Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,056 posts)
Mon May 14, 2012, 09:01 AM May 2012

The Next Kennedy

I say YAY! I miss the Kennedys; Joe sounds promising.

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/05/14/the_next_kennedy.html

May 14, 2012

The Next Kennedy


Bloomberg notes that veteran politicians say 31-year-old Joseph Kennedy III (D), running for Congress in Massachusetts, "is the real deal. He draws comparisons to the young Jack Kennedy, and especially to Ted Kennedy in his first race for the Senate in 1962: Both were a little beyond their 30th birthdays, and it was their first bid for office after serving stints as county prosecutors."

"An even more relevant analogy, longtime politicians say, is that Joseph Kennedy is a natural, as were his illustrious great- uncles."

Said former Sen. Chris Dodd: "I have been around politics for a long time and only occasionally you meet someone with special skills and ability and genuine warmth. I don't care what his name is; that's Joe."

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Next Kennedy (Original Post) babylonsister May 2012 OP
Recommended. H2O Man May 2012 #1
I say Boo! I don't like dynasties. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2012 #2
Agreed. Mass May 2012 #3
I'll take a good, charismatic, liberal pol any day, not babylonsister May 2012 #5
I think the fact he served in the Peace Corps and works for a pro bono law firm gateley May 2012 #7
He may be a good guy, The Velveteen Ocelot May 2012 #8
I think if his name was Joe Jones, and knowing what little I gleaned from Wiki and other articles, gateley May 2012 #30
He may be a good guy, but we do not know Mass May 2012 #22
... and the Romneys and Bushes, etc. ... (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #24
I didn't cite them. This guy's a Kennedy, not a Bush or Romney. He's been raised gateley May 2012 #28
And the Bushes and Romneys weren't? They think it's terrible and disgusting? harmonicon May 2012 #31
I think they were raised to scam the system and to put their interestes ahead of others. gateley May 2012 #34
There was no Kennedy dynasty... zeemike May 2012 #13
Lots of folks have talked about the Bush dynasty Alcibiades May 2012 #17
And yet they compare and contrast one to the other that never was. zeemike May 2012 #21
There is a false equivalence Alcibiades May 2012 #26
Being a senator is not exactly being in power. zeemike May 2012 #27
Absolutely. We wanted JFK, they killed him. We wanted RFK and they killed him. We refused to jwirr May 2012 #20
I couldn't agree more. (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #23
I would say that he can't be "the next Kennedy" because there is no such thing. hedgehog May 2012 #4
Nice looking too. ananda May 2012 #6
He's got the teeth and the hair! Ishoutandscream2 May 2012 #9
and demeanour Voice for Peace May 2012 #10
I would advise him to stay off of small planes adigal May 2012 #19
Nice looking?! Thank god. I couldn't stand to have an ugly or homely politician. (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #25
Wow. He looks a lot like a young Jack Kennedy! Bake May 2012 #29
He does look a lot like Jack, doesn't he? hifiguy May 2012 #32
Another Dynasty? lynne May 2012 #11
An individual is as an individual does. & A dynasty is as a dynasty does. The Bushes are a dynasty patrice May 2012 #12
Reducing all possible factors to a single label also disrespects the People, because patrice May 2012 #14
This is Barney Frank's district, and includes JFK's birthplace Recursion May 2012 #15
It's not odd at all Alcibiades May 2012 #18
Joe for Oil Dystopian May 2012 #16
They've done so much for those in need. Bobby Jr is fighting for the gateley May 2012 #33

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,673 posts)
2. I say Boo! I don't like dynasties.
Mon May 14, 2012, 09:06 AM
May 2012

Just being another Kennedy doesn't make him special. What if his name were Joe Blotchnik and he came from Nowheresville?

Mass

(27,315 posts)
3. Agreed.
Mon May 14, 2012, 09:09 AM
May 2012

At this point, there is still a primary on this seat. This may leave him a chance to show who he is, but at this point, why not have kings?

gateley

(62,683 posts)
7. I think the fact he served in the Peace Corps and works for a pro bono law firm
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:10 AM
May 2012

says a lot about him.

I like the fact of the uber wealthy (well some of them) going into public service. They've been raised with a sense of fearlessness that others haven't, and are more inclined to say Fuck You to the establishment. I'm thinking Roosevelt and the Kennedys who have gone before.

I think what he's done with his young life -- working for those who most need it -- is what makes him special.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,673 posts)
8. He may be a good guy,
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:16 AM
May 2012

and well-qualified. If so, great. I just don't like the idea of somebody running for office, and people rushing out to vote for them, just because they are one of the many members of the very fecund Kennedy family. I'm sure there are some Kennedys who shouldn't be elected dogcatcher. Detach the person from the name, then make the decision.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
30. I think if his name was Joe Jones, and knowing what little I gleaned from Wiki and other articles,
Mon May 14, 2012, 01:03 PM
May 2012

I'd pay attention to him anyway. I like what I've read, and I'd like that about any candidate I was considering.

I don't want to DIScount him because he's a Kennedy, either.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
22. He may be a good guy, but we do not know
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:50 AM
May 2012

So, let's have this primary so that democracy wins. We are only stronger when we debate our ideas.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
28. I didn't cite them. This guy's a Kennedy, not a Bush or Romney. He's been raised
Mon May 14, 2012, 01:01 PM
May 2012

to believe public service is honorable.

