General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNAFTA, TPP, Detroit... Shame On Us All...

Michigan Central Station - Detroit's main train station, opened in 1913, has not been used since 1988.

William Livingstone House - Constructed in 1893 in the once elegant Brush Park neighborhood, this home, designed by architect Albert Kahn, was moved from its original location several years ago by preservationists who hoped to maintain it. It was demolished last year.

St. Margaret Mary School - Many of the city's Catholic schools have been closed, though the churches they are affiliated with remain active.

David Broderick Tower - One of the city's most prominent skyscrapers, this 35-story tower once housed the offices of many doctors, lawyers and dentists. It has been virtually empty since the 1980s. Developers hope to convert the building to residential units by 2010.
More: http://content.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1882089_1850973,00.html
That's TWO major cities WE have abandoned (so far)... hope you don't live in the next one.
Plus...

Detroits alarming decline can be attributed to the crippling effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the flood of foreign-made cars into the United States. Under NAFTA, manufacturing in America has all but been eliminated. In order to compete, Detroits automotive companies were forced to lower costs by outsourcing their operations to Mexico. Essentially, NAFTA made manufacturing cars in the U.S. too expensive. As a result, Detroit factories closed down and jobs were lost. The hard-won wealth of Detroit disappeared to make room for free trade.
Link: http://economyincrisis.org/content/how-free-trade-agreements-crippled-detroit
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)before NAFTA.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)cars. Are we supposed to protect them by isolating ourselves from the world?
As to "asshole," tell it to the people who failed Detroit, the USA, and the world.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)working people. You were more than willing to protect them, and isolate them from failure and international competition.
So your laissez-faire bullshit falls flat. It's just not borne out by the facts. No. Just as sure as our policies saved the banks from their own idiocy and greed, our policies sacrificed the entire industrial midwest at the alter of "free trade". It destroyed vast swaths of the country and the people who live there.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)like our auto companies of the 60/70s that produced gas guzzling, polluting, and generally crummy cars for American consumers who demanded bigger, gas guzzling cars.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts).. drug producers, denying life-saving drugs to poor brown people who can't afford first-world prices.
Make up your mind- you can't have your cake and eat it too.
"world's best interests" my ass.
Typical.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)like you would research a new gun.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)The UAW called on the Big Three to switch to making the kind of cars Japan and Germany were making, but ther Big Three refused to stop churning out gas-guzzlers.
The autoworkers themselves were blameless.
And Woody Guthrie would probably punch your lights out (and write a killer song about it) for dissing workers.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I'm not dissing workers by saying auto companies couldn't compete, that's a fact. Execs -- and unions -- were fine with the gas guzzlers and crummy cars as long ad they were lining their pockets. Nobody wanted to kill the goose . . . . . . until it was too late. That's a shame.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)But it wasn't the UAW resisting redesign in the early Seventies. Douglas Fraser was fighting for it. It was management who refused to listen.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)early enough to do any good. But, I will read any links or comments.
Management was clearly shortsighted. But I don't remember unions saying this has to change right now, either.
It does seem Fraser tried to help, but probably too late by then.
It really us sad what had happened to Detroit, New Orleans, and lots if other places. But, isolation and protectionism, would at best have been a delaying tactic.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Now, you're backpedaling in a misguided effort to make sure unions/labor get blamed for Detroit's failures.
News flash, management may have to negotiate with unions about wages and the like. They don't have to negotiate with them about product design, nor is product design an area in which union leaders are supposed to have expertise. Your trying to blame unions or labor for car design is certainly laughable and transparent, though not surprising.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)on the orders of the same rich idiots that wrecked the whole eocnomy, despite the fact that the unions wanted to make better cars.
Proof: the 40 mpg cars that now keep ford and chevy alive were only made once Obama, in a rare good act of socialism, had GM taken over by the government. Now that they are free, they want to build SUVS and trucks again.
MichMan
(17,151 posts)Short sighted or not, the sales of Hybrids and electrics has plummeted while full size truck sales are surging. The big 3 automakers are in the business to sell cars which ultimately provide good paying union jobs.
DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)You can ask Ford why the Focuses are flying out the door. You can ask Fiat why it is selling, or Mini.
But let's get beyond that, the only reason those cars came back is because the Saudis realized they were getting competition, once they have the good old boys hooked on their trucks, they pull the rug, and then our economy goes down thanks to the price of gas affecting every little thing.
