Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:29 AM May 2015

Two reasons I could never support Hillary.





Our economy is our number priority and I have zero faith that she won't select similar characters in the same mold.

I know the type of person that Bernie would select.
123 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two reasons I could never support Hillary. (Original Post) Dawgs May 2015 OP
K&R! marym625 May 2015 #1
Never is a strong word Fast Walker 52 May 2015 #2
I'm sure she'll tell me exactly what I want to hear... until 11/8/16 corkhead May 2015 #14
I can't argue with that-- that being said, Fast Walker 52 May 2015 #61
Why take chances on someone "changing" when we have someone who has been consistent? arcane1 May 2015 #77
+1,000 Scuba May 2015 #118
Never is a good for when 840high May 2015 #98
Do you feel better now? /NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #3
Huh? Dawgs May 2015 #15
Who do you think should be in a Democratic President's cabinet. sabrina 1 May 2015 #46
Eric Holder... The Republican corporatist that he is. Agschmid May 2015 #64
Hillary isn't my first choice, but I could still support her. dawg May 2015 #4
dawg, I was confused by you response to Dawgs. morningfog May 2015 #6
Understandable. dawg May 2015 #13
Who... sendero May 2015 #18
a Cabinet of rivals, eh? MisterP May 2015 #93
Will you be leaving DU during the primary? leftofcool May 2015 #5
They don't have to. morningfog May 2015 #7
Why would you need to leave during the primary? I'm confused. el_bryanto May 2015 #9
No. There's no rule that says I MUST support the nominee. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #16
You just have to stop bashing her MaggieD May 2015 #24
You're right. I will stop (if I ever start) bashing Hillary if she ever wins the nom. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #27
I think you will run very fast to the voting booth, yeoman6987 May 2015 #32
I'm supporting Bernie until a Democratic nominee is selected. Dawgs May 2015 #40
Lol. I won't run either and I hope Bernie wins yeoman6987 May 2015 #74
If Ted Cruz is 50-50 with Hillary we are fucked. Agschmid May 2015 #66
"if I ever start"? Look to the top of the page! George II May 2015 #67
"Not supporting" is bashing? OK. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #73
True but you can't advocate third party when she is the nominee. hrmjustin May 2015 #60
Is that question relevant to anything? sabrina 1 May 2015 #47
It's nice having a solid non-sequitur to support your choices rock May 2015 #8
The first photo is of Tim Geithner, of course... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #11
I guess if you were bailed out you could say that. But for the people I know who lost their jobs sabrina 1 May 2015 #50
I lost everything in the Great Recession... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #62
So, by supporting Clinton, you are in fact supporting another economic crash.. eloydude May 2015 #68
Wow, thank you./NT DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #87
Are you really trying to state that Clinton will orchstrate a Bush-esque crash? Sheepshank May 2015 #109
Her economic policies are in question eloydude May 2015 #110
So you would prefer the choices made by a Republican? yardwork May 2015 #10
That's not a problem, as Hillary will not be the nominee. NYC_SKP May 2015 #12
Heh. If she loses in the general Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #58
No. I'm supporting Bernie Sanders. Dawgs May 2015 #17
In all seriousness, could anyone be worse than those two pusbags? nt hifiguy May 2015 #101
Yes. Watch what happens is a Republican gets elected. yardwork May 2015 #108
Geithner was a pick by both Obama and McCain Mnpaul May 2015 #119
And on that basis you assume there are no other differences. yardwork May 2015 #120
You were the one who claimed a Republican pick would be different Mnpaul May 2015 #122
Do you know the kind Jeb Bush or Scott Walker will select? brooklynite May 2015 #19
Yes, that's why I'm supporting Bernie to win the primary and then beat one of them for President. Dawgs May 2015 #20
Present a convincing argument as to how Bernie wins a national campaign... brooklynite May 2015 #22
Sure. All of us supporters of candidates beside Hillary should just give up. Dawgs May 2015 #30
Funny - I thought we were on a political blog... brooklynite May 2015 #75
That's not what you were doing, and you know it. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #79
he has better ideas questionseverything May 2015 #92
I've asked this question several times on this site, never got an answer.... George II May 2015 #95
A year before the 2008 election, bvar22 May 2015 #99
People more to Bernie fans liking workinclasszero May 2015 #29
Nothing but the best of course. Another someone from Goldman Sachs.... think May 2015 #34
Yep. Just look at the current lineup. Who appointed Exilednight May 2015 #90
