Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:48 PM May 2015

‘No Gays Allowed’ Law Set To Pass In Virginia

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/01/13/no-gays-allowed-law-set-to-pass-in-virginia/

The state of Virginia is set to pass a law which would allow anti-LGBT business owners to bar gay people, purely on the basis of their sexuality.

The Virginia Bill states that anyone seeking or holding a business license from the state of Virginia in the state can refuse service or entry to gay people, on the grounds it “would violate the religious or moral convictions of such person with respect to same-sex “marriage” or homosexual behavior.”

This would make it lawful for LGBT people to be barred from hotels, restaurants, schools, hospitals, and any other premise where a good or service is exchanged by someone who dislikes their sexual orientation:...

The toxic bill has been spearheaded by Virginia’s virulently anti-gay lawmaker Bob Marshall. You might remember him for his fruitless effort to exclude gay people from the state’s National Guard, or his 2012 attempt to block the appointment of a judge on the grounds that the nominee was gay, saying that “sodomy is not a civil right.”


So Virginia's not for lovers?

edit: Of course McAuliffe will veto this piece of trash. Hopefully he will shred it and throw the confetti onto the House of Delegates' floor.
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
‘No Gays Allowed’ Law Set To Pass In Virginia (Original Post) KamaAina May 2015 OP
It's really ohheckyeah May 2015 #1
I'm a native of Maryland. KamaAina May 2015 #2
LOL ohheckyeah May 2015 #16
Don't worry, McAuliffe has been burning thru pens vetoing GOP bills. FSogol May 2015 #8
It's becoming quite bad. You might remember this from a few days ago, May 21 (sorry) appalachiablue May 2015 #9
P.S. Morrissey last year pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of contributing to the appalachiablue May 2015 #12
OMG ohheckyeah May 2015 #17
That is sick on so many levels. nt awoke_in_2003 May 2015 #85
The haters are everywhere.. mountain grammy May 2015 #18
I can't ohheckyeah May 2015 #19
It is sad, especially when I read a post like NanceGreggs' mountain grammy May 2015 #21
That's a great ohheckyeah May 2015 #22
A friend, and smart, successful businessman in OR told me his health insurance went waaaaaaay down! vkkv May 2015 #28
The monthly premium is $332 ohheckyeah May 2015 #29
It is, it's epidemic, this country feeds on hatred and hostilities. n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #57
I'm not embarassed given that the legislature killed the bill in committee onenote May 2015 #46
And so sad, because it's such a beautiful state. I used to love Virginia, did a lot of hiking and RKP5637 May 2015 #56
Did you dgibby May 2015 #79
No, I didn't. I was usuallly on Old Rag Mountain and Priest Mountain. It sounds RKP5637 May 2015 #80
This article is from January 13 and is out of date Ancashina May 2015 #64
The OP admitted down thread that he neglected to check the date Rhiannon12866 May 2015 #67
Yup. Agschmid May 2015 #71
Guess he/they missed Lawrence v. Texas, elleng May 2015 #3
Right, because it worked so well for Indiana. NuclearDem May 2015 #4
wtf is wrong with some people? Why even try this? It will be nice when this is no longer an issue. uppityperson May 2015 #5
Some people thrive on persecution, prejudices and hostilities. IMO it's sexual gratification for RKP5637 May 2015 #58
Oldie but Goodie from Marv Albert Trial HockeyMom May 2015 #6
It will be vetoed? Too bad rocktivity May 2015 #7
You mean like Michelle Bachmann's husband? dhol82 May 2015 #50
Michelle Bachmann's husband AKA The Poster man-child for Gaydar! RKP5637 May 2015 #59
Freepers are grandstanding because they know it will be vetoed. immoderate May 2015 #10
They use the word gay but want to add the word black and a few others too. nt TeamPooka May 2015 #11
More Focus on the family garbage n2doc May 2015 #13
FFS -- this is a story from January that was wrong when it was published. onenote May 2015 #14
Because he forgot to check the date on the story KamaAina May 2015 #15
Thanks for the update.. mountain grammy May 2015 #20
Here's a story from November that explains where this toxic thinking comes from. Bluenorthwest May 2015 #23
I was wondering how that escaped my notice. mahatmakanejeeves May 2015 #25
Theses dominionists are like a nasty virus spreading rapidly. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #24
