Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
76 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FYI - the c-word does not have a negative connotation for all people: (Original Post) grahamhgreen Jun 2015 OP
It's a term of endearment in the UK. PeteSelman Jun 2015 #1
Yup, over there its like being offended Cuz you called someone dude. grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #2
This is irrelevant treestar Jun 2015 #11
Wouldn't be happening if a Hillary supporter MoonRiver Jun 2015 #29
If you really believe that, try visiting the UK and using it in a variety of social settings. Denzil_DC Jun 2015 #16
DU is not located, nor are most of its posters, in the UK nor Australia. Your point is irrelevent. hlthe2b Jun 2015 #23
The Admin who banned NYC_SKP is from the UK. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #30
What he didn't find endearing... Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #34
I take him at his word. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #36
yes, context matters and the use on DU which resulted in the ban was a pretty negative use of the JI7 Jun 2015 #3
B-b-but . . . that four-letter-word was NOT used by the person banned. Petrushka Jun 2015 #4
Exactly the intent was so obvious treestar Jun 2015 #12
B-b-but he knew what he wrote meant it and used it anyway... CTyankee Jun 2015 #26
"B-b-but he knew...." ??? It's awesome . . . Petrushka Jun 2015 #70
Try using it as described in that.......article....... WillowTree Jun 2015 #5
The actual context makes it much more muddled Egnever Jun 2015 #6
Very well stated Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #7
We know how much that poster hated Hillary treestar Jun 2015 #13
Somehow I missed this entire brouhaha. Vinca Jun 2015 #18
No, unless you are using it as part of a tongue twister mythology Jun 2015 #24
I think the phrase "cunning stunt" and the tongue twister embedded within is what is at issue, but KingCharlemagne Jun 2015 #25
We are now into silly season nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #41
Thread Winner. Game over. Thank you all for playing. Hiraeth Jun 2015 #35
Just wondering dsc Jun 2015 #39
Cute but not relevant Egnever Jun 2015 #58
Exactly GCP Jun 2015 #74
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #14
It does in our culture. Kind of irrelevant that it's perceived differently in AU cali Jun 2015 #8
DU is an interntional board, so what is "our" culture? SwissTony Jun 2015 #10
DU's culture is it's own culture el_bryanto Jun 2015 #20
I'm an Aussie and would not use the c-word. SwissTony Jun 2015 #33
Why swisstony? grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #42
It's a word that offends many people and unless there's a good reason for using it SwissTony Jun 2015 #50
It depends on who's using it and how.... Violet_Crumble Jun 2015 #17
Violet, you can call me "dickhead" any time. SwissTony Jun 2015 #37
My son-in-law is Aussie, Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #46
And the greater the affection the "worse" the name SwissTony Jun 2015 #56
Exactly. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #66
Just out of interest, Union or League? I'm not asking for his name. Just curious. n/t SwissTony Jun 2015 #67
I'm not sure. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #69
Rugby League is the game I SHOULD have played. SwissTony Jun 2015 #71
They're always watching rugby on TV down there. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #72
How Aussies address each other often surprises and confuses furriners. SwissTony Jun 2015 #9
Your personal likes and dislikes -or Australia's or mine- are irrelevant. randome Jun 2015 #15
Oh for fuck's sake. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #19
You just used f***, lol! grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #43
I've seen similar justification for using the n-word. nt. LexVegas Jun 2015 #21
Is one of their houses in a different country? NCTraveler Jun 2015 #22
Irrelevant. MineralMan Jun 2015 #27
If it was serious, if it was a bad joke taken the wrong way, well.... grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #45
Who cares? sammythecat Jun 2015 #28
But where is "here"? SwissTony Jun 2015 #38
Wow! What a clever way of looking at it. sammythecat Jun 2015 #40
LOL I actually have a cat called Sammy. Nice puddy n/t SwissTony Jun 2015 #51
You had an argument? I must have missed that? n/t SwissTony Jun 2015 #60
When a person is writing, MuseRider Jun 2015 #31
Straight to the point - what SKIP said was meant as an insult to Hillary Rhodam Clinton. Rex Jun 2015 #32
Who gives a shit? Act_of_Reparation Jun 2015 #44
It's possible that some people may have mistook a bad joke done in poor taste as a vicious verbal grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #47
No more, nor no less possible than some people may have mistook LanternWaste Jun 2015 #48
Would you agree that intent is important in this context? grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #49
I remain unconvinced. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2015 #53
But he didn't use it, it was a play on words. That leads me to believe it was intended grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #55
What if he had "joked" about the words "nuck figgers" in a thread about Obama? beam me up scottie Jun 2015 #68
Simple logic, BMUS. Racial slurs are bad. Gendered slurs are fine. Because jokes. Act_of_Reparation Jun 2015 #75
i may not say it but i think about it every few minutes samsingh Jun 2015 #52
We're not all people. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #54
RESULTS OF JURY SERVICE --> 0-7 LEAVE IT nashville_brook Jun 2015 #57
I apologize for offending the alerter. Post is not meant to offend, but to inform. grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #59
thanks for the clarification, but it's not necessary. any reasonable person knows this... nashville_brook Jun 2015 #62
The censorious feel emboldened. The jury disagrees. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #61
And in the U.S. we use the word 'fannie' kiva Jun 2015 #63
"Education yourself"? lol grahamhgreen Jun 2015 #65
Ooooh, typo negates everything else in a post. kiva Jun 2015 #73
I once posted a video of Jarvis Cocker's excellent song "C**ts Are Still Running the World" whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #64
Offensive lands with the reciever of the message liberal N proud Jun 2015 #76

