General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs my understanding of the Greece situation correct?
1. Bankers loaned lots of money to Greece.
2. Greece effectively gave most of the money to rich people, through reduced taxes and other scams.
3. The rich people claim they "earned" it, ain't giving it back to Greece.
4. Greece couldn't pay the loans back to the bankers.
5. The banks told their paid help in EU governments and the IMF to get them off the hook, by giving money to Greece to repay the bankers, then squeezing Greece to get the Proles to cough up the cash.
6. Proles behaved for a while, suffered like crazy
7. Proles realized that the more they behaved the more difficult it became to make payments because behaving meant eviscerating their economy.
8. Proles said "enough!"
Is this correct? Critiques are appreciated (if based on facts, of course).
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)9. Proles still screwed. But at least they are screwed voluntarily and collectively.
Greece is now a fourth world country. NOT emerging economy.
They need to develop an entire new economic model, and will share the sacrifice.
The US and affluent European nations should get ready to help with humanitarian aid.
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
A HERETIC I AM This message was self-deleted by its author.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)You give money to the wealthy by lowering their taxes while at the same time borrowing money to cover the country's expenses. This is right wing redistribution. Here we called it Reaganomics.
For someone to claim they don't understand this, or disagree with it is astounding.
Response to BillZBubb (Reply #8)
A HERETIC I AM This message was self-deleted by its author.
PETRUS
(3,678 posts)Perhaps you have your own ideas about who has a claim to what (perhaps I do, too), but most of us have to accept the government as the final arbiter. If the law is changed so that you get a bigger piece of the pie, what would you call it?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'll do that.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Give has many definitions. At the least it is GIVING them tax "relief", if you want to use GOP propaganda points. The end result is they get more money than they would have had if the taxes weren't cut. That is, in reality, giving them money.
We say the Constitution gives us many rights. But the Declaration says those rights are natural and unalienable. By your definition, then, people are wrong to say the Constitution gives us rights.
If you want to parrot the republican line on tax cuts, that's fine. Don't expect many people to buy it though.
Response to BillZBubb (Reply #45)
A HERETIC I AM This message was self-deleted by its author.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Is it always so fucking black and white?"
merrily
(45,251 posts)Out of the mouth of one of the buffoonish characters in Hamlet came the advice, "Never miss an opportunity to relieve yourself." With DU's centrists, that becomes "Never miss an opportunity to bash liberals. If none exists, pretend it does and punch left anyway."
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Bashing genuine 'liberals'? Where?
Personally, I make a distinction between the 'liberal' mentality and left-wing ideologues.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Personally, I make a distinction between the 'liberal' mentality and left-wing ideologues.
I'm sure you do make a distinction that is correct-in your own mind. Each of those terms is used in a highly subjective way on DU.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)The entire notion of money and how it is distributed is based upon societal agreement. If society disagrees with the monetary exchange then it will be changed by the government or through revolution. At least, historically.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)Let's say you pay $10,000 a year in taxes, which helps pay for roads, schools, libraries, police, firemen, retirement benefits, trash pick-up, parks, museums, military etc. Then your gov decides to cut your taxes by 50%, effectively letting you keep $5,000 that would otherwise have gone to taxes. Gov has "given" you $5,000. But because everyone else in your tax bracket also got a 50% cut in taxes, there is less money to pay for all the niceties of civilized society listed above. So all the people, who provide those services and benefits have to take a pay cut or get laid off. Which means there's less money circulating in the economy for food, clothes, housing, entertainment, education, healthcare, investment in expanding and creating new business. Now do you get it?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Tax cuts leave people with more money than they would have had without the cut. The net result is that these people end up richer than they would have without the cut.
However, the nation has to keep operating. So it has to continue to spend money, but now has less income to cover its costs. So, either it has to raise taxes on other people or be unable to repay its debts. If anything, it's going to need to borrow more.
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)Why didn't #8 happen somewhere around #2? Because it worked until it didn't. Nobody ever really says "enough", until they're the ones paying for it.
It's probably a little more complicated than rich guy gets everything, little guy gets screwed. No doubt that's happening, but there's no way that's all it is.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)The little guy was not invited to the table when the loans were being made nor did he have a say in the distribution of the money. But now they want him to be at the table alone to pay for the mess. 8. Enough.
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)Was there any point from whenever all this started however many years ago, up to today, when this was going to work?