Fortunately, in this case it didn't spread and the legislation died in committee onenote May 2015 #33
Thank you, good news. Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #35
Even more than that, it's mental illness now recognizable by the numbers. n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #60
That it is, RKP! Dont call me Shirley May 2015 #75
Now just how will they know that a person is gay? rock May 2015 #26
THANK you!! That was my FIRST thought!! A written test? A declaration? MADem May 2015 #42
And would the burden of proof be on the person denied service? arcane1 May 2015 #47
I'm glad it died in committee (as a DUer updating this contributed) but it's bad that it even got MADem May 2015 #48
How will the business owners know the customers are gay? Do they have a gaydar? muntrv May 2015 #27
They have the Frank Fontana Gay-O-Meter KamaAina May 2015 #36
That show was so well written that it's stood the test of time... Rhiannon12866 May 2015 #39
Alas, it's only rerun on the obscure REELZ channel. KamaAina May 2015 #40
That's such a waste! Rhiannon12866 May 2015 #43
You and me both. KamaAina May 2015 #45
Post removed Post removed May 2015 #37
What do you mean by the normal gay? hrmjustin May 2015 #41
Okay, I have to ask these two questions again... KansDem May 2015 #30
Two criteria for admittance Zambero May 2015 #31
Half of Congress would be banned from Virginia! nt valerief May 2015 #32
Can I put a sign out there that says 'No Breeders who fondle their little sisters'? LynneSin May 2015 #34
Only if you change "fondle" to "molest," in the interests of accuracy. MADem May 2015 #44
Any business that wants to use such a law should be REQUiRED to post notice of intent front&center peacebird May 2015 #38
Arrrrrrrrh shenmue May 2015 #49
How will they be detected? Tattoos on the forehead. Fuck, I'm glad I don't live in VA. n/t RKP5637 May 2015 #51
Like this would be my guess... workinclasszero May 2015 #53
That's what they seem to want! Hatred never dies and is born again. Same type of RKP5637 May 2015 #55
Set to does not mean it did, did it? Horrific the hate people have for others they do not AuntPatsy May 2015 #52
This legislation was never "set" to be enacted. It died in committee onenote May 2015 #69
Once more: the "story" is WRONG!!!! Adrahil May 2015 #54
No, the story is old. KamaAina May 2015 #66
Old and inaccurate when written onenote May 2015 #68
So Bob Marshall is behind this Bartlet May 2015 #61
This is not true... Ancashina May 2015 #62
once again, I am going to ask, "HOW IN THE HELL CAN THEY TELL???" niyad May 2015 #63
"So Virginia's not for lovers?" Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #65
Fine, I don't want their business either. Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel May 2015 #70
Oh no, not again! This is so disturbing! akbacchus_BC May 2015 #72
That's sickening and stupid.. it worked out so well for Indiana and Pence. And, yes McAuliffe will Cha May 2015 #73
These laws need to get challenged in SCOTUS ASAP. Initech May 2015 #74
He didn't have to. Lawmakers killed the bill 4 MONTHS AGO. FSogol May 2015 #77
I bet Bob Marshall is Gay. Me thinks he doth protest too much Heather MC May 2015 #76
That never even became a bill. It was axed by a subcommitte on Jan 30, 2015. n/t FSogol May 2015 #78
Why does it violate their religious views? treestar May 2015 #81
Well, actually, it's news to some, but sodomy IS a civil right. Bernardo de La Paz May 2015 #82
then you hets need to knock off your back room and nite time forays allan01 May 2015 #83
At a minimum I hope they are required to prominently post their LGBT ban NorthCarolina May 2015 #84
Why is a six month old story that has a deceptive, untrue headline still on the DU front page? Leontius May 2015 #86
Because folks like you keep kicking it. KamaAina May 2015 #87

FSogol

(45,473 posts)
8. Don't worry, McAuliffe has been burning thru pens vetoing GOP bills.
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:23 PM
May 2015

He vetoed 6 bills live on a call-in radio show, just to piss the freepers off.

appalachiablue

(41,123 posts)
9. It's becoming quite bad. You might remember this from a few days ago, May 21 (sorry)
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:49 PM
May 2015



Joe Morrissey, 57 year old former VA Delegate, legislator and Democrat with his 19 year old receptionist Myrna Pride and their 9 week old son Chase.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10812269


It's not some bad TV Mini Series from the '90s, it's life- jes' like way back!