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
1. It's a term of endearment in the UK.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:55 AM
Jun 2015

All my overseas Facebook friends use it all the time. It's no big deal.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
11. This is irrelevant
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:48 AM
Jun 2015

The banned poster is American. Cannot believe I seeing liberals defend use of this word.

Denzil_DC

(7,232 posts)
16. If you really believe that, try visiting the UK and using it in a variety of social settings.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:29 AM
Jun 2015

The reactions may be mixed, but I think you'll find a consensus emerging, and I doubt it'll be the one you believe your Facebook friends represent.

hlthe2b

(102,225 posts)
23. DU is not located, nor are most of its posters, in the UK nor Australia. Your point is irrelevent.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:02 AM
Jun 2015

JI7

(89,247 posts)
3. yes, context matters and the use on DU which resulted in the ban was a pretty negative use of the
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:10 AM
Jun 2015

word . and that's putting it lightly

treestar

(82,383 posts)
12. Exactly the intent was so obvious
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:50 AM
Jun 2015

Amazing people defend this misogyny. The surgery used as an excuse too. Claiming it is no worse than calling a man a dick. Incredible.

CTyankee

(63,902 posts)
26. B-b-but he knew what he wrote meant it and used it anyway...
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:40 AM
Jun 2015

such splitting hair arguments are really not convincing...you fool no one...

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
70. "B-b-but he knew...." ??? It's awesome . . .
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:10 PM
Jun 2015

. . . to see how many unrecognized mind-readers are making their presentiments known on DU.


WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
5. Try using it as described in that.......article.......
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:19 AM
Jun 2015

.......on the street in NYC and let us know how that works out for ya.

But that wasn't the context as used in the post in question. And frankly, in this country, it's pretty much universally considered in a negative manner. So how it's used 9000 miles away from here really isn't germane.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
6. The actual context makes it much more muddled
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:32 AM
Jun 2015

Since it was in reference to Hillary telling reporters her speech was their interview. A cunning stunt is a perfectly apt description.

The double entendre was certainly intended but that is why it is muddled IMHO.

I understand people taking offense to it on the other hand I also see the the cleverness of the double entendre. It seems to me he thought what the person he responded to had been clever with it and rehashed it.

Was his intention to call Hillary a C word or was his intention to recognize the play on words I am not sure that is clear.

And in the context of the level of obnoxiousness this board has become I find an outright banning of a decade long poster over it troubling.

A hide certainly, but a banning smacks of a personal action instead of a reasoned response to an offensive post.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
13. We know how much that poster hated Hillary
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:53 AM
Jun 2015

Doesn't matter how any posts they had. The severed hatred was obviously infected with misogyny too. it is not at all troubling that it is a ban offense on a board for Democrats whose likely validate is a woman.

