Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:39 AM Jun 2015

Surprise! Hillary Clinton's Big Campaign Speech Didn't Mention The Trade Deal - HuffPo

Surprise! Hillary Clinton's Big Campaign Speech Didn't Mention The Trade Deal
The Huffington Post | By Igor Bobic
Posted: 06/13/2015 2:28 pm EDT Updated: 06/13/2015 2:59 pm EDT


Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arrives to speak to supporters on June 13, 2015, at Roosevelt Island in New York. (Photo: Julio Cortez) | ASSOCIATED PRESS

<snip>

Hillary Clinton paid lip service to just about every issue dear to progressive voters in her presidential campaign kickoff on Saturday, from paid sick leave, to LGBT rights, to climate change and student loan reform. But one issue she notably omitted from her speech to supporters at New York City's Roosevelt Island was the pending trade legislation that roiled Democrats in Congress merely a day prior.

The pressure on Clinton to clarify her stance on the controversial trade deal, known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, has grown in recent weeks as former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) -- her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination -- have repeatedly urged her to do so. The issue came to a head on Friday, after President Barack Obama suffered an embarrassing defeat when House Democrats spurned his last-second personal appeal and voted against a measure that would have granted him the authority to fast-track the sweeping trade deal though Congress.


Clinton did make one reference to trade in her speech, but more as a general point in her argument that America ought to work better for the middle class.

"Advances in technology and the rise of global trade have created whole new areas of economic activity and opened new markets for our exports, but they have also displaced jobs and undercut wages for millions of Americans," she said.

Clinton's aides have pointed to the candidate's remarks in New Hampshire last month, where she voiced a number of "real concerns" about the major trade pact. Among those are currency manipulation and some health, environmental and labor provisions. But ultimately Clinton has refrained from taking a formal position on the agreement, saying that she would do so after she reviews the final deal.

"I want to judge this when I see exactly what is in it and whether or not I think it meets my standards," she said.


Yet progressives like Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren...

<snip>

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/13/hillary-clinton-trade-deal_n_7576812.html


61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Surprise! Hillary Clinton's Big Campaign Speech Didn't Mention The Trade Deal - HuffPo (Original Post) WillyT Jun 2015 OP
Why would it? n/t zappaman Jun 2015 #1
You're right. It's really nothing but a minor issue. Bonobo Jun 2015 #10
It is when discussing a candidates kickoff speech. zappaman Jun 2015 #12
Bernie Sanders' stances on immigration and equality are clear. We have only to Google JDPriestly Jun 2015 #18
If you count her book as public TM99 Jun 2015 #30
Thanks. I have not read her most recent book. JDPriestly Jun 2015 #32
lol BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #28
Why should she care about a bill that would let corporate courts overturn our government's laws... cascadiance Jun 2015 #26
HRC - Hope And Change Redux - One Can't Bite The Hand That Feeds - America Never Seems To Learn cantbeserious Jun 2015 #2
To paraphrase Jon Stewart: Learning curves are for wusses! nt truebluegreen Jun 2015 #56
So Then - America Is Forever To Be Duped By Corporate Candidates - How Pessimistic cantbeserious Jun 2015 #57
I'm willing to be shocked by us learning from our mistakes. nt truebluegreen Jun 2015 #59
I understand that TPTB have approved of Hillary, senseandsensibility Jun 2015 #3
Your point? sheshe2 Jun 2015 #4
And then people complained about that and people complained about the complaining Fumesucker Jun 2015 #6
He is speaking about it on the campaign trail BrotherIvan Jun 2015 #11
Well... WillyT Jun 2015 #15
Your point? marym625 Jun 2015 #16
Barnie was among the first if not the first politicians to express his support for JDPriestly Jun 2015 #19
+1000 marym625 Jun 2015 #36
He spoke out about it before that, though. One of the first federal politicians to speak out merrily Jun 2015 #52
It won't matter madokie Jun 2015 #5
She's running a content-free campaign. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #7
She hasn't really started her campaign. zappaman Jun 2015 #13
She announced her candidacy 4/12. Must be a Groundhog Day campaign. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #14
Snap! SoapBox Jun 2015 #20
wonder when the next one will be? Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #40
that's funny. she chose a video, and cannot stand all the visuals of Bernie, so it's a redo! TheNutcracker Jun 2015 #54
The trouble here is that by the time she is able to 'judge this,' PatrickforO Jun 2015 #8
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #9
How could she? fadedrose Jun 2015 #17
She even called it the "gold standard in trade agreements" Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #21
You Doin Ok ??? WillyT Jun 2015 #22
Oh, I'm hanging in there Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #24
Likewise... WillyT Jun 2015 #25
Keep up the OPs Art_from_Ark Jun 2015 #31
What Art from Arkansas said. Scuba Jun 2015 #39
I wonder if she originally planned to talk about it when "it was too late" already on Saturday... cascadiance Jun 2015 #29
That is the intention. djean111 Jun 2015 #42
Here we have the Democratic front runner that doesn't mention the trade deal. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #23
I don't expect her to davidpdx Jun 2015 #27
I found the fact she only had 500 more people than Senator Sanders did marym625 Jun 2015 #35
I haven't heard a word of any of her speeches and don't care to davidpdx Jun 2015 #37
You are not missing anything marym625 Jun 2015 #38
Surprise! Hillary Clinton's Big Campaign Speech Didn't Mention Free Ponies For Everyone! thelordofhell Jun 2015 #33
Opposing the biggest piece of shit Corporate Giveaway, Job Killing deal ever attempted... 99Forever Jun 2015 #47
I forgot to K&R marym625 Jun 2015 #34
Fuck huffington post just another hit piece on Hillary bigdarryl Jun 2015 #41
I think that she did mention it. murray hill farm Jun 2015 #50
No suprise at all. That would require a definite I'm for it or I'm against it. Autumn Jun 2015 #43
Hard choices Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #44
"I want to judge this when I see exactly what is in it... Omaha Steve Jun 2015 #45
Whatever she says about it some of us will take whatever she says to prove 1 of 2 things: pampango Jun 2015 #46
She didn't commit to the Fight for $15, either Dems to Win Jun 2015 #48
Bump...nt Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #49
Mentioned FDR more than once, but no opinion on TPP, which she helped negotiate. k. nt merrily Jun 2015 #51
If a candidate can't or won't address the issues I care about... 99Forever Jun 2015 #53
+ 1,000,000,000 - What You Said !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #61
Well, I'm shocked. truebluegreen Jun 2015 #55
Her spokespeople didn't do any better on the Sunday talk shows Mnpaul Jun 2015 #58
a) She's for it SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #60

