General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCop Arrested After His Own Body Cam Refuted His Report, Shows Him Pummeling Teen
In his report, Fraser wrote that his victim, 19-year-old Michael Roquet struck me with his left elbow in my chest, and later he hit me again with his elbow
. so I struck him [with a baton] in the leg and upper body and then handcuffed him.
However, according to the body camera footage of the incident, it is clear that there is no violent struggle, and only a drunken college kid serving as an outlet for this cops rage. At no time in the report did Fraser mention that he struck Roquet in the head. Nor did Fraser mention that Roquet fell to the ground after the devastating blow and that he proceeded to pummel his inebriated victim as he curled up in the fetal position to protect himself.
He [Roquet] is not resisting at that point, he is on the ground, said Police Chief Scott Freeman as he watched the video of this beating.
Amazingly enough, when the department investigated themselves, they actually found wrongdoing. In the report investigators issued to Fraser after the incident they stated that You violated
policy
. You used hard control strikes from an impact weapon
on an individual who was actively resistant, but was not assaultive
. a strike to the head from a baton is considered use of deadly force
. You used more force than necessary.
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/cop-arrested-after-his-own-body-cam-refuted-his-report-shows-him-pummeling-teen
Kablooie
(19,107 posts)They can't just indiscriminately do what they want to anyone as they have always done in the past.
Boy do we need these body cams. There's a whole ocean of evil that needs draining.
NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)Because believe it or not, they've actually charged people for reflexively responding to painful stimuli with resisting arrest.
At least this Dept actually gave a damn about justice versus corruption.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Did he just forget that he was recording himself?
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)force just lose control of themselves. That was what I saw in the Sandra Bland video. An emotionally immature cop who lost control.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)FuzzyRabbit
(2,217 posts)About 25% of police officers use illegal steroids. 'Roid rage is an everyday occurrence with police these days.
From http://www.menshealth.com/health/scandals-cops-and-steroids :
7962
(11,841 posts)If not, thats another step that should be taken
FuzzyRabbit
(2,217 posts)The city contract with the police officers union prohibits testing police for steroids.
4lbs
(7,395 posts)then so should all law enforcement.
7962
(11,841 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)but I remember Aasif Mandvi on the the Daily Show once, during a particularly bigoted interview, exclaim: "you know we can hear you, right?"
It is ample evidence of just how corrupt police culture is that this officer thought his bullshit would fly, despite the evidence of his body cam.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)What fight between any two people ended with one of them saying "I started it."
The difference with cops is that since a defendant is rarely going to take the stand, their version of "he started it" is the only one that the jury hears.
But people's memories are set up in such a way that self-justify.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and would certainly explain the ability of cop perpetrators to justify their actions in a convincing way: they've already convinced themselves.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)been there done that, and yes, they lie as good as any politician could ever hope.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Maybe he will try claiming the footage was doctored.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)...that this is evidence of the change the citizenry rightfully yearns for.
Beartracks
(14,591 posts)... is it possible that cops, too, can mis-remember things about their own adrenaline-charged encounters with suspects?
Otherwise, why bother lying about the episode? Of course, that would actually imply that the cop could have been in some sort of "blind rage" -- which is exactly the kind of loss-of-control cops should be trained to NOT have.
The other option being that the cop simply forgot about the camera and just defaulted into doing his "normal" thing.
In either case: Body Cams are a definite necessity!
=========================
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Memory is not objective.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Generally they expect a cops memory to be flawless and have the benefit of perfect recall and perspective- while at the same time allowing any other witness or the suspect be be human and have imperfect memory.
Cameras are always great. The protect good cops from bogus complaints. People behave better and are less likely to lie or resist or be belligerent when they know they are on camera. And cameras expose bad cops.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,461 posts)For some reason, these websites like alter net and raw story never display for me om ipad.
https://m.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)or else the cop would have received a medal.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,461 posts)And/or the cop has enemies in the department.
Yeah, I'm cynical.
7962
(11,841 posts)If it wasnt for the camera, he'd have gotten away with it. THESE are the cases people need to SEE so they can believe that it IS happening everywhere.
What about the cop charged after his cam showed him shooting the guy in the car? That guy was black. Video is making a difference. be happy about it
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)and serve real time I will be happy.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Different solutions are needed.
7962
(11,841 posts)The cameras are another piece of the puzzle
markpkessinger
(8,912 posts). . . Nobody ever said body cams would be the total solution. But they are a valuable tool.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)sub.theory
(652 posts)The body cam WORKED! It showed the cop was lying. He would have gotten away with it otherwise. The body cam did its job perfectly.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)But if you are allergic to s medication, and are in a car accident, the bracelet is going to help.
The body cam, in this instance, is very likely to prevent this cop from doing the same to anyone else.
Prisons don't prevent crime either.
Democat
(11,617 posts)They prevent the cop from doing the same thing again the next day.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)And "other solutions are also needed." I support the use of body cameras, but don't think they will end police brutality.
7962
(11,841 posts)aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)They will reduce violence and they will help bring justice to some who are violated by police.
A while back I was skeptical because I wouldn't want a camera on me while I was doing my job for 8 hours a day, but clearly they are needed.
malaise
(296,102 posts)Truth will out.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)They are a win-win for all.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)We've all heard for years about how good cops are supposed to help rein in bad cops, for the good of the community and the integrity of force. But we've also seen how that doesn't work out so well in real life, as a cadre of bad cops can rule an entire force through threats, intimidation, and outright violence against their brother and sister cops.
Here's a tool that will help those good cops identify and weed out the bad ones. Let's use it, and get our society working toward that more perfect union I hear so much about, with the promotion of the general welfare and stuff.