Vinca

(50,261 posts)
18. Somehow I missed this entire brouhaha.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:38 AM
Jun 2015

Are the PC police telling us we can no longer use the word "cunning?" It gets so confusing what one can and can't use from one day to the next.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
24. No, unless you are using it as part of a tongue twister
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:09 AM
Jun 2015

to get people to mix up the first sounds making it stunning and well, you get the rest.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
25. I think the phrase "cunning stunt" and the tongue twister embedded within is what is at issue, but
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:24 AM
Jun 2015

I agree that it's confusing as all get out.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
41. We are now into silly season
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jun 2015

and banning season

Watch what you say, period

(It is like all other primary seasons, but this one will be far worst)

dsc

(52,155 posts)
39. Just wondering
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 12:15 PM
Jun 2015

if a poster played as fast and loose with racist language as he did with sexist language would you still be defending it.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
58. Cute but not relevant
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:14 PM
Jun 2015

I am not defending it I am speaking against a baning with no warning that seems to be motivated by politics as opposed to adherence to the rules.

The fact that you can search for the actual word on this site and find plenty of instances of it being used with out repercussion makes this ban a farce.

Lot's of vile posts on this site that only get hides. Why is this one so special that it warrants a ban of a long time poster?



GCP

(8,166 posts)
74. Exactly
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 03:08 AM
Jun 2015

The word police have gone too far this time. I've been on DU since 2001 and I've never seen the political correctness as bad as it is now.

Response to WillowTree (Reply #5)

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
20. DU's culture is it's own culture
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:43 AM
Jun 2015

If there was a visitor from Australia who used that word and legitimately didn't know it was offensive, presumably upon discovering it was offensive he or she would apologize and promise not to say it again. I don't think NYC Skip has that defense, though.

Bryant

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
33. I'm an Aussie and would not use the c-word.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 11:54 AM
Jun 2015

And most certainly not the n-word. I know both are offensive.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
50. It's a word that offends many people and unless there's a good reason for using it
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:03 PM
Jun 2015

I wouldn't do so. Particularly as we're on an international board where some of us say tom-ay-to and others say tom-ah-to.

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
17. It depends on who's using it and how....
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:29 AM
Jun 2015

If an American DUer is calling someone else one, it's bad...

If an Australian DUer is calling someone else one at DU, it's kind of bad because we should follow the When In Rome rule at DU...

If, on the other hand, American DUers get outraged that the word's commonly used here and doesn't have the same shock value, then that's bad:

Australia's Opposition Leader Just Called A C**t In Parliament

I'm not sure what the call is if I were to greet Swiss Tony with it if he posted in the Australia Group, which is, btw, the one place at DU where my culture fucking rules!!

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
37. Violet, you can call me "dickhead" any time.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 12:04 PM
Jun 2015

My Dutch wife and kids do so. They are also Aussies.

As I said in another post on this thread, we Aussies often call each other names that would shock non-Aussies. We know how things work in Oz.

But on DU, I know what's OK in Oz can cause offence elsewhere. So, I don't use certain words and phrases.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
46. My son-in-law is Aussie,
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:26 PM
Jun 2015

and he's used some affectionate nicknames for his kids, too, that might raise some American eyebrows, but his loving intent is very clear.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
56. And the greater the affection the "worse" the name
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:13 PM
Jun 2015

In Aussie, if you haven't seen your best mate for a few weeks, you'll greet him with something like "You fucking ugly bastard".

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
66. Exactly.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 05:03 PM
Jun 2015

My son-in-law was a professional rugby player. When he gets around his old teammates the conversations are hilariously ribald.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
69. I'm not sure.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 05:46 PM
Jun 2015

Whatever one was good enough for him to get his cover shot on the Rugby magazine at one time. I believe he played for at least Australia, Hong Kong, and Great Britain, and then when he was semi-retired he played with the Santa Monica guys, which is where he met my daughter, who was playing with the Santa Monica ladies rugby team. I'll PM you his name, maybe you know of him.