That needed to be said. Wilms May 2015 #115
You forgot to include 2 more reasons. Fuddnik May 2015 #21
I understand exactly what the OP means. SoapBox May 2015 #23
You missed Hillary's economic BFF. Chan790 May 2015 #25
Ok when Hillary wins the democratic nomination workinclasszero May 2015 #26
Will post later Android3.14 May 2015 #35
The minute Hillary is declared the official nominee workinclasszero May 2015 #37
Are you putting words in my mouth? Because it feels like it. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #42
At least a dozen reasons why I WOULD support Hillary Zambero May 2015 #28
Hillary will not be the nominee. Here is my prediction: RufusTFirefly May 2015 #31
Darn plausible Android3.14 May 2015 #36
This why you are wrong. Bernie does not have upaloopa May 2015 #43
...and that prediction is based on...? brooklynite May 2015 #71
More than 40 years as a Democratic activist and political junkie? RufusTFirefly May 2015 #78
well, I have 45 years as a Democratic activist... brooklynite May 2015 #96
I think there is a good chance of that happening and it IS my preference. nt Bonobo May 2015 #117
So, if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, you'd support the addition of 1 or 2 more... Nitram May 2015 #33
No. I'd probably vote (not support) for her. Dawgs May 2015 #44
In this thread? Wilms May 2015 #116
These are Obama appointees. lark May 2015 #38
I'm going to point this out more often. yardwork May 2015 #121
At least it's not because she's female. classof56 May 2015 #39
Why are you rolling your eyes? Dawgs May 2015 #49
You're wrong, and I'm rolling my eyes because I want to. classof56 May 2015 #56
Great response, class. sheshe2 May 2015 #112
Thanks, friend. Needed that! classof56 May 2015 #123
Bernie isn't going to select anyone. upaloopa May 2015 #41
Great. Another, 'the nomination is over already' response. Dawgs May 2015 #45
Yes I do. Consider it tough love. upaloopa May 2015 #52
Indeed -- cold, dispassionate analysis is better than insubstantial faith brooklynite May 2015 #70
How are Bernie supporters unrealistic? Dawgs May 2015 #76
It's unrealistic that Sanders would be nominated, but somehow realistic that Cruz would. arcane1 May 2015 #89
You say and I say father founding May 2015 #48
I Can't Wait Until Elizabeth Warren Endorses Hillary Corey_Baker08 May 2015 #51
Disappointing, but it would not get me to support Hillary. djean111 May 2015 #54
No I Am Anticipating A United Democratic Party Corey_Baker08 May 2015 #65
She might, but it wouldn't make any sense. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #80
Bernie first, but I will support the nominee aintitfunny May 2015 #53
I will support the Democratic nominee. Beacool May 2015 #55
Just to be clear, did I say I would refuse to vote for Hillary in the general? n/t Dawgs May 2015 #81
Well, what does this sound to you? Beacool May 2015 #94
Voting for someone to avoid a republican president is different than supporting. Dawgs May 2015 #113
If she is the nominee I will support her AgingAmerican May 2015 #57
how do you know? samsingh May 2015 #59
I don't know. I do know her history though, and I don't want to risk it. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #84
Interesting that you use two people she had nothing to do with to justify not supporting Clinton. George II May 2015 #63
Interesting that you don't know her history. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #83
Oh, but I do, and she didn't choose either of them to be Treasury Secretary George II May 2015 #85
Well, if you know her history then you should know that exactly the type of person she would pick. Dawgs May 2015 #86
Her "history" is that she's never chosen a Treasury Secretary. George II May 2015 #88
That's part of her history. Dawgs May 2015 #91
One More Big Problem colsohlibgal May 2015 #69
Yep. This too. n/t Dawgs May 2015 #82
These guys were why I couldn't get too enthusiastic about Obama deutsey May 2015 #72
There are a million reasons not to support the Republican candidate... Mike Nelson May 2015 #97
That is a mighty powerful argument. hifiguy May 2015 #100
never as, even if she wins the primary and is our democratic nominee? nt seabeyond May 2015 #102
It's like Jeb's neocons. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #103
Are you talking about the primary and general or just thd primary? hrmjustin May 2015 #104
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #105
Dawgs IIRC you were a diehard Obama supporter during the '08 primaries. Maven May 2015 #106
I was a supporter because he appeared to be anti-war. Dawgs May 2015 #114
I often can't support Republicans for obvious reasons Dem2 May 2015 #107
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #111
 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
2. Never is a strong word
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:34 AM
May 2015

