Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:20 PM May 2015

Meet Robby Mook - HRC's ACTUAL campaign manager

He has a winning track record and is the first openly gay person to run a presidential campaign. And he has not worked for MONSANTO. So you can discard the lie in the recent OP that claims a Monsanto lobbyist is running her campaign.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robby_Mook

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meet Robby Mook - HRC's ACTUAL campaign manager (Original Post) MaggieD May 2015 OP
I am shocked, shocked that someone would poast an unfactual story Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #1
She let Mark Penn run her last campaign. Are you really surprised that people believed the story Chakab May 2015 #21
It doesn't work to try and change the subject when another OP uses a title that is 100% false. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #22
I'm just pointing out that her past actions are what gave the story the veneer of credbility. Chakab May 2015 #26
I pointing out the use of false information Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #35
What a LUNTZ-ian turn of phrase... "veneer of credibility!" MADem May 2015 #55
Whaddaya mean? (Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck...!) /sarcasm .... MADem May 2015 #27
You are right on MaggieD May 2015 #34
When Republican use false information or out right lies, we point it out. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #36
Yes, but we don't change the subject entirely--which is how some get out of a tough conversation. nt MADem May 2015 #61
'"Never mind that... LOOK OVER THERE!!! Ooooh!!! OOOOOH!!!!" (point!!! point!!!)' freshwest May 2015 #38
I doubt anyone is surprised people will believe anything that validates their biases. LanternWaste May 2015 #65
Since I first learned of validation bias, I have attempted to check stories Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #67
What? I guess I missed that one. nt sufrommich May 2015 #2
i heard of him. hrmjustin May 2015 #3
The Monsanto lobbyist is running her Round-up Ready Hillary PAC. Nt HooptieWagon May 2015 #4
-------"Jerry Crawford as adviser to her “Ready for Hillary” super PAC"------- NYC_SKP May 2015 #5
He is a fixture in Iowa dem politics MaggieD May 2015 #7
A Monsanto Lobbyist? COOL! cherokeeprogressive May 2015 #8
He's been a much sought after political adviser in Iowa since 1980. sufrommich May 2015 #10
He is essentially a kingmaker there MaggieD May 2015 #12
Unfortunate but true. calimary May 2015 #13
Well, there are those who would gladly say: Purrfessor May 2015 #15
+1 deutsey May 2015 #37
I guess so, in a way, if you want to say that Crawford's work on behalf of Hillary bullwinkle428 May 2015 #19
Good to know your mind accepts bumper stickers. The real stuff can be difficult... LanternWaste May 2015 #66
MaggieD! sheshe2 May 2015 #6
It is good to see a 100% accurate title to a post. Agnosticsherbet May 2015 #9
I thought it might be refreshing MaggieD May 2015 #11
Gettin' so tired of LIES about DEMS on DEMOCRATIC Underground.... Hekate May 2015 #14
A false sense of power. MADem May 2015 #28
Wearing socks, huh? I thought socks were free agents... n/t freshwest May 2015 #39
Around these parts, they are more like leeches.... MADem May 2015 #47
The right hates Hillary. The fringe left hates Hillary... SidDithers May 2015 #43
Thus, 'the unholy alliance' shows itself. Which means they were right after all. But didn't know it. freshwest May 2015 #69
you mean this OP? where it shows that a Monsanto lobbyist is running her campaign? MisterP May 2015 #16
The first one that uses "cultist" loses. That title ya got there is a misnomer but Cha May 2015 #18
You mean the "blog" cite that was ripped off directly from the Moonie WASHINGTON TIMES? MADem May 2015 #48
This whole story stinks of this: sufrommich May 2015 #54
Yes--and so many of them are here, logged in on multiple devices, getting paid. MADem May 2015 #56
Thanks, MaggieD.. someone had to do this! Cha May 2015 #17
Voters don't give a rat's ass about Monsanto... DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #20
And that is sad. PowerToThePeople May 2015 #23
I would assume, then, that you despise the spread of DISINFORMATION--and that's what that MADem May 2015 #51
Hillary has a connection with the carpet manufacturer? leftofcool May 2015 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words May 2015 #24
The better to win! MaggieD May 2015 #25
Here's what the OP you are trying to slam says... Scootaloo May 2015 #29
"Hillary Clinton Hires Former Monsanto Lobbyist to Run Her Campaign" MaggieD May 2015 #30
It's the title of the source article, though Scootaloo May 2015 #40
Here's an idea MaggieD May 2015 #41
Yes or no? Scootaloo May 2015 #42
It's really a great idea.... MaggieD May 2015 #44
Would the dude be running the Nevada campaign, though? Scootaloo May 2015 #45
Emmy Ruiz runs Clinton's Nevada campaign. Here's an actual news sufrommich May 2015 #53
Thank you very much! Scootaloo May 2015 #57
So... Agschmid May 2015 #62
Nope, because maggieD was evading the question. Scootaloo May 2015 #63
The "source article" was a lie sourced from the Moonie Times. MADem May 2015 #60
I think people take issue with the ops headline. hrmjustin May 2015 #31
And here's what the title of that topic says... Lancero May 2015 #32
The Ready For Hillary Super Pac doesn't even exist anymore.nt sufrommich May 2015 #49
Dude fucking ADMITTED he knew the headline was a lie, but posted anyway. OilemFirchen May 2015 #33
Where is the original news source for the "Hillary hires Jerry Crawford for campaign" story? sufrommich May 2015 #46
I've looked myself and the closest I've come to finding anything is WaPo justiceischeap May 2015 #50
MOONIE WASHINGTON TIMES. Not "WaPo" as averred below. MADem May 2015 #58
Mook? Did he ever work for Stephanie Miller? KamaAina May 2015 #59
K&R for the truth! Dr Hobbitstein May 2015 #64
KnR for an honest headline Sheepshank May 2015 #68
 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
21. She let Mark Penn run her last campaign. Are you really surprised that people believed the story
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:09 AM
May 2015

about the lobbyist?

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
22. It doesn't work to try and change the subject when another OP uses a title that is 100% false.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:13 AM
May 2015

Her campaign manager has not worked for Monsanto.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
55. What a LUNTZ-ian turn of phrase... "veneer of credibility!"
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:23 PM
May 2015

Sort of like covering horseshit with maple syrup!



No one here at DU, piling on so anxiously, vetted that story at all--it took me thirty seconds and Google to find the Washington TIMES source. It wasn't like trying to find the source of the Nile!

You'd think people here would be smarter. So many were so easily fooled. Doesn't say much for their judgment.

Always ask that 'cui bono' question when some curious and crazy news item causes your heart to sink or sing. Or as an old guy with dementia once quoted from an old Russian proverb (wisely--but probably because someone else wrote the riff for him) 'Trust but verify.'

MADem

(135,425 posts)
27. Whaddaya mean? (Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck...!) /sarcasm ....
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:28 AM
May 2015

Isn't "never mind that....LOOK OVER THERE!!! Ooooh!!! OOOOOH!!!!" (point!!! point!!!) a hallmark of DU "debate?

Here's how I regard those sorts of things--if people have to resort to lies, innuendos, or wingnut sources--or even worse, the latest one I've noticed--trying to get away with using NO LINK or citation at all--then they're already saying, "Hey, I recognize that I have already lost the debate, I'm just firing for effect, here."

I think the best course of action is to stick to the truth, and the high road. People who can't do that, who have to lie and smear and resort to Newsmax and Drudge and Breitbart for their talking points, why, they're to be pitied. They're going to spend a lot of time shoveling sand against the tide. At the end of the day, they'll still be mired on the beach!

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
34. You are right on
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:09 AM
May 2015

I used to tell my kid when he was growing up - if people feel they have to lie to convince you of something it's a pretty sure bet they don't think the truth will do the job.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
36. When Republican use false information or out right lies, we point it out.
Fri May 22, 2015, 09:45 AM
May 2015

I feel it is important to do the same for those who are on our side, because no confirmation bias reader app has been included with this site.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
61. Yes, but we don't change the subject entirely--which is how some get out of a tough conversation. nt
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:46 PM
May 2015
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
65. I doubt anyone is surprised people will believe anything that validates their biases.
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:21 PM
May 2015

I doubt anyone is surprised people will believe anything that validates their biases...

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
5. -------"Jerry Crawford as adviser to her “Ready for Hillary” super PAC"-------
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:27 PM
May 2015

Mook is manager, Mr. Monsanto is adviser.


Hillary's Pick for Her Political Fixer in Iowa Is a Classic Illustration of America's Political Corporate Insider Problem
Monsanto-linked Jerry Crawford doesn't inspire much hope.
By Zaid Jilani / AlterNet
March 9, 2015

Monsanto's Man In Iowa

Before joining Clinton's campaign in 2008, Crawford served in a variety of high-profile political roles. In addition to a variety of local positions, he served as the Iowa chair for the presidential campaigns of Mike Dukakis, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry—each one the more conservative candidates in their Democratic presidential primaries.

So it was a natural fit for Crawford to sign up for the Hillary campaign. But after Clinton's 2008 loss, Crawford spent his days at Crawford Muaro, his law and lobbying firm. While there, he represented a variety of corporate clients, including Kraft and Altria (the parent company of Philip Morris USA). He also served as a lawyer for Jack DeCoster, a factory farm tycoon who infamously supplied eggs that led to a salmonella outbreak. His most prominent client, however, was Monsanto.

