General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse Dem: I'm not sure Bernie Sanders likes immigrants
Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) says he doesnt know whether Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) likes immigrants because he doesnt hear him advocating on their behalf.
In an interview that will air Tuesday with Larry King on ORA TVs PolitiKING, Gutiérrez, who is backing Hillary Clinton for president, first failed to remember Sanderss name before blasting him for not doing enough to push immigration reform.
Weve got the socialist, uh I cant remember his name. Bernie Sanders, Gutierrez said. I dont know if he likes immigrants because he doesnt seem to talk about immigrants. But sooner or later, hell tell us. I hope he likes immigrants. I havent heard him say anything. Hes been kind of quiet and silent.
"So I hope that when he sees this program, he sees that theres a lot of people waiting to hear from him.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/244696-house-dem-im-not-sure-bernie-sanders-likes-immigrants
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Imagine that. Ignorant comments from a House Dem meant to make her opponent look bad. How convenient and surely 100% coincidental.
Jumpin Jack Flash
(242 posts)I think Bernie would disagree with Gutiérrez.
#FeelTheBern, Gutiérrez.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)election in Chicago.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)This looks like another example of personal ambition trumping everything else. Please see Reply 113.
And it smacks of Clinton campaign identity tactics.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)is more than a little telling.
JI7
(93,616 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)"...the positions that are probably maybe held by -- who is it again?"
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)guy who founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus and chaired it while Gutierrez was a member.
Bernie founded the Caucus in 1991, the year Bernie entered Congress, and chaired it for its first 8 years. He remain a member to this day--the only Senator who is a member.
Gutierrez entered Congress in 1993, when the Caucus was less than two years old. Either he did not attend many meetings of the Caucus or his claim not to know Sanders' name is as highly suspect as his endorsement of DLC Third Way pioneers Rahm and Hillary. Please see Reply 113.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And there weren't any at his campaign launch, either. Oh, right. That was in Vermont, which is 96% white.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)most of whom are...Caucasian. Mostly Canadian, the same as the majority of immigrants in the rest of New England and upstate NY.
Can we call this from Gutiérrez what it really is: an unfounded dog-whistle accusation of racism.
cali
(114,904 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)Whether there is a sizable immigrant minority community in Burlington, VT (and Hartford/New Haven/Springfield, CT/MA (This is a single uninterrupted metro-region) and Providence, RI and Boston, MA for that matter) doesn't change the the immigration demographics of New England.
Our immigrant community is VERY diverse...we have one of the largest populations of Cambodians outside Cambodia in Lowell which also has a substantial Laotian and African presence. And Latin American immigrants continue to arrive in huge numbers in the city of Boston and other communities. Central America is well represented in Lawrence, and Brazil on Cape Cod.
Immigration offsets the people who split because they're tired of winters here and who leave for jobs elsewhere.
karynnj
(60,968 posts)Burlington accepts refugees from places like Somolia, Nepal, and Vietnam.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Not to mention, Bernie is originally from NY.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)which was that Gutierrez's comment was at face value racist dog-whistle which ignores the demographic reality of immigration in VT. (and the rest of New England) Facts are tricky things though.
A.) VT has a sizable year-to-year immigration of foreigners. (As does New England as a whole.)
B.) Because of the % of those immigrants that are Canadian (and to a lesser extent European), a majority (77% in 2013) of immigrants to VT are Caucasian...like the rest of New England (Even MA has a immigrant-gain from year to year that is majority Caucasian. CT and MA are the two most-diverse in terms of immigrants...and both are still over 50% Caucasian immigrants in any given year.) The higher % of non-Caucasian immigrants to the major urban centers of New England...specifically Burlington, VT in this case...does not alter the reality that the majority of immigrants to New England states are Caucasian which does nothing to alter the lily-white diversity of the state of VT...it does however lead non-contemplative partisans like Rep. Gutierrez to assume that New Englanders don't think about immigration policy because he doesn't see a lot of Latino faces.
