General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo what's up with the (I'm guessing Clinton operatives) out here calling Bernie Sanders racist?
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Sissyk (a host of the General Discussion forum).
There's a million threads on it and Google search came up empty.
Where did this come from?
And I'll just say this. I'm voting for Bernie Sanders in the primary. Obviously Hillary Clinton will want our support in the general if she defeats Bernie Sanders in the primary. This is not the way to go about it.
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That's what I've gathered from reading DU over the past two days
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)I have to admit that the huge kerfuffle here today finally drew me in.
It was pretty funny at first. Then I was aghast at the nastiness on both sides.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)saying about Bernie what some Bernie supporters are saying about Hillary.
Hillary supporters do not hate Bernie and are not afraid of him. There is no reason for Hillary supporters to do as you suggest.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)a post linking to a blog that suggested he didn't go far enough about racism in his campaign launch set off one poster, known to be occasionally vitriolic, which subsequently incited this entire series of threads about whether or not Bernie is racist.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I won't even bother to chalk it up to 'Clinton operatives'. Online trolls don't actually need to be for or against any particular candidate or issue, they just want to stir up division and strife, and can use either side of any possible divide to do their work. Heck, wouldn't put it past folks to have accounts pretending to be on both sides, and sniping at 'each other' to stir things up.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,729 posts)He got caught because he didn't change his handle when he was arguing with himself.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Yeah, I'd think that the professional operatives would do less to alienate Democratic voters...
FSogol
(45,699 posts)![](/emoticons/facepalm.gif)
peecoolyour
(336 posts)They are used to people who say a lot about stuff.
But then never really follow through on it.
Give them time, they'll adjust.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)an hour or two long? His record speaks for itself and he will have many more chances to speak to these issues.
People are sure finding BS reasons to get bent out of shape about ONE speech.
pampango
(24,692 posts)Even (especially?) stupid opinions have to come from the dreaded "operatives"!
NYC Liberal
(20,154 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)needs to get rid of them immediately and completely disavow any association with them, or they will continue to damage the reputation and dignity of her campaign.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)I don't think I inferred the OP wrongly at all.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)so, implication? your interpretation makes it right, by gosh. !!!
you believe these long time duers are "operatives" lmFao, again
well. glad you spelled it out for me.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)and no one has to tell me anything. My understanding comes from reading your interactions and replies and OPs.
Yes, I think you have to have things spelled out for you clearly and, in no uncertain terms preferably using words of one syllable.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i am a dummy?
do you have to speak really, really, ..... slow, too?
hey
welcome to du.
romanic
(2,841 posts)It's stemming from the whole economic vs social justice debate plus Bernie had mostly white people at his kick-off speech which brought out the "racist" horde out of nowhere.
That and because people just want to fucking argue for the sake of it. :/
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)worked a lot faster.
Imagine if you could click on a dozen or two of those little x's at once and then *poof*
Trajan
(19,089 posts)"What's up with that? ... "
Sing like SNL ...
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Earlier, there was the insinuation that anyone who supports Bernie is a "useful idiot" for Republican ratfuckers.
And before that, there was the screaming that Bernie was going to pull a Ralph Nader and spoil the election for the Republicans, which is especially laughable considering that Bernie is running for President as a Democrat, not an independent or third-party candidate.
And there was the accusations that Bernie is an NRA-certified gun nut...
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)and "Clinton Operatives" really? Someone is watching way too many Bourne movies.
Making up persecution posts to bolster Bernie, isn't a way to go about it either. Speaking of which, I suppose you havent seen all the shit being posted about HRC lately, have you?
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Probably just some Clinton supporters who are tired of Hillary being endlessly attacked here and wanted to add some variety.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Sissyk
(12,665 posts)At this point, host consensus is to lock each OP that mentions, talks about DU, DU members, or "here".
Positive threads about Democratic Underground or its members are are permitted.
Threads complaining about Democratic Underground or its members; threads complaining about jury decisions, locked threads, suspensions, bannings, or the like; and threads intended to disrupt or negatively influence the normal workings of Democratic Underground and its community moderating system are not permitted.