Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sun May 17, 2015, 09:16 AM May 2015

The Obscure Trade Provision Everyone Is Talking About

by Terra Lawson-Remer

Last week the U.S. Senate dealt the President a temporary surprise setback on a central piece of his trade agenda, refusing to allow Fast Track trade authority to move to a vote. The Senate showdown was just a preview of the epic battle brewing in the House. Whether the President can convince enough members of Congress to go along with him will depend in large part on what horses he's willing to trade to get a deal.

There are a huge number of issues on the table, but the make-or-break may come down to an obscure provision of international law, obliquely called 'Investor State Dispute Settlement' (ISDS) mechanisms. ISDS gives foreign corporations the right to bring private lawsuits through secretive supra-national tribunals when governments pass laws that protect the public interest, but might harm profits.

In the U.S., libertarians and conservatives worried about national sovereignty have joined with pro-environment, pro-labor progressives to mobilize against Fast Track, in large part because Fast Track would grease the skids to expand ISDS through trade treaties.

ISDS allows foreign companies to dodge national justice systems and sue governments in front of self-selected panels of private arbitrators (drawn from the ranks of corporate trade lawyers), whose decisions are binding and cannot be appealed. The system has already generated literally billions of dollars in frivolous claims by foreign corporations against democratic governments.

more

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terra-lawsonremer/the-obscure-trade-provisi_b_7297342.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

enough

(13,774 posts)
2. The examples are telling:
Sun May 17, 2015, 09:39 AM
May 2015

snip from the article>

When Germany began phasing-out nuclear power after Japan's Fukushima disaster, Swedish energy company Vattenfall sued to recover their lost projected profits.

Australia and Uruguay are now under attack by Phillip Morris for requiring health warnings on tobacco products, because the regulations, designed to save children's lives, are cutting into profits.

French company Veolia sued Egypt after Egypt raised its minimum wage, increasing Veolia's operating costs.

And most recently, Canada was successfully sued for refusing to grant a mining company a permit for destructive mega-blasting, in an effort to protect the ecosystem and the livelihoods of local fisherman in Nova Scotia.

The size of damages can be breathtaking. An ISDS arbitration panel ordered Ecuador to pay Occidental Petroleum $2.3 billion as compensation for lost hoped-for future profits when Occidental broke the law and suffered the fully foreseeable consequences.

snip>

PSPS

(15,376 posts)
3. Yet the swooners seem compelled to defend/dismiss this lest it reflect badly on their "Dear Leader."
Sun May 17, 2015, 10:18 AM
May 2015

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
7. why smear Obama with that "dear leader" crap?
Sun May 17, 2015, 12:10 PM
May 2015

Obama isn't perfect, but no reason to use a term that is used for Kim Jong-il
I see it a lot used by freeper types too.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. huh? That's one of the less obscure provisions- if not the least obscure
Sun May 17, 2015, 11:26 AM
May 2015

I suspect there is so much buried in the tpp and obscured by weasel language that doesn't do what it purports to do, that it's mind boggling- in other words, there will be a massive amount of lipstick on this pig.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
8. another comment that doesn't reflect any knowledge about ISDS, from you.
Sun May 17, 2015, 12:12 PM
May 2015

don't you have enough to worry about in Great Britain?

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
10. Posted in that thread
Sun May 17, 2015, 12:18 PM
May 2015

Rand voted for cloture 2 times on the TPP fast track. He is a supporter.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
11. Whew...
Sun May 17, 2015, 12:24 PM
May 2015

Well I dodged that bullet...


... thought I might have become a "Paulbot," as stated by the usual suspect.



Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Obscure Trade Provisi...