Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Wed May 20, 2015, 12:07 AM May 2015

Blue Dogs And New Dems Are STILL WORKING To Undermine And TAKE OVER The Democratic Party



Florida DINOs Gwen Graham and Patrick Murphy




When Boehner and McCarthy boast how their extreme right agenda gets bipartisan support, they're talking about a gaggle of reactionary Democrats who for one reason or another vote with the GOP-- primarily Blue Dogs and New Dems. Last week, for example, the House voted 242-184 to further restrict women's right to reproductive Choice. Boehner was crowing how it was a bipartisan vote; it wasn't really. 4 Republicans voted with the Democrats and 4 Democrats voted with the Republicans. Of the 4 Democrats, one, Jim Langevin (RI), is a deranged religious fanatic and the other 3-- Henry Cuellar, Collin Peterson and Dan Lipinski-- are hard-core right-wing Blue Dogs who vote far more frequently for conservative initiatives than for progressive ones.


The real tragedy is that with "former" Blue Dog and New Dem leaders, respectively Steve Israel and Joe Crowley, rising in the ranks of House Democratic leadership, more and more conservatives and fewer and fewer progressives are being recruited by the DCCC. So far this cycle Blue America has endorsed 8 progressives for House seats. The DCCC hasn't lifted a finger in any of those districts. They don't want progressives or independent-minded legislators. They want hackish followers who won't make Wall Street banksters nervous. And both Blue Dogs and New Dems insist they're just trying to save the Democratic Party from itself-- by acting more like Republicans.



Secret Origins

Blue Dogs knew from the beginning they were doing something their leadership probably wouldn’t appreciate.

Rep. Collin C. Peterson of Minnesota, a founding member who’s also the longtime top Democrat on the Agriculture Committee, said the group started meeting secretly in 1994.

“We could see the party was gonna drive us into a ditch,” Peterson recalled.

Fiercely protective of its ideological purity and committed to preserving trust within the ranks, the Blue Dogs enforced a strict quota for membership and specific guidelines for admittance, even after going public in 1995.

Members were predominantly from the South — so much so that aspiring Blue Dogs from elsewhere seemed circumspect.

“It was the Southerners, they thought anybody from Minnesota had to be a raving liberal. I had a couple buddies who helped get me in,” Peterson said. “The way the rules worked, people were invited one at a time. But any member could blackball you.”

Fifteen years later, Schrader faced similar skepticism. The Oregonian applied for membership in 2010, at the plateau of Blue Dog prominence, and struggled to make his case at a time when, according to rules, the group couldn’t exceed a quarter of the caucus.

Schrader said he finally earned a spot when he revealed his nickname as Budget chairman in the Oregon Legislature: “Darth Schrader.”

In 1995, the Blue Dogs started with 23 members and quickly established themselves as players, putting forth welfare overhaul legislation and a budget resolution that won plaudits from Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt, D-Mo.

In 2006, Democrats won back the House; two years later, President Barack Obama won by a landslide. Democrats felt invincible, and in early 2010, Blue Dog membership topped 50 — a formidable bloc. Members were courted heavily to shore up votes for then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s big-ticket items, most significantly the Affordable Care Act.

That support would prove costly: In 2010, 26 Blue Dogs lost seats as Republicans reclaimed the House.

“We thought we were all about the right message, we had a mandate, the Republicans are gonna be irrelevant again,” Schrader said. “Only to find out the vote [that put Democrats back in power] was mostly against George [W.] Bush, not for Barack Obama an

http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/blue-dogs/?dcz=


The two freshmen who vote with the GOP most frequently are Brad Ashford (Blue Dog-NE) and Gwen Graham (Blue Dog-FL). Each has an abysmal 22.86 ProgressivePunch score this session, worse than the records of several Republicans. And yet the DCCC is gearing up to spend over a million dollars on each of these worthless Members to help save their seats, despite all their votes for Boehner's agenda.

Here are the 10 "Democrats" who have been with the GOP the most this session on the crucial roll calls:


• Gwen Graham (Blue Dog-FL)- 22.86

• Brad Ashford (Blue Dog-NE)- 22.86

• Henry Cuellar (Blue Dog-TX)- 25.71

• Kyrsten Sinema (Blue Dog-AZ)- 31.43

• Sean Patrick Maloney (New Dem-NY)- 31.43

• Collin Peterson (Blue Dog-MN)- 35.29

• Patrick Murphy (New Dem-FL)- 39.39

• Dan Lipinski (Blue Dog-IL)- 42.86

• Cheri Bustos (Blue Dog-IL)- 42.86

• Rubén Hinojosa (TX)- 45.0


Contribute to the DCCC and most of that money will go to Blue Dogs and New Dems who have nearly as little in common with you politically as the Republicans do. The main Blue America page is for House candidates. There are no Blue Dogs and no New Dems on that page. And there never will be.




http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blue Dogs And New Dems Are STILL WORKING To Undermine And TAKE OVER The Democratic Party (Original Post) Segami May 2015 OP
They remind me of DJ13 May 2015 #1
To save our village, they destroyed it Demeter May 2015 #2
These people are the types to think Harold Ford is the next logical choice. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author RandiFan1290 May 2015 #4
Wall Street buying fascism. woo me with science May 2015 #5
morning kickee nashville_brook May 2015 #6
And they've done a great job, LWolf May 2015 #7
Important info here. Its the very heart of all (political) disagreements at DU, really. RiverLover May 2015 #8
This is why I only give to individual candidates, the national party hacks will spend it on bemildred May 2015 #9
+1 CharlotteVale May 2015 #13
It's Why For Now I Do Not Donate To The Democratic Party colsohlibgal May 2015 #10
Contribute to the DCCC and the money will go to elect Democrats... brooklynite May 2015 #11
How do you imagine we won the House in 2006? brooklynite May 2015 #12

Response to Segami (Original post)

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
8. Important info here. Its the very heart of all (political) disagreements at DU, really.
Wed May 20, 2015, 08:00 AM
May 2015

The policies of the republican party are infiltrating the Democratic Party via these "centrists". But are defended against only because they have the effing nerve to call themselves 'Democrats'.

We're becoming the infilitrated party, not the opposition party. Our country is hurting because of it.

Thank you Segami!!!

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
9. This is why I only give to individual candidates, the national party hacks will spend it on
Wed May 20, 2015, 08:02 AM
May 2015

conservatives, not progressives.

colsohlibgal

(5,276 posts)
10. It's Why For Now I Do Not Donate To The Democratic Party
Wed May 20, 2015, 08:46 AM
May 2015

I will and have donated to individual ones. But I want none of my cash going to the Blue Dog/DINOs.

15 more years of old while males dying, more young coming of age, this country can turn around if it's not too late by then.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
11. Contribute to the DCCC and the money will go to elect Democrats...
Wed May 20, 2015, 09:45 AM
May 2015

...that will include progressives like Alan Grayson where progressives can be elected, and Blue Dogs like Patrick Murphy where they can't. DCCC doesn't have a preference as long as the campaigns are well funded and well organized.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
12. How do you imagine we won the House in 2006?
Wed May 20, 2015, 09:46 AM
May 2015

Hint - it involved winning seats in Southern and Western States where the progressives you like wouldn't be competetive.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Blue Dogs And New Dems Ar...