Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 07:43 PM Jun 2015

The difference in coverage

Sexism is alive and well in America. Jeb has gravitas, stature and maturity, while Hillary is old and boring. Yep, that's our media...and it's sickening.

http://www.salon.com/2015/06/16/surprise_surprise_the_media_is_treating_jeb_bush_hillary_clinton_very_differently

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The difference in coverage (Original Post) BreakfastClub Jun 2015 OP
Only to the idiots who subscribe to MSM, Bernie has no image, know why ? orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #1
Even though I'm in the Bernie camp I find it hard to believe anyone would feel Hillary monmouth4 Jun 2015 #2
 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
1. Only to the idiots who subscribe to MSM, Bernie has no image, know why ?
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jun 2015

too weighed down with content, and solutions and MSM wants polls and poles .

monmouth4

(10,615 posts)
2. Even though I'm in the Bernie camp I find it hard to believe anyone would feel Hillary
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 08:22 PM
Jun 2015

is either too old or boring. She is neither one. Their problem would be they can't hold a candle to her or her experience so this is all they have. Poor souls....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The difference in coverag...