Let's see how the campaign goes. Unless you don't think she can change at all.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
14. I'm sure she'll tell me exactly what I want to hear... until 11/8/16
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:58 AM
May 2015

If she publicly PROMISES to put Elizabeth Warren in charge of the Fed and Tammy Duckworth Secretary of Defense maybe that will make me less skeptical of what she does should she actually manage to get elected next year.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
77. Why take chances on someone "changing" when we have someone who has been consistent?
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:51 PM
May 2015

If she can have such a fundamental change during the campaign, then she can just as easily change back after getting elected

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
46. Who do you think should be in a Democratic President's cabinet.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:04 PM
May 2015

We didn't ask this question last time and we got Corporate CEOs and Republicans.

dawg

(10,777 posts)
4. Hillary isn't my first choice, but I could still support her.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:46 AM
May 2015

I could even be okay with those guys as advisors, so long as there were other voices to balance them out and they weren't allowed to steer policy entirely in their own direction.

dawg

(10,777 posts)
13. Understandable.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:52 AM
May 2015

I'm lucky, I guess, that I agree with about 99% of everything I have ever seen Dawgs post.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
7. They don't have to.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:58 AM
May 2015

For one thing, until we have a nominee, nothing is required.

And when we have a nominee (which may not be Hillary!) the poster need not leave DU, but only mindful of critiques of te nominee.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
9. Why would you need to leave during the primary? I'm confused.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:14 AM
May 2015

After the primary I can sort of see.

Bryant

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
27. You're right. I will stop (if I ever start) bashing Hillary if she ever wins the nom. n/t
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:35 AM
May 2015
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
32. I think you will run very fast to the voting booth,
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:43 AM
May 2015

If Ted Cruz is 50-50 with Hillary. Granted she may not have your best interest 100 percent but I predict Ted Cruz has about zero percent iof your interests.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
40. I'm supporting Bernie until a Democratic nominee is selected.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:58 AM
May 2015

It will be a sad day, but if Hillary wins I will vote for her against any republican. I can guarantee I won't run.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
74. Lol. I won't run either and I hope Bernie wins
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:51 PM
May 2015

He isn't perfect but he is the only candidate on both sides that care about people in a genuine way.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,852 posts)
11. The first photo is of Tim Geithner, of course...
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:29 AM
May 2015

Team Obama did a pretty good job of getting us out of the worst economic crisis since The Great Depression.


sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
50. I guess if you were bailed out you could say that. But for the people I know who lost their jobs
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:09 PM
May 2015

and their homes, (because of the corruption no one was held accountable for) they have a different view of the economy.

Geithner is a tax evader also, and all you have to do is what Warren questioning him about why the money that was set aside to help MAIN ST, never got to MAIN ST to know why he was chosen to guard the henhouse.

Glad you were okay, wish I could say that the people I know and so many across the country.

