General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy does Team Hillary ALWAYS take the low road
When asked about concern at Team Clinton about Sanders' surge, McCaskill responds:
"No, I think the media is giving Bernie a pass right now.
I very rarely read in any coverage of Bernie that he's a socialist."
She is using the term "Socialist" in the same manner as the right wing.......as a slur.
Reminds me of her campaign against President Obama.
BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)Fight back. Ask her what established forms of socialism she's against in this country, e.g. Here's a good list:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/29/1078852/-75-Ways-Socialism-Has-Improved-America#
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Which was why take the low road. Why promote the repub point of view and ask Sanders to defend it? Why not take the high road and promote the positive?
Response to rufus dog (Reply #2)
virtualobserver This message was self-deleted by its author.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Looked up the link, didn't thoroughly read it, but I was doubtful that there were so many socialistic programs in the US already.
Thanks for posting.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)"Rand Paul's father, Ron Paul, got massive crowds. Pat Buchanan got massive crowds. It's not unusual for someone who has an extreme message to have a following."
Who needs Republicans when Democrats label Bernie's message is extreme.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Fucking DINO...
erronis
(15,216 posts)So if we don't like him now, we will be even more upset when/if she wins.
With this message, I'll be changing my tagline to "Liberal, Progressive, Socialist, and intelligent" or some such. We need to get these terms out from under the slime mass that the repug PR machine has generated.
frylock
(34,825 posts)this would appear to confirm that it's a talking point that originated from the Clinton camp.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)their panic will grow.
They have been through this before, and they didn't like it.
They will soon be shouting the S-word from the rooftops.
frylock
(34,825 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)2016: too high turnout = erosion of democracy
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)when his mob is large enough, there is a danger that he might take over this county through democratic means
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)haa haa haa
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)the minute that she senses DANGER.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...but Clinton "ALWAYS"? yeah, whatev.
btw. do you have a link?
Robbins
(5,066 posts)She was sent to bash Bernie.it's 2007/2008 all over again.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and these are talking points
http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/mccaskill--bernie-is-too-liberal-to-win-471130691652
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)and ALWAYS said exactly what the candidate intends and an the tone and manner the candidate intended. Got it. ALWAYS.
I think I will wait to hear this directly from Clinton, thanks.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I encourage Clinton to speak out more often. It's not going to happen though, because it's too much of a liability.
7962
(11,841 posts)Thats how politics works. How many times have we seen a comment or act by someone on the right and then the party say "that doesnt represent us/me"? Same thing here.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)McCaskill is not on Clinton's payroll. Clinton is not running against McCaskill for any office. Why should Clinton infringe on her 1st A opinions. Is Bernie setting everyone straight when they talk about his racism? No...that's not how it works.
7962
(11,841 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)so why didn't he dignify the idiots with a response?
My thoughts are he doesn't want to feed the idiocy.
So why is Hillary being required to respond to this idiocy too?
I was being told that her silence is agreement.
I simply tried to raise a similar situation when silence on a matter does NOT in any way shape or form imply agreement.
7962
(11,841 posts)I dont follow everything all the time, so i guess i missed that story!
hedda_foil
(16,371 posts)Because it is. Maybe you're overtired and need a nap.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)maybe glasses will help, or access to a good teacher?
hedda_foil
(16,371 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)the 08 primaries all over again
SCantiGOP
(13,867 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)She's not their mom!
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and saying that Bernie is "too liberal"
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I separate myself from her comments but I don't separate myself from the observation that HRC is not responsible for everything her supporters say.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)someone else's responsibility when they leap to their death.
That is their personal responsibility.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)My parents should have done a better job at raising my self esteem and self confidence.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)but if it comforts you, so be it.
I suspect your vainometer is broken, however.
Hekate
(90,616 posts)...will do to nice old avuncular Bernie exactly what they have been doing to Hillary all along.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)a nice OLD uncle?
Hekate
(90,616 posts)....any thread tossing off insulting one-liners as though you think they are sophisticated bon mots. Keep trying.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)How do you know what I think?