Monsanto, the agricultural and biotechnology corporation founded in Missouri, is known worldwide for its abuses against the environment and practices designed to crush farm competition. Iowa is a farming state, with agriculture making up a large share of its total economy.

The 2010 Agriculture Secretary election was particularly important for Monsanto; as one Iowa blogger noted, it holds “patents on most of the corn and soybeans grown in Iowa.” The company was also the subject of an antitrust investigation. The Democratic nominee for the spot, Francis Thicke, was a critic of Monsanto and a backer of antitrust actions against the big agricultural companies. Thus it wasn't long before Monsanto took aim at Thicke, allying itself to the Republican nominee and incumbent, Bill Northey.

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/hillarys-pick-her-political-fixer-iowa-classic-illustration-americas-political




 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
7. He is a fixture in Iowa dem politics
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:47 PM
May 2015

He has worked for Dukakis, Bill, Gore, Kerry, Hillary, The Democratic Gov Committee, The Iowa Dem party, and many more. http://www.crawfordlawfirm.com/attorneys/view.cfm?id=20

Are all those people evil too?

He has also worked as a lawyer/lobbyist for Monsanto. That still does make any of the above evil.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
10. He's been a much sought after political adviser in Iowa since 1980.
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:53 PM
May 2015

There isn't a democratic campaign that hasn't tried to sign him on before the primaries in Iowa.He's got a reputation for delivering the votes,I'm sure the Clinton campaign is happy to have him as would anyone serious about winning in Iowa.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
12. He is essentially a kingmaker there
Thu May 21, 2015, 09:59 PM
May 2015

I don't think people realize that if we want to win we can't pretend we live in puretopia.

calimary

(81,179 posts)
13. Unfortunate but true.
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:13 PM
May 2015

If we want to win, and we want to keep the GOP's grubby paws OFF the Supreme Court. It HAS to be a Dem. Even if you have to hold your nose and vote for Hillary. Would you rather have jeb bush in there (with his little pal wolfowitz in his back pocket)?

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
19. I guess so, in a way, if you want to say that Crawford's work on behalf of Hillary
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:49 PM
May 2015

in 2008 made Barack Obama "King" of Iowa in that year's caucuses!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
66. Good to know your mind accepts bumper stickers. The real stuff can be difficult...
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:23 PM
May 2015

Good to know your mind accepts bumper stickers. The real stuff can be difficult...

Hekate

(90,616 posts)
14. Gettin' so tired of LIES about DEMS on DEMOCRATIC Underground....
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:15 PM
May 2015

What the bleep do they get out of it?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. Around these parts, they are more like leeches....
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:04 PM
May 2015

Sucking the life and vibrancy out of the site.

I wonder, sometimes, if the admins have gotten a better gig somewhere, and they've abandoned us?

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
43. The right hates Hillary. The fringe left hates Hillary...
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:23 PM
May 2015

and neither minds lying about her to bash her.

Sid

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
69. Thus, 'the unholy alliance' shows itself. Which means they were right after all. But didn't know it.
Sat May 23, 2015, 08:40 AM
May 2015

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
16. you mean this OP? where it shows that a Monsanto lobbyist is running her campaign?
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:30 PM
May 2015

and how her cultists look like sad remoras trying to deny it? because they're so empty someone who doesn't care about them in the slightest is running?

http://www.nationofchange.org/2015/04/26/hillary-clinton-hires-former-monsanto-lobbyist-to-run-her-campaign/

Cha

(297,029 posts)
18. The first one that uses "cultist" loses. That title ya got there is a misnomer but
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:39 PM
May 2015

don't let that stop the "sad remoras" from pushing it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. You mean the "blog" cite that was ripped off directly from the Moonie WASHINGTON TIMES?
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:06 PM
May 2015

And was posted here without ANY vetting or SHAME?

You mean THAT OP?

Why not let us know how NEWSMAX and BREITBART feel about things, hmmmm?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
56. Yes--and so many of them are here, logged in on multiple devices, getting paid.
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:27 PM
May 2015

Those swarms are not your imagination.

You don't have to be an expert in pattern recognition to be able to spot it. It has potential to ruin the bottom line for the owners here if they don't check it.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
20. Voters don't give a rat's ass about Monsanto...
Thu May 21, 2015, 11:52 PM
May 2015

If I asked the next 100 people about Hillary and a Monsanto connection either they wouldn't know what Monsanto does or they would say Hillary has a connection with the carpet manufacturer.


 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
23. And that is sad.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:16 AM
May 2015
No one more sincerely wishes the spread of information among mankind than I do, and none has greater confidence in it’s effect towards supporting free & good government.

Thomas Jefferson.