That's not picking on the Greek people, because every population works the same way. We can all see the problems. We know it's ultimately not going to work. But it's working, so nobody says enough, as we try and keep human imagination ahead of physical reality. Everyone just does what we do, and when the fan is about to be turned on, then everyone says enough. The shit grows though. It's really good fertilizer. It allows us to grow economically. We couldn't do that as much as we do without the shit.
Finite planet, limitless human imagination. One of those things won't win. We keep trying to manipulate these numbers that we created, and it gets more complicated all the time.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 6, 2015, 05:16 AM - Edit history (1)
Again, as I understand it, Greece had been lax in a lot of ways that would have prevented this.
I don't think people voting to support loan defaults, or lax repayment terms, is going to play well. But it is satisfying to say "screw you" on the way down, I suppose.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)I vote this the understatement of the day...
LuckyLib
(7,052 posts)particularly among the educated, moneyed, professional class. Folks were off the books. The only people the government could find to nail for taxes were municipal, regional or national employees who could be found through a paper trail. It became a national pastime, keeping away from the taxman.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and economy isn't being, but rather has been eviscerated: economy contracted 25%, unemployment also at 25%, debt higher than when they started--banksters were still getting paid though and rich people were still rich so a little more austerity shouldn't hurt
just like ^^^this!^^^ is.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)How annoying could a +1 possible be?
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)It was hell for the lowered class and elderly even then.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Greece (and Spain) had a real estate bubble from people buying vacation homes. A little like Florida.
Florida had the US federal government to bail them out and keep the money flowing. Spain didn't have some of Greece's other problems (failure at tax collection, really, really, really generous pensions, and a few others)
merrily
(45,251 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Greece committed Fraud to join the Eurozone: they lied about their finances to gain membership, and made promises they could not fulfill.
Greece borrowed lots of money at low interest rates
2008 hit. Greece was affected much worse than other countries in the Eurozone because they are poorer, and have more debt.
The unemployment rate was 28%. Worse than the US in the great depression.
If Greece had its own currency, it would print more drachmas. Doing so would make them worth less on the international market, which would make exporting goods cheaper, tourism cheaper, and imports more expensive (all for the most part good for Greece. It would also lower domestic interest rates, making investment easier, and service to debts cheaper.
Since Greece is in the Eurozone, they can not print money. The German dominated central bank has a monetary policy that works great for Germany, but not for Greece.
Greece has a debt load twice the US, but no ability to raise the money to pay it.
Greece is trying to negotiate with the troika (meaning trio:international monetary fund, Europe Central bank, European Commission)
Greece wants financial assistance, and they have been given loans in return for tax hikes and spending cuts.
Rich countries in the Euro zone want Greece to live with in its means, but Greece sees the cuts as hurting the economy. A lot of people in other European countries are upset that Greece is taking bailouts yet Greece has a retirement age of 57, other EU countries have a retirement age in the 60's for example.
The debt to Greece was held by private banks. The risk of default and crashing the economy of the EU was great, so that debt was bought up by European governments.
So the choices today is to accept the austerity, or to reject it. If they reject it, and aid is cut off, they are in worse shape and will have to leave the Euro to regain control of their own currency. Or maybe the troika will back down and renegotiate.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 5, 2015, 09:42 PM - Edit history (1)
what about the lenders who knew it was BS and lent money anyway?--not unlike our banksters who pushed loans on people they knew could not pay them back, but collected their own fat commissions and skated? Or our banksters who resold morgage securities that they knew were toxic--even bet against them--and then collected from the taxpayers when their scheme went bust? Doesn't any of the Greek situation sound familiar?
And btw, the unemployment rate "was 28%", and after seven years of austerity, a cratered economy and even more debt is still 25%...what was that definition of insanity again?
ETA: and there's more:
The IMF released a report just a few days ago admitting what so many economists have already said, that Greece's debt is unsustainable and odious. The IMF had this report for months.
Just two days ago Wikileaks released a document from 2011 where German Chancellor Angela Merkel who told her personal assistant that Greece's debts would still be unsustainable under the terms of the new arrangement.
So basically the troika knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that the crushing austerity they are forcing upon Greece is doomed to fail. Greece will never be able to pay these debts.
Yet neither the IMF, nor the ECB, nor the political leaders of Europe are willing to change course. Why?