Ever visit one of our now familiar 'Tent Cities' and talk to some of the residents? It's heart breaking.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,852 posts)
62. I lost everything in the Great Recession...
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:33 PM
May 2015

I lost everything in The Great Recession; my home, my business, my savings, my investments, and my car. I still don't own a car. The only thing I didn't lose, praise be to God, is my girlfriend... She lost her job as well... Yes, we were homeless...Luckily for us my neighbor let us live with him...Out of the blue I got a check for approximately $2,800.00 in the mail. It was escrow money for the insurance on my foreclosed home. We used that money to buy a one way ticket to move from Orlando, a city I lived in since I was a kid, and the only home I really knew to Los Angeles, her hometown. That left it us with $2,000.00 between us and the abyss... We are in our forties and we lived in a hostel in Koreatown while she looked for a job...

Thanks to God, the Obama recovery and the dint of her perseverance, toughness, and plain hard work she found a job...But even then it wasn't all sunshine and roses... We moved from rooms in Alhambra, Los Feliz, Northridge, Koreatown, and Van Nuys until we could save enough to get enough money to pay the deposit on a studio apartment and furnish it.

There is always the supposition here that I and some other BHO/HRC supporters on this board are part of the 1%. Nothing could be further from the truth but when all a person has is a hammer the whole world looks like a nail...

...

I once had a lot of money, not !% money, of course, but enough to live well...I don't miss it as much I thought I would...

 

eloydude

(376 posts)
68. So, by supporting Clinton, you are in fact supporting another economic crash..
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:42 PM
May 2015

and you'd have to start all over again, and by then it'll be too late for you.

Bernie has a extensive plan for every issue, especially making sure that the economy is robust.

It is improving, but Clinton's allegiance with the 1% will always be a major problem for the 99%.

I wish you the very best of luck with your choices, and believe me, when the debates starts, you will change your mind.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
109. Are you really trying to state that Clinton will orchstrate a Bush-esque crash?
Thu May 21, 2015, 06:21 PM
May 2015

wtf is that made up piece of shit supposition

 

eloydude

(376 posts)
110. Her economic policies are in question
Thu May 21, 2015, 06:29 PM
May 2015

She waffles just about every issue involving the economy.

How is she going to improve on it without pissing off her major donors? She's in a Catch-22 mode.

yardwork

(69,364 posts)
10. So you would prefer the choices made by a Republican?
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:24 AM
May 2015

By all means campaign for your preferred candidate during the primaries. But if Hillary ends up being the Democratic nominee and you fail to vote for her, then you become part of the problem. Sorry to sound harsh but that's the way it is.

This is the system we have. We often have to choose between options we don't really like. A Republican president would be far worse than anything Hillary does.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
12. That's not a problem, as Hillary will not be the nominee.
Thu May 21, 2015, 10:31 AM
May 2015

And if she by some horrific act of nature becomes the nominee, she will lose to the Republican.

Ergo, support for her now is support for a win by the GOP later.

peace out.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
58. Heh. If she loses in the general
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:24 PM
May 2015

they plan to blame it on people who wanted better 'discouraging the vote' or 'staying home' or whatever else, instead of admitting they chose a poor candidate.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
17. No. I'm supporting Bernie Sanders.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:12 AM
May 2015

Is the primary already over, or is it really a coronation?

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
119. Geithner was a pick by both Obama and McCain
Fri May 22, 2015, 07:29 AM
May 2015
During the 2008 Presidential election, Geithner was one of three people tipped to be nominated for Treasury Secretary regardless of whether John McCain or Barack Obama won
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Geithner

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
122. You were the one who claimed a Republican pick would be different
Fri May 22, 2015, 07:48 AM
May 2015

I said nothing about no difference - strawman.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
20. Yes, that's why I'm supporting Bernie to win the primary and then beat one of them for President.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:17 AM
May 2015
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
22. Present a convincing argument as to how Bernie wins a national campaign...
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:29 AM
May 2015

...because I don't see one.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
30. Sure. All of us supporters of candidates beside Hillary should just give up.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:37 AM
May 2015

I mean, since you don't think it's possible, right?

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
75. Funny - I thought we were on a political blog...
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:51 PM
May 2015

...where we discuss political issues.

I'm challenging your belief that Bernie Sanders can win and giving you an opportunity to sell your candidate's electability.

