General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatch this self-driving car park itself...
right underneath the pedestrians. Apparently, the anti-pedestrian-killing feature costs extra, and these people neglected to pay for it. Self-driving trucks you say? I'm thinking... maybe in a generation or two?
It's kinda graphic.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)on this car, hence the accident.
So basically they tested a car for a technology that isn't present in the car in the first place. Where's the radar in the grill?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I mean, what could go wrong?
"I'm not gonna stand in front of it, YOU stand in front of it."
"I'M not gonna stand in front of it, YOU stand in front of it."
"I know, let's get Mikey!"
"Yeah!"
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)So your claim that this means true self driving is a generation or two away is false. First, the technology in question is already sold in luxury cars and SUVs and is trickling down as a safety feature in more modest vehicles as well. And second, we already have fully autonomous cars on the road now, they are still in the experimental stage, we can improve the accuracy of the sensors, but hese are issues that can be resolved in a few years, not generations.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Human error is the root cause of ALL the world's problems.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)and whether its worth it for someone to hack it.
With failsafes and executable lockdown, partitioned userspace and system files, along with possible encryption of communications and filesystems and you can minimize the threat. This is no reason to not move forward with such technologies if they can help greatly reduce the amount of road deaths due to accidents every years. In 2013, 32,719 people died in car accidents in the U.S. We have to find ways to reduce that number further.