Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Tue May 26, 2015, 01:43 AM May 2015

NAFTA, TPP, Detroit... Shame On Us All...


Michigan Central Station - Detroit's main train station, opened in 1913, has not been used since 1988.


William Livingstone House - Constructed in 1893 in the once elegant Brush Park neighborhood, this home, designed by architect Albert Kahn, was moved from its original location several years ago by preservationists who hoped to maintain it. It was demolished last year.


St. Margaret Mary School - Many of the city's Catholic schools have been closed, though the churches they are affiliated with remain active.

David Broderick Tower - One of the city's most prominent skyscrapers, this 35-story tower once housed the offices of many doctors, lawyers and dentists. It has been virtually empty since the 1980s. Developers hope to convert the building to residential units by 2010.

More: http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1882089_1850973,00.html



That's TWO major cities WE have abandoned (so far)... hope you don't live in the next one.



Plus...

Upon visiting Detroit today it can be difficult to imagine it was once the wealthiest city in America. Once the fourth largest city in the country, with a population of two million, Detroit is now nothing more than the poster-child for America’s deteriorating economy. Its streets are lined with vacant houses and rows upon rows of dilapidated structures: old apartments and long-abandoned factories and warehouses. In fact, about a third of all Detroit has now been abandoned, and the population of two million has plummeted to a mere 714,000.



Detroit’s alarming decline can be attributed to the crippling effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the flood of foreign-made cars into the United States. Under NAFTA, manufacturing in America has all but been eliminated. In order to compete, Detroit’s automotive companies were forced to lower costs by outsourcing their operations to Mexico. Essentially, NAFTA made manufacturing cars in the U.S. too expensive. As a result, Detroit factories closed down and jobs were lost. The hard-won wealth of Detroit disappeared to make room for “free trade.”


Link: http://economyincrisis.org/content/how-free-trade-agreements-crippled-detroit