Sorry, but if you are to the left of Rush Limbaugh, the old "Whatever is good for GM is good for America" line is dead and gone, and good riddance to it, because that line was used to screw Detroit and it's workers, like it or not.
MichMan
(17,151 posts)Focus and C Max are not flying out the door . The Wayne Assy plant adjacent to Detroit has just announced that the Third shift is laid off indefinitely due to poor sales
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)True colors eventually show through
WillyT
(72,631 posts)My question for you is...
How much pain, how many foreclosures and ruined lives, are you willing to promote to gain global "equality" ?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Sorry. However you look at it, NAFTA wasn't the culprit .
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datsun_510
. . . lonnnnnnnnnng before NAFTA. Toyota Coronas and Carollas started arriving in serious numbers around the same time.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)ucrdem
(15,720 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)one who posts on behalf of limousine neoliberal philosophies.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)So-called "Hippies" wouldn't be caught in one of those crummy cars. Now, suddenly, you are in love with them and the big corporations that make them. What happened to the let them die movement?
Good thing some of the foreign car companies have built plants here, providing good jobs to areas of the country left out.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Truly the exact opposite.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I appreciate your interpretation of his remarks.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I'm from Michigan so maybe things were different here, but progressives here were mainly labor supporters, and they refused to buy foreign cars. No one in my family would ever buy a foreign car, but then, after NAFTA, the huge GM plant in my town moved to Mexico, and any loyalty American car companies had died. So maybe nationwide that was the case, but here in Michigan anyway, American car companies lost loyalty after they moved due to NAFTA.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)You must have earned a nice little pat on the head from your masters
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Why bother pretending you are a Democrat?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)train would last, etc.
merrily
(45,251 posts)not the ones suffering in Detroit now.
What a tasteless comment on this tragedy.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Detroit is suffering because we didn't compete in the global economy where other countries were producing better cars.
I feel terrible for the poor left in Detroit and the policies that failed them. But blaming it on NAFTA gets us nowhere.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)The impoverishment of Detroit was the result of concerted National policy choices.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)which is that Obama saved it:
merrily
(45,251 posts)At least as far as many thousands of laborers.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Mitt's infamous comment seems to confirm it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Then go south to Windsor and pick places at random.
What you see in Detroit is PUNISHMENT, plain and simple. It started in the 70s when Detroit elected a black mayor and it's continued to this day. It is a textbook example of "white flight".
merrily
(45,251 posts)"Made in America" success.
Race may well have been a factor. However, I have to wonder if Mayor Ben Carson or Mayor Michael Steele would have brought punishment down on Detroit.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Back in the '70s, when Kucinich was Mayor of Cleveland.
Cleveland had a small, city owned electric company, that provided electricity to parts of the city an much cheaper rates than the electric monopoly, CEI. The monopoly tried for several years to force Cleveland to sell its utility, but Kucinich refused.
The President of a major bank back then, Brock Weir, of Cleveland Trust, also sat on CEI's board. Cleveland Trust also owned a substantial stake in city bonds, and Weir delivered Kucinich an ultimatum. Sell Muny Light or the bank would refuse to roll over the city bonds, demand payment in full, and put the city in default. Kucinich told them to stick it up their ass. He wasn't giving in to blackmail.
Cleveland Trust forced the city into default and the talking point of the day was Kucinich bankrupted the city. Not true, but they tried to recall him and failed.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The "owners" (as Carlin put it) don't like a "man of the people" because he can't be bought.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)See post 28 for how it's worded. "Corrupt city government" as if there were more corruption in Detroit than in any other big city. It's always blamed on people of color by white people here in Michigan.
MichMan
(17,151 posts)Last edited Tue May 26, 2015, 03:24 PM - Edit history (4)
Dog whistles? The former mayor Kwame Kilpatrick is currently in jail for corruption and many of his staff have plead guilty or been convicted. Conspired to rob the city of millions in kickbacks from city construction projects with contractor Bobby Ferguson. Still owes millions in restitution and taxes.
Former City Council President Monica Conyers was just released after a bribery conviction. Apparently being the wife of an iconic congressman and a powerful politician in her own right didn't pay enough. The next Council president abandoned the position and fled the state after pedophilia accusations. There is a lot more than that as well concerning the pension funds.