Tom Jefferson was 46 and his slave Sally Hemings 14 when he seduced her in Paris. She was his wife's- Martha Wayles' half sister, the 3rd generation of Hemings concubine slave women and 3/4 white.





19th cent. Portrait of Col. John Wayles Jefferson, a grandson of Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson through their son Eston Hemings.

appalachiablue

(41,123 posts)
12. P.S. Morrissey last year pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of contributing to the
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:12 PM
May 2015

delinquency of a minor for relations with Ms. Pride, then 17. Felonies charges were denied. It's in the DU post.

mountain grammy

(26,618 posts)
21. It is sad, especially when I read a post like NanceGreggs'
Tue May 26, 2015, 05:57 PM
May 2015

and see, that in some countries, people are treated like human beings.

In case you missed it:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026727625

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
22. That's a great
Tue May 26, 2015, 06:01 PM
May 2015

post. To make things worse, my deductible went from $1000 to $4000. I don''t get it. The ACA was supposed to be affordable.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
28. A friend, and smart, successful businessman in OR told me his health insurance went waaaaaaay down!
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:56 AM
May 2015

Signed up for ACA:

His cost went from 579.00 monthly down to less than 200 bucks!

Successful retailer, owns two houses in Bend.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
29. The monthly premium is $332
Wed May 27, 2015, 12:20 PM
May 2015

which isn't too bad but the deductible is killing us. I'm unable to work because of a stroke, but I'm far from stupid. The deductible is in addition to the premiums, expenses not covered, and copays which means we're going over $10,000 this year. We don't have an extra $10,000. That's not affordable.

I don't live in OR I live in Virginia.

onenote

(42,691 posts)
46. I'm not embarassed given that the legislature killed the bill in committee
Wed May 27, 2015, 06:21 PM
May 2015

Which puts Virginia ahead of some other states.

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
56. And so sad, because it's such a beautiful state. I used to love Virginia, did a lot of hiking and
Wed May 27, 2015, 09:00 PM
May 2015

camping. I have friends there that tell me in some areas the crazies with religion have really invaded.

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
79. Did you
Thu May 28, 2015, 09:34 AM
May 2015

ever make it to Douthat State Park? If not, I highly recommend you do. It's beautiful and only about 12 miles from where I am. It was built by the Conservation Corps and still has the original log cabins, which were built from the trees taken down to make room for the lake. Autumn is the best time to be there- we're in the mountains, so the fall colors are beautiful.

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
80. No, I didn't. I was usuallly on Old Rag Mountain and Priest Mountain. It sounds
Thu May 28, 2015, 09:39 AM
May 2015

beautiful. I really loved Virginia! I'm a zillion miles away now.

Ancashina

(3 posts)
64. This article is from January 13 and is out of date
Wed May 27, 2015, 10:54 PM
May 2015

This Virginia General Assembly ended months ago. This bill died in the House. See legislative history here http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?151+sum+HB1414

Virginia is not about to pass this anti-gay legislation.

Virginia is no more embarrassing than any other state. Every state has its embarrassing politicians and their politics.

elleng

(130,864 posts)
3. Guess he/they missed Lawrence v. Texas,
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:59 PM
May 2015
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas, wherein the United States Supreme Court, in the 6–3 ruling the Court struck down the sodomy law in Texas and, by extension, invalidated sodomy laws in 13 other states, making same-sex sexual activity legal in every U.S. state and territory. The Court overturned its previous ruling on the same issue in the 1986 case Bowers v. Hardwick, where it upheld a challenged Georgia statute and did not find a constitutional protection of sexual privacy.

Lawrence explicitly overruled Bowers, holding that it had viewed the liberty interest too narrowly. The Court held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by substantive due process under the 14th Amendment. Lawrence invalidated similar laws throughout the United States that criminalized sodomy between consenting adults acting in private, whatever the sex of the participants.[1]

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
58. Some people thrive on persecution, prejudices and hostilities. IMO it's sexual gratification for
Wed May 27, 2015, 09:08 PM
May 2015

for them, mental masturbation.