Can you predict the future too?
Is calling someone an "old uncle" a "insulting" "figure of speech"?
Do you "bop around" too or stay on the same thread for a week?
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)She played dirty against Obama, playing the Muslim card, and had the Jeremiah Wright "God damn America!" tape loop playing on cable news 24/7, and came out of that race wondering why so many Democrats turned against her and distrusted her.
Marr
(20,317 posts)more or less equal when it comes to things like this, but there is already a distinctive flavor to the comments of Hillary's surrogates and supporters-- and it's identical to 2008's.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And she'll do it again. It's all she knows...unable to learn from mistakes.
dsc
(52,155 posts)or does that only work if the candidate doesn't have a penis.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)She isn't employed by the campaign she has merely endorsed her, just like West did him.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)...then we'll talk.
dsc
(52,155 posts)You're saying she supports Clinton, she says x, x are Clinton talking points. Why can't we say West supports Sanders, West says y, y are Sanders talking points? Either candidates are to blame for what people who endorse them say or they are not to blame for what people who endorse them say. I think the candidate is responsible for what the candidate says. You seem to think if the candidate has a penis then they are not responsible for what their endorsers say but if the candidate lacks a penis then she is.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)When a sitting Democratic Senator goes on major news talk programs as a supporter of a candidate, they do not go off-message.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Response to dsc (Reply #34)
frylock This message was self-deleted by its author.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)of sexism.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Google Cornel West/Sean Hannity
What FOX host said "we love Bernie" ?
Sean Hannity
Megyn Kelley
Bill O'Reilly
Greta Van Susteren
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)as Claire McCaskill stated....
He is also loved by Fox News.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Corny crapped on the pres and has been a guest on Hannity. Billo said "we love Bernie."
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Corny called the pres the n word and an emasculated man and has been a guest on Hannity. Billo said "we love Bernie".
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Cornell West can defend himself.
He started out as a big supporter of Obama, and he had high expectations.
When I have lived his life, I will judge his words. His feelings are his own,
but one thing that I do know, he was not cynically trying to win votes
with his words
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)See how that works.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Jeez!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The suggestion that we can dismiss everything a person says or does because we don't have the same experiences while appropriate in some instances is not a universal rule... Lots of African Americans have had the same experience as Cornel West and don't consider President Obama emasculated or n-------ed.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)So I do not judge him or his words. That is just me. I am not qualified to do so.
I will leave that criticism to the "lots of African Americans" of whom you speak.
I do not question their judgment either. It would be presumptuous of me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)eom
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)but if you feel qualified to do so, be my guest.....just don't ask me to do it.
Cha
(297,029 posts)http://crooksandliars.com/2015/06/cornel-west-obama-first-niggerized-black
Calling Obama a global George Zimmerman?No. No.: Michael Eric Dyson sounds off on Cornel West, Obama & his critics
The Georgetown University scholar and author reflects on his very public break with his mentor turned tormentor
snip//
When African-American friends defended the president, he went in on them. West called MSNBCs Perry a liar and a fraud, claimed Sharpton was the bona fide house negro of the Obama plantation, and attacked the Michael Dysons and others whove really prostituted themselves intellectually in a very, very ugly and vicious way.
Its true that as Dysons TNR piece bemoans the nasty ad hominem nature of Wests attacks on Obama, as well as on him and his colleagues, he gave almost as good as he got, first praising West as the most exciting black scholar ever, then charting his intellectual decline. His greatest opponent isnt Obama, Sharpton, Harris-Perry, or me, the Georgetown scholars article concludes. It is the ghost of a self that spits at him from his own mirror.
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/22/calling_obama_a_global_george_zimmerman_no_no_michael_eric_dyson_sounds_off_on_cornel_west_obama_his_critics/
7962
(11,841 posts)I watched most of the interview. Sanders didnt do the typical pol-speak nonsense, he answered the questions and gave his opinion. O'Reilly said he was a straight shooter, which he is. Sanders even seemed to enjoy the interview. Sanders hasnt pandered to anyone as far as I've seen.