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
10. You're right. It's really nothing but a minor issue.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:50 AM
Jun 2015

One that the president has been working tirelessly for the last 6 months or so to shove down the world's collective throat.

Now who you do you think yer jivin' with that cosmik debris?

zappaman

(20,627 posts)
12. It is when discussing a candidates kickoff speech.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:56 AM
Jun 2015

But I also didn't complain when Bernie didn't mention minor issues like immigration or equality in his kickoff speech so what do I know?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
18. Bernie Sanders' stances on immigration and equality are clear. We have only to Google
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:40 AM
Jun 2015

and we find speeches he made in Congress, etc. on these issues.

But Hillary has never expressed her opinion publicly on the TPP. Bernie has. When we Google Hillary and the TPP we find that she was the Sec. of State during the first phases of its negotiation and information that suggest that she supports it. Her past statements and conduct with regard to the TPP need to be clarified. Bernie's positions on equality and immigration are very clear to anyone who bothers to Google.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
30. If you count her book as public
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:35 AM
Jun 2015

then yes, she stated it was the gold standard of trade agreements and that she worked on it as SoS.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
26. Why should she care about a bill that would let corporate courts overturn our government's laws...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:54 AM
Jun 2015

... and sue us to put us further in to debt, which this bill will also do by raising our trade deficit in the same fashion that all of the other so-called "free trade" bills have done when they reversed a trade surplus just before Reagan getting elected to the crap we have now that let's foreign entities buy up our national assets!

Oh, you ask "Why should anyone be concerned about that?" That's what's wrong when we don't care about this and someone not caring about this who is wanting our votes to lead this country!

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
2. HRC - Hope And Change Redux - One Can't Bite The Hand That Feeds - America Never Seems To Learn
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:44 AM
Jun 2015

eom

senseandsensibility

(24,978 posts)
3. I understand that TPTB have approved of Hillary,
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:55 AM
Jun 2015

and that being said, she will be the nominee. Got it. So, therefore, I expect absolutely nothing from her that "rocks the boat."
Because of this, I am grateful for Bernie and Martin. At least for a short time, the peoples' voices will be heard.

sheshe2

(97,637 posts)
4. Your point?
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 01:56 AM
Jun 2015

TPP?

