Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,630 posts)
Sun May 24, 2015, 08:31 AM May 2015

Affordable Care Act rule on tracking of workers' coverage is costing employers time, money


http://www.livewellnebraska.com/obamacare/affordable-care-act-rule-on-tracking-of-workers-coverage-is/article_db80785f-30b6-50fc-a1a3-6400e4087ac9.html

Posted: Sunday, May 24, 2015 12:00 am
By Steve Jordon / World-Herald staff writer

Midlands employers, like their counterparts nationwide, are finding ways to meet a new federal rule that requires them to track each employee’s monthly health insurance status for a new tax document.

The information goes into Form 1095, and if your employer has 50 or more workers, most likely you’ll be getting one by Jan. 31, thanks to the Affordable Care Act.

Employers already have the information, including whether you buy insurance and how much of your paycheck goes for coverage. But there are time and expense involved in compiling the information into the forms the government requires.

How much time and expense?

FULL story at link.



Page 1



Page 2
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Affordable Care Act rule on tracking of workers' coverage is costing employers time, money (Original Post) Omaha Steve May 2015 OP
They spend money to deduce the intention of my orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #1
Three words: Medicare for all. merrily May 2015 #2
My guess SickOfTheOnePct May 2015 #3
As a payroll/benefits admin, Freddie May 2015 #4
Yep SickOfTheOnePct May 2015 #5
 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
1. They spend money to deduce the intention of my
Sun May 24, 2015, 08:37 AM
May 2015

every phone conversation, seems like they could deduce, my income .

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
3. My guess
Sun May 24, 2015, 08:44 AM
May 2015

is that larger companies will outsource the reporting requirement and smaller companies will hire someone part time or full time to take it on.

As an IT professional, my first thought is how much of this is already held in various files? Find out where it's kept, and create or obtain a program that pulls it out and compiles it into the correct format for reporting.

Freddie

(9,265 posts)
4. As a payroll/benefits admin,
Sun May 24, 2015, 10:52 AM
May 2015

We already have this info available, it's not that hard to compile. Right now the hardest thing is getting the SS#s of every dependent, since until fairly recently our insurance carrier only needed the subscribers info. So far no one has given me a hard time about it.
My boss whines about "all the hard work" these requirements are (I'm the one doing the work, natch) but if I tell her it's really no biggie, she'll suspect where my political sympathies are, and I'd rather not discuss that with her.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
5. Yep
Sun May 24, 2015, 11:02 AM
May 2015

In my previous job, we had to provide dependents' SSN in order to continue their coverage, but I can see where it might be a new thing to many companies.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Affordable Care Act rule ...