95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NAFTA, TPP, Detroit... Shame On Us All... (Original Post) WillyT May 2015 OP
That is sad. Too bad our big, gas guzzling cars couldn't compete with foreign cars beginning long Hoyt May 2015 #1
Real people live here, asshole. nt Romulox May 2015 #3
Yes they do, and many made good money producing gas guzzling, poorly designed Hoyt May 2015 #6
Our government picks the winners and losers. Our banks are utter failures, bailed out by regular Romulox May 2015 #7
No I'm not willing to protect them or corporations who don't act in the world's best interests, Hoyt May 2015 #9
And yet here we are, and that is EXACTLY what happened. So what *are* you defending? nt Romulox May 2015 #11
Wait, you're the one who was rah-rah-rah-ing TPP's patent protections extending to 3rd world.. X_Digger May 2015 #79
Fortunately, drug companies don't charge first-world prices in poor countries. Check it out Hoyt May 2015 #80
It was the auto executives who failed, not the autoworkers. Ken Burch May 2015 #13
Woody Guthrie cared about workers worldwide, listen to Deportee. Hoyt May 2015 #14
I'm for workers worldwide, too(none of whom ever win in these trade deals). Ken Burch May 2015 #15
Management or not, it's a fact. I do not remember unions putting anything on the table Hoyt May 2015 #17
Yet, you went straight to a huge management decision as the cause for Detroit's woes. merrily May 2015 #24
Whoever is to blame, our crummy, noncompetitive cars were the problem. Hoyt May 2015 #32
which were only being made DonCoquixote May 2015 #78
Customers not interested in them MichMan May 2015 #82
Funny, the smaller cars do seem to sell DonCoquixote May 2015 #83
Laid off one entire shift MichMan May 2015 #92
No, not surprising in the least LondonReign2 May 2015 #43
You're Wrong... The Toyota Celica Started Beating Detroit In The 80's.. But... WillyT May 2015 #4
I'm not willing to protect our auto companies of the 60/70s that produced gas guzzling cars. Hoyt May 2015 #5
Datsun 510s arrived here in 1968 . . . ucrdem May 2015 #8
Exactly. Back then, progressives shunned Detroit's gas, guzzling chromed monstrosities. Hoyt May 2015 #10
Yep. There's plenty of blame for what happened to Detroit but NAFTA is the wrong target. nt ucrdem May 2015 #12
Ah, so the energy/environmentally prudent left is to blame for Detroit. LMAO at the merrily May 2015 #25
Who said that. The big, clumsy, gas guzzling, noncompetitive cars were the problem. Hoyt May 2015 #34
The poster is making the exact opposite arguement you are claiming. NCTraveler May 2015 #90
I think he's tried to smear a few groups with blame for the demise of Detroit, but merrily May 2015 #91
Hmm that's not what I remember gollygee May 2015 #40
So far you've managed to blame unions and progressives for the fall of Detroit LondonReign2 May 2015 #45
Did you live back in the 60/70s? If so, what cars were the "lefties" driving? Hoyt May 2015 #46
Oooooo, "lefties" in quotes. The trifecta! LondonReign2 May 2015 #50
I was one of them. Are you trying to be obtuse? Hoyt May 2015 #51
Over the years I've merely realized that it is useless to argue with Republicans LondonReign2 May 2015 #55
I'd agree with that, but would add obtuse people on either side. Hoyt May 2015 #60
Vans were real popular. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #63
VW vans, especially. Good times. Hoyt May 2015 #65
That's because they ran on bong water. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #66
LOL, many of us did. Hoyt May 2015 #67
Nope, I've blamed auto companies, Nationalists, Protectionists, anyone who thought the gravy Hoyt May 2015 #49
The people who were responsible for putting gas guzzling, planned obsolescing cars on the market are merrily May 2015 #18
Those photos are mostly related to well-heeled folks. Hoyt May 2015 #35
They did this to Detroit on purpose. This was the fucking Arsenal of Democracy, and they trashed it. Romulox May 2015 #2
That's a logical conclusion from "let Detroit go bankrupt" but don't forget the corollary ucrdem May 2015 #16
No. By the time it go to the "Let Detroit go bankrupt" stage, the damage was done. merrily May 2015 #19
A lot was yes but I was commenting on the intentionality. ucrdem May 2015 #20
No, you were just doing you usual bit. merrily May 2015 #22
Saved the auto industry but too late to save the city. There is a difference. jwirr May 2015 #74
Go to Google Earth. Pick random spots in Detroit.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #21
Detroit was once a shining example of union strength creating a middle class and merrily May 2015 #23
They tried the same thing, at about the same time, in Cleveland. Fuddnik May 2015 #26
It's the same thing all over the planet.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #27
He used a light bulb in his campaign for congress. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #64
+1 gollygee May 2015 #29
Much worse than other cities. MichMan May 2015 #58
amen from a Detroiter n/t Quayblue May 2015 #84
A lot of other factors were responsible MichMan May 2015 #28
I'm not going to alert on this gollygee May 2015 #30
I am from metro Detroit and I hear the whistles loud and clear etherealtruth May 2015 #31
You just described present-day Chicago and its still standing. RiverLover May 2015 #33
The permanent war economy is a legacy that TPP seems intended to repair. ucrdem May 2015 #38
Maybe not, but its making fracking's natural gas a key component. RiverLover May 2015 #39
Okay but apparently the treaty itself doesn't say anything about fracking, just LNG, ucrdem May 2015 #42
Everything about it is "could" because it isn't in place yet. And logically, with reduced tariffs, RiverLover May 2015 #44
Sure but there are as many POTENTIAL bad effects as the imagination will allow ucrdem May 2015 #47
How is the TPP going to replace "the permanent war economy"? neverforget May 2015 #56
by incentivizing growth in other sectors. ucrdem May 2015 #59
That document says a lot of things but if you think that the TPP is suddenly going neverforget May 2015 #62
Auto supplier jobs now in suburbs MichMan May 2015 #61
The vast majority of mom-and-pop machine shops and the like have closed in Metro Detroit Romulox May 2015 #69
Tariffs on imports from Mexico averaged 4% before NAFTA. pampango May 2015 #36
NAFTA seems to have improved employment in Detroit ucrdem May 2015 #37
The steep, downhill trajectory? That's not "improvement". nt Romulox May 2015 #71
NAFTA is one cause of many. Detroit has seen a *precipitous* decline since its passage. Romulox May 2015 #70
Unfortunately since long before its passage. From 250,000 in the mid-70's to 150,000 in early 90's. pampango May 2015 #75
Nonsense. It saw a precipitous decline AFTER its passage. Your cite stats to prove it. nt Romulox May 2015 #93
The drop from 250,000 to 150,000 BEFORE its passage was not a "precipitous decline"? pampango May 2015 #95
NAFTA had nothing to do with the fall of the Detroit auto industry. sufrommich May 2015 #41
First company I worked for sent its PC board mfg to Mexico BuelahWitch May 2015 #87
An interesting article: fredamae May 2015 #48
kick samsingh May 2015 #52
"NAFTA made manufacturing cars in the U.S. too expensive." hack89 May 2015 #53
In non-union "Right to Work" states, every one. Race to the bottom! nt Romulox May 2015 #68
I know. But it has nothing to do with NAFTA. nt hack89 May 2015 #73
Wrong again. It's of a piece. The constituent suppliers for cheap labor southern industry Romulox May 2015 #94
Silicon Valley will be next FreakinDJ May 2015 #54
It's going to be sweet to see. In my lifetime, I guarantee it. nt Romulox May 2015 #72
Doubtful. KamaAina May 2015 #77
K & R AzDar May 2015 #57
More to come . orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #76
I proudly bought a Cadillac recently, made in the good 'ole USA. My first American car beaglelover May 2015 #81
That's the Cadillac Division that moved out of Detroit? JustABozoOnThisBus May 2015 #85
Only a few hundred employees....the cars are still built there.... beaglelover May 2015 #88
I bear no shame for this. PeteSelman May 2015 #86
Train wreck of a local government. NCTraveler May 2015 #89
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. That is sad. Too bad our big, gas guzzling cars couldn't compete with foreign cars beginning long
Tue May 26, 2015, 01:48 AM
May 2015