The debt, in other words, isn't about money. It's about political control.
(my bold)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/26-Centuries-later-Athens-by-Daily-Kos-Debt_Debtor-Nation_Democracy_Greece-150705-780.html
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And lent them money to pay back banks in Germany, Belgium, France, basically getting them into predatory loans to pay back banks in their own country, a form of money laundering. They also forced arms sales onto them that Greece didn't even want but Germany profited from.
They fucking knew they were going to make Greece insolvent. It's Shock Doctrine 101. And it worked for all the countries who went through austerity. It was privatizing the profits and heaping the losses onto the public coffers. Just like in the US. It's the biggest swindle of all time in terms of amounts.
But it's those damn lazy Greeks!
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)And the rich get richer...either way, Greece was going to be in big trouble, and you know who was ready and waiting to capitalize on it.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)They will look on with blank faces as people have no food or medicine. They are, in fact, evil.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)money for? Starting with the Goldman Sachs loan? Were any of these loans absolutely necessary? Were they allowed to invest them the way they wanted or did the bankers tell them how to use them?
I guess I want to know why the banks gave them the money in the first place and if the loans were given even when they knew they could not be paid back? Was there collateral? I have watched how the banksters act here in the USA and read Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine. How much of that is going on in this deal?
marym625
(17,997 posts)In the Greg Palast links I put in reply #14. Much, much more than I put it in the post
LuvNewcastle
(17,821 posts)I'm glad they said no to the banksters. Greece is a beautiful country with a rich history and wonderful people. I think tourists will want to go there, and if it's cheaper, I think many more will. They're going to make it through this as long as they continue to have courage and patience.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)this happened.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)from this week's On the Media program on NPR:
There's no transcript up yet, but you can listen to the interview here: http://www.onthemedia.org/story/perceived-tragedy-greece/
Bear in mind this was taped before today's vote, but I found it to be an excellent aid to understand how Greece got to where it is today - "No" vote and all.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'll listen when I can.
merrily
(45,251 posts)OT, but I hope jackpine's services were all he deserved.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)It appears to me that there are quite a lot of erroneous assumptions going on in this thread - Palast's writings are an excellent corrective.
In answer to your "OT" about Jackpine's memorial - it was pretty amazing. I have been wanting to do an in-depth post about it, but somehow have not managed to do so yet. There have been so many other major issues happening for the past couple weeks, and I've been as caught up in them as everyone else. Still, I feel that it's something I need to do - so I will.
merrily
(45,251 posts)in a post about the services. He is so well loved and respected here.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Larry Summers
My children often ask me, Daddy, where does austerity come from? And I tell them:
Once upon a time, there was a good fairy named John Maynard Keynes. He wanted to stop depressions, financial crises and suffering, so he conceived of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. He said, When a nations foreign exchange earnings drop (say, if the price of oil rises or Greek tourism falls because its currency is over-valued), the countries taking the poor nations money, rich countries like Germany and the USA, would lend it back via the IMF.
By this rule, the rich lending to the poor, the world prospered and lived happily ever after until the 1980s, when a wicked witch, known as the Iron Lady, and Americas gaga grandpa, Reagan of the Rich, insisted that the IMF and the World Bank beat poor nations with a stick called, structural adjustment.
Nations facing destitution because of higher oil costs, currency imbalance or predatory interest rate demands were structurally adjusted. Structural adjustment is a cruel and debilitating potion of mass firings of public employees, cheap sell-offs of national assets and deregulation of corporate profiteering. This ripping the wings off the better angels of government is called, austerity.
The good fairy Keynes had warned about this evil potion, this snake oil called austerity. Cutting government spending during a recession, he said, will only make things worse.
And thats what happened: In every single case, the adjusted nations economies were devastated.
Structural adjustment reached its cruel apotheosis in the early 1990s under the guidance of the World Banks Chief Economist, one Larry Summers.
The Golden Dawn Murder Case
Larry Summers and the New FascismGreg Palast
I don't buy it. I don't buy it because of the document in my hand marked, "RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION."
Lazy Ouzo-Swilling, Olive-Pit Spitting Greeks
Or, How Goldman Sacked GreeceGreg Palast
And much more:
Greece: What they dont want you to know
More Greg Palast
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 5, 2015, 11:06 PM - Edit history (1)
Wearing rags with no ID.