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
6. Oldie but Goodie from Marv Albert Trial
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:07 PM
May 2015

Virginia is for Lovers but only if you are straight, married, having missionary intercourse to make babies.

rocktivity

(44,575 posts)
7. It will be vetoed? Too bad
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:13 PM
May 2015

it would have been fun to see what would have happened when a hetero who was denied service on the grounds of "looking" gay.


rocktivity

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
10. Freepers are grandstanding because they know it will be vetoed.
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:52 PM
May 2015

It prevents them getting primaried from their right, the direction that counts in a primary.

--imm

onenote

(42,691 posts)
14. FFS -- this is a story from January that was wrong when it was published.
Tue May 26, 2015, 04:34 PM
May 2015

The bill referenced in the story was never "set to pass" -- in fact, it died in committee in late January.

See: http://www.washingtonblade.com/2015/01/29/va-house-subcommittee-vetoes-conscience-clause-bill/

Which leaves me wondering why, at this point in time, the OP posted this story, rather than one about the bill being killed?


Sheesh....

mountain grammy

(26,618 posts)
20. Thanks for the update..
Tue May 26, 2015, 05:53 PM
May 2015

that date thing is pretty important, along with a lot of other considerations. That's why I'm reluctant to post anything, and when I do run across something to post, it's already here. Great minds think alike.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. Here's a story from November that explains where this toxic thinking comes from.
Tue May 26, 2015, 06:07 PM
May 2015

Vatican Strengthens Ties with Evangelicals and Mormons Against Gay Marriage
"The presence of American evangelicals and the LDS Church was particularly notable. Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church, and Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, each gave speeches, and representatives from the Heritage Foundation and the Family Research Council in Washington attended. President Henry Eyring of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ first presidency spoke and Elder Tom Perry of the LDS’s Quorum of the Twelve also joined. In the United States, this trio of faiths has worked together to stand against the government’s Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate, but it was the first time they were coming together at the Vatican to talk about marriage.
Pope Francis did not spearhead the colloquium, as many casual observers might think. It was organized and led by German Cardinal Gerhard Müller, a strong conservative voice at the Pope’s Synod on the Family last month. Müller is the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican group that sponsored the event. Still, Pope Francis gave an opening address to attendees, in which he affirmed the Church’s teaching that children have a right to a mother and a father."
http://time.com/3597245/vatican-evangelicals-mormons-gay-marriage/

It's a virulent strain of bigotry being carefully nurtured by a large segment of the mainstream faith community. Note the Vatican invited FRC, NOM, etc, Tony Perkins, Maggie Gallagher...
This is why this bullshit keeps coming up. Straight religious people are far too willing to dismiss it.

rock

(13,218 posts)
26. Now just how will they know that a person is gay?
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:11 AM
May 2015

Seriously. I mean something that will stick up in a court of law of course.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
42. THANK you!! That was my FIRST thought!! A written test? A declaration?
Wed May 27, 2015, 06:14 PM
May 2015

Will they go by the "Huummmmmmph...yew LOOOK gay!!!!!!" method?

I just don't see how they can enforce such a boneheaded and bigoted concept....

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
47. And would the burden of proof be on the person denied service?
Wed May 27, 2015, 06:39 PM
May 2015

It's crazy all the way around. This over-emphasis on picking on gay people WILL backfire!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. I'm glad it died in committee (as a DUer updating this contributed) but it's bad that it even got
Wed May 27, 2015, 07:59 PM
May 2015

proposed....! I mean, really--whassamatta wit' people???

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
36. They have the Frank Fontana Gay-O-Meter
Wed May 27, 2015, 05:16 PM
May 2015

An old episode of Murphy Brown centered around everyone at FYI speculating on whether the new guy was gay. Finally Murphy got fed up with it and yelled at Frank, "based on what? The Frank Fontana Gay-O-Meter?"

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
40. Alas, it's only rerun on the obscure REELZ channel.
Wed May 27, 2015, 06:11 PM
May 2015

Mom and Republican Stepdad get it at the Jersey Shore, but not in Manhattan! As for me in San Jose, well, fuhgeddaboutit!

Rhiannon12866

(205,161 posts)
43. That's such a waste!
Wed May 27, 2015, 06:16 PM
May 2015

There are so many times that I can find nothing to watch on TV, despite having a hundred channels to choose from. I often find myself tuning into the old stuff, better than the tripe that passes for entertainment these days. Am I getting old?