George II

(67,782 posts)
95. I've asked this question several times on this site, never got an answer....
Thu May 21, 2015, 02:26 PM
May 2015

.....do supporters of Sanders reallly think he'll get 60+ million votes next year?

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
90. Yep. Just look at the current lineup. Who appointed
Thu May 21, 2015, 01:13 PM
May 2015

Bernanke? Who nominated him a second time? Who did Bill keep in charge of the Fed after Bush I?

A D or R next to the president's name still seems to yield us the same results as to who is put in charge of the Fed or Treasury.

The people Walker and Bush will surround themselves with are the same peor that Bush II surrounded himself with and Obama kept around.

There's nothing Hillary has said it done to make me believe she would appoint a Krugman type economist.

There are only two ponds to fish from for your economic advisors. The Greenspan pond, or the Keynes pond. No president had wandered over to the Keynes pond to find a new head of any US economic policy, but the Greenspan pond gets fished regularly and stocked as needed.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
21. You forgot to include 2 more reasons.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:26 AM
May 2015

Orszag and Rubin are her other economic advisors.

I'll be goddamned if I'll vote for anyone again, who'll bring those 4 shitstains back into the White House.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
23. I understand exactly what the OP means.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:30 AM
May 2015

HRC will line her cabinet with the same old, same old...and that is not what we need.

We need a Progressive/Liberal/True Democrat in the White House and we need to return to the left of center (especially since the center is now so far to the right), to bring back an America that works for the 99%.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
25. You missed Hillary's economic BFF.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:33 AM
May 2015


Robert Rubin is someone like Geithner or Summers...and probably exactly who she will choose.
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
26. Ok when Hillary wins the democratic nomination
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:35 AM
May 2015

Will you post the same thing here again?

If by some crazy miracle Bernie wins the nomination, I would support and vote for him in the general election.

I find it very interesting how the vast majority of Bernie fans say they will never vote for Hillary even if she is the democratic party's nominee.

Very interesting.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
35. Will post later
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:46 AM
May 2015

During the day, the sockpuppets have too much influence on the alert system.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
37. The minute Hillary is declared the official nominee
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:51 AM
May 2015

of the democratic party I will be wearing out the alert button on "democrats" who post that they will not vote for her or support her election on the Democratic Underground website.

I promise that!

Zambero

(9,990 posts)
28. At least a dozen reasons why I WOULD support Hillary
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:35 AM
May 2015

All crammed into the GOP's 2016 clown car at the moment.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
31. Hillary will not be the nominee. Here is my prediction:
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:38 AM
May 2015

Hillary, often her own worst enemy, will self-destruct. The Democratic Party, having long taken for granted that she would be the nominee, will be thrown into disarray. Meanwhile, the swelling Sanders contingent will prove impossible to ignore. Searching frantically for an alternative to Hillary who isn't Bernie but who doesn't utterly alienate Berne's supporters, the party leaders will settle on Martin O'Malley, who is able to attract key backers from both Sanders' and Clinton's camps.

This is my prediction, not my preference.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
43. This why you are wrong. Bernie does not have
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:03 PM
May 2015

the ability to raise enough money to last until the general election.
You base everything on fantacy and ignore reality just as most every other Bernie supporter on this board.
My guess is you also see the universe acting against you and Bernie will ride in on a white horse and put an end to that.
We need to defeat the right and only pragmatic realistic people have a shot at that, not socialist leaning people hoping for Bernie to give them free stuff paid for by the 1%.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
78. More than 40 years as a Democratic activist and political junkie?
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:51 PM
May 2015

It's a hunch. An intuition. If you expect me to provide you with data, you're on the wrong track.

But then, I already knew that.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
96. well, I have 45 years as a Democratic activist...
Thu May 21, 2015, 02:27 PM
May 2015

...and one of the lessons I learned from supporting many candidates who ended up losing was not to confuse my personal hopes and dreams with political reality.