before NAFTA.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Yes they do, and many made good money producing gas guzzling, poorly designed
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:10 AM
May 2015

cars. Are we supposed to protect them by isolating ourselves from the world?

As to "asshole," tell it to the people who failed Detroit, the USA, and the world.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
7. Our government picks the winners and losers. Our banks are utter failures, bailed out by regular
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:15 AM
May 2015

working people. You were more than willing to protect them, and isolate them from failure and international competition.

So your laissez-faire bullshit falls flat. It's just not borne out by the facts. No. Just as sure as our policies saved the banks from their own idiocy and greed, our policies sacrificed the entire industrial midwest at the alter of "free trade". It destroyed vast swaths of the country and the people who live there.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. No I'm not willing to protect them or corporations who don't act in the world's best interests,
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:21 AM
May 2015

like our auto companies of the 60/70s that produced gas guzzling, polluting, and generally crummy cars for American consumers who demanded bigger, gas guzzling cars.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
11. And yet here we are, and that is EXACTLY what happened. So what *are* you defending? nt
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:25 AM
May 2015

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
79. Wait, you're the one who was rah-rah-rah-ing TPP's patent protections extending to 3rd world..
Tue May 26, 2015, 11:33 PM
May 2015

.. drug producers, denying life-saving drugs to poor brown people who can't afford first-world prices.

Make up your mind- you can't have your cake and eat it too.

"world's best interests" my ass.

Typical.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
80. Fortunately, drug companies don't charge first-world prices in poor countries. Check it out
Tue May 26, 2015, 11:38 PM
May 2015

like you would research a new gun.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
13. It was the auto executives who failed, not the autoworkers.
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:33 AM
May 2015

The UAW called on the Big Three to switch to making the kind of cars Japan and Germany were making, but ther Big Three refused to stop churning out gas-guzzlers.