Response to muntrv (Reply #27)

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
30. Okay, I have to ask these two questions again...
Wed May 27, 2015, 03:03 PM
May 2015

1) How do these business owners know that a customer is gay?
2) Does this law require employees to honor the "rights" of the business owner by refusing to serve gays even if doing so doesn't violate their own "rights"?


Zambero

(8,964 posts)
31. Two criteria for admittance
Wed May 27, 2015, 04:03 PM
May 2015

Either one of these would get a hater-in-question into one of these these joints:

1. Patrons wearing an "I hate gays" t-shirt, cap, or a Rick Santorum for President badge
2. Footage showing them as active participants in a Westboro Baptist Church funeral protest

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
34. Can I put a sign out there that says 'No Breeders who fondle their little sisters'?
Wed May 27, 2015, 05:05 PM
May 2015


For me I know children are safe around LGBT folks. But lately it seems like Christian Fundamentalists one could be putting their kids at risk having them near Fundies.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
44. Only if you change "fondle" to "molest," in the interests of accuracy.
Wed May 27, 2015, 06:19 PM
May 2015

Fondle can have a benign meaning. Molest, OTOH, does not.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
38. Any business that wants to use such a law should be REQUiRED to post notice of intent front&center
Wed May 27, 2015, 05:26 PM
May 2015

On their door, website, and any ads. I, for one, would love to know who NOT to give my money to.

If such a law passes without that required notification by businesses, I would be forced to avoid all that post the fish symbol.....

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
55. That's what they seem to want! Hatred never dies and is born again. Same type of
Wed May 27, 2015, 08:57 PM
May 2015

people, just different times, different names, many hiding under the banner of religion.

AuntPatsy

(9,904 posts)
52. Set to does not mean it did, did it? Horrific the hate people have for others they do not
Wed May 27, 2015, 08:49 PM
May 2015

Even know...mind numbing.

onenote

(42,691 posts)
68. Old and inaccurate when written
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:46 PM
May 2015

insofar as it claimed Virginia was about to pass this legislation. It was never close to happening.

Bartlet

(172 posts)
61. So Bob Marshall is behind this
Wed May 27, 2015, 10:16 PM
May 2015

How long till it's uncovered that he's a closeted self hating homosexual like all the other virulent anti-gay crusaders always turn out to be.

niyad

(113,257 posts)
63. once again, I am going to ask, "HOW IN THE HELL CAN THEY TELL???"
Wed May 27, 2015, 10:28 PM
May 2015

is the entire lgbtq community supposed to register and wear pink triangles? what level of ugly hatred does one have to descend to in order to, not only FEEL this kind of hatred and bigotry, but proudly sponsor it into law???

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
65. "So Virginia's not for lovers?"
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:02 PM
May 2015

Right after 9/11 one of the first news accounts of a Muslim being beaten to death was in Virginia.

Cha

(297,136 posts)
73. That's sickening and stupid.. it worked out so well for Indiana and Pence. And, yes McAuliffe will
Thu May 28, 2015, 01:31 AM
May 2015

Veto.

Initech

(100,063 posts)
74. These laws need to get challenged in SCOTUS ASAP.
Thu May 28, 2015, 01:53 AM
May 2015

They are pretty much the exact opposite of freedom.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
81. Why does it violate their religious views?
Thu May 28, 2015, 09:40 AM
May 2015

Where does the Bible say never to deal with gay people? Or in fact, any sinners? (as they see it). And why don't they also refuse to deal with fornicators? And adulterers? And criminals? One would think those people violated their religious standards too. Yet they don't make a big deal of that.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
82. Well, actually, it's news to some, but sodomy IS a civil right.
Thu May 28, 2015, 09:59 AM
May 2015

So is cunnilingus and fellatio and masturbation and the missionary position. (All of it between consenting adults)

allan01

(1,950 posts)
83. then you hets need to knock off your back room and nite time forays
Thu May 28, 2015, 11:49 AM
May 2015

think you hets are so perfect ? , got another thing comeing .

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
84. At a minimum I hope they are required to prominently post their LGBT ban
Thu May 28, 2015, 04:37 PM
May 2015

so that members of the gay community will know before walking into an establishment and assuming equal treatment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»‘No Gays Allowed’ Law Set...