Bernie Sanders' political experience comes in a small state where he can meet voters personally, and in one of the most liberal States in the country. The national political landscape is far larger (including the need to campaign in multiple States at once) requiring a substantial campaign warchest for advertising and permanent staff -- yes, that's distressing and we'd all like to change the system, but it won't change before 2016. And for all of her weaknesses vs Obama in 2008, Hillary Clinton did far better than he did in Battleground States like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Florida.

Add to that, polling OVER TIME has shown that Hillary Clinton is popular with all of the Democratic Party's constituent group. In fact, her LOW point in the past year is higher that her HIGH point in 2007/2008.

Bottom line, Bernie Sanders has to effectively be as popular and successful as Barack Obama was. I don't see that happening.

Nitram

(27,749 posts)
33. So, if Hillary wins the Democratic nomination, you'd support the addition of 1 or 2 more...
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:43 AM
May 2015

...conservative supreme court justices. That would be catastrophic. I don't think you're thinking straight.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
44. No. I'd probably vote (not support) for her.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:03 PM
May 2015

Not supporting one person does not mean I'd support someone else.

Seems like a lot of Hillary supporters are failing with logic in this thread.

lark

(26,081 posts)
38. These are Obama appointees.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:51 AM
May 2015

Why are you dogging Clinton for Obama's actions? Why is it OK for him, but not for her?

I'm leary of Clinton's corporatist leanings, but she's no different than Obama in that aspect. Why is she getting killed for the same things that Obama's given a pass on here on this board?

classof56

(5,376 posts)
39. At least it's not because she's female.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:56 AM
May 2015

And white. Or because of what her husband did.

Sigh...sometimes this old white female is at a loss for words that might make it through the glass ceiling.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
49. Why are you rolling your eyes?
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:07 PM
May 2015

Please elaborate, because it feels like you want people to support her just for being a female. Am I wrong?

classof56

(5,376 posts)
56. You're wrong, and I'm rolling my eyes because I want to.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:21 PM
May 2015

Hey, I'm pushing 80. Indulge me!

Cheers.

classof56

(5,376 posts)
123. Thanks, friend. Needed that!
Fri May 22, 2015, 10:00 AM
May 2015

I was worried it could get me alerted--and if I'd said what I really thought, it probably would have. Appreciate the affirmation!

Love ya, too and hugs back.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
45. Great. Another, 'the nomination is over already' response.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:04 PM
May 2015

Do you realize how you guys/gals sound?

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
52. Yes I do. Consider it tough love.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:16 PM
May 2015

The problem is you don't know how unrealistic Bernie supporters sound.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
70. Indeed -- cold, dispassionate analysis is better than insubstantial faith
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:44 PM
May 2015

Sort of like religion

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
76. How are Bernie supporters unrealistic?
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:51 PM
May 2015

I think almost all of us believe his chances of beating Hillary are really slim.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
89. It's unrealistic that Sanders would be nominated, but somehow realistic that Cruz would.
Thu May 21, 2015, 01:07 PM
May 2015

Makes no sense to me

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
54. Disappointing, but it would not get me to support Hillary.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:18 PM
May 2015

Or are you just gleefully anticipating unhappiness?

aintitfunny

(1,424 posts)
53. Bernie first, but I will support the nominee
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:17 PM
May 2015

So as not to create a larger problem.

In Maryland we are stuck with a governor who shouldn't be cutting back education funding approved by a bipartisan legislature. He wants to invest in a youth prison in Baltimore. We are stuck with this guy because the Democrats either turned to the dark side or didn't bother to vote because they were less than enthusiastic for Anthony Brown. I was less than enthusiastic and I voted for the man who would be, at least, supporting that which I support.

Bernie Sanders will vote for Hillary if she wins the nomination.

Beacool

(30,518 posts)
55. I will support the Democratic nominee.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:20 PM
May 2015

Whether it's Hillary, Bernie or Mickey Mouse. There's no Democrat in the running who wouldn't be far better than whoever ends up being the Republican nominee.

