General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBloomberg: Unions Drawing Line in Sand With Hillary Clinton and Democrats on Trade Deal
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-05-29/unions-drawing-line-in-sand-with-hillary-clinton-and-democrats-on-trade-deal
May 29, 2015 10:33 AM CDT
As the clash moves toward a vote in the House of Representatives, the union is beginning to pressure Democrats directly
By Emily Greenhouse,
The AFL-CIO, the largest labor federation in the United States, is typically allied with Democrats, but today finds itself moving away from the Democratic president over Obamas proposed trade pact.
In an interview with Susan Page of USA Today, Richard Trumka, the unions president, on Friday warned Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton that the wrong position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership could cost her much union support.
She's going to have to answer that, Trumka said of her position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. I think she won't be able to go through a campaign without answering that and people will take it seriously and it will affect whether they vote for her or don't vote for her.
As the clash moves toward a vote in the House of Representativeswhich Trumka predicted would failthe union is beginning to pressure Democrats directly. The AFL-CIO, the New York Times reported Friday, has launched an aggressive ad campaign against Democrats who support the president on the pact.
FULL story at link.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)came in front of her. It would be like Obama saying on the campaign trail that he would rein in Wall Street, in reality it ain't going to happen!
sendero
(28,552 posts)... her words on the subject will mean NOTHING. Look at her past deeds for the best clue of where she really stands.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Amazing how many people, even on this site, are anti-Union and anti-labor.
Backwoodsrider
(764 posts)Unless that party goes back to doing things for the union. Maybe unions go the way of the Chamber of Commerce? After all the current shot callers in the GOP are looking for a new base now that theirs is either dying, nuts or woke the f up that national politics don't matter.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I've been an AFSCME member for over 30 years. Retired public employee now.
Without fail AFSCME has always supported the democratic candidate for governor in my state.
Even though in my time the 2 governors who gave us the biggest pay raises were republicans.
One governor, republican who was opposed by AFSCME sat down with the union after the election and agreed to a 3 year pay raise that gave us more money than any governor in my 30 year career. He also appointed a director to my agency that gave everybody 5%. When the election came around the union supported not him, but the Democrat. Who if I recall did not give us ANYTHING in his 4 year term.
I'm a democrat thru and thru, but it really rubbed me the wrong way that after the raises the union couldn't at least get some concrete promise out of any of the democratic governors for us, yet they supported them.
I think the union should support the candidate that promises the best deal for the membership, regardless of party.
Response to hollowdweller (Reply #11)
Backwoodsrider This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)It's time to support him and get him the exposure he needs to win. What are you waiting for?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)turbinetree
(24,695 posts)Sanders response:
http://www.ringoffireradio.com/2015/02/bernie-sanders-on-the-tpp-not-another-nafta/
I rest my case, I support the man who supports me, and my union brothers and sisters, he has not sat on the side lines hemming and hawing
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)But that was before the progressives stood up to fight, so now she's trying to lay low.
A Timeline Of Hillary Clinton's Evolution On Trade
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/04/21/401123124/a-timeline-of-hillary-clintons-evolution-on-trade
Why is "evolution" so often used with HRC? Curious.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)is the reason that I do not trust this woman.
Her evolution is based in part on my opinion when she was a Goldwater Girl.
I am reading three books by Rick Perlstein, about the republican machine during Goldwater , Nixon and Reagan, and it brought back many memories about why I have always been a democrat, anti-draft, war, pro -union, civil liberties, environment, ect.....
They (republicans) will do whatever it takes to subvert the Constitution, subvert any means possible to gain power at all means, and to hell with everyone else, and for some reason I see a façade in her, and this election is going to be about trust----------and I mean trust.
When she was on the board of directors at Wal Mart she hemmed and hawed on being questioned on why she didn't do more for the worker, men and woman.
And most people do not realize that she was there when they started to remove the made in America brand and replace it with foreign made products.
She did some other good things, for woman and others items while in the senate, but her position with the worker has not in opinion been totally with us.
The third way position gave us NAFTA-----------and then we have gotten the false promise
But her sitting on that board says a lot about her position of wage and unions, middle class, ect..... and then your fine piece on her position, which I thank you very much, truly says everything about her waffling and trying to have it both ways ------------------- its not going to happen this time.
Like Warren and Sanders, Brown ect.... have said many times the system is rigged and its rigged for the rich and the powerful.
Again Thank you for the opposition research
democrank
(11,094 posts)and thanks for your long-standing support for workers.
Mbrow
(1,090 posts)Go Bernie!
peecoolyour
(336 posts)Should be a no-brainer for any Democrat worth our time.
Also: Anytime Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan are happy, the American people are getting fucked.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)a whole lot of soul-searching. This may be the first time in a long time a real candidate can speak for Labor. Get on the Bus, Sir, your members need a welcome place to sit. Only a Socialist will be willing to "hand out" decent wages. It's the Capitalists that go wherever any country offers them the best deal...profits, you know.
I believe that is the crux of this election in a nutshell. And it affects all classes, races, gender, religions, sexual orientationt et al. There aren't many gray areas any more.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Why Labor Should Get Behind Bernie Sanders in the Primary Elections
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026750062