Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:30 PM May 2015

Can I just say without being called a troll or people saying I'm coming to Duggar's defense...

Last edited Fri May 22, 2015, 01:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Aren't Juvenile records suppose to be sealed?


I mean if it wasn't the fact he went after his sister --incest---my brother and his girlfriend fondled one another at that age.


One also has to wondered who abused him...Generally isn't this learned behavior?




I am sorry I didn't have all the information. My knowledge was what I heard/read yesterday. he was 14 and the girls around his age. I had no clue of the 4/5 year old victim OR the repeat abuse of that victim. I admit I am dumb.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can I just say without being called a troll or people saying I'm coming to Duggar's defense... (Original Post) diabeticman May 2015 OP
yous trollin aikoaiko May 2015 #1
Yep! Tom Ripley May 2015 #5
I don't know enough about it to be sure, but in another thread someone pointed out that Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #2
5 years old?! Now that is sick BUT the report I saw was that the girls and Josh were around his age diabeticman May 2015 #3
The girls were 12, 11, 10, 8 and 5 years old. This wasn't just some "doctor game" riderinthestorm May 2015 #8
He was 14. The youngest victim was 4. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #4
See today is the first I'm hearing about a 4 or 5 year old victim. diabeticman May 2015 #12
Now that you mention it, I'm not sure how this story got out in the first place n/t arcane1 May 2015 #6
This is purely a guess on my part. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #10
Apparently there was a FOIA request made. The evidence found in the book haikugal May 2015 #18
There is a difference in a boy and girlfriend fondling at fourteen and a fourteen fondling younger Thinkingabout May 2015 #7
I agree on that. But some of the reports I saw yesterday said it was girls around his age not a 4 diabeticman May 2015 #9
The next daughter was 2 years younger making her 12, it was wrong. I do not ever buy the argument Thinkingabout May 2015 #17
I guess I'll be the first here to answer your actual question, diabeticman: NYC_SKP May 2015 #11
In 2002, he was 14. In 2006, he was 18. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #13
I was kind of shocked to learn that the statute of limitations had run out on some of this. NYC_SKP May 2015 #15
I don't follow them either, but I was able to gather this from the police report. ScreamingMeemie May 2015 #16
my wife friend just e-mailed her saying she figured out which sister it was. diabeticman May 2015 #23
Thanksand I am sorry I didn't know all facts. Going after a 4 or 5 year old... just sick. diabeticman May 2015 #14
The kid was a sick little shit. MineralMan May 2015 #19
Incest is no excuse for sexual abuse of a child. In_The_Wind May 2015 #20
I'm going to take a wild guess here...I'd bet that letter was put there on purpose by one of the libdem4life May 2015 #21
I read somewhere the letter was written by a parent or friend of the molested child who polly7 May 2015 #22
Actually, that would make more sense. Again, a victim of family incest is almost never libdem4life May 2015 #24

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but in another thread someone pointed out that
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:33 PM
May 2015

at the time he was 12 or so, and at least one of the girls was around 5.

If that's true, that's a darn site different than your brother and his girlfriend 'fondling one another'.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
3. 5 years old?! Now that is sick BUT the report I saw was that the girls and Josh were around his age
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:37 PM
May 2015

That is a whole different matter. 5 years old....

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
8. The girls were 12, 11, 10, 8 and 5 years old. This wasn't just some "doctor game"
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:41 PM
May 2015

he was actively sexually assaulting them.

As for how this came out, I've heard (but don't have a source for this), that a book was loaned out to someone outside the family that had incriminating notes in it.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
10. This is purely a guess on my part.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:45 PM
May 2015

19 kids is a lot of kids. Not all of them are going to want to tow that "morally superior" line. A letter was left in a book at the church about it and was found by another churchgoer. Those accusations were later forwarded to Harpo Productions who in turn, contacted authorities...

An investigation began and was ended because the statute of limitations had expired.

My (purely) imagination has me thinking it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to think about a very young girl being extremely angry over what happened to her and the fact that no steps were taken to punish the offender.