Bernie didn't mention PoC being murdered by police either?

So, your point?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
6. And then people complained about that and people complained about the complaining
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:10 AM
Jun 2015

And so on and so on.

And here we are.

Divided.

Mission accomplished for someone.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
15. Well...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:14 AM
Jun 2015
Some cowed Democrats have fallen in line. According to The New York Times, New York’s Rep. Gregory Meeks has even been spreading word in the Congressional Black Caucus that denying the first African-American president this trade authority “smacks of bias.” As if low-wage workers in communities of color won’t be among the real losers once TPP goes into effect and more jobs disappear overseas where labor is cheap and workers too often are treated like dirt.


From: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026811560


marym625

(17,997 posts)
16. Your point?
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:23 AM
Jun 2015

One has nothing to do with the other.

Hillary didn't mention people of color being murdered by police either.

So your point?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
19. Barnie was among the first if not the first politicians to express his support for
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 03:52 AM
Jun 2015

African-Americans in the time following the Ferguson killing.

The killing was August 9, 2014.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/14/michael-brown-ferguson-missouri-timeline/14051827/

By August 20, 2014, Bernie Sanders had not only responded to the killing but was proposing legislation to deal with the economic factors that are associated so often with brutality by police against minorities, especially African-American young people.

"When you see the kind of force that's been used in
Ferguson, it really does make it appear that the
police department there is an occupying army in a
hostile territory and that is absolutely not what we
want to see in the U.S."


Wednesday, August 20, 2014

In the wake of continuing unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, Sen. Bernie Sanders said on Wednesday that he will introduce legislation to address the national crisis of black youth unemployment. In a letter to Senate colleagues, Sanders called for a thorough federal investigation of the Aug. 9 death of an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, who was shot by a police officer in the St. Louis suburb. “We also must recognize, however, that there is an economic crisis facing our nation’s youth, particularly young African-Americans,” Sanders said. In the St. Louis metro area, almost half of young African-American men are unemployed, Sanders said. Nationwide, the youth unemployment rate today is more than 20 percent and African-American youth unemployment is nearly 35 percent.

“If we are going to address the issue of crime in low-income areas and in African-American communities, it might be a good idea that instead of putting military style equipment into police departments in those areas, we start investing in jobs for the young people there who desperately need them.”

(More below the orange squiggle...)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/08/21/1323382/-Bernie-Sanders-Responds-To-Ferguson

Assumptions. Assumptions. Bernie Sanders marched with Martin Luther King, was active in the civil rights movement before many of his critics were even born and has an unassailable record of racial equality. Let's get real.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
52. He spoke out about it before that, though. One of the first federal politicians to speak out
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:45 AM
Jun 2015

about Ferguson.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
5. It won't matter
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:00 AM
Jun 2015

She'll never be the President of the United States of America

yes I'm a democrat and I will vote for her if she makes it to the general but no way will I before then

 

TheNutcracker

(2,104 posts)
54. that's funny. she chose a video, and cannot stand all the visuals of Bernie, so it's a redo!
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:57 AM
Jun 2015

PatrickforO

(15,426 posts)
8. The trouble here is that by the time she is able to 'judge this,'
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:21 AM
Jun 2015

it will be TOO LATE, because the Obama Administration and Congressional Republicans are trying to ram it down our throats sight unseen. All we have, fortunately, is what has come out on WikiLeaks and that has been alarming.

I think Clinton is making a big mistake by not coming out against the TPP.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
24. Oh, I'm hanging in there
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:30 AM
Jun 2015

But all bets are off if they get this TPP rammed through.



By the way, I enjoy reading your OPs.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
29. I wonder if she originally planned to talk about it when "it was too late" already on Saturday...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 05:05 AM
Jun 2015

... when she and Obama had hoped that he would be able to sign it this weekend before things got "complicated" on Friday and it is going back to the Senate now. Since it isn't done, rather than her taking a stance on it now like perhaps she had earlier planned by having her speech on this weekend, she simply continued to do the strategy of avoiding talking about it.

This weekend was the perfect opportunity if she really wanted TPP to be stopped unless it had "good things" in it that Obama had promised to say it shouldn't be passed any more once the TAA provision was taken out of the bill that goes back before the Senate. Would have been a good excuse for her to have said the right thing and say, "the bill that is now before congress has now been made weaker and I can't support it any more". The timing offered the perfect opportunity to have her put her stamp on Democrats to stop it in congress now, which could ensure that TPA won't get passed. I'd be very thankful to her then if she were to have done that. Not commenting on it makes her appear to be more a part of the problem rather than the solution. She is just fueling more opposition from many of us that are concerned about this issue now. I'm also looking for newer candidates to primary Wyden in the Senate and Bonamici in the House too.

