Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJeb Bush Needs More Evidence for Climate Change Action Than He Does to Start a War
Jeb Bush Needs More Evidence for Climate Change Action Than He Does to Start a WarBy Rebecca Leber at the New Republic
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121892/jeb-bush-needs-more-evidence-climate-change-less-iraq-war
"SNIP..............
Former Florida governor and likely presidential candidate Jeb Bush had a lot to say about climate change this week, putting to rest prior speculation that he might take a more reasonable position on the issue than his Republican opponents. At a campaign event in New Hampshire on Wednesday, Bush said, I dont think the science is clear of what percentage is man-made and what percentage is natural. Its convoluted. Though he said the climate is changing, Bush isn't convinced that mankind has contributed or that we have a mandate to do something about it. For the people to say the science is decided on this is really arrogant, to be honest with you, he continued. Its this intellectual arrogance that now you cant have a conversation about it, even.
On foreign policy, however, Bush needs much less certainty. The bar is so low, in fact, that he's said he would still have invaded Iraq, even knowing what we do today about the bad intelligence. I would have, he told Fox News earlier this month. And so would have almost everybody that was confronted with the intelligence they got. As with climate change, it's hard to pin down exactly how Bush views the Iraq War, and he's tied himself into knots trying to explain it, later backtracking with, I would have not gone into Iraq.
Under George W. Bush's administration, the White House subscribed to the hawkish war philosophy known as the One Percent Doctrine, which got its name from former Vice President Dick Cheney's post-9/11 strategy and which was codified in a book of the same name. If there was even a 1 percent chance of terrorists getting a weapon of mass destructionand there has been a small probability of such an occurrence for some timethe United States must now act as if it were a certainty, the author, Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind wrote. Cheney insisted that our response was more important than our analysis. The administration presented its severely flawed intelligence as a certainty, in order to convince the public that Iraq had nuclear, chemical, and biological capabilities.
The Bush administration's troubling approach to foreign policy isnt a perfect parallel to the case for climate change action, because the certainty is much higher than 1 percent97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists say that humans are responsible for our changing climate. Still, it exposes the fallacies in Bush's argument that the U.S. should wait to act on global climate change until the science is more sure. Not only is perfect certainty a stupidly high bar to set for climate action, but it's irresponsible to insist on perfect knowledge. Climate scientists are still improving their models to forecast the precise effects of warming the planet 4 degrees Fahrenheit and higher, but they agree on this: The longer the world waits to act, the more it risks and the more catastrophic the consequences become. If we waited another few decades to do something while Republicans like Bush misrepresent reality, the damage will already be done. It will be too late.
..............SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 688 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb Bush Needs More Evidence for Climate Change Action Than He Does to Start a War (Original Post)
applegrove
May 2015
OP
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)1. I read that the other day
My first thought was damn good point. My second thought was typical rethuglican moron.
Gothmog
(145,086 posts)2. Jeb is an idiot and I am beginning to think that he will not be the GOP nominee
applegrove
(118,600 posts)3. He is such an idiot that I am beginning to think he might
just win the nomination. Only real idiots get the base' support.
Gothmog
(145,086 posts)4. Jeb has a great deal of baggage and the base does not like him
Normally Jeb will be the nominee due to the support of the GOP donor class but this could be a different year. Jeb is not helping his case with his blunders