General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClinton Campaign FUNDRAISES With PRO-TPP LOBBY FIRM As Congress Reschedules Trade Vote

While Hillary Clinton continues to hedge her position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the related issue of trade promotion authority, her campaign is partnering with a pro-TPP/TPA law and lobby firm to raise cash. The House Rules Committee held an emergency meeting at 4:40 p.m. on Wednesday to plan how to move forward with TPA.
At 5:00 p.m., the Clinton campaign was holding a Washington, D.C. fundraiser with the McGuireWoods law firms PAC. According to lobby registration documents, the firms McGuireWoods Consulting subsidiary is lobbying on behalf of Smithfield Foods to help pass both the TPP and TPA.
Despite mounting pressure to take a position, Clinton has only provided non-commital answers regarding her stance on both TPP and TPA. On Sunday, at a rally in Iowa, Clinton said there should be better protections for American workers and called for the president to work with Democrats in Congress hardly a clarifying statement. Earlier that day, her chief pollster dismissed a call from ABC News George Stephanopoulos to provide a clear stance on TPA, casting the issue as simply Washington inside baseball.
cont'
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/06/18/congress-scrambles-reschedule-trade-promotion-vote-clintons-campaign-hosts-fundraiser-tpp-lobbying-firm/
NRaleighLiberal
(61,857 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Ironically, the people's team always seems to be the Generals, despite being from Washington. They'll Globe trot with the TPP all over our collective asses.
Jumpin Jack Flash
(242 posts)Russian roulette with our lives.
Fuck that.
CaliforniaPeggy
(156,619 posts)I am deeply angry and disappointed.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(156,619 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)1) they will benefit from the TPP
2) they do not feel they will be harmed by the TPP
3) they want a female
daleanime
(17,796 posts)4) must be corporate owned
MisterP
(23,730 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)Gloria
(17,663 posts)Sigh...
elleng
(141,926 posts)O'Malley on TPA: Im fundamentally opposed to anything were not allowed to read-thats un-American.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026644381
Jumpin Jack Flash
(242 posts)He's rising.... to 2%? from 2%?
I like him too, but he's winding up as an afterthought of Bernie vs Clinton, and Bernie's going to win out because at the end, it'll be principles before party loyalty - because we need changes and I agree with O'Malley about everything except for his L&O issues....
In addition I found this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/06/AR2007080601158.html - not sure if you have read this, which makes me leery of which way he truly stands for.
elleng
(141,926 posts)I choose a candidate for reasons of substance, NOT because others might choose someone else at a particular moment.
as to 'L&O,' he
Repealed death penalty; reduced prison incarceration. (Jan 2014)
Root out prison gangs and prison guard corruption. (Jun 2013)
Repeal the death penalty: it does not work. (May 2013)
Additional funding to hire correctional and police officers. (Jan 2007)
http://www.ontheissues.org/Governor/Martin_O%60Malley_Crime.htm
antigop
(12,778 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)I have my answer.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)on behalf of O'Malley. I appreciate your integrity.
elleng
(141,926 posts)We're together on many issues.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)a long time. Voted against the Iraq War, against the Patriot Act, against the TPP, against DOMA, against NAFTA. If people really want what they say they want, they have an opportunity now to get it.
Next to Sanders, there is O'Malley who would be my second choice. I wish he would, like Bernie, refuse to take Corporate funding. THAT is how to get the money out of politics, when candidates stand up and say, as Bernie has, 'I don't want their money'. THAT is why he is free to be as truthful as he is, to name names, because he is beholden ONLY to the people.
And he is going to win. As he said, don't listen to them telling us 'he isn't electable', THAT is what they want you to believe'.
He has been elected so many times, by huge majories, you have to wonder who these people are who say such a ridiculous thing. IF the people vote for him, he will win, it's that simple.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)It seems lately I've had to hold my nose nearly every time I vote, esp. as everyting has shifted right. The Dems are specialists at either caving to or "trusting" the GOP only to get screwed..and they don't seem to learn from tnis...it wasn't always this way...
840high
(17,196 posts)nose. You can always write in a name.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)people are done holding their noses. That is why his campaign has been going so well. No more lesser evil, or holding noses, not when there is a choice.
I remember when people didn't think Obama had a chance either. If people had allowed their fears of a Repub wining they would not have voted for Obama.
We have this one chance to get a president who actually works for us. I know I am going to take it.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)I keep thinking about Paul Wellstone...
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)don't get behind them. The more people who support him, the harder it will be for anyone to try to stop him.
djean111
(14,255 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
elleng
(141,926 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)O'Malley on TPA: Im fundamentally opposed to anything were not allowed to read-thats un-American.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026644381
yourout
(8,821 posts)elleng
(141,926 posts)Second, DUers MUST learn about him.
Third, there is no such rule.
yourout.
yourout
(8,821 posts)I never said it was a rule just a bit of courtesy to not polute threads with repetitive posts.
elleng
(141,926 posts)THIS is NOT pollution.
yourout
(8,821 posts)Quite the tap dance.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)to state rules Bernie may not even be on the ballot.
If they keep this up, they will find that HRC will lose
the GE, because too many Dems -especially the younger
generation - will boycott the election out of disgust.
Naturally the Bernie supporters will be blamed, but
actually to the Third Way it does not make any
difference. It is only the money that counts.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)But I'll bet you that the Hillary legal team is working overtime to see how they can successfully keep him off the ballots even though Dean faced no such problem qualifying.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)if that is what you think you need to win, then you represent their interests. No one gives a politician billions of dollars just because it's a nice thing to do.
And that is why Sanders has refused to take their money, and that is why he is free to tell the truth to the people to whom HE is beholden.
colsohlibgal
(5,276 posts)It amazes me that so many Hillary supporters seem oblivious to this or don't care. They must be fine with third way neo democrats - republican lite.
Segami
(14,923 posts)...she is beholden.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)He also, er, convinced Jimmy Carter to allow the Shah of Iran to enter the United States
http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/archives_roll/2003_01-03/dauherty_shah/dauherty_shah.html
Quite a counselor, that Henry Kissinger.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Does a typical politician nowadays know or care what his opinion is?
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Still first down, but now 20 yards to go.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)She is supported by the oligarchs and, as Senator Warren likes to remind us, the game is rigged.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(25,518 posts)Hillary can't keep up this act for long; eventually she'll have to answer to the people on Main Street, not Wall Street, and explain her out-of-touch positions on the issues of the day.
When that happens, watch Bernie surge even more than he already has.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)(which is virtually a certainty) she's going to wish she doesn't get elected president.
Because her lack of opposition will be viewed as approval and she will be the one facing the angry peasants.
If she had the guts to come right out and oppose the thing now, it might be different, but she obviously believes she can continue to finesse it and hope it's forgotten by the time the election arrives. Unfortunately for her, the effects of this terrible trade deal will be quite apparent by the time of the election and that strategery won't work.
Obama can just sit back and chortle as she gets the blame for the mess he caused.
I'll work and vote for Bernie.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)that can be counted on to be the way it is
delrem
(9,688 posts)has to be whittled away.
But it will be.
It has to be.
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)that in the offices of these lobbyists and their clients, HRC's position on TPP is not ambiguous.
Response to Segami (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed