General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow “On the Ground” Are We in Syria?
Soilders in Iraq in 2003. [/center]
The Saturday morning Delta Force raid that killed ISIS commander Abu Sayyaf and captured his wife was sigifnicant less for who it killed than for where it killed him: To execute the raid, U.S. troops, very briefly, had boots on the ground in Syria. This wasnt the first U.S. ground operation in Syria, though. Theres been at least one other: the unsuccessful attempt to free ISIS hostages James Foley and Steven Sotloff in the summer of 2014. But the killing of Abu Sayyaf is the first successful ground raid that we know of, assuming that the goal was to kill the emir of oil and gas rather than capture him.
Terrorism analyst Bruce Reidel tells the New York Times that the raid looks like it was meant to be a collection mission to capture someone with information on the inner workings of ISIS. Drones, after all, have generally been the administrations preferred method for targeted killings, whereas the U.S. has carried out a number of similar Special Forces raids recently to capture al-Qaida targets in Libya and Somalia.
The raid also raises the question of whether the U.S. will undertake more ground operations in Syria. The White Houses proposed authorization for the use of military force against ISIS, which has not been approved by Congress but can be interpreted as the administrations self-imposed rules of engagement, specifies that it does not allow for enduring offensive ground combat operations. That rules out a permanent Iraq or Afghanistanstyle occupation but the word enduring is in there to allow for operations just like this one: quick in-and-out special forces raids to target specific ISIS members or rescue hostages.
Early in the war against ISIS, the U.S. effort was hampered by a lack of on-the-ground intelligence from within Syria. The Abu Sayyaf raid could be a sign that the level of information is increasing, which could lead to more raids like this one, or drone strikes targeting ISIS commanders. The raid also comes at a time when, after weeks of setbacks and reports of internal strife, ISIS is on the offensive again, taking over several key sites in the city of Ramadi, the capital of Iraqs largest province, Anbar.
Read More.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I am not sure we can do anything about that.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Does that sometimes impact national security...
Mind you I don't think this is one of those times.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)My question was more a general question about other things, I know it's broad.
merrily
(45,251 posts)solely because of national security are very, very few.
delrem
(9,688 posts)That's all.
And don't worry, even if told the truth about everything the US would still be gung ho for war, *any* war.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)We have wasted some many resources, money and lives in what has become Obama's Wars.
delrem
(9,688 posts)And destroyed a few countries. Created a lot of hopeless despair. Way to fucking well go!
The cost to the USA? US war profiteers and their banks have made out swimmingly, and the MIC is a rather large part of the US economy.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Because the USA doesn't give a fuck about the slaughter, the unending chaos, so long as it can sell arms, and drop bombs (every bomb is dollars in the bank for the war profiteers), and claim "no boots on the ground" aka "no precious US blood".