That might help him understand the world a bit better.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Who threatened Elizabeth Warren, and is a trusted adviser to Hillary Clinton
merrily
(45,251 posts)Fucking flim flam artists, giving cover.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Goldman Sachs and all their appendages need to be utterly destroyed for the sake of our planet and its people.
marym625
(17,997 posts)RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Loved him when I read his book about the 2000 stolen election, which mainly focused on how Bushco purged the voters from Texas to Florida.
marym625
(17,997 posts)But I just love it so much, I'll share it again!

In case you can't read this, it says, "To my Mary, Greg Palast"
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Thanks for sharing!
marym625
(17,997 posts)I love it. I have no problem bragging about it either!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)former9thward
(33,424 posts)European taxpayers loaned a lot of money to Greece. Greece used it to set up a pension and benefit system far above the rest of Europe. Greeks, rich, poor and in between evade taxes. Their economy is finished now because the northern European nations are not going to subsidize it any longer. They voted. It is their choice.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)PSPS
(15,321 posts)In other words, this is a manufactured crisis just to keep the almighty bankers from having to take a haircut.
Here's a 9-minute piece from a viewpoint not beholden to the banks:
http://www.onthemedia.org/story/perceived-tragedy-greece/
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Also if you blame the organizations that lent Greece money for being stupid for doing so
then I guess it would be stupid to lend them any more.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)It have a very low retirement age and very generous pensions, which would be OK, but it created massive tax loopholes for the rich, and even the middle class routinely evaded paying taxes. I read somewhere that it was estimate that nearly 40% of Greek tax revenue went uncollected, and corruption was rampant in the government, leading to massive fraudulent government payouts
Warpy
(114,615 posts)The right wing leaders were lavishly persuaded, if not bribed, into ordering things like military hardware and infrastructure projects that mostly benefited rich people in a few small areas. For instance, they bought six submarines from France and that's the tip of a very large MIC iceberg. They didn't just get money from Germany and Goldman-Sachs and hand it to the rich, they got trinkets for it that didn't do the average Greek any good, at all, but helped the rich sleep better at night.
#3 is more like a lax tax code with poor enforcement enabling the rich to skate on taxes.
The rest of it is spot on.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... and if you are on the side of the bankster scams, you are a fucking idiot and it sucks to be you. Moron. Bend over douche.
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 6, 2015, 12:31 AM - Edit history (1)
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Its kinda like denying water to a person with diarrhea, its going to make things worse but the denial of water isnt what caused the diarrhea.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)austerity. The rich ran away with the money, refused to invest, refused decent paying jobs especially to immigrants. Actually spread hate of their own government. Sound familiar?
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)The 2008 crisis hurt everybody, Greece included. It was after that it couldn't pay back its loans. By 2010 it needed help.
step 5. The IMF looked at the situ and stated that a bailout package had to include debt restructuring to be successful. The Troika refused to restructure the debt, instead forcing deep cuts in government spending in exchange for bailout loans. That strangled the Greek economy.
The Troika has known for 5 years that it's austerity program was doomed from the start. It not only refused to restructure the debt as the IMF has stated was necessary, it *hid* the report. It was only leaked last week or so.
The Troika designed the program with the intention of destroying Greece's economy. It was deliberate. It was the shock doctrine in practice.
pansypoo53219
(23,034 posts)CREDITORS! the banisters! the profit pigs! wall streat!
dflprincess
(29,341 posts)reparations from WWII and Germany says it doesn't owe them anything.
The matter seems open to debate.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And I think it is an excellent point.
dflprincess
(29,341 posts)(I do like post #6 in it - with the John Cleese picture)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026942920#post6
merrily
(45,251 posts)dflprincess
(29,341 posts)some days I just can't keep track of where a thread is going.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)because they might have to fork over the money they owe to pay for the services they benefited from while not paying for them.
Because little people are supposed to pay for those things, not the wealthy. My goodness, they might actually have a tax increase, see a reduction in their bank accounts and it won't amount to diddly because they have more money than they can spend in a lifetime, anyway.
But apparently, it's the principle of the thing, not having to do their part because ... well they shouldn't. Or something like that. Entitled to not having to do their part.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)(1) Most of the debt owed to the private sector has been written down in previous bailouts.
(2) It's not just the rich but most of Greece tries to avoid paying taxes. Greece has a very large underground economy.
