Why doesn't he just fess up to his treason with the Florida theft 2000?
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...but in his case it isn't a very good idea.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,835 posts)How about 'dreamt up, trumped up, and pushed through'?
Sanity Claws
(21,847 posts)He is not her spokesperson. He just wants to dirty her up. Fuck off Jeb.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...and decide what Hillary does and thinks.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)the dumbness of Jeb's remark. At first, I thought Jeb, in his arrogance, wasn't even listening to the question. Even so, it was a dumb remark. Sticking with the lies his brother went along with, even in the face of evidence now widely understood and accepted as true, tells me that there is still a very deranged RW mind in the GOP that is far outside the mainstream American voter.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)They've never disavowed the Iraq war, much less had a debate about it, and are still pushing for war against Iran. Hell just look at the shit Rand Paul took for supporting Obama's shift on Cuba. GOP is still the party of chicken hawks and war criminals. Vote for these turds at your own peril, America.
bobjacksonk2832
(50 posts)What a scumbag. He and his brother are probably the worst politicians in America today. Hope he never wins another election.