It's selfish and immature to refuse to vote for the party's nominee just because one's favorite candidate didn't get the nomination. If for nothing more, SCOTUS is of great concern.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
81. Just to be clear, did I say I would refuse to vote for Hillary in the general? n/t
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:57 PM
May 2015
 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
113. Voting for someone to avoid a republican president is different than supporting.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:52 PM
May 2015

I don't know why that's so hard to understand.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
57. If she is the nominee I will support her
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:22 PM
May 2015

But until then, I'm behind Bernie Sanders.

Climate will soon trump the economy as number 1 priority.

George II

(67,782 posts)
63. Interesting that you use two people she had nothing to do with to justify not supporting Clinton.
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:35 PM
May 2015
 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
86. Well, if you know her history then you should know that exactly the type of person she would pick.
Thu May 21, 2015, 01:02 PM
May 2015

Seems like pretty simple logic to me.

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
91. That's part of her history.
Thu May 21, 2015, 01:15 PM
May 2015

My concern is that, based on the rest of her history, she will pick another one from wall street to be her economic adviser. I'm not willing to take that chance.

See. Logic.

colsohlibgal

(5,276 posts)
69. One More Big Problem
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:43 PM
May 2015

Her yes vote on war with Iraq. I've heard talkers who support her say she's handled it brilliantly by saying "I was wrong". Really?

It didn't take a brain surgeon to see that Iraq had zero to do with 9/11. But Hillary went with the herd to approve something unthinkable in the US, a first strike war, all to make Halliburton and others wealthier. It cost her the 2008 nomination but she gets a pass now? I see people who pushed back against that war as true heroes, as they did it in an insane time where unbelievably your patriotism was questioned if you even had any reservations about it. Phil Donahue was one who paid.

I see doing what is right as an important personal trait, way ahead of just going with the flow. That goes long with her being beholden to Wall Street.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
72. These guys were why I couldn't get too enthusiastic about Obama
Thu May 21, 2015, 12:46 PM
May 2015

I still voted for him (twice), but I was never on the bandwagon.

Same will probably be the case with Clinton (as was the case with her husband).

Mike Nelson

(10,943 posts)
97. There are a million reasons not to support the Republican candidate...
Thu May 21, 2015, 02:49 PM
May 2015

...many of them will be poorer. Many will be dead.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
100. That is a mighty powerful argument.
Thu May 21, 2015, 03:59 PM
May 2015

Those two fuckers are evil on such a large scale that it is not even quantifiable in exponential terms.

Response to Dawgs (Original post)

Maven

(10,533 posts)
106. Dawgs IIRC you were a diehard Obama supporter during the '08 primaries.
Thu May 21, 2015, 04:59 PM
May 2015

Last edited Thu May 21, 2015, 06:29 PM - Edit history (1)

At the time, many of us were sounding the alarm about Obama, and pointing out that his populist rhetoric was at odds w/ his actual positions, and the corporatists running his campaign, and the big banks who'd filled his campaign coffers. We were called firebaggers and PUMAs and generally rolled over by starry-eyed O loyalists.

Now you pick two Obama appointees to indict Hillary? Who was also an Obama appointee?

 

Dawgs

(14,755 posts)
114. I was a supporter because he appeared to be anti-war.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:58 PM
May 2015

I knew Hillary voted for war, so I knew I couldn't trust her.

I was fooled by Obama. My vote for him in 2012 was to avoid Romney getting elected.

I still have the same problems now with Hillary as I did in 2008. Just because Obama turned out be be a dud doesn't mean that Hillary would be the opposite.

Dem2

(8,178 posts)
107. I often can't support Republicans for obvious reasons
Thu May 21, 2015, 05:04 PM
May 2015

Usually because they want to shit all over my rights, piss on the poor, make it difficult for Democrats to vote, want to hand money to the rich while simultaneously raising taxes on the poor or force my wife to do things she doesn't want to (to name a few.)

But I've never heard of someone so angry at their own possible candidate that they would claim to not support the candidate because they might possibly appoint one of 2 people they consider unacceptable - this assuming they somehow were lucky enough to be elected President.

Response to Dawgs (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two reasons I could never...