It's quite an accomplishment to be both too liberal AND a Fox News fav!! If Bernie can do that, maybe HE'S the guy to achieve peace in the ME!!
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)show me '''just like west did'' like this
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)eom
Rex
(65,616 posts)Yeah...didn't think so...not even a nice try...
dsc
(52,155 posts)last I checked she was employed by the US Government.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Yeah...didn't think so...not even a nice try...
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)tokenlib
(4,186 posts)First Luis Gutierrez pissed off enough people to get out the checkbooks for Bernie, and now Claire McCaskill....
Foolish surrogates who insult and belittle Bernie and his supporters need to learn they will not help Hillary in the long run.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Bernie Sanders is a cozy soft pillow next to the past 25 years of dealing with thr RW nasty Kkkarl Rove MSM lies & hate.
She's handled them & is still on top in the game.
She can debate Bernie. He's an easy one compared to the RW
I doubt anyone on Team Hillary is too concerned.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)he felt that the one size fits all nature of the bill didn't work for rural areas
howard dean- very similar views
he was in favor of instant background checks
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)It's how they roll.
randys1
(16,286 posts)sites?
Asks this Bernie supporter.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts).....but I want to trust Hillary.
When she uses tactics that diminish progressive ideas it disturbs me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts).....but I like Bernie...
I hope he disassociates himself from someone who says Obama is an emasculated man and n-------ed.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Working class Whites are largely racist, misogynistic and homophobic. Democrats used to win that demographic anyway because, while we strongly supported social justice, we also supported economic justice. As long as we supported economic justice, they were willing to accept the social justice. The result was steady progress on social issues.
When a DLC founder got elected President, Democrats were persuaded to go along with giving up economic justice. To counter that, the DLC started backing Democrats willing to compromise on social justice to appeal to working class Whites. On many occasions backing from third way Democrats helped a compromised Democrat edge out a liberal Democrat in the primary.
And Hillary Clinton was the president of the DLC backing Democrats weak on social justice. While she never does anything directly against social justice, she has helped others opposed to social justice achieve the power to undo the advances we have made. The result has been varied. Gays have achieved a lot of equality. But for women and African-Americans, the country has been back-sliding.
I do not get why anyone at DU would let her slide on this.
nolabear
(41,956 posts)And he IS a Socialist. He should be proud of it and run as he believes.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)"too extreme". Great.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)bought the historical records and website of the DLC back in 2011. Who next will be ripping on Bernie Sanders, Harold Ford?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Leadership_Council
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)My porridge is just right.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,173 posts)If they had any involvement at all, it might be just for McCaskill to casually toss it out there and see what (if any) response it gets, so they can note whether to let the term slip in occasionally or avoid it at all costs. Just a guess.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)McCaskill clearly was sent out to attack Bernie, so as to keep the attack a certain distance from the Hillary campaign itself. That is the essence of dirty politics and I have no doubt whatsoever it came directly from Hillary's campaign thinktank. I find it distasteful. YMMV.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,173 posts)I find it distasteful, too -- but I keep reminding myself that this is the realm of the hardest of hardball politics, and any chink (or perceived chink) in someone's armor is to be exploited. 'Tis the nature of the profession.
On a good day, such things are noted and then ignored. But they ARE noted.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)It stems from the laissez faire capitalist based ethical tradition of
"Let The Buyer Beware"
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)She's pledged herself to Hillary for her own personal gains, NOT because it may be best for the country! AND, she will do what she needs to, and Hillary has been the only game in town... since FOREVER!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)of saying and doing whatever is necessary, truthful or not, to gain an advantage.
Some of us recall all too vividly HRC's dog-whistling in 2008.
Standard Operational Bullshit.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)She campaigned against Hilary in 2008.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and doing a bang-up job.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Bernies never going to make it if you bash all the super delegates.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/19/us/politics/mccaskill-lends-support-to-group-urging-2016-clinton-run.html
Just yesterday this was put out......remember its sauce for the goose.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6898719
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)You remember the 90s....