The autoworkers themselves were blameless.

And Woody Guthrie would probably punch your lights out (and write a killer song about it) for dissing workers.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
14. Woody Guthrie cared about workers worldwide, listen to Deportee.
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:39 AM
May 2015

I'm not dissing workers by saying auto companies couldn't compete, that's a fact. Execs -- and unions -- were fine with the gas guzzlers and crummy cars as long ad they were lining their pockets. Nobody wanted to kill the goose . . . . . . until it was too late. That's a shame.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
15. I'm for workers worldwide, too(none of whom ever win in these trade deals).
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:42 AM
May 2015

But it wasn't the UAW resisting redesign in the early Seventies. Douglas Fraser was fighting for it. It was management who refused to listen.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
17. Management or not, it's a fact. I do not remember unions putting anything on the table
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:50 AM
May 2015

early enough to do any good. But, I will read any links or comments.

Management was clearly shortsighted. But I don't remember unions saying this has to change right now, either.

It does seem Fraser tried to help, but probably too late by then.

It really us sad what had happened to Detroit, New Orleans, and lots if other places. But, isolation and protectionism, would at best have been a delaying tactic.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
24. Yet, you went straight to a huge management decision as the cause for Detroit's woes.
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:42 AM
May 2015

Now, you're backpedaling in a misguided effort to make sure unions/labor get blamed for Detroit's failures.

News flash, management may have to negotiate with unions about wages and the like. They don't have to negotiate with them about product design, nor is product design an area in which union leaders are supposed to have expertise. Your trying to blame unions or labor for car design is certainly laughable and transparent, though not surprising.

DonCoquixote

(13,961 posts)
78. which were only being made
Tue May 26, 2015, 11:24 PM
May 2015

on the orders of the same rich idiots that wrecked the whole eocnomy, despite the fact that the unions wanted to make better cars.

Proof: the 40 mpg cars that now keep ford and chevy alive were only made once Obama, in a rare good act of socialism, had GM taken over by the government. Now that they are free, they want to build SUVS and trucks again.

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
82. Customers not interested in them
Wed May 27, 2015, 12:37 AM
May 2015

Short sighted or not, the sales of Hybrids and electrics has plummeted while full size truck sales are surging. The big 3 automakers are in the business to sell cars which ultimately provide good paying union jobs.

DonCoquixote

(13,961 posts)
83. Funny, the smaller cars do seem to sell
Wed May 27, 2015, 08:22 AM
May 2015

You can ask Ford why the Focuses are flying out the door. You can ask Fiat why it is selling, or Mini.

But let's get beyond that, the only reason those cars came back is because the Saudis realized they were getting competition, once they have the good old boys hooked on their trucks, they pull the rug, and then our economy goes down thanks to the price of gas affecting every little thing.

Sorry, but if you are to the left of Rush Limbaugh, the old "Whatever is good for GM is good for America" line is dead and gone, and good riddance to it, because that line was used to screw Detroit and it's workers, like it or not.

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
92. Laid off one entire shift
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:13 AM
May 2015

Focus and C Max are not flying out the door . The Wayne Assy plant adjacent to Detroit has just announced that the Third shift is laid off indefinitely due to poor sales

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
4. You're Wrong... The Toyota Celica Started Beating Detroit In The 80's.. But...
Tue May 26, 2015, 01:57 AM
May 2015

My question for you is...

How much pain, how many foreclosures and ruined lives, are you willing to promote to gain global "equality" ?


 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. I'm not willing to protect our auto companies of the 60/70s that produced gas guzzling cars.
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:07 AM
May 2015

Sorry. However you look at it, NAFTA wasn't the culprit .