I have no toleration for public elected officials who steal from the people they are elected to represent. City residents deserve much better leadership.
There was a lot of white flight after the 67 riots. Whether justified by self preservation or racist doesn't change the fact that it occured. A lot of the exodus to the suburbs has also been POC who want a better life for their families. Some of that is coming back and hopefully the new administration can use the bankruptcy to turn things around in the right direction.
NAFTA was a terrible trade agreement, but to lay the decline of Detoit on that ignored a lot of other factors
Quayblue
(1,045 posts)MichMan
(17,151 posts)This is a very simplistic view as there were a lot of other factors more responsible for the decline. I have lived in the metro Detroit area most of my life.
The 1967 riots, incompetent and corrupt city government, racial animosity, high murder and crime rates etc. I could go on and on.... NAFTA is far down the list.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)because people not from Michigan might not know that these are dog whistles, so I don't think this post would get hidden.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)...but, you are right, if you are not from the area the post has a ring of sincerity (I am from Macomb County ... these were de rigeur in county politics for decades)
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Bottomline, NAFTA took the jobs from Detroit & the city is dying. If Detroit still had jobs, it wouldn't have lost 1.4 million residents. People have to work, they go where the jobs are. My cousin is one of them. He now helps Raytheon build bombs in Dallas instead of engines for Chrysler in Detroit.
(Just fyi, Raytheon's business is booming. They're working now to fill an enormous order from Saudi Arabia. Life is good for those in oil & war profiteering.)
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)As I read it the focus is on trade in everything BUT oil and weapons.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)The U.S. is already on track to become a net exporter of natural gas by 2018 according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, and LNG export facilities have overwhelmingly received government approval. Currently, there are seven LNG terminals that are operating or have been approved, and there are over 50 applications currently awaiting government approval. Additionally, the Department of Energy is considering exporting up to 45% of total US gas produced.
However, the possibility of increased LNG exports has many in the environmental community concerned. According to a statement released by the Sierra Club with the passage of the TPP, the DOE loses its authority to regulate exports of natural gas to countries with which the United States has a free trade agreement that includes so-called ―national treatment for trade in gas. The TPP, therefore, would mean automatic approval of LNG export permitswithout any review or analysisto TPP countries. Additionally, a higher demand for LNG exports could cause increased fracking, a practice seen by many in the environmental community as ecologically dangerous.
A key provision of the TPP is that it allows additional countries to join the agreement at a later time. So, in addition to the LNG prospects with countries currently part of the agreement there is the potential for other Asian markets to join the TPP at a later time.
http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/what-the-trans-pacific-partnership-means-for-lng
It was happening anyways, but the TPP will expand our LNG exports. We need the jobs though right? We need them because we quit making things here & opted to have them made by virtual slaves, many of them children, in other countries. And its the "environmental community" howling in the wind, because while we put all our eggs in the basket of a FINITE natural resource that poisons water, land & air, it's also just another fossil fuel that is slowly killing life on earth.
The TPP is bad in so many ways, its difficult to sum up in posts here. But it will go through, and our age of greed & short-sightedness will continue until it is too late, most likely.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)which has its own potential hazards as I understand it (like blowing up), and as you say is going to happen one way or the other. But I've noticed that a lot of bad things imputed to TPP are not actually in it:
p.s LNG = 'liquid natural gas' which is basically frozen gas.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)its a safe assumption LNG exports will increase. Just like LNG implies fracking because that's how we extract it now.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)and there seems to be an awful lot of imaginative activity attached to these scare stories.
neverforget
(9,513 posts)Is the TPP going to give us new peace loving leaders to go along with the "most progressive trade deal" in history?
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)neverforget
(9,513 posts)to take away the "permanent war economy", I want whatever your smoking.
MichMan
(17,151 posts)There are still a lot of auto supplier jobs in the Detroit Metro area, just not many within the Detroit city limits. Now they don't always pay high wages which can be blamed on NAFTA.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)over the last 15 years. Supplier jobs are way down, and pay $12/hour (no bennies) through a temp agency.
pampango
(24,692 posts)It is doubtful that removing a 4% tariff is what caused Detroit's downfall. Detroit's auto industry employment was at its highest in the mid-1970's with a sustained decline after that along with mini-recoveries in the mid-1980's, mid-1990's and in the past few years. It is doubtful that NAFTA caused the 40 year decline in Detroit's auto employment.


