General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGiant Galaxy-Packed Filament Revealed
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120517143639.htm
Giant Galaxy-Packed Filament Revealed
ScienceDaily (May 17, 2012) A McGill-led research team using the Herschel Space Observatory has discovered a giant, galaxy-packed filament ablaze with billions of new stars. The filament connects two clusters of galaxies that, along with a third cluster, will smash together and give rise to one of the largest galaxy superclusters in the universe.
The filament is the first structure of its kind spied in a critical era of cosmic buildup when colossal collections of galaxies called superclusters began to take shape. The glowing galactic bridge offers astronomers a unique opportunity to explore how galaxies evolve and merge to form superclusters.
"We are excited about this filament, because we think the intense star formation we see in its galaxies is related to the consolidation of the surrounding supercluster," said Kristen Coppin, a postdoctoral fellow in astrophysics at McGill and lead author of a new paper in Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Swede
(39,096 posts)Thanks for posting.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)It was just made to look old.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)To mess with people's minds
Vidar
(18,335 posts)DontTreadOnMe
(2,442 posts)House of Representatives.
Just a bunch of Superclusterfuks!
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)On edit: doh. Didn't read your whole post
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)That they can make these determinations from what looks to be an ordinary image.
But someone noticed the subtle difference and analyzed it further. And no doubt studied it in depth using methods that we can't immediately imagine.
It's like how the first astronomer figured out that these tiny, unexplained variations in star brightness were actually PLANETS passing in front of the star - again, amazing.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)Uncle Joe
(64,808 posts)Thanks for the thread, 2on2u.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Zanzoobar
(894 posts)I took that foto when I was three sheets to the wind. I must have emailed it to sciencedaily in a drunken haze.
I'm rirry shorry.
Beautiful!
DiverDave
(5,238 posts)[IMG]
[/IMG]tabasco
(22,974 posts)Thanks.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and yet, it still sounds like a brand of sugar free gum.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)should be qualified with "as much as we can observe."
It's stupid to believe we are observing more than a tiny fraction of the universe.