Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThose $22,600 W. Virginia routers were "economical"
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/a-bizarre-operation-why-west-virginia-stuck-22600-routers-in-tiny-libraries/ (ORIGINAL STORY I posted)At a House Energy and Commerce Committee oversight hearing yesterday, Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) wanted to know why the state of West Virginia bought hundreds of $22,000 enterprise-grade routers from Cisco, only to place some of them into tiny rural libraries with a couple computers. Hundreds more sit in warehouses, still awaiting installation.
The routers, each of which can serve a branch office or campus of more than 500 computers, were purchased as part of a $24 million contract paid for with federal stimulus money doled out by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. The state stuck the same Cisco 3945 series router into every public facility on its list, regardless of size. Some needed routers of this size; others could have used models that cost a few hundred dollars.
"It seems pretty disturbing," Walden said.
NTIA head Larry Strickling said the whole issue was overblown. "The facts of the situation there are not exactly as described in the newspaper article," he said, in reference to the Charleston Gazette, which has been digging on the story for two weeks. The paper called the entire project a "bizarre operation."
Strickling says that NTIA looked into the situation and found that the average cost of the routers was only $12,000not the $22,600 reported by the paper. (The contract for the devices was $24 million and 1,064 were purchased; 1,064 x $22,600 = $24 million. It's not clear how Strickling broke down the numbers.)
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/05/those-22600-w-virginia-routers-were-economical/
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Those $22,600 W. Virginia routers were "economical" (Original Post)
DainBramaged
May 2012
OP
And the same thing could have been accomplished with routers from Staples for $100...
rfranklin
May 2012
#1
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)1. And the same thing could have been accomplished with routers from Staples for $100...
I smell a kickback.
summerschild
(725 posts)2. You know it!
Hope they keep drilling that hole til they can name and convict the varmints!