Newt came out with his "word list" and got a bunch of unqualified ASSHOLES into congress using negative campaigns and wedge issues.
That was also back when we had the lowest voter turnout in history because Republicans and Democrats had the exact same positions on every issue they cared about. The Red State Dems ran on the "I'm as good as a Republican" platform.
Hillary's people are running a generic formulaic campaign from the 20th Century.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Who could forget that classic work from the Newt
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4443.htm
Maybe we can ditch the Rebel flag and the 3rd way in the same election cycle.
still_one
(92,111 posts)fine with their coverage of Hillary and Bernie, but it appears to me they are not covering O'Malley events as much
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)built on a myth and fueled by corporate money.
7962
(11,841 posts)And really most politicians. But the clintons do usually take it to another level
tularetom
(23,664 posts)And yet they've raised whining to an art form when they are criticized.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Hillary will evolve INTO a socialist, at least on TV.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The simple explanation is that they are republicans.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)please elaborate
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)CanadaexPat
(496 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)CanadaexPat
(496 posts)for them to turn around and do it to someone else.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)she said that the media are giving Bernie "a pass" by not mentioning that he is a socialist.
Someone isn't given a pass for a good thing. You are only given a pass for bad things.
"
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)For him. I pointed this out before he declared his candidacy, I was told it wasn't a problem. When he wanted to promote his stand on the issue of being a socialists, it was good, it is not a selling point to many, it is his position.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Good things become bad things. Kerry's Vietnam war service was swiftboated. Obama's multi-cultural background was cast as his not even being American. Racism, sexism, any and every foul attack is part and parcel of politics in this country and has been since the early Republic. Politics in America is dirty business, and no Democrat, even the most slimy like Terry MacAullife, can compete with the GOP. Politics is Hardball.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)It means that you can't make a legitimate case for yourself.
I'm not worried about this damaging Bernie. He knows how to handle this, and if Hillary doesn't watch out, this will be her undoing.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)on edit- misread
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Possibly for the same reason that many Democrats on DU are compelled to debate personalities rather than policies in the primaries, illustrating a distinct and dramatic lack of substance and objectivity.
They are using the term "ALWAYS" as though it has meaning.
They are using the term Team Hillary in the same manner as right wing slur.
Reminds me of my second grade campaign class president against Lisa Beurlini.
(distinction lacking a difference below to maintain fiction of objectivity...)
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and does so against Democrats and I am tired of it.
I am criticizing tactics, not personality......unless you are asserting that
using this kind of attack is an integral part of her personality...
then I defer to your deeper understanding of her.
I used TEAM HILLARY because it was done through one of her surrogates.
It is a group effort.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)CONCERNED that Bernie supporters are too mean. You can't make this shit up.
It's brilliant Hillary! Keep going! You're doing a GREAT job.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)Keep talking surrogates its really helped Hillary in 08'
Those surrogates have diarrhea mouth let them expose themselves
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)it is a dirty word. The Cold War ensured that. This should come as a surprise to no one. You can't wish away the last 60 years of American history and propaganda because you suddenly find it inconvenient.
If Sanders starts to become a serious contender, you will see much, much more of it. If he wins the nomination, the GOP will engage in all out nuclear war. Sanders will be cast as Joseph Stalin, and Cold War rhetoric will be given new life through growing tensions with Russia.
This ain't nothing. If you're complaining now, you're not ready for the main event.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)but to quote Bob Dylan
"The times they are a changin' "
treestar
(82,383 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)they have only been successful because of Democrats adopting the same strategy and also falling for those strategies (Oooh, I am not nearly as liberal as you say I am, look at all the conservative things I've done)
These techniques only work on cowards, and those who are poll testing their positions.
4_TN_TITANS
(2,977 posts)election cycle, of course establishment Dems will be against him. That said, ignoring his message will be their downfall.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)Is that there is an equally, yet grueling, upward slope once they hit the lowest point.
lame54
(35,277 posts)as in passing right by him
but they can't ignore him forever
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)But have you seen the Clinton video in support of marriage equality? That is the high road.