I might pull back from trying to get DeFazio to primary Wyden, if Wyden uses this opportunity to shut down the TPA in the Senate by using the same logic. That the TAA portion he fought to get put in the TPA bill has been removed in the version that is before him now, and that he and other senators can no longer support it. I think that might rescue him from facing a primary challenger in 2016.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
23. Here we have the Democratic front runner that doesn't mention the trade deal.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:16 AM
Jun 2015

The trade deal is one of the most important issues to many of us.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
27. I don't expect her to
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 04:59 AM
Jun 2015

She's only interested in delivering the poll tested drivel in her speeches rather than taking a stance. At this point she's had her chance, let her sit back and wait until it passes or fails. I'm sure she's got a poll test answer ready in the event of either scenario.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
35. I found the fact she only had 500 more people than Senator Sanders did
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:11 AM
Jun 2015

At his kick off, telling. Encouraging for Sanders.

I was also disappointed in her military part of the speech. Actually, I found it frightening.

The rest was predictable and veiled corporatism, except for Citizens United. And that part, while good to hear, makes me wonder why she is taking so much money from corporations

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
37. I haven't heard a word of any of her speeches and don't care to
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:18 AM
Jun 2015

I guess it's easy to ignore being over here in Korea with less political news.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
47. Opposing the biggest piece of shit Corporate Giveaway, Job Killing deal ever attempted...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:22 AM
Jun 2015

... is "free ponies for everyone?"

That's the stupidest defense of it I've ever heard, and I've heard some real doozies.

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
41. Fuck huffington post just another hit piece on Hillary
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 07:37 AM
Jun 2015

If she had mentioned it they would be saying she didn't go far enough

murray hill farm

(3,650 posts)
50. I think that she did mention it.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:39 AM
Jun 2015

At one point she was talking about negatives economically and listed some which included something she called "Quick Trade".

Autumn

(48,962 posts)
43. No suprise at all. That would require a definite I'm for it or I'm against it.
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:41 AM
Jun 2015

Taking a stand is something of a risk for this Hillary. Which is sad because I don't remember her being timid, for lack of a better word, before.

Omaha Steve

(109,234 posts)
45. "I want to judge this when I see exactly what is in it...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 08:54 AM
Jun 2015

That is why Fast Track should wait too.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
46. Whatever she says about it some of us will take whatever she says to prove 1 of 2 things:
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 09:07 AM
Jun 2015

1) She's a liar; 2) She is not a real Democrat.

I hope Bernie wins the nomination, but I understand her strategy in that sense. At least on DU, whatever she says is not going to win her anything but more criticism.

I too wish all candidates would take public positions on important issues. Then we can consider their statements seriously and give them credit while considering whether they are consistent with, or a believable evolution from, their previous actions and statements.

 

Dems to Win

(2,161 posts)
48. She didn't commit to the Fight for $15, either
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:00 AM
Jun 2015

She did say she supported raising the minimum wage, but she didn't mention a dollar amount.

Today, the two big issues I'm watching and calling leaders about are TPP and #FightFor15. Hillary gave a big speech and did not firmly ally herself with working people on the two big issues of the moment.

I noticed.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
51. Mentioned FDR more than once, but no opinion on TPP, which she helped negotiate. k. nt
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:41 AM
Jun 2015

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
53. If a candidate can't or won't address the issues I care about...
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 10:45 AM
Jun 2015

... then I can't support them. Ever.

I will not be duped again. I have had my fill of phony "liberals" and their destruction of the Middle Class and poor. Neoliberal pretenders have seen my last vote for them. Never again.

I WILL vote my conscience in every election.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
58. Her spokespeople didn't do any better on the Sunday talk shows
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 12:50 PM
Jun 2015

The one on Fox did poorly. She kept changing the conversation. Wallace asked about TPA and she kept spouting the TPP response and just kept talking(tactics used by Michele Bachmann and DWS). Stephanopolis had no luck either.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
60. a) She's for it
Sun Jun 14, 2015, 02:12 PM
Jun 2015

b) She doesn't want to say so (unless it can't be removed, like in her book).

There ya go.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Surprise! Hillary Clinton...