General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe B-Word... What Are We To Do With Elton John ???
Look... I have three sisters, and they use it all the time... so...
A little guidance here, please.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)fishwax
(29,346 posts)Like I said, I don't get it, but c'est la vie.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)So...
One posts a question... and maybe gets a response...
Maybe even responds to the response.
Am I missing something ???
fishwax
(29,346 posts)Certainly seems to me like there is some sort of obscured context, but maybe it's just a bit too late at night.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Which implies a whole bunch.
Like I said... a whole bunch of women I know use the term "liberally"...
And that does not mean they're using it literally.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)is how slurs against a man are so often literally slurs against his mother, such as "bastard." Which also is a word I haven't really seen here at DU, and don't hear in the world anywhere near as much as "bitch," which has also been turned into a verb, and an adjective ("bitchy"
, so we can use it even more often.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Literally, "bastard" is more a slur against a person's mother.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)but irrelevant for others. I doubt that most high schoolers even know what the original meaning of bastard is.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I will have to ask some high schoolers. I can ask my daughter when she's home from school, but she's only a middle schooler. I really think everyone understands the etymology of that word.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Then again I've been wrong once or twice in my life.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)I guess I should have listened to the song.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The use of this word has been discussed extensively and at length at DU and, yes, Elton John's song has been raised repeatedly in those discussions.
Unless there has been some new development, the bottom line of those discussions appeared to be that there is a substantial consensus that it goes beyond a mere insult to the level of a sexist insult, because it is applied primarily to women with a high degree of uniformity.
Is it a word that a lot of people use in places other than DU? Sure. But so what? We all communicate differently in various social contexts, and this is one of them.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)DUzy indeed.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)So go ahead and use it if you wish, Willy.
Keep in mind that people like me will think you're an (censored). But go ahead. Use it all you like. Many still do.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Having any luck ???
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Use it all you want, like I said.
I'll just think you an (censored)
JI7
(93,618 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)The bitch fights back if her puppies are threatened. Women were called that when they fought back in a patriarchal society when they had no rights. The men called them bitches because they fought back like the mother dog even though they probably would be beaten and wouldn't win. I don't consider it an insult at all and any women who do aren't honoring their female canine companions.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)ms liberty
(11,237 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)but fortunately, most women don't deserve to called that. Save it for when the term accurately describes the person's bitchy attitude and behavior.
LuvNewcastle
(17,822 posts)NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)I'm going to sit back and enjoy his music.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)he lost me at playing at a party for Rush.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)Apparently, per Elton, the two are "friends". He's been dead to me ever since.
This is no loss, really, because he's terrible now. His voice is shot, his songs are boring, and he and Bernie Taupin have been phoning it in for a long time now.
And to think that I was such a huge fan, back in the day. Everyone loved Elton.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)I have a few.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)But I don't have any friends who spew their toxic, despicable philosophies to millions of listeners every day. Nor would I.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I'd rather see Elton John distributing that cash, as opposed to Limbaugh.
Here's a list of some of the charities EJ supports: https://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/elton-john
The charitable areas included in his giving are as follows:
Abuse, Adoption, Fostering, Orphans, AIDS & HIV, Animals, At-Risk/Disadvantaged Youths, Bullying, Cancer, Children, Civil Rights, Creative Arts, Depression and Suicide, Diabetes, Disaster Relief, Education, Emergency services, Environment, Family/Parent Support, Health, Homelessness, Human Rights, Hunger, LGBT Support, Mental Challenges, Miscellaneous, Peace, Physical Challenges, Poverty, Rape/Sexual Abuse, Refugees, Sports, Substance Abuse, Unemployment/Career Support, Women
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)As you've pointed out, Elton gives to charities all the time. He didn't need to perform at that loathsome pustule's wedding. To do so indicates that Sir John has monumentally poor judgment, or some sort of bond with Rush that, frankly, makes me want to convulsively throw up.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And that's just not a smart move for him. People of all political persuasions listen to his music, even as they know that he leans left in his personal politics. If you go to that link I provided, you will see he generously donates to a number of causes.
Excoriating a blowhard only gives the blowhard power and creates public sympathy for him. Far better to take his money and laugh all the way to the bank. That's an absurd sum for a brief bit of work; a fool and his money are soon parted.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)largest and most effective and does extremely vital work all over the world, including here in the United States granting millions of dollars here at home out of well over 200 million raised and spent world wide. It is a massive, important organization and the fact of the matter is that while you can hire almost any superstar to entertain privately if you have enough money Elton John does so exclusively as a mechanism for raising Foundation funds. Of course for his for profit public shows, anyone from Rush to the devil could buy a ticket and sit right down and the box office is much higher than a million bucks.
This link lists some of the 2014 grants from his foundation to groups in the US and Canada. I invite the smug among us to read about the six figure grants to the Transgender Law Center in Oakland and the National Black Justice Coalition and consider which they might have chosen to cut in order to avoid singing Tiny Dancer in the presence of Rush Limbaugh.
http://newyork.ejaf.org/2014-grants/
MADem
(135,425 posts)I find it amusing when people who have no cash on the line try to tell people how much money they should give up for the sake of principles. I think if they were expected to match a penny of their own cash for a thousand of the famous person's, they'd snap that mouth shut right quick!