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
8. Datsun 510s arrived here in 1968 . . .
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:20 AM
May 2015
The Datsun 510 was a series of the Datsun Bluebird sold from 1968 to 1973



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datsun_510


. . . lonnnnnnnnnng before NAFTA. Toyota Coronas and Carollas started arriving in serious numbers around the same time.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
10. Exactly. Back then, progressives shunned Detroit's gas, guzzling chromed monstrosities.
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:24 AM
May 2015

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
12. Yep. There's plenty of blame for what happened to Detroit but NAFTA is the wrong target. nt
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:27 AM
May 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
25. Ah, so the energy/environmentally prudent left is to blame for Detroit. LMAO at the
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:48 AM
May 2015

one who posts on behalf of limousine neoliberal philosophies.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
34. Who said that. The big, clumsy, gas guzzling, noncompetitive cars were the problem.
Tue May 26, 2015, 07:46 AM
May 2015

So-called "Hippies" wouldn't be caught in one of those crummy cars. Now, suddenly, you are in love with them and the big corporations that make them. What happened to the let them die movement?

Good thing some of the foreign car companies have built plants here, providing good jobs to areas of the country left out.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
90. The poster is making the exact opposite arguement you are claiming.
Wed May 27, 2015, 09:39 AM
May 2015

Truly the exact opposite.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
91. I think he's tried to smear a few groups with blame for the demise of Detroit, but
Wed May 27, 2015, 10:26 AM
May 2015

I appreciate your interpretation of his remarks.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
40. Hmm that's not what I remember
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:57 AM
May 2015

I'm from Michigan so maybe things were different here, but progressives here were mainly labor supporters, and they refused to buy foreign cars. No one in my family would ever buy a foreign car, but then, after NAFTA, the huge GM plant in my town moved to Mexico, and any loyalty American car companies had died. So maybe nationwide that was the case, but here in Michigan anyway, American car companies lost loyalty after they moved due to NAFTA.

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
45. So far you've managed to blame unions and progressives for the fall of Detroit
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:12 AM
May 2015

You must have earned a nice little pat on the head from your masters

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
49. Nope, I've blamed auto companies, Nationalists, Protectionists, anyone who thought the gravy
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:18 AM
May 2015

train would last, etc.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
18. The people who were responsible for putting gas guzzling, planned obsolescing cars on the market are
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:26 AM
May 2015

not the ones suffering in Detroit now.

What a tasteless comment on this tragedy.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
35. Those photos are mostly related to well-heeled folks.
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:00 AM
May 2015

Detroit is suffering because we didn't compete in the global economy where other countries were producing better cars.

I feel terrible for the poor left in Detroit and the policies that failed them. But blaming it on NAFTA gets us nowhere.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
2. They did this to Detroit on purpose. This was the fucking Arsenal of Democracy, and they trashed it.
Tue May 26, 2015, 01:51 AM
May 2015

The impoverishment of Detroit was the result of concerted National policy choices.

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
16. That's a logical conclusion from "let Detroit go bankrupt" but don't forget the corollary
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:44 AM
May 2015

which is that Obama saved it:

merrily

(45,251 posts)
19. No. By the time it go to the "Let Detroit go bankrupt" stage, the damage was done.
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:28 AM
May 2015

At least as far as many thousands of laborers.

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
20. A lot was yes but I was commenting on the intentionality.
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:33 AM
May 2015

Mitt's infamous comment seems to confirm it.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
21. Go to Google Earth. Pick random spots in Detroit....
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:34 AM
May 2015

Then go south to Windsor and pick places at random.

What you see in Detroit is PUNISHMENT, plain and simple. It started in the 70s when Detroit elected a black mayor and it's continued to this day. It is a textbook example of "white flight".

merrily

(45,251 posts)
23. Detroit was once a shining example of union strength creating a middle class and
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:39 AM
May 2015

"Made in America" success.

Race may well have been a factor. However, I have to wonder if Mayor Ben Carson or Mayor Michael Steele would have brought punishment down on Detroit.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
26. They tried the same thing, at about the same time, in Cleveland.
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:01 AM
May 2015

Back in the '70s, when Kucinich was Mayor of Cleveland.