We met some semi-elderly Australian ladies out at the Iditarod finish in Nome a few years ago who knew exactly who he was. That kind of tickled me.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
71. Rugby League is the game I SHOULD have played.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:12 PM
Jun 2015

I was born in Glasgow (Scotland) in 1950. Glasgow was not a rugby town in those days.

My family moved to Adelaide in 1960. Not a rugby town either. I remember playing a soccer game and then standing watching a rugby game - the first I'd ever seen.

I became a rugby fan at about 3:30 am one morning. I had a dreadful cold and had been sleeping and woke up at some ungodly hour. Nothing to do, so I put the TV on. There was a Home Nations game: Scotland v England (The Auld Enemy) so i watched it. I was amazed at the skill level - one Scottish guy unloaded a ball to his teammate to score a try while being smashed into the ground.

The fact that the game was being shown at 3:30 am says all you need to know about how rugby was regarded in Adelaide in the early 70s.

Some years later, I discovered Rugby League. I was watching it on TV and thought "Oh, WOW". And then my wife said "You should have played this game."

Remind your SIL that the State Of Origin has already started if he needs the reminder.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
72. They're always watching rugby on TV down there.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:15 PM
Jun 2015

I'm sure he's aware.

The rugby players I've met through him are such interesting guys and really much different than, say, our professional football players. They're gentlemen. It's a tough sport, though.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
9. How Aussies address each other often surprises and confuses furriners.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 06:41 AM
Jun 2015

I used to teach maths (in Oz) at tertiary level and one day I was sitting in the staff room talking to a mate and fellow lecturer when the head of the department walked in. He said "I've been looking for you two. You're a pair of dickheads." There was a Canadian lecturer on exchange sitting just opposite us. He was shocked. He told us later that such a comment would have lead to a fist fight in Canada. Our reaction? Mate's: "Oh, why is that, (name)?" Mine: "Have you just worked that out, (name)?"

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
15. Your personal likes and dislikes -or Australia's or mine- are irrelevant.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 07:19 AM
Jun 2015

Last edited Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:01 AM - Edit history (1)

It's understandable that some would see use of that word as offensive and worthy of a ban. Like calling Muslims 'ragheads'.

Trying to see things from other points of view makes life so much easier, IMO.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
22. Is one of their houses in a different country?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 08:02 AM
Jun 2015

Were they posting from one of their foreign villas? lol. This is where it's going now.

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
27. Irrelevant.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jun 2015

Applying that word to a potential Democratic candidate for President is entirely a different matter. It is not the word, or the play on words, alone that is the problem here. That level of disrespect for a woman who is very likely to be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States simply has no place on a website named Democratic Underground.

Such vile insults have no place here, and are incredibly easy to avoid. Using such an insult is a deliberate decision.

Never mind the misogynistic elements of that slur. Aiming it at Hillary Clinton is the real offense. We know better. We can do better. We should do better.

sammythecat

(3,568 posts)
28. Who cares?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 11:01 AM
Jun 2015

We're not in any of those places, we're here, and here that word has an extremely negative connotation and everybody here knows that.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
38. But where is "here"?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 12:10 PM
Jun 2015

I'm pretty sure your "here" is not my "here" and Violet's "here" is not the same as yours.

This is an international board. We've got US expats posting here. We've got Brits and Aussies posting.

sammythecat

(3,568 posts)
40. Wow! What a clever way of looking at it.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jun 2015

Another Gerry Spence, you completely destroyed my argument.

I guess you're right!

Go ahead and use it then.

MuseRider

(34,105 posts)
31. When a person is writing,
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 11:05 AM
Jun 2015

even if they are angry, they have a chance to rethink and change what they write before sending it on. He has been a member for a very long time, he knows the rules and the sensibilities of the forum. This stupid "he was quoting the post above so we would know what was said once it was gone" is ridiculous. It could have been done without saying what he said. It seemed very much like an opportunity to get by with something and he took it.

The thing about "it is just a word" is true until you are on the end of the word when it is used the way it is meant in most situations. Most men I know will not even flinch if you call them a gender specific word as an insult but they are rarely used to judge the recipient and all those like them in the horrific ways the c-word is used for women. Of course, things being what they are, I need to mention that I am not talking about ALL men. See how that works? I must use that little phrase, "not all men" constantly. Me thinks y'all are pretty sensitive but have a certain way you get around it without looking like "silly little babies".