https://web.duke.edu/soc142/team1/employment.html
https://macvandam.wordpress.com/fall-of-the-automotive-industry-2/
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)as elsewhere. If I'm reading your first chart correctly auto employment continued to rise after NAFTA (start of 1994) and basically collapsed after Bush and Cheney took the reins. That's the same pattern I've noticed in other data -- NAFTA worked until Junior broke the economy.

Romulox
(25,960 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)As your charts so amply show.
pampango
(24,692 posts)Detroit-area auto employment improved to about 175,000 during the 1990's then lost 100,000 again to around 75,000 from 2000 to 2009 before recovering some 15,000 jobs from 2009 to 2013.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)At the pre-NAFTA rate of decline, auto-related employment in the Detroit area would have hit zero by now. I would call that pretty 'precipitous'.
Perhaps 'precipitous' is in the eye of the beholder.
"NAFTA is one cause of many."
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I know it's soothing to pretend that Detroit was doing OK before NAFTA,especially if you're driving a non union made foreign car around, but lets not pretend that a trade deal did it. Americans choose to kill that industry and along with the auto industry went the steel industry,way before NAFTA.
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)starting in the late '80s. By the early '90s they had laid off almost everyone and cleared out two of the buildings in the campus. Only the one doing gov't work was left. I blamed Reagan for all of it.
Not that I'm a fan of NAFTA, but I do remember massive layoffs before it came about (and in Utah, not the midwest).
fredamae
(4,458 posts)samsingh
(18,426 posts)hack89
(39,181 posts)Last edited Tue May 26, 2015, 04:16 PM - Edit history (1)
Not too expensive for Toyota, Honda, BMW, Mercedes Benz, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia and Volkswagen, all of which have opened manufacturing plants in America.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)hack89
(39,181 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)are largely in Mexico.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Even if tech were to go completely bust, the area would simply revert to its former role as a collection of SF bedroom suburbs.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)beaglelover
(4,466 posts)and it rocks!
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,681 posts)Leaving a couple more empty offices in its wake?
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/detroit-auto-show/2015/01/14/gm-asks-employees-move-cadillac-nyc/21787893/
Anyway, yes, they're nice cars. Someday, maybe ...
beaglelover
(4,466 posts)some of them anyway....lots are made in TX too.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)I didn't vote for Reagan, I wasn't old enough.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Too many eggs in one basket. Too much corruption. Complete lack of trust. Complete lack of open debate for decades. The people, government, and corporations viewed economic booms as playtime.