Cleveland had a small, city owned electric company, that provided electricity to parts of the city an much cheaper rates than the electric monopoly, CEI. The monopoly tried for several years to force Cleveland to sell its utility, but Kucinich refused.

The President of a major bank back then, Brock Weir, of Cleveland Trust, also sat on CEI's board. Cleveland Trust also owned a substantial stake in city bonds, and Weir delivered Kucinich an ultimatum. Sell Muny Light or the bank would refuse to roll over the city bonds, demand payment in full, and put the city in default. Kucinich told them to stick it up their ass. He wasn't giving in to blackmail.

Cleveland Trust forced the city into default and the talking point of the day was Kucinich bankrupted the city. Not true, but they tried to recall him and failed.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
27. It's the same thing all over the planet....
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:48 AM
May 2015

The "owners" (as Carlin put it) don't like a "man of the people" because he can't be bought.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
29. +1
Tue May 26, 2015, 07:35 AM
May 2015

See post 28 for how it's worded. "Corrupt city government" as if there were more corruption in Detroit than in any other big city. It's always blamed on people of color by white people here in Michigan.

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
58. Much worse than other cities.
Tue May 26, 2015, 11:10 AM
May 2015

Last edited Tue May 26, 2015, 03:24 PM - Edit history (4)

Dog whistles? The former mayor Kwame Kilpatrick is currently in jail for corruption and many of his staff have plead guilty or been convicted. Conspired to rob the city of millions in kickbacks from city construction projects with contractor Bobby Ferguson. Still owes millions in restitution and taxes.

Former City Council President Monica Conyers was just released after a bribery conviction. Apparently being the wife of an iconic congressman and a powerful politician in her own right didn't pay enough. The next Council president abandoned the position and fled the state after pedophilia accusations. There is a lot more than that as well concerning the pension funds.

I have no toleration for public elected officials who steal from the people they are elected to represent. City residents deserve much better leadership.


There was a lot of white flight after the 67 riots. Whether justified by self preservation or racist doesn't change the fact that it occured. A lot of the exodus to the suburbs has also been POC who want a better life for their families. Some of that is coming back and hopefully the new administration can use the bankruptcy to turn things around in the right direction.

NAFTA was a terrible trade agreement, but to lay the decline of Detoit on that ignored a lot of other factors

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
28. A lot of other factors were responsible
Tue May 26, 2015, 07:14 AM
May 2015

This is a very simplistic view as there were a lot of other factors more responsible for the decline. I have lived in the metro Detroit area most of my life.

The 1967 riots, incompetent and corrupt city government, racial animosity, high murder and crime rates etc. I could go on and on.... NAFTA is far down the list.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
30. I'm not going to alert on this
Tue May 26, 2015, 07:37 AM
May 2015

because people not from Michigan might not know that these are dog whistles, so I don't think this post would get hidden.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
31. I am from metro Detroit and I hear the whistles loud and clear
Tue May 26, 2015, 07:44 AM
May 2015

...but, you are right, if you are not from the area the post has a ring of sincerity (I am from Macomb County ... these were de rigeur in county politics for decades)

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
33. You just described present-day Chicago and its still standing.
Tue May 26, 2015, 07:44 AM
May 2015

Bottomline, NAFTA took the jobs from Detroit & the city is dying. If Detroit still had jobs, it wouldn't have lost 1.4 million residents. People have to work, they go where the jobs are. My cousin is one of them. He now helps Raytheon build bombs in Dallas instead of engines for Chrysler in Detroit.

(Just fyi, Raytheon's business is booming. They're working now to fill an enormous order from Saudi Arabia. Life is good for those in oil & war profiteering.)