C.) Saying that Sanders doesn't speak about immigration issues, an issue he has spoken on repeatedly, because the state he is from is overwhelmingly Caucasian is a lie that Rep. Gutierrez thinks he can pass unchallenged by incorrectly-conflating that "immigrant" means "Latino".
Which brings us back around to Rep. Gutierrez's comment which was in-fact racist dog-whistle...he's using "immigration" as a code-word addressed to Americans of Hispanic and Latino descent to convey 2 lies (and 3 falsehoods)...that Sanders doesn't care or speak about issues that affect minorities and specifically them (false)...and that Sanders doesn't speak about immigration (false) because he represents a state that has no substantial immigration. (Also false) I hope at this point that's clear because I really don't want to hand-hold anybody else through an explanation that the vast majority of immigrants to New England are not Latino but Caucasian and that immigrant population is not incidental but very-large.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Particularly French Canadians who are returning to Canada due to improved job prospects, and the better exchange rate there.
Furthermore, I am unaware of any European immigrants coming here. At least not in any notable numbers. This btw, is not just from my anecdotal perspective-- If there truly were many European immigrants coming here, I'm sure there would have been info somewhere, ie newspaper stories, ect... But I have yet to see any... Would you happen to have a link to support your claims?
Regarding immigrants of color, please note the following:
At the other end of the spectrum, in Maine, is the Lewiston-Auburn area, which saw a 476% increase in its black population from 2000 to 2010. Most of the newcomers are refugees from Somalia, says Phil Nadeau, deputy city administrator in Lewiston.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/2011-05-20-chicago-blacks-exodus_n.htm
This state is still very white, but I must say that it is nice to finally see some diversity, and I hope the trend continues. Hopefully, the demographic shift will include more than just refugees. I for one, would appreciate seeing more PoC.
Vermont is seeing similar changes.
And finally, while I know that this is straying somewhat from what you are saying, I think it's important to point out that Sanders does indeed speak to social issues that affect PoC. An example would be his strong opposition to 'the war on drugs' that is rife with racist policies that disproportionately ensnare PoC into the prison system. Michele Alexander, the author of 'The New Jim Crow' directly links the war on drugs to the disproportionately large mass incarceration of PoC. She is quite critical of the Clintons' role in creating this toxic situation.
Her words from an article she authored in The Nation back in 2010:
http://www.thenation.com/article/new-jim-crow
Response to Chan790 (Reply #162)
PotatoChip This message was self-deleted by its author.
merrily
(45,251 posts)was in the photo. Also, many immigrants are white. Besides Gutierrez is not very informed. Sanders HAS spoken about immigrants..
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)they are getting desperate.
If bernie is nothing but fringe cnadiate why attack him like this.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)As I have mentioned before, progressives will face their greatest opposition from Democratic Party bureaus, rather than from the GOP.
villager
(26,001 posts)or, maybe not amazing, after all...
Robbins
(5,066 posts)I see parales to 2007/2008 to how clinton people are dealing with Bernie.who they claim has no chance to win.
if her poll numbers reflect reality why even acknowledge bernie's exsiatnce in race?
of course i say her numbers are soft and people have accepted line only she can win.Well what happens when they hear from candiate
who will tell you where he stands and they agree with him.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It won't work.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)referring to Bernie: "objects in mirror closer than they appear"
merrily
(45,251 posts)TBF
(36,669 posts)will just put this here and cut to the chase:
Sanders on Gay Marriage: Time for Supreme Court to Catch Up to the American People
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
WASHINGTON, April 28 As the Supreme Court today took up cases on gay marriage, Sen. Bernie Sanders said gay Americans in all states deserve the right to wed.
Of course all citizens deserve equal rights, Sanders said. Its time for the Supreme Court to catch up to the American people and legalize gay marriage.