When I was was little a relative of mine had a stash of very graphic written porn. I was a little girl, not older than 10 when I found it and was mesmerized since in the early 60's TV spouses still slept in separate beds. Much of it was the all powerful men and women were frequently being raped (of course they ended up loving it) but the prevailing word used for insults, verbal battery and disgust was that word. It will never fail to bring me to my knees when I hear it. It was not cute, funny nor a term of endearment.

If this site chooses to let this slide I don't think there is a chance I can participate. Once this starts it will be fair game against women with the word play. Hillary brings the worst out in some people and the backlash from the other side is already frightening to anticipate. Can't we please be civil here with regards to gender specific insults? I know insults in general are the norm but think about it and those you are harming. It can really be hard to read.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
32. Straight to the point - what SKIP said was meant as an insult to Hillary Rhodam Clinton.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 11:07 AM
Jun 2015

You can't paint a barn red and then tell everyone it is blue...doesn't work that way, the EYES won't lie...they never will.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
44. Who gives a shit?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:19 PM
Jun 2015

In some circles, the n-word is a term of endearment. But not here. So don't fucking use it.

Not a terribly hard concept to wrap one's head around.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
47. It's possible that some people may have mistook a bad joke done in poor taste as a vicious verbal
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:42 PM
Jun 2015

Attack meant to demean, demoralize, degrade and bully.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
48. No more, nor no less possible than some people may have mistook
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:45 PM
Jun 2015

No more, nor no less possible than some people may have mistook an attack meant to demean, demoralize, degrade and bully as little more than a bad joke in poor taste...

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
53. I remain unconvinced.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:11 PM
Jun 2015

Sarcasm doesn't give you license to the Leviathan of gendered slurs. It won't protect you from those who find any use of the word, humorous or not, an attack on women. So my rationale steadfastly remains: don't fucking use it. Ever.

This place isn't your house, and not everyone reading these forums is your fucking friend. So it's probably best you not say anything here you wouldn't say in public, in front of your grandmother.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
68. What if he had "joked" about the words "nuck figgers" in a thread about Obama?
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 05:29 PM
Jun 2015

Would everybody still be falling all over themselves to excuse his use of a slur?

Somehow I doubt it.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
54. We're not all people.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jun 2015

As, no doubt, many folks have already said in the comments, most of the folks on this site are Americans, and in America, it's one of the most misogynistic words out there.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
57. RESULTS OF JURY SERVICE --> 0-7 LEAVE IT
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:13 PM
Jun 2015

On Fri Jun 5, 2015, 01:02 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

FYI - the c-word does not have a negative connotation for all people:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026783073

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

No amount of excuses makes using the c-word okay here. Just stop trying to defend that shit.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Jun 5, 2015, 01:11 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am not going to hide the truth!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This OP doesn't meet the threshold for a hide imo.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
62. thanks for the clarification, but it's not necessary. any reasonable person knows this...
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jun 2015

the alerter, on the other hand, is clearly one of those throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks. it's sad, middle school behavior.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
63. And in the U.S. we use the word 'fannie'
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jun 2015

in front of small children. I wouldn't use it to my UK or Australian friends or on a UK or Australian website, and if you can't control your fingers or care to education yourself about another country's customs, then you really shouldn't be posting in foreign communities.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
73. Ooooh, typo negates everything else in a post.
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:07 PM
Jun 2015

I wish you many typos to point out, since your logic skills aren't going to make for many posts. Heres another one, just for you.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
64. I once posted a video of Jarvis Cocker's excellent song "C**ts Are Still Running the World"
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 04:50 PM
Jun 2015

I first heard it in the end credits of Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men. Jarvis used it in that "Brit way" to damn the one-percent's pernicious control of the levers of power. It was aimed at men mainly, but it was locked in minutes despite the context. I get it tho, the word has a connotation rooted in sexism and misogyny, so it was a gamble.

liberal N proud

(60,334 posts)
76. Offensive lands with the reciever of the message
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 09:38 AM
Jun 2015

In other words, what does not offend you may offend me, so if I am offended, then it is inappropriate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FYI - the c-word does not...