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
38. The permanent war economy is a legacy that TPP seems intended to repair.
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:32 AM
May 2015

As I read it the focus is on trade in everything BUT oil and weapons.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
39. Maybe not, but its making fracking's natural gas a key component.
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:51 AM
May 2015
...Passage of the agreement may signal a dramatic increase in LNG exports as tariffs on energy products are slashed. Additionally, the agreement would streamline the current U.S. Department of Energy export facility review process. The Japanese market in particular has been eyeing the United States as a growing source for LNG imports. In the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Japan shut down its nuclear power facilities and has increasingly become dependent on coal and LNG imports. As of 2012 it was the world’s largest LNG importer accounting for 37% of world LNG trade. Currently, Japanese companies hold stake in three of the first four LNG export terminals the U.S. approved.

The U.S. is already on track to become a net exporter of natural gas by 2018 according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and LNG export facilities have overwhelmingly received government approval. Currently, there are seven LNG terminals that are operating or have been approved, and there are over 50 applications currently awaiting government approval. Additionally, the Department of Energy is considering exporting up to 45% of total US gas produced.

However, the possibility of increased LNG exports has many in the environmental community concerned. According to a statement released by the Sierra Club with the passage of the TPP, “the DOE loses its authority to regulate exports of natural gas to countries with which the United States has a free trade agreement that includes so-called ―national treatment for trade in gas. The TPP, therefore, would mean automatic approval of LNG export permits—without any review or analysis—to TPP countries.” Additionally, a higher demand for LNG exports could cause increased fracking, a practice seen by many in the environmental community as ecologically dangerous.

A key provision of the TPP is that it allows additional countries to join the agreement at a later time. So, in addition to the LNG prospects with countries currently part of the agreement there is the potential for other Asian markets to join the TPP at a later time.
http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/what-the-trans-pacific-partnership-means-for-lng


It was happening anyways, but the TPP will expand our LNG exports. We need the jobs though right? We need them because we quit making things here & opted to have them made by virtual slaves, many of them children, in other countries. And its the "environmental community" howling in the wind, because while we put all our eggs in the basket of a FINITE natural resource that poisons water, land & air, it's also just another fossil fuel that is slowly killing life on earth.

The TPP is bad in so many ways, its difficult to sum up in posts here. But it will go through, and our age of greed & short-sightedness will continue until it is too late, most likely.

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
42. Okay but apparently the treaty itself doesn't say anything about fracking, just LNG,
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:05 AM
May 2015

which has its own potential hazards as I understand it (like blowing up), and as you say is going to happen one way or the other. But I've noticed that a lot of bad things imputed to TPP are not actually in it:

a higher demand for LNG exports could cause increased fracking . . .


p.s LNG = 'liquid natural gas' which is basically frozen gas.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
44. Everything about it is "could" because it isn't in place yet. And logically, with reduced tariffs,
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:11 AM
May 2015

its a safe assumption LNG exports will increase. Just like LNG implies fracking because that's how we extract it now.

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
47. Sure but there are as many POTENTIAL bad effects as the imagination will allow
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:16 AM
May 2015

and there seems to be an awful lot of imaginative activity attached to these scare stories.

neverforget

(9,513 posts)
56. How is the TPP going to replace "the permanent war economy"?
Tue May 26, 2015, 10:21 AM
May 2015

Is the TPP going to give us new peace loving leaders to go along with the "most progressive trade deal" in history?

neverforget

(9,513 posts)
62. That document says a lot of things but if you think that the TPP is suddenly going
Tue May 26, 2015, 12:48 PM
May 2015

to take away the "permanent war economy", I want whatever your smoking.

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
61. Auto supplier jobs now in suburbs
Tue May 26, 2015, 11:50 AM
May 2015

There are still a lot of auto supplier jobs in the Detroit Metro area, just not many within the Detroit city limits. Now they don't always pay high wages which can be blamed on NAFTA.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
69. The vast majority of mom-and-pop machine shops and the like have closed in Metro Detroit
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:05 PM
May 2015

over the last 15 years. Supplier jobs are way down, and pay $12/hour (no bennies) through a temp agency.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
36. Tariffs on imports from Mexico averaged 4% before NAFTA.
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:21 AM
May 2015