Vermont was a pioneer in enacting laws giving gay couples legal recognition, beginning with a history-making statute in 2000 permitting civil unions and the nations first marriage law passed without a court order in 2009. Gay marriage is now legal in 36 states.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-on-gay-marriage-time-for-supreme-court-to-catch-up-to-the-american-people
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Attacks which call into question his liberalism will come from the Center Right, mainly Democrats.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)The wacko idea eventually works its way up to a higher-up in the GOP who says, in effect: "I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but these rumors persist. If only the president will come clean with the American people, we could clear this all up."
The effect: The issue is mainstreamed (HeSaid/SheSaid), and the media (including the growing web presence of the FR) investigates, thereby keeping the theory alive.
merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)from the link:
"During the Democratic Party's 2008 presidential primaries, anonymous e-mails from supporters of Hillary Clinton surfaced that questioned Obama's citizenship in an attempt to revive Clinton's faltering primary election campaign. These and numerous other chain e-mails during the subsequent presidential election circulated false rumors about Obama's origin, religion and birth certificate. [25] [26]
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)It's a cowardly way to run a campaign.
madokie
(51,076 posts)She is a come lately on most important issues so far
Don't get me wrong I'll happily vote for her in the general if she makes it that far but in the mean time Its Bernie all the way for me
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)He commented during the 2008 primary that Hillary was running against Obama as if she were the Republican and he the Democrat.
And she's doing it again.
cali
(114,904 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)Ted kennedy endorsed obama because he didn't like how the clinton campagin was going after obama.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)I don't think Teddy was too happy with the bullying from the Clintons that turned racist and ugly. Bill demanded that Teddy either endorse Hillary or remain silent, that Obama would have been serving them coffee.
I have to admit I am stunned it appears she is running the same campaign.
merrily
(45,251 posts)But, they couldn't stop themselves. Or didn't want to. Then Bubba reproached Kennedy!
Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and a group of other senators who would back Hillary Clintons candidacy encouraged Obama to run for the White House as early as 2006. The concern over Clinton was that she would be a weak Democratic standard-bearer while Obama could energize the party. In late summer 2007, Schumer using an Obama ally, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), as a back channel pushed the candidate to take a two-by-four to Hillary, as the authors put it.
In lobbying the late Sen. Ted Kennedy to endorse his wife, former President Bill Clinton angered the liberal icon by belittling Obama. Telling a friend about the conversation, Kennedy recalled Clinton had said a few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee, the authors paraphrase. A spokesman for the former president declined to comment on the claim.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31302.html
Attacks on Politico and Game Change as sources in -3-2-
goldent
(1,582 posts)That's how primaries work.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Democratic Presidential primary.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)so ironic, as well as just plain nauseating.
goldent
(1,582 posts)but I would say in the vast majority of majority of primaries where there is a real race, there will be some mud slinging. Sanders is a grown-up and can handle it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)In Democratic Presidential primaries, I have observed that only in 2008 and now.
cali
(114,904 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Bernie has an excellent record on immigrant issue- something Gutierrez surely knows. And he has trouble remembering his name? Odd that, considering he served with him for well over a decade in the House and that Bernie co-founded the Progressive Caucus, which he is a member of. And then there's his calling Bernie "the socialist".
This has an eerie familiarity.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Its pathetic.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)target.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)how badly he embarrassed himself. I expect this shit from republicans.
cali
(114,904 posts)It's typically Clinton style vile.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)bland nice things regarding him and her surrogates will launch vile lying attacks.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)And just how rotten they are as people in general. Why doesn't Rep What's His Name CALL Bernie Sanders and talk to him? Probably not that hard to do since they work in the same building.
cali
(114,904 posts)He served with Bernie for 17 years. He is a member of the caucus Bernie co-founded,and has been for years.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)TBF
(36,669 posts)nt
merrily
(45,251 posts)Prism
(5,815 posts)Of course Gutierrez knows who Sanders is. They're in the same friggin caucus!
Hoo boy.
At least the race-baiting this time around is coming more from the outer edges of the campaign instead of smack dab in the middle of it.
