General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPRESS RELEASE – Relkin Law Tackles Haas v Romney Racketeering & eToys cs
Some of you are aware that yours truly sued Willard Mitt Romney and a plethora of cohorts - including Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs - for Racketeering (see previous thread - HERE). Most have given up and (sad to say) many keep telling me to give up. That's a sad thing. This is why Wall Street fraudsters tend to always succeed in their chicanery; because the victims see the DOJ is protecting (instead of prosecuting) Wall Street Frauds.
But now comes David H. Relkin Law firm - to the rescue.
[center]
[/center]
It took moi a while to find counsel. For years many a naysayer tends to bellow "If Laser's case is so strong against Romney - why hasn't any attorney at law taken the case"? This is a remark by people who have never gone through losing everything you have to justice system protected crooks.
A more better question should have been "If Laser's case isn't correct against Romney - why hasn't Mitt and friends sued him for something"? At the barest of minimums, shouldn't some court have fined me by now? After all, I've filed over 100 briefs in many courts (DE Bankruptcy, District Courts, Circuit Courts, NY Supreme Court).
The answer is - Romney wouldn't dare sue me - and the courts wouldn't DARE fine me;
because everything I'm saying is true.
What moi really needed, is an attorney of top pedigree (David and his father were partners at Duane Morris and David's uncle is the wonderful former New York Supreme Court Chief Justice His Honor Charles Breitel - see Wikipedia - HERE).
Furthermore, every counsel that represented moi in the past - sold out.
As for big firms, it's too easy for them to move an associate out to another position and tell you that there's no one left to handle the case. For no one wants to piss off the possible future lucrative Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and/or Bain Capital. Much less the issue of getting to do a solid for the POTUS wannabe.
David H. Relkin IS the guy Laser Haas has been looking for. A man who believes in justice. He began as a prosecutor in New York and has worked his way through professional firms, arriving on his own - after 3 decades. He is a PRO in issues of fraudulent conveyances - and has even established case law thereof.
Mr. Relkin also teaches CLE classes of Law.
Here's my self explanatory
[center][font size=6] PRESS RELEASE[/font][/center]
New York 212-244-8722 (phone) RelkinLaw.com
PRESS RELEASE Relkin Law Tackles Haas v Romney Racketeering & eToys
The New York firm of DAVID H. RELKIN Law Agrees to represent Laser Haas & his CLI entity: Concerning eToys massive frauds and HAAS v ROMNEY RICO
David H. Relkin agrees to be retained by Laser Haas to address the issues of fraudulent conveyances, conspiracy to defraud and intentional frauds on the courts issues in the New York Supreme Court case of eToys (ebc1) v. Goldman Sachs, the Kay Bee and eToys Bankruptcy cases in Delaware, The Learning Company merger with Mattel Toys (billions lost) and the HAAS v ROMNEY et., al. Racketeering case filed in Los Angeles (# 2:13-cv-7738)
Too Big to be Investigated; Much Less Prosecuted or Jailed
In 2001 Laser and his Collateral Logistics, Inc., (CLI) firm halted the sale of eToys.com to Bain Capital/ Kay Bee for $5.4 million; and did then compel bids of tens of millions. Laser was unaware the eToys.com Debtor & Creditors counsel and a hand-picked CEO, were secretly linked to Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs. This deception harmed Kay Bee and eToys bankruptcies in the hundreds of millions. And also corrupted the New York Supreme Court case of ebc1 (eToys) v Goldman Sachs.
Due to the Wall Street firms being too big to even investigate, much less prosecute, major frauds sprouted up and grew across the country. Including the Tom Petters Ponzi and Marc Dreier frauds that are directly linked to the eToys cases. Several parties confessed to bogus affidavits and got off easy!
David Relkins Legal Experience
In eToys, the good ole boys continue to lie and blame the whistle blower. Hence, it took Laser a while to find a counsel smart enough and honorable enough, with ample moxie. David H. Relkin began as a New York prosecutor who gained skills in RICO, complex commercial litigations, fraudulent conveyances and bankruptcies. Upon detailed review by Relkin Law, it appears that Laser and his Collateral Logistics, Inc. (CLI) are entitled to considerable compensation in the millions of dollars.
No sane person believes that those who confessed lying in court, are allowed to put for a forgery claiming CLI waived $3.7 million in fees. As a result of Laser Haass whistleblowing, he lost his rising career and the marketability of his companies.
Mitt may have quit (do you really think so) - and he certainly did throw in the towel against Holyfield...
But this fights the real deal - and Pitten's ain't gonna like the outcome!
[br]
1 vote, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Get em - nail the Wall Street Bandits | |
1 (100%) |
|
No one gives a chit | |
0 (0%) |
|
Laser is a kumquat | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
ablamj
(333 posts)keep fighting the good fight!
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)One sharp character
and someone HAS to do this....
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)before anyone else really does
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I loved that store. I was pissed when it went under and wondered why.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)In..fer done..as. In
Toast
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Mitt is such a brilliant biz guy - he would never want to be involved in an industry -
that was "lacking in sales".
So - that's why - eToys and Kay Bee were in bankruptcy multiple times;
but always seem to wind up back under the ownership of Romney's Bain.
--------------------------------------
And - of course - the losing of $100 million to Bain Cap and Kay Bee CEO Michael Glazer
before Kay Bee filed its first bankruptcy
most certainly had nothing to do with the "Lack of Sales".
Cause - ya know - it today's world, nobody pays invoices with real money anyway.
---------------------------------------
Mitt's ownership of The Learning Company - that merged with Mattel - by crooked lawfirm MNAT
and costing Mattel investors a $3 billion dollar immediate loss - surely wouldn't create a lack of sales.
----------------------------------------
For - Mitt is a true, Red, White & Blue biz man - smart and clean to the highest order. And those "lack of sales" are the real reason why Romney and Bain Capital just dumped the toy industry all together.
Except - OOPs - they didn't.
For the real formula of Mitt & Bain Capital - is to get theirs and damn everyone else (including moi)
WHEREAS, eToys and Kay Bee were in bankruptcy multiple times, and kept winding back their way to Bain Capital - this time under Toys R Us.
For Mitt & Gangs lack NO salesmanship on selling their crime, corruption and other bullshit
as just doing "bizness"
Kabeesh!