General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy are there so many threads about Zimmerman's head wounds
and very little - if any - mention of the fact that the autopsy report says that Trayvon Martin was shot from an "intermediate range?'
http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/16/11736208-trayvon-martin-killed-by-single-gunshot-fired-from-intermediate-range-autopsy-shows?lite
It seems to me that this information is far more important in adjudicating the case. That Zimmerman stalked Trayvon, who then, ahem, "stood his ground," by standing up to his stalker is somewhat relevant; however, I find it more relevant that Trayvon wasn't shot at point blank range.
If he was on top of Zimmerman when he was shot, as Zimmerman claims, then the bullet wound would reflect a much closer angle. Not so.
Was Trayvon attempting to stop the fight and leave when he was shot? "Intermediate range" would suggest so.
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)if Trayvon was on top, and shot in the left ventricle, there would be buckets of blood on Zimmerman. There was none.
Meiko
(1,076 posts)not all gun shot wounds produce copious amounts of blood. There are several factors involved.However, Trayvon was suppose to have been involved in a fist fight, a fight which would have raised his BP and heart rate. You would think that a chest wound would have bleed like crazy.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Zimmerman to the ground and Zimmerman shot Martin as he walked or ran away.
If Martin was backing up from Zimmerman (while continuing to face him), the bullet's entrance would be in the front.
As for why there are so many threads, seems to me defenders of Zimmerman are using the head wounds as a sort of latter-day stigmata, to cast Zimmerman as the righteous victim\martyr here (while ignoring the reality that Martin lies dead). As you rightly note, the head wounds are irrelevant to the question of where the shooter and victim were in relation to one another when the shooting took place.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)and sickening... it's all about gun carrying. Most of those in the gungeon are the ones defending Zim.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)are not in the least exculpatory, IMO. He could have banged his head into a tree or slipped and fell after he shot his young victim. He doesn't claim to have been attacked from the rear, the victim was shot in the chest from at least an arm's length away. Nope, just doesn't add up. He stalked and killed a visitor to his neighborhood who had every right to be there after the police told him to let them handle it.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I didn't find them life-threatening and I didn't pull a gun out on the tree that scratched me or the rock I tripped over.
yellerpup
(12,253 posts)I weren't out stalking the flora or minerals, either. This asshat had a gun and was dying to use it. He's an attention whore and now a murderer.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)"An intermediate range gunshot, like that seen in the above image, can range from just beyond the 12-inch range out to 24 to 36 inches. This depends greatly upon the caliber, barrel length and powder type used in the ammunition"
From: http://www.firearmsid.com/A_distanceResults.htm
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)was much closer than 12 inches.
If they were no longer struggling and Trayvon had backed off from Zimmerman a foot or a yard, then there was nothing "life-threatening."
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Funny how some posters have been completely absent from any discussion of the case at all, but all of a sudden are all over GD/LBN and not even trying to hide the giddyness
Mods need to do a mega-merge of all this shit
belcffub
(595 posts)which this last dump of data gave me... before then there were two many unknowns...
could my opinion change... absolutely if something new comes out... zimmerman is an idiot who should have stayed in the car... prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered martin... please... I just don't see it with the current information known....
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and when his "official" statement of the events of that night -- if the police are competent in the least, they will have taken a statement, and I want to see how consistent it is...
belcffub
(595 posts)my problem is the difference between legally and morally responisble... morally 100%... legally I just don't see it...
and I would love to read his official statement... I wonder why it wasn't in this weeks data dump...
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)liberal masks from slipping over this topic.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)whether you would defend yourself from a broken nose. The close range is not favorable to Trayvon.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)Because American media likes to jerk people around for PROFIT. People respond to propaganda with ill-informed opinions they didn't even think of themselves and pretend they are discussing reality.