Not that I was ever going to vote for Clinton in the primary, but this has already gotten too gross.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)that the OP isn't aware of much of anything at all.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)I expect it from the GOP...sad when it is from our side. More like pathetic and revealing imo.
cali
(114,904 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)However I ain't doing that this time and going to call out the bullshit when I see it.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Some say they will have to be drunk to vote for Hillary if it comes down to that, given they have to because of the alternative.
I cant drink, I am allergic, every-time I drink I break out in handcuffs, so I better not have to drop acid to vote for her.
But incidents like this make me wonder if I need to find my dealer
merrily
(45,251 posts)Lies, race-baiting, even citizenship issues. I rather suspect Rehm, who, according to her wiki, is big admirer of both Clintons, and Gutierrez are only the beginning.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post132
Rex
(65,616 posts)Because he did not, he took a cheapshot and it backfired.
I've known DR was trending right now for years and years, sad to see her do what she did. An honest apology would have maybe made it less transparent - yet she couldn't even do that!
merrily
(45,251 posts)LOL, my guess is that politicians and ad agencies commissioned a few of them, but I'm only guessing about that.
Anyway, one of them showed that the first story people learn is all that matters. A later correction or retraction does not help. To the contrary, it only makes the first impression stronger than if no correction or retraction had occurred.*
Another study shows that people believe most what reinforces their already existing beliefs. So, appealing to bigots is easy, if you are willing to stoop that low in a Presidential campaign.
And people thought Republicans revealing that Muskie's wife had once had a breakdown was low.
During a recession, notice how many times we get an unemployment report that doesn't seem so bad. However, a few days later, a corrected one is released with worse numbers. The correction never has improved numbers, though, at least not that I've ever noticed.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)And gee, Luis, you loyally lying shill, look where Bernie will be on Friday- as will Hillary
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/06/09/bernie-sanders-to-address-latino-politicians-group-naleo/
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)doesn't like immigrants'.
Two intended negative talking points in one shot.
Too bad he's so out of it that he missed Bernie's interview with Diane Rehm where he was asked about Immigration and answered beautifully stating his views.
Maybe we should all sent this out of touch, except on dirty politics tactics, a copy of Bernie's position on immigration.
What a blatant and not even clever display.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)attempts to smear a politician. This one was not even at the level of a five year old. 'I don't know him, but you mean 'THE SOCIALIST'!!
Wait, it's more like 'Bush the Lesser' level! You can tell he was instructed as to HOW to smear 'what you see in your rear view mirror' but he did it poorly.
Rex
(65,616 posts)the ugly personalities that have hidden away so long in the DLC\DNC will come out in full force. No more hiding behind the curtain. And we will call them out each and every time they do.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Getting good candidates in office is just the first half of the battle. The other half is getting rid of the bad ones
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)can't talk about issues because the people do not agree with them on the issues, are stomping their little feet and throwing temper tantrums, they only emphasize how far above them in every way, he is.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Please see Replies 113, 115 and this video of Sanders speaking on immigration reform. http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017271517
Link to Reply 113 http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post113
Link to Reply 115 http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post115
BUSTED!
We've seen this play out before:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Origins_of_the_claims
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post120
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12777603
Shameful.
NightWatcher
(39,376 posts)Enemies of Bernie have moved from laughing to fighting, I see.
djean111
(14,255 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Gutierrez has zero cred on this.
See http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post127 and items linked in that post.
djean111
(14,255 posts)the two white guys holding up the black guy as a hunting trophy may have been the start, though.
Eventually, that will be a club I will have no interest in joining, I think.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Sounds awful.
djean111
(14,255 posts)campaign launch. In Vermont. Evidently Bernie was supposed to bring in black people to prove he is not racist.
Conflating Bernie with that picture was a gratuitously nasty calculated thing to do. All that matters is that it is out there. In fact, I bet if Bernie supporters did not keep bringing up the smears, they would be brought up and repeated and repeated in that passive-aggressive "oh, yeah, too bad someone went there" way, just to keep it going. Some days we carry their water for them. Make that slops-bucket.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Solly Mack
(96,943 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 11, 2015, 04:03 PM - Edit history (1)
And as none of the other candidates have either - hmmmmmm.