Again, that's just my thoughts/guess.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
18. Apparently there was a FOIA request made. The evidence found in the book
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:58 PM
May 2015

(Where the letter was found) was faxed to Oprah before a scheduled appearance by the Duggars and they sent it to the authorities and there was an investigation. It seems this took place in 2007 so the TLC knew about this for years and kept this disgusting, abusive family of Christian cult members on the air.

From what I've read (take it for what it's worth..) the file wasn't identified as "sealed" so the information was released to the paper that made the request.

The valued police officer who gave Josh a " stern talking to" was later convicted for child porn and is serving a long sentence in prison. I wonder if that guy abused Josh? Who knows but this is typical of religious fanatics who's world view is so f'd up.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
7. There is a difference in a boy and girlfriend fondling at fourteen and a fourteen fondling younger
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:40 PM
May 2015

sisters. He should be a protector rather than an abuser.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
9. I agree on that. But some of the reports I saw yesterday said it was girls around his age not a 4
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:45 PM
May 2015

or 5 year old.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
17. The next daughter was 2 years younger making her 12, it was wrong. I do not ever buy the argument
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:57 PM
May 2015

"well she wanted it", and I was abused so therefore I abused. The statue of limitations may have run out legally, I am not sure the incidents is forgotten by the victims.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
11. I guess I'll be the first here to answer your actual question, diabeticman:
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:45 PM
May 2015

My understanding is that juvenile records are meant to be sealed, and I would expect this to be true, especially, when there is no conviction.

One caveat is that laws will vary from state to state, so one can't be sure without a little research.

Children are arrested and jailed regularly for all sorts of things, their names are not published but they are recorded, naturally.

How this case fits into all this, I'm not sure.



ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
13. In 2002, he was 14. In 2006, he was 18.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:50 PM
May 2015

I am guessing that is why the record wasn't sealed. I will also note here that a victim went before the court yesterday as a "Jane Doe" (because she's still a minor) to ask that the records be destroyed.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
15. I was kind of shocked to learn that the statute of limitations had run out on some of this.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:54 PM
May 2015

I don't follow them, overpopulation makes me ill.

None of this surprises me and how fucked up that they're celebrated on TV.

Damn.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
16. I don't follow them either, but I was able to gather this from the police report.
Fri May 22, 2015, 12:56 PM
May 2015

We are a sick society.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
19. The kid was a sick little shit.
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:00 PM
May 2015

Multiple incidents are a pattern. It's an ugly pattern, too. I wouldn't trust him as an adult, either, around young girls. Not for 30 seconds alone.

When a pattern of abuse is clear, there were no doubt other incidents. Does the pattern continue? I have no idea, but there is no defense possible. 14 year olds know they're not supposed to sexually molest their sisters.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
21. I'm going to take a wild guess here...I'd bet that letter was put there on purpose by one of the
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:09 PM
May 2015

victims, because she surely could not go to the police or even DHS. No one would have believed any of them. Talk about leading double and triple lives...home in denial, church in denial, family income and in Public...All is Just Fine.

I wonder what will happen to The Family internally now it's all in the open? In a way, that's the sister's worst nightmare. He'll carry on like any patriarch. Maybe getting a job with a family values Resume a bit tough, but there are always some...

polly7

(20,582 posts)
22. I read somewhere the letter was written by a parent or friend of the molested child who
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:12 PM
May 2015

wasn't a Duggar, but that may or may not be correct.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
24. Actually, that would make more sense. Again, a victim of family incest is almost never
Fri May 22, 2015, 01:24 PM
May 2015

believed without someone outside the family to corroborate it...usually a psychologist/psychiatrist, social worker or someone in an official capacity.

DHS and the Police triy to stay out of family abuse as much as possible. The psychological community are usually loathe to report it, even if they believe the victim, as it requires getting on the stand, can take lots of time, time is their income and the likelihood of conviction ranks on the scale lower than a police officer's conviction for killing a black male. (Edit...without a video or camera footage). Society does not want to hear about and because there is nothing to do...it's almost always multi-generational. As someone said up thread, it's learned behavior...both the molesting and the denial.

It was a very smart thing to do, whoever did it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can I just say without be...