General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresidential Hopeful Scott Walker’s Higher Education Deficit
What do you do after gutting public-sector unions? Gut public universities, it seems.
BY SUSAN J. DOUGLAS
Ive just returned from a visit to the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, where the governorwho thinks he could take on ISIS because he took on 100,000 American protestersis now taking on higher education. Scott Walker has proposed cutting $300 million in state funding from Wisconsins public universities. According to an analysis by Politifact, this constitutes 13 percent of the overall budget; it would be the largest cut in the systems 45- year history. UW Milwaukee alone would face a $40 million hit, beginning with $20 million on July
No doubt because he did not finish college himself yet has managed to become a presidential hopeful with extravagant support from the government-loathing Koch machineWalker seems determined to decimate public higher education in his state. He has already frozen tuition, which, while admirable in theory, has, coupled with state funding cuts, hamstrung the universities ability to replace faculty who leave or retire. The UW system is already relying on more underpaid, typically exploited adjunct professorswho taught 29 percent of lectures in 2004 and 35 percent in 2013a trend his cuts would only accelerate. As with so many of Walkers initiatives, like trashing the states public-sector unions, dismantling the states university system was not something he campaigned on in 2014. Its just another of his stealth attacks on democratic values and the middle and working classes.
Walker also proposes making the UW system a public authority, modeled in part on the University of Michigan, where I teach. What does this mean? A public authority is part of the state government but is not subject to direct state governance (or to the rules that apply to other state agencies). At Michigan, for example, tuition increase caps are still approved by the state, but decisions about building, hiring and operations are made by the Board of Regents. Nor does a public authority rely on the state for the bulk of its operating budget. It is a semi-corporate model and can give universities more autonomy and flexibility, especially in the face of massive state disinvestments in higher education. But it also compels universities to look for funding beyond the state, and that typically leads to higher tuition, which makes higher education less affordable and more exclusive.
At Michigan, our regents are elected and are a mix of Democrats and Republicans; at Wisconsin, 16 of the 18 regents are gubernatorial appointees. Walker has already appointed 10 of them, and by the end of his second term, he will have appointed them all. What do we think a Walker Board of Regents might have to say about tenure, academic freedom, quality of classroom teaching, appropriate research, or diversity and affirmative action? What programs might they just out-and-out eliminate for ideological reasons? Indeed, if the Wisconsin universities are freed from state regulations, faculty could lose their statutory protections around tenure, academic freedom and faculty governance.
more
http://inthesetimes.com/article/17905/scott-walkers-higher-education-deficit
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Both are POS.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)by Walker Cronies. Wisconsin past History of Progressive Policies was encouraged by it's Educators. Truth be known,corporations fear human knowledge. They prefer some monolithic idiot who can't find their way out of a paper bag with a flash light and a map. This has to be taking a toll on Grads and their job recruitment and opportunities.