I am well aware that none of the Democratic candidates hate Germans. And I'm sure they all love my mini dachshund.
I was having a momentary loss of a grip.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)'We've got the socialist, uh, what's his name'.....What a Grade-A jag off...
cali
(114,904 posts)Despicable.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)someone who is at least as capable as a six year old to this kind of dirty work.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I dunno, maybe Gutierrez is always like that, but he came off as fairly sloshed.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"I have to get really sloshed before I spout a lot of garbage"
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Bernie is clear in his reasons for not supporting these programs, and that he does want REAL immigration reform, not a crappy bill that is "clean" and focuses on helping real immigration to happen that is needed here. Hillary Clinton would seem to want this bill because it has the H-1B expansion that her corporate lobbyists want. If this guy can make up what he thinks Bernie is thinking, I think there are those of us who can "conclude" why Hillary Clinton wanted the immigration bill to pass too!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/25/this-is-a-massive-effort-to-attract-cheap-labor-why-sen-bernie-sanders-is-skeptical-of-guest-workers/
Clinton's position on expanding H-1B program...
quickesst
(6,309 posts)...are going through what blue collar workers have already experienced. Doesn't feel too great when the shoe is on the other foot. I know, its about jobs, just like it was for me. The only differences are country, legality, and that I won't accuse most white collar democrats of being racist for wanting to deny "poor Brown people the opportunity to make a better life for their families." I was, and I've been wondering where those good liberals were until I realized they were still here. They're just looking at things from my side of the tracks. But, life goes on. We're content with our small retirement,and our part-time jobs. Of course the 3 bedroom mobile home is not as nice as the 3 bedroom house I had to give up, and neither are the vehicles, the savings account, blah, blah, blah, but it's comfortable as long as we can avoid the tornadoes here in Jindal World. Best of luck to all. You'll do just fine.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... and Bernie mentions them in the link I pointed to. Here's another link to show how these guest workers who aren't the white collar tech jobs that are usually associated with H-1B are screwed just as much (along with American workers they displace) and perhaps these foreign workers are screwed even moreso than H-1B workers. Read how a bunch of them sued for how they were treated after they were hired to do cleanup after hurricane Katrina.
http://www.guestworkeralliance.org/tag/h2b-regulations/
http://www.southernstudies.org/2007/08/modern-day-slavery-on-the-gulf-coast.html
http://www.thenation.com/blog/198665/these-workers-came-overseas-help-rebuild-after-hurricane-katrina-and-were-treated-prison

All of these programs are such that we need to join forces and fight together. The culprits behind them are the same crooks that want to screw all of us so that they can take more for themselves. And they have so many of our politicians bought and paid for now too!
quickesst
(6,309 posts)...but what I was pointing out was not hb2 workers with work visas, but those who, and at the risk another accusation, come here without the benefit of visas or US citizenship. Most work under the table and avoid taxes plus all the other government requirements. One reason they work for far less, and another good reason a path to full citizenship needs to happen. My experience with this happened mostly in the early years of 2000. The hue and cry about the h1b issue was not there, or just not discussed a lot. The atmosphere was different then. Anyway, things worked out, and I intended no harm. Just a few sad memory triggers. As our favorite Vulcan would say, I hope for everyone to "Live long and prosper"
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Was just noting how the PTB are using these kind of programs to escape being nailed for hiring people in the circumstances you describe illegally, which they could be prosecuted for, but we weren't enforcing the laws there, and more apt to just enforce laws on those being exploited by them. These "guest worker" programs mainly allow the same sort of exploitation to happen, but let these employers get away with doing it legally.
We'd all be better off if we did away with these guest worker programs, or minimized them to the levels that they were originally intended for in providing workers for the kind of work that no one would do, or weren't able to do (with certain kind of skill set requirements), and not being used just to exploit cheap labor, as Bernie has expressed concern about.