(3) Greece has a more generous pension system than other European neighbors.
Hence by your argument, Greece effectively gave most of the money to its rich and middle class people through reduced taxes and unsustainable welfare (meaning insufficient revenues to cover).
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Please provide a reasonable argument to defend such a position. Exactly what percentage of the Greek economy goes to pensions?
Do you not realize that Greek pensions have already taken a significant hit? How much do you think the poor and elderly should give up while the rich and bankers give nothing? Would starving be enough for you? Or do you suggest they attempt going back to work in a society that has a 25% unemployment rate already?
I won't be surprised if you suggest that the unemployment rate is attributable to the elderly and young that are too lazy to work. But if you'd like to learn the truth, try this:
http://blogs.wsj.com/brussels/2015/06/18/greek-pensions-have-been-cut-but-creditors-want-more/
1939
(1,683 posts)During the time between the overthrow of the Greek military junta and the election of the current government, there was a real rivalry between a center-right and center-left party with control of the government passing back and forth between them. To shore up their support, each party, while in power, created large numbers of patronage government jobs. Greece has one of the highest government employee to population ratio in the world (all with quick and easy retirement vesting at a relatively young age).
reorg
(3,317 posts)The Greek government has plans to further decrease this share, by replacing only 20% of staff leaving on retirement. Public employment is also highly centralised in Greece, with over 80% of staff working at the central government level.
https://www.oecd.org/greece/48214177.pdf

MattSh
(3,714 posts)







More charts and the story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/07/03/why-greece-and-germany-just-dont-get-along-in-15-charts/
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)This thread contains some wildly diverging views about what caused the crisis. One view seems to be shared by most, but not all, of the center right posters. The rest of the center right posters and the liberals seem to have a very different view. I want to know where the facts are.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Greece can devalue their own money and in step with what FDR did to guarantee returning money after runs on the banks), emulate, "The only thing we have to fear is
. FEAR ITSELF." They are following the example of Iceland (though the economies are based differently), who ALMOST joined the European Union.
They will be on the path to getting out from under the banksters who caused this mess.
The Proles will be better off in the long term, and so others
who WILL consider the same action against this ongoing financial terrorism of those like Jamie Dimon, and his ilk of Wall Street.
However, I'm puzzled by the step down of the financial minister, Yanis Varoufakis
For what purpose is that move?
TBF
(36,669 posts)with the caveat that you know getting out of this mess, however they end up doing, will mean more suffering for the proles while the rich do their thing.
Solidarity with our sisters and brothers in Greece.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)8. Proles said "enough!"
9. ECB stops giving Greece bailout money
10. Greek banks run out of cash for depositors (nb - the proles)
11. Greece is unable to / refuses to pay debts
12. Greece drops out of Eurozone
13. Weak Greek economy can't support value of new Drachma
14. Greek Government can't afford spending on pensions and social safety net
I think that covers it...
(nb - my wife, an international tax lawyer, pointed out that the Iceland and Ireland recoveries were possible because they had bad banks but good economies. Greece has neither.)
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)If you think that Proles will just sit around while being vivisected by the Predator Class...
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)all kinds of goodies.
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)they seem to be forcing greece to change their alliances from europe to china/russia
MattSh
(3,714 posts)is that people in (fill in the country name here) think they will get a better deal from the USA/IMF/NATO/World Bank/EU.
And I wonder what century those people are living in?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Vampire Squid squeezed democracy out of its homeland to turn a buck off austerity economic trickle down ripoff crapola.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Greek-Depression-the-by-William-K-Black--Austerity_Austerity_Austerity_Bailout-141231-49.html
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The banksters also sold a lot of worthless securities to Greece. And probably loaned them the mon, at usurious rates, while convincing the Greeks that they were AAA grade investmens.
Scratch a banker, find a Ferengi.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)half of us were called every name in the book because we saw exactly what was happening.
I mean, really, telling me that I drink the tears of children or some-such because I know exactly why Greece chose these measures?
Same old crap.

merrily
(45,251 posts)Repeal of Glass Steagall, aka Gramm, Leach, Bliley, aka Financial Services Modernization Act and Commodity Futures Modernization Act.
Sanders voted against the former. He voted for House Bill of the latter, but before the Senate compromise that put in the bad stuff.