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
31. And the Bushes and Romneys weren't? They think it's terrible and disgusting?
Mon May 14, 2012, 01:04 PM
May 2012

Whether or not this Kennedy guy is a good guy or not has nothing to do with his name, and everything to do with his character.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
34. I think they were raised to scam the system and to put their interestes ahead of others.
Mon May 14, 2012, 01:10 PM
May 2012

Well, the Bushes, anyway. Romney's dad seemed to do a lot of good while he was in office, don't know what happened to Mitt.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
13. There was no Kennedy dynasty...
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:50 AM
May 2012

The real dynastic powers killed them...or did we forget?
Has anyone ever talked about the Bush dynasty?...who have been in the political elite for a hundred years.

Alcibiades

(5,061 posts)
17. Lots of folks have talked about the Bush dynasty
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:02 AM
May 2012

I'm critical of it, too. It's actually been something even the MSM has noticed. The article below is one of many.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/2012-first-election-cycle-without-a-bush-since-1948.php

While I don't care for dynasties either, the Bush dysnasty has long been duly noted. And, yes, both dynasties have been compared and contrasted ad nauseum.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-250_162-639795.html
http://www.villagevoice.com/2002-11-19/news/the-kennedy-dynasty-vs-the-bush-dynasty/
http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Walter-Rodgers/2012/0411/Political-dynasties-Romney-Bush-Kennedy-betray-basic-American-values

And, though it is largey forgotten, in part because the brand of Republican his father represented is now long dead, Mitt is also the heir to an important political dynasty. His own conversion to Reagan Republicanism mirrors that of the GOP as a whole.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
21. And yet they compare and contrast one to the other that never was.
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:39 AM
May 2012

Thus diluting the one that was by saying they both do it...

Alcibiades

(5,061 posts)
26. There is a false equivalence
Mon May 14, 2012, 12:31 PM
May 2012

Especially given that one dynasty was ended by an assasin and the other was in power for 12 or more years, not counting Bush Sr.'s vice presidency.

Nonetheless, if you look at state, local and federal offices to exclude the presidency, the Kennedy family certainly do constitute a dynasty as most folks use the term.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
27. Being a senator is not exactly being in power.
Mon May 14, 2012, 12:51 PM
May 2012

Except perhaps in the state...and you can broaden the definition enough to make a case for many family dynasties...Ron Paul is a dynasty under that definition...and the Udall dynasty...and many others.
But none of them attained real power...and retained that power for such a long time.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
20. Absolutely. We wanted JFK, they killed him. We wanted RFK and they killed him. We refused to
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:10 AM
May 2012

elect Ted because many of us were afraid they would kill him also. There was never a Democratic dynasty.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
4. I would say that he can't be "the next Kennedy" because there is no such thing.
Mon May 14, 2012, 09:15 AM
May 2012

For one thing, he's two generations further from the immigrant experience. He was raised in a different time and place than the three Kennedy brothers.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
19. I would advise him to stay off of small planes
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:10 AM
May 2012

Did you all know that before Ted Kennedy torpedoed his chances for the presidency with Chappaquidick, he was in a small plane crash?? Just too many coincidences for me.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
29. Wow. He looks a lot like a young Jack Kennedy!
Mon May 14, 2012, 01:03 PM
May 2012

Dynasty, schmynasty. If he's GOOD, and if the name helps him get elected, MORE POWER TO HIM!!

I hope he has Teddy's heart of a lion!!!

Bake

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
32. He does look a lot like Jack, doesn't he?
Mon May 14, 2012, 01:07 PM
May 2012

That sardonic, self effacing smile in the second pic is pure JFK.

lynne

(3,118 posts)
11. Another Dynasty?
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:36 AM
May 2012

Never been fond of the idea. Let him prove himself first before getting excited. If he's "cream", he'll rise to the top no matter his name.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
12. An individual is as an individual does. & A dynasty is as a dynasty does. The Bushes are a dynasty
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:44 AM
May 2012

because they act like one and they treated us like chattel.

Whether Joseph Kennedy III is a dynasty or not depends upon WHAT HE SAYS AND DOES.

Labels used with little or no actual facts are just another form of prejudice.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
14. Reducing all possible factors to a single label also disrespects the People, because
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:54 AM
May 2012

it's paternalistic.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
15. This is Barney Frank's district, and includes JFK's birthplace
Mon May 14, 2012, 10:55 AM
May 2012

It's also the district for which Gerrymandering was named, though it's moved farther south than it was at the time. Oddly enough, it still looks a bit like a salamander:



To summarize: this is Brookline, Newton, Fall River, and New Bedford with a long stretch of Route 2 connecting them. I don't know if he'll win the primary, but if he does he'll probably be in the House for however long he wants to be...

Alcibiades

(5,061 posts)
18. It's not odd at all
Mon May 14, 2012, 11:04 AM
May 2012

What's remarkable is that we have any districts that seem geographically compact. So long as state legislatures--no matter who is in the majority--get to draw the lines, and the population is fairly heterogeneous, this will be the result.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Next Kennedy