We should have good, decent immigration bills that focus on helping get people that have been brought here as undocumented workers without guest worker "protection" and offer them the paths to citizenship, etc. so that everyone can get what they want work wise and we can have higher salaries again, and no one is getting exploited. If people want to live here and become citizens, find a way to facilitate that, and if they want to move back home, and find a way to restore their farm business viabilities that they might have lost, find some way to work internationally to help with that, by renegotiating these "trade deals" that facilitate "bottoms" to race to, and by getting rid of ag subsidies that let rich ag companies "dump" products overseas and push many people to come here illegally or to be a part of these "guest worker" programs at low pay.
I think we're on the same page, and in today's world, I think there are a lot more of us affected onh the "same page" too, which is one more reason for all of us to work together for solutions that work for all of us, and hopefully getting back what has been taken from so many of us by the very rich.
Response to cascadiance (Reply #44)
lumberjack_jeff This message was self-deleted by its author.
JI7
(93,616 posts)You already had an O'malley supporter go after sanders.
He needs someone to respond and go after others.
cali
(114,904 posts)this kind of campaigning
JI7
(93,616 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I MIGHT still vote for him in the primary if he went to race-baiting and lies, but I might now. Anti-Semitic insinuations about his citizenship? Lies about whether he spoke about immigration? I'd hate to see Sanders engage in that low a variety of Presidential campaigning.
Please see this post and material linked within this post. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post132
I think Rehm was probably on the same page as Gutierrez, or a very similar one.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)
So ferocious.
Oneironaut
(6,299 posts)I hope not, and I hope other candidates aren't entertaining such garbage.
I'm not a Bernie supporter, btw.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Bernie wants to hear what Clinton has to say about the TPP and Gutiérrez wants to hear what Bernie has to say about immigrants.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)I could've sworn he discussed the issue as recently as that NPR interview. Maybe people didn't hear that
He's due to speak at the same Latino conference where Clinton will be speaking. Many people likely won't hear that either.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Apparently according to Cali, he talked about it today. Somebody needs to send this info to Gutierrez.
cali
(114,904 posts)Bernie's positions
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Politics can really get to a person. I know, I've been there.
Giving Guterriez any of your attention over this is precisely what he wants.
cali
(114,904 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)You've been giving me a lot of chuckles, though.
merrily
(45,251 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)to address a convention of Hispanic Democratic politicians, and he's spoken of it on the campaign trail
Send links to Congressman Gutierrez!
That'll answer his questions!
cali
(114,904 posts)He's a member of the Progressive Caucus which Bernie co-founded. Bernie has an excellent record on immigration issues and either Gutierrez is a total idiot, suffering from memory loss, or he's lying.


Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)or factual.
xxx ooo
Rex
(65,616 posts)It's like some kind of Pretzel logic.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)On Thu Jun 11, 2015, 04:30 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6817625
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Rude, nasty, trolling.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jun 11, 2015, 04:44 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This image does not contribute to the discussion and helps make DU suck.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: de minimis
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: ?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: As a Hillary supporter I find MRT embarassing.
Oh well.
I'm not buying what juror #7 is selling.
frylock
(34,825 posts)embarrassing
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #65)
neverforget This message was self-deleted by its author.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)happen, regardless of the facts, recorded votes, transcripts, recorded interviews, stated positions, etc, etc, etc. It just probably didn't happen. Shit, it's not like Luis Gutierrez has ever met him or worked with him before. He only vaguely recalls his nickname "The Socialist".
merrily
(45,251 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)How did you form your opinions, if you consistently demonstrate you know absolutly nothing?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)That's pretty obvious from the hyperbole and drama in most posts.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)But pretty clearly, you don't know much about the subject at hand, yet insist on talking shit.
Maybe learn some stuff, then talk.
frylock
(34,825 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Sanders talked about immigration yesterday. If that wasn't good enough, Sanders has a long record on immigration - and that record is more favorable to immigrants than Clinton's record. And if that wasn't good enough, Sanders is the child of immigrants. And if that wasn't good enough, Gutiérrez and Sanders were in the same fucking progressive caucus for 17 years.
