Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:28 AM Jul 2015

Elisabeth Hasselbeck is "sure" that Sandra Bland "could have" because "someone has." Err...HUH???



On Monday’s edition of “Fox & Friends,” Elisabeth Hasselbeck speculated that an “irritated” Sandra Bland could have “attacked” Officer Brian Encinia with her cigarette, because the co-host is “sure someone has, in the history of this land, used a cigarette against a police officer.”

Putting aside the fact that “the history of this land” contains a nearly infinite number of otherwise innocent objects that could, in a pinch, be used by someone, somewhere as a weapon. At this very moment, I have access to pens, a lamp, a cup of rapidly cooling green tea, not to mention the very keyboard on which I type these words — any one of which could conceivably be used to attack another human being.

Just because I could toss a cup of lukewarm green tea at any police officer who walks into my office doesn’t mean that, should a police officer actually enter my office, he or she should feel immediately threatened by my Bigelow. There’s no logic to that logic — it’s effectively a license to live in perpetual fear of everyday objects, and Hasselback wants to grant it to law enforcement.

But Hasselbeck continued, albeit oddly, stopping and starting almost as if her brain didn’t want allow her mouth to eject the words it’d ordered her to say. “What if, I mean, there are times, I’m sure, someone has, in the history of this land, used a cigarette against a police officer,” Hasselbeck said. “Maybe chucked it at him — pushed it at him?”

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/27/fox_news_elisabeth_hasselbeck_justifies_sandra_blands_arrest_she_could_have_used_cigarette_as_a_weapon/
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elisabeth Hasselbeck is "sure" that Sandra Bland "could have" because "someone has." Err...HUH??? (Original Post) Miles Archer Jul 2015 OP
Sandra is gone and this asshat is still here BeyondGeography Jul 2015 #1
She's an ass Faux pas Jul 2015 #2
If you look at a cop and squint your eyes... DetlefK Jul 2015 #3
How and why does this woman have a job in television? Atman Jul 2015 #4
because of rupert murdoch and roger ailes spanone Jul 2015 #6
What amazes me is that she gets paid big bucks for saying leftyladyfrommo Jul 2015 #5
Clearly, being hot is about the only qualification for being on Fox "News." Atman Jul 2015 #7
Yes, because a black person would be excused tavernier Jul 2015 #8
Ill will and mistrust. Igel Jul 2015 #9
It is a medical miracle that Hasselbeck continues to survive... tkmorris Jul 2015 #10
She is such a moron. cwydro Jul 2015 #11

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
3. If you look at a cop and squint your eyes...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:55 AM
Jul 2015

that means you are measuring the distance for poking his eye out.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
4. How and why does this woman have a job in television?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:59 AM
Jul 2015

She is an absolute idiot. What are credentials? Who the hell is she?

Oh, and a shout-out to my man, Will Pitt. At least HE knows I was making a funny.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,868 posts)
5. What amazes me is that she gets paid big bucks for saying
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:01 AM
Jul 2015

astonishingly stupid stuff. But then she is amazingly good at it.

Do right wing guys think she's hot? That has to be the only reason she is still around.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
7. Clearly, being hot is about the only qualification for being on Fox "News."
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:10 AM
Jul 2015

And "hot" is obviously a subjective term. I have actually heard and read comments by many people who admit to watching Fox "News" because of the good-looking women. Roger and Rupert are old coots. They're the type who pat the waitress's ass in a restaurant and think it's perfectly okay.

tavernier

(12,375 posts)
8. Yes, because a black person would be excused
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:10 AM
Jul 2015

for tossing a lit cigarette at a white cop in the south.



I don't she was looking to get her head blown off for a lane change.
---------

E.H. = Moron

Igel

(35,296 posts)
9. Ill will and mistrust.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:50 AM
Jul 2015

Just because police officers have assaulted AfAm citizens for no reason doesn't mean that when I'm pulled over an AfAm motorist should feel threatened.

We're bad at intuitive statistics. We by default assume that what is know is all that's important to know. If we didn't hear about many AfAm deaths a year ago and hear about more this year, it can only be because there's a spike. Ignorance and innumeracy are often the basis for our conclusions. That goes for all of us.

We're defensive, so the "bad stats" assume outsized importance. That goes for all us.

We also justify and make excuses for those we empathize with or feel some solidarity with. It's an extension of being defensive. Our team is good, theirs isn't. This is what humans try to do naturally. All of us.

Everything said in this entire conversation has to be understood with those three things constantly in mind. Not just their side. Not just our side. Everything. We all have big mouths and little ears, and our brains are entirely dedicated to talking.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
10. It is a medical miracle that Hasselbeck continues to survive...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:40 PM
Jul 2015

Without the assistance of life support machinery. The woman makes the average IQ of any room she walks into plunge into negative numbers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elisabeth Hasselbeck is &...