Luckily we do not have to fear having a "free & good government" anytime soon.



MADem

(135,425 posts)
51. I would assume, then, that you despise the spread of DISINFORMATION--and that's what that
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:16 PM
May 2015

honking "Hillary's new campaign manager is from Monsanto" lie is. It's the whole reason for this thread, which pushes back against a Big Lie that was being spread in order to discredit and vilify. It took an anonymous blog post and presented it as gospel. The source of the blog post, because Google is Our Friend, was a piece of shit published--where else?--in the Rev. Sun Myung Moon wingnut TIMES.

Smearing and propagandizing don't end well when they happen in a small community like DU. It's best to stick to the simple truth.

I think we would have a better government if everyone did that in all levels of public life --of course, we probably wouldn't have a GOP majority in the House or Senate in that case....

Response to MaggieD (Original post)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
29. Here's what the OP you are trying to slam says...
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:11 AM
May 2015
Hillary Clinton recently announced that she will be appointing long-time Monsanto lobbyist Jerry Crawford as adviser to her “Ready for Hillary” super PAC.

Crawford has mostly worked with Democratic politicians in the past, but has also put his support behind Republican candidates as well. Anyone who was willing to support Monsanto’s goals would receive support from Crawford.
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
30. "Hillary Clinton Hires Former Monsanto Lobbyist to Run Her Campaign"
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:15 AM
May 2015

That's the subject header. And it's bullshit.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
40. It's the title of the source article, though
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:15 PM
May 2015

And wouldn't this guy be running her campaign in Nevada? Honest question there, I'm not 100% sure on how it works, there.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
44. It's really a great idea....
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:26 PM
May 2015

Don't post OPs from a source starts out with a blatantly false title.

Simple idea. Hope it catches on.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
45. Would the dude be running the Nevada campaign, though?
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:39 PM
May 2015

The more you evade, the more obvious the answer is, of course.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
62. So...
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:48 PM
May 2015

You going to go back and delete the post about evasion, especially when you could have googled that information?

Oh DU...

MADem

(135,425 posts)
60. The "source article" was a lie sourced from the Moonie Times.
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:43 PM
May 2015

And it wasn't an article--it was a blog post.

A woman is running her campaign in Nevada, so no, he wouldn't be.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
32. And here's what the title of that topic says...
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:35 AM
May 2015

"Hillary Clinton Hires Former Monsanto Lobbyist to Run Her Campaign"

Figured I'd point that out since you missed it the first time.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
33. Dude fucking ADMITTED he knew the headline was a lie, but posted anyway.
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:58 AM
May 2015

Truly despicable. Entirely predictable.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
46. Where is the original news source for the "Hillary hires Jerry Crawford for campaign" story?
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:59 PM
May 2015

I've looked and if there's a real source for the story I haven't found it.In fact the only "sources" for this story that I can find are on anti GMO blogs and right wing blogs.
He's a regular fixture in Iowa democratic primaries and has been for decades,he started the Ready For Hillary PAC and will put his weight behind her in Iowa,but where is the info on when he was hired and what his job description is in the actual campaign?

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
50. I've looked myself and the closest I've come to finding anything is WaPo
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:12 PM
May 2015

It's really just a bio on him: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/hillary-clintons-iowa-horse-whisperer-jerry-crawford-aims-for-caucus-kentucky-derby/2015/03/02/9c93b638-be23-11e4-bdfa-b8e8f594e6ee_story.html

Here's the most interesting part of the article (I think--emphasis mine):

A lawyer with white hair mowed like a golf-course fairway, Crawford is something of a kingmaker back home in Des Moines. He has shepherded every Democratic presidential nominee in the most important caucus state going back to 1980 — every nominee except for one, that is. Crawford, 65, still blames himself for Clinton’s 2008 third-place finish in the Hawkeye State, from which her campaign never really recovered. He vows that 2016 will be his year to make it right for her. “I’m trying to make amends,” he said.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
58. MOONIE WASHINGTON TIMES. Not "WaPo" as averred below.
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:34 PM
May 2015

The big lede is buried in this load of shit (warning--they blast the morons who can't read with VIDEO from officious - sounding, Fauxlike "reporters"--dumbed-down "noose" on steroids): http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/17/hillary-clinton-gmo-support-monsanto-ties-spark-ba/?page=all

You can also read there that she hired an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT, too!!!! Oooooh! And that "librul wimmins" HATE her now and love Bernie instead....because....errrr BENGHAZI!!!!!! That's if you want to stick around the site and have the stench clinging to you!

The people posting this shit should be real proud of themselves.... not.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
64. K&R for the truth!
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:19 PM
May 2015

Why some on this site have to resort to lies about one candidate to prop up their own is beyond me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meet Robby Mook - HRC's A...