Clinton has repeatedly refused to take a position on the TPP.
Yeah, totally similar. 100% the same. Just like apples and nuclear weapons.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Please see this post and items linked within this post, including a link to a 28 minute speech Bernie made on immigration reform 2 years ago.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post127
See also http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026817096#post119
JI7
(93,616 posts)Sanders needs someone like axelrod
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I totally forgot about her comments about Obama in 2008.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)must feel Sanders is a threat. They already managed to get the other threat to agree not to run,
that wasn't enough..evidently.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Gutierrez USED TO BE known as a progressive legislator.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Please see all the items linked within that post on this thread, and, in connection with Rahm, esp. Reply 113 on this thread.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Not. What a lovely remark from a member of one's own party. Unless he's saying Bernie's not, which is what it sounds like. Hey, guy, Bernie's running in the Democratic primary, he's a Democrat.
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)So obviously he support the live cutting of animals in half.
He has also no spoken directly to the needs of <insert anything here>. That makes him a dickhead.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)It reminds me of an character assassination piece I once saw on Ralph Nader (whatever you may think of Nader). The author wrote that Nader had never owned a dog and it isn't even known if he likes dogs.
We are quickly descending to that level of silliness.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Bernie, the son of an immigrant, does not like immigrants.
I got no candidate, but this 2008 all over again.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)And Sanders should be coy about illegal immigrants and gun control.
People know he's about inequality. That is good enough for a broad coalition.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Desperate much?
cali
(114,904 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)to Bernie.
Funny how that works.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... when President Sanders is being sworn in.
Well, probably not. In fact I doubt I'll remember that asinine chump's name after dinner tonite.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)The Establishment's strategy use: HRC surrogate/supporter to make Bernie as white as possible.
So the gloves are off ? I hope corporate dems really dont want to go down this path because it will be an ugly campaign season
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Luis Gutiérrez's parents are both from Puerto Rico and thus not immigrants but both natural born Americans. Bernie Sander's father however immigrated from Poland to the United States where he became a naturalized citizen.
Ironic and actually ironic is a racist flavored way.
TBF
(36,669 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)What was Rahm's? (Raise your hand if you think a Daley's replacing Chief of Staff Rahm before Rahm became mayor of Daley-controlled Chicago was sheer coincidence.)
Let's face it. Most Democratic politicians cannot afford to, and therefore will not, piss off the PTB of the Democratic Party, which is backing Hillary.
Gutiérrez' name has often been mentioned as a potential candidate for Mayor of Chicago. In 2006 he explored running for mayor of Chicago against incumbent Richard M. Daley, but announced in November that he would remain in Congress.
After Daley declared his retirement in 2011, Gutiérrez' name was once again floated as a potential mayoral candidate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Guti%C3%A9rrez
karynnj
(60,968 posts)In spite of being insufficiently diverse for some Clinton fans. Not to mention Bernie ' s dad was an immigrant from Poland. This is obnoxious and why I lost respect for people like Bob Kerrey in 2008.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The racial makeup of the CDP was 91.80% White, 0.94% African American, 0.03% Native American, 5.62% Asian, 0.02% Pacific Islander, 0.52% from other races, and 1.07% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.55% of the population. 14.3% were of Italian, 11.4% Russian, 10.6% Irish, 7.1% United States or American, 6.0% English and 5.7% German ancestry according to Census 2000. 92.4% spoke English, 3.6% Spanish and 1.0% Italian as their first language.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chappaqua,_New_York#Demographics
Politicians. amirite?
karynnj
(60,968 posts)To be refugee resettlement places and have welcomed refugees since 1989. So, in this largely white town, there are refugees. Note the mayor in 1989 was Sanders until April. He almost certainly started this.
An elementary school in Burlington has a total of 41 languages that are the first language of its students. The school system has far more diversity than the census numbers would suggest.
merrily
(45,251 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)"uh I can't remember..."
Marr
(20,317 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Hillary something
deutsey
(20,166 posts)FOX folks swear by it.