I love that EJ gives his "private concert" money to good causes, too. It makes me appreciate him all the more.
Again, thanks for that additional detail.
msongs
(73,755 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I occasionally hear a man call another man "that word," but that happens less frequently.
The censorship of the word here is another one of those things that makes DU an unrealistic reflection of the real world.
The reason it is censored is because some people take great offense, and some people like to goad and bait the people who take great offense.
I think the use of the word is a situational thing. You know if it's meant in a disparaging way, and if it's used as a trendy cultural expression.
There are a few words that will probably never get play here. The Bee Word is one, and the Cee Word is the other. There may be a few others, but those are the Mighty Two to Avoid!
trumad
(41,692 posts)Should that word be used here?
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Or used to when I was working.
What do we make of that?
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)I haven't used it in a long time because it makes some so apoplectic, but it doesn't bother me or anyone I know IRL.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Are you talking about a feline pet? I find those sketches hilarious. So did the vast majority of the British and PBS-viewing public, for decades, in fact, and even today.
Context--as with the "bee word"--is everything.
That said, if you will cast your eyes back, and re-read what I wrote, I advised AGAINST using "that word" in this unrealistic, not-real-life environment.
I think we do have people here who have, to put it charitably, a great deal of difficulty with both "tone" and "context." And there's just no fixing that, I've concluded. I also think we have trolls and assholes here, who will sense a weakness and use "naughty words" to goad, bait and annoy DUers. Some people just can't get along. Some people like to make trouble. Some people just deliberately refuse to 'understand' because playing the vexed fool is so much more gratifying for them.
That's life on the internet.
romanic
(2,841 posts)refer to each other as bitches either as a compliment or as an insult. My take on it as a man; say it if you want to and defend yourself if someone gets offended by it.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Of course I use the word bitch & the word bastard.... Got no problem with either.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Use it as often and as loudly as you want. People will either judge you positively or negatively for the words you use in life. Not sure why you need guidance on something so amazingly simple. Shout the word from the rooftops if you would like. I have yet to make a place for it in my lexicon that actually adds to any conversation I am a part of. If it increases the level of intellect between you and your friends conversations, jam on it.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I don't see much wrong with the word. It has its place, but should be used at appropriate times. Like, I wouldn't recommend standing up in church and shouting it.
It has many definitions and uses in this modern time.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)So much more satisfying.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(101,853 posts)The song is forty or so years old and is self referential:
Raising cane, I spit in your eye
Times are changing, now the poor get fat
But the fever's gonna catch you when the bitch gets back
Eat meat on Friday that's alright
Even like steak on a Saturday night
I can bitch the best at your social do's
I get high in the evening sniffing pots of glue
I'm a bitch, I'm a bitch
Oh the bitch is back
Stone cold sober as a matter of fact
I can bitch, I can bitch
`Cause I'm better than you
It's the way that I move
The things that I do
I entertain by picking brains
Sell my soul by dropping names
I don't like those, my God, what's that
Oh it's full of nasty habits when the bitch gets back
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)he does not have straight white male privilege. By my calculations that permits him to have one hit song that focuses on the b-word, without anyone bitching about it, er I mean complaining about it.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)My compliments!
[IMG]
[/IMG]
MADem
(135,425 posts)For some reason, many people in USA think that a British accent conveys a little "something more" that imbues the speaker with frequently undeserved gravitas and credibility. Thus, someone with a fishmonger's east end accent can wander over this side of the pond and with great authority, go on TV and tell people why they need a Wonder Mop or a Super Duper Fryer, and willing customers by the droves will get on that phone, dial an eight hundred number, and eagerly order two!
lame54
(39,771 posts)they could have done a great version
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Please tell me you're joking.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Use the bee word, and odds are good your post will be alerted, and possibly hidden, if you get critical mass on your jury.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)As a lover of words, and the powerful, playful, eloquent, clever, effective use of words, I love them all.
I abhor the use of a word to express hate, or bigotry of any kind. It's the use of the word, the context, rather than the word itself.
So...I'm just fine with Elton John; I've been a big fan for about 45 years.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)mercuryblues
(16,415 posts)to do about a song recorded 40 years ago? I will put it in the context of him playing for Limbaugh's wedding, despite the way he talks about the LBGQT community. Then has the gall to ask people to boycott D&G because he feels slighted over some remarks they made.
He is a privileged asswipe, whose ego is bigger than his 80's glasses.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)Why are you bringing this up today. An old Elton John song? WTF?
Surely there are current topics you might want to discuss, right?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Or is that worthy of its own OP?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)depict their own community and relationships with the larger society. I don't know, WillyT, what will you straight white people do about these minorities with their self referencing verbiage that might include words which, if said by others, could be taken differently?
Your reasons for posting this would be a good thing for you to share with the DU community. 40 year old song.....
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)What you are looking for is probably to feel like you don't have to feel bad for it. We aren't in charge of your feelings, and we get the right to say whatever we want about it right back at you.
Fire away.