It is doubtful that removing a 4% tariff is what caused Detroit's downfall. Detroit's auto industry employment was at its highest in the mid-1970's with a sustained decline after that along with mini-recoveries in the mid-1980's, mid-1990's and in the past few years. It is doubtful that NAFTA caused the 40 year decline in Detroit's auto employment.



https://web.duke.edu/soc142/team1/employment.html
https://macvandam.wordpress.com/fall-of-the-automotive-industry-2/

ucrdem

(15,720 posts)
37. NAFTA seems to have improved employment in Detroit
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:26 AM
May 2015

as elsewhere. If I'm reading your first chart correctly auto employment continued to rise after NAFTA (start of 1994) and basically collapsed after Bush and Cheney took the reins. That's the same pattern I've noticed in other data -- NAFTA worked until Junior broke the economy.


Romulox

(25,960 posts)
70. NAFTA is one cause of many. Detroit has seen a *precipitous* decline since its passage.
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:06 PM
May 2015

As your charts so amply show.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
75. Unfortunately since long before its passage. From 250,000 in the mid-70's to 150,000 in early 90's.
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:20 PM
May 2015

Detroit-area auto employment improved to about 175,000 during the 1990's then lost 100,000 again to around 75,000 from 2000 to 2009 before recovering some 15,000 jobs from 2009 to 2013.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
93. Nonsense. It saw a precipitous decline AFTER its passage. Your cite stats to prove it. nt
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:13 AM
May 2015

pampango

(24,692 posts)
95. The drop from 250,000 to 150,000 BEFORE its passage was not a "precipitous decline"?
Wed May 27, 2015, 01:46 PM
May 2015

At the pre-NAFTA rate of decline, auto-related employment in the Detroit area would have hit zero by now. I would call that pretty 'precipitous'.

Perhaps 'precipitous' is in the eye of the beholder.

"NAFTA is one cause of many."

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
41. NAFTA had nothing to do with the fall of the Detroit auto industry.
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:04 AM
May 2015

I know it's soothing to pretend that Detroit was doing OK before NAFTA,especially if you're driving a non union made foreign car around, but lets not pretend that a trade deal did it. Americans choose to kill that industry and along with the auto industry went the steel industry,way before NAFTA.

BuelahWitch

(9,083 posts)
87. First company I worked for sent its PC board mfg to Mexico
Wed May 27, 2015, 09:11 AM
May 2015

starting in the late '80s. By the early '90s they had laid off almost everyone and cleared out two of the buildings in the campus. Only the one doing gov't work was left. I blamed Reagan for all of it.
Not that I'm a fan of NAFTA, but I do remember massive layoffs before it came about (and in Utah, not the midwest).

hack89

(39,181 posts)
53. "NAFTA made manufacturing cars in the U.S. too expensive."
Tue May 26, 2015, 09:32 AM
May 2015

Last edited Tue May 26, 2015, 04:16 PM - Edit history (1)

Not too expensive for Toyota, Honda, BMW, Mercedes Benz, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia and Volkswagen, all of which have opened manufacturing plants in America.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
94. Wrong again. It's of a piece. The constituent suppliers for cheap labor southern industry
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:15 AM
May 2015

are largely in Mexico.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
77. Doubtful.
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:23 PM
May 2015

Even if tech were to go completely bust, the area would simply revert to its former role as a collection of SF bedroom suburbs.

beaglelover

(4,466 posts)
81. I proudly bought a Cadillac recently, made in the good 'ole USA. My first American car
Tue May 26, 2015, 11:43 PM
May 2015

and it rocks!

beaglelover

(4,466 posts)
88. Only a few hundred employees....the cars are still built there....
Wed May 27, 2015, 09:31 AM
May 2015

some of them anyway....lots are made in TX too.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
89. Train wreck of a local government.
Wed May 27, 2015, 09:36 AM
May 2015

Too many eggs in one basket. Too much corruption. Complete lack of trust. Complete lack of open debate for decades. The people, government, and corporations viewed economic booms as playtime.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NAFTA, TPP, Detroit... Sh...