General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFlorida needs to pardon the gal who just got 20 years for firing a warning shot
What the fuck is wrong with the law enforcement there? It is like they are making the shit up as they go!
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)I don't live in Florida, but it shouldn't matter. This has just torn me up inside. I can't imagine what her kids are going through.
This case can't go away. It needs to embarass the hell outta Florida. "Stand Your Ground" was friggin' MADE for a case like this, not for some wannabe cop who's afraid of black teenagers.
think
(11,641 posts)How the people who got her this sentence can live with themselves is beyond me.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Laxman
(2,419 posts)or maybe she was just exercising her 2nd Amendment rights?
Bill219
(1,235 posts)After leaving the house the first time, she realized that she did not have her keys. So she grabbed the gun and went back inside the house to get them which is when she fired the warning shot.
It seems like a load of shit that Zimmerman can use the "Stand Your Ground" defense when he was the person chasing after someone , but this poor woman is denied the chance to use that defense and gets this harsh judgement.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)and the garage door was locked and she couldn't get out.
So, she went back into the main part of the house.
Cerridwen
(13,258 posts)Marissa's story didn't fit the definition of "self defense" according to corey.
link
It's very difficult to unscramble a lot of the details coming out. It seems each media outlet has their own slant and their own selective use of details.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)This sentence is outrageous.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)decision. I am assuming it was a jury. Judge didnt have much leeway, which is another problem.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)Which leads me to believe they didn't give a shit.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)juries apply two separate standards of justice to defendants: rich and white get to stand their ground, poor and black not so much.
dkf
(37,305 posts)If SYG was meant for any case it is this one. I do not understand how this does not apply.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)think
(11,641 posts)This woman deserves to be free. In my eyes the real criminals appear to be the prosecutors that consider this a fair and just punishment for this incident.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)"No black person shall have the same right to Stand Your Ground as others." It's in the Barney Fife Police Handbook.
Baitball Blogger
(46,706 posts)think
(11,641 posts)they are doing in the name of justice because they have missed the mark completely.
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)think
(11,641 posts)crazyjoe
(1,191 posts)She should of never grabbed a firearm and went back into the house, that asking for trouble. Firing a "warning" shot, especially with children in the house, was clearly illegal, and stupid. Anyone on DU that thinks that's ok is a hypocrite.
But giving her 20 years in jail is ridiculous, and an obvious example of black vs white sentencing.
think
(11,641 posts)and the punishment is very extreme especially in light of the circumstances. The only way I can see to really rectify the matter is for her to be pardoned.
Perhaps legal eagles have a better solution but to let this woman sit in prison for any extended length of time for shooting a warning shot is a complete miscarriage of justice.
crazyjoe
(1,191 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)she gave the shootee a black eye a few months after being released on bail.
Instead of her trying to work toward a resolution, about four months into this thing, claiming to be so afraid of this man, she went barging to his house and attacked him, Corey said. So it didnt show much of her being remorseful of what happened and being a peaceful person.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/marissa-alexander-prosecutor_n_1504428.html
Of course, that's only part of the story.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)She said it was a warning shot. Why should anyone not believe her?
Cave_Johnson
(137 posts)Corey said she had offered Alexander a plea bargain that would have resulted in a three-year prison sentence, but Alexander chose to take the case to a jury trial, where a conviction would carry a mandatory sentence under a Florida law known as "10-20-life."
The law mandates increased penalties for some felonies, including aggravated assault, in which a gun is carried or used.
Corey said the case deserved to be prosecuted because Alexander fired in the direction of a room where two children were standing.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/11/justice/florida-stand-ground-sentencing/index.html
________________________________
Warning shots are never never never never never a good idea.
Shoot for center mass or don't shoot at all.
On a side note, I wonder if she had hollow points.
crazyjoe
(1,191 posts)a huge chance that someone is going to be shot. You never know where that bullet is going to end up, especially in an emotional situation.
There is no defense for her actions, imho.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)be a "warning shot" than a miss.
For her, it's too bad that her family who categorized the shot as a "warning shot" couldn't be on the jury.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)only way she could leave was through the house.
Guy had previously put her in the hospital and had threatened to kill her.
Kaleva
(36,299 posts)A full pardon
A pardon without firearm authority (meaning she can't posses a gun in Florida)
A commutation of sentence
A conditional clemency
http://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011-Amended-Rules-for-Executive-Clemency.final_.3-9.pdf
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)SYG was obviously meant to apply only to white people.
crazyjoe
(1,191 posts)think
(11,641 posts)she fired to defend herself from an abusive husband who admitted physically abusing her on 5 separate occasions. (I've put the husbands word in bold for emphasis):
~snip~
Beyond this, the media, even those sympathetic to the case, have focused more on the "stand your ground" and "he said/she said" aspects of the case and have largely ignored the most damning piece of evidence: a November 22, 2010 sworn deposition from Marissa's husband/"crime victim"/alleged abuser (found on here or here). In the 66-page document, he not only admits to abusing her at least five times, he also affirms that Marissa never pointed the gun at him or his children and that he did walk toward her before she shot in the air and began "cursing" at her. Some of the most chilling admissions from her husband are made on page 36 in reference to his state of mind during their August 1, 2010 encounter:
"...I just don't know what would have happened. If my kids wouldn't have been there, I probably would have put my hands on her."
"Probably hit her. I got five baby mamas and I put my hand on every last one of them except one."
"I physically abused them; physically, emotionally, you know, it's like...Me, the way I was with women, they was like they had to walk on eggshells around me. You know, they never knew what I was thinking... or what I might do... hit them, push them."
It is unclear to those of us newly acquainted with the case whether or not a jury ever heard or read those words from the deposition. It is also unclear if her husband ever recanted those statements in court. But even for legal minds that acquired their knowledge through watching <em>Law and Order</em>, it does seem clear that her husband's admissions raise enough reasonable doubt that she did nothing wrong. If you look at Florida's "justifiable force" (what is now know as "stand your ground" statutes, the intro basically says it all:
~snip
Full article:
http://www.organizingupgrade.com/index.php/blogs/subhash-kateel
Here's the article stating 458 days served already:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2143313/Abused-Florida-wife-sentenced-20-YEARS-firing-warning-shot-husband-Stand-Your-Ground-defence-fails.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
So yes, I believe 458 is more than adequate punishment for firing a warning shot when trying to get a way from an abusive husband in a state especially since the state has a stand your ground law.
Kaleva
(36,299 posts)She was in the kitchen when she fired the gun.
She was later out on bail and ignored a court order not to have contact with her husband. She ignored that order and allegedly discussed with her husband about what he was to say in his disposition so that she wouldn't be prosecuted. In their final meeting, she attacked her husband who called 911 and she was arrested again and her bail revoked.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89763383/States-Motion-in-Opposition-of-Defendants-Motion-for-Immunity
think
(11,641 posts)I am surprised this was not mentioned in many of the main stream reports. I stand corrected.
20 years is still pretty steep but after reading that she should have took the plea bargain.
Kaleva
(36,299 posts)I think 20 years is way too much but after reading that report, my opinion on the woman changed.