Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Federal Judge Blocks Indefinite Detention Provisions Of NDAA
Federal Judge Blocks Indefinite Detention Provisions Of NDAA
A federal judge in Manhattan has blocked enforcement of provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which allow the government to place individuals they claim supported al Qaeda, the Taliban or “associated forces” in indefinite military detention.
“Before anyone should be subjected to the possibility ofindefinite military detention, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires that individuals be able to understandwhat conduct might cause him or her to run afoul of [the law],” wrote District Judge Katherine Forrest. “Unfortunately, there are a number of terms that are sufficientlyvague that no ordinary citizen can reliably define such conduct.”
Forrest ruled that Congress “can add definitional language to the statute and resolve the issues the plaintiffs have raised” and “resolve the issues with the statute and proceed with enforcement activities it deems fit.” But for now, there are “a variety of other statutes which can be utilized to detain those engaged in various levels of support of terrorists,” so enjoining enforcement of the provisions “does not divest the Government of its many other tools.”
President Barack Obama signed the law in December despite his objections to the military detention provisions of the statute. The administration later issued guidelines in February which essentially made it nearly impossible for a terrorism suspect to end up in the hands of the military.
- more -
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/federal-judge-blocks-indefinite-detention-provisions-of-ndaa
A federal judge in Manhattan has blocked enforcement of provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which allow the government to place individuals they claim supported al Qaeda, the Taliban or “associated forces” in indefinite military detention.
“Before anyone should be subjected to the possibility ofindefinite military detention, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires that individuals be able to understandwhat conduct might cause him or her to run afoul of [the law],” wrote District Judge Katherine Forrest. “Unfortunately, there are a number of terms that are sufficientlyvague that no ordinary citizen can reliably define such conduct.”
Forrest ruled that Congress “can add definitional language to the statute and resolve the issues the plaintiffs have raised” and “resolve the issues with the statute and proceed with enforcement activities it deems fit.” But for now, there are “a variety of other statutes which can be utilized to detain those engaged in various levels of support of terrorists,” so enjoining enforcement of the provisions “does not divest the Government of its many other tools.”
President Barack Obama signed the law in December despite his objections to the military detention provisions of the statute. The administration later issued guidelines in February which essentially made it nearly impossible for a terrorism suspect to end up in the hands of the military.
- more -
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/federal-judge-blocks-indefinite-detention-provisions-of-ndaa
Katherine Forrest was nominated by President Obama in May 2011. She was confirmed in October.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_B._Forrest
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
How could a Federal judge block what everyone here knew wasn't a part of the law????? 
(Note: I'm being facetious)
