Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWall Street Suddenly Worried Hillary Might Stop Openly Loving It
Clinton is expected to continue to ratchet up the tone she debuted during her listening tour of Iowa, when the candidate bemoaned the influence of money in politics and said that low-income truck drivers shouldnt pay more taxes than hedge-fund managers. Few, however, expect her to go as far as OMalley, who has called for the prosecution of big bankers, or Sanders, who has openly pushed for breaking up the countrys largest banks.
Its almost refreshing how open nearly all parties are about their belief that Clinton would never argue for reining in the financial industry if she didnt absolutely have to in order to make her way to the White House. Presumably waiting to see whether she can overcome that perception are Senator Elizabeth Warren and New York mayor Bill de Blasio, both of whom are progressive champions and have yet to endorse Clinton.
On the other side of that calculus is Clintons donor base, which is richly populated with folks who work on Wall Street. Clinton is struggling to raise the type of money that Bush has already raised before declaring his candidacy, and the Democrats have far fewer donors willing to write checks in the six to eight figure range than the Republicans do.
All of this makes for an ugly, rather dispiriting balancing actone that we can all look forward to watching unfold over the more than 500 days left between today and Election Day.
Its almost refreshing how open nearly all parties are about their belief that Clinton would never argue for reining in the financial industry if she didnt absolutely have to in order to make her way to the White House. Presumably waiting to see whether she can overcome that perception are Senator Elizabeth Warren and New York mayor Bill de Blasio, both of whom are progressive champions and have yet to endorse Clinton.
On the other side of that calculus is Clintons donor base, which is richly populated with folks who work on Wall Street. Clinton is struggling to raise the type of money that Bush has already raised before declaring his candidacy, and the Democrats have far fewer donors willing to write checks in the six to eight figure range than the Republicans do.
All of this makes for an ugly, rather dispiriting balancing actone that we can all look forward to watching unfold over the more than 500 days left between today and Election Day.
That's the meat of the article.
Anyone else remember people claiming that Liz has endorsed Hillary? It would appear, not so much.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 637 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street Suddenly Worried Hillary Might Stop Openly Loving It (Original Post)
hootinholler
Jun 2015
OP
Wall street worried about Hillary? That's funny. I heard her speech to them, and so did they.
TheNutcracker
Jun 2015
#1
awww. I remember an investment finance person saying in the 90s that when an
appalachiablue
Jun 2015
#7
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)1. Wall street worried about Hillary? That's funny. I heard her speech to them, and so did they.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)3. So you're saying they're not worried at all?
That's a big plus for Hillary I guess.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)6. They're not scared of speeches
Look at all of Obama's speeches that came to nothing. It's just the political version of "lying for the Lord." Say what you need to say to win, as long as you don't do it.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)2. She'll need to dissociate herself
from that image of "running errands for the banks", that is for sure.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)4. "openly"
That word says a mouthful.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)5. Indeed
More than a mouthful.
appalachiablue
(41,140 posts)7. awww. I remember an investment finance person saying in the 90s that when an
institution was hauled before Congress for some testimony or transgression, it was basically theatre, acting. Meaning the banks knew the reps. would smack them around a bit, just for show. The arrogance...