General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums(CNN just now) If, as many on the right suggest that we can never stop gun killings and no law on the books will
or would have prevented the mass shootings that have and continue to take place, then why do these same folks favor endless wars in the name of religion? The same thing is true about war. If religious nuts can never be fully erased from society and if people have a right to their own religion and it has been going on all through out history, why do we spend so many lives and resources on fighting wars and taking more lives?
It just strikes me that the arguments in favor of not being able to do anything about guns fits perfectly with the argument that there is nothing you can do about religion. Just listen to the arguments from the NRA and gun lovers and substitute war or fighting ISIS or "Islamic terrorist or extremists."
Take away guns and take away religion ...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That doesn't seem a particularly progressive thing to suggest.
In fact it seems to play into the right-wing stereotype of a leftist.
LonePirate
(14,375 posts)That's how you eradicate religion.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I do not understand why the eradication of religion would be a progressive goal. What a person believes privately ought to be their own business as long as it does not impinge on the rights of others.
LonePirate
(14,375 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)For most religious people I know, their faith is a private matter.
Response to oberliner (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)You'd think people would be carrying pitchforks and torches in the streets still.
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Reply #12)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Where people dance naked around a "Burning Man".
Your point?
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Response to LondonReign2 (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)National borders, existing nowhere but our imaginations are "fanciful bullshit" too.
Though I do realize we often hold up some of the imaginary as more real than other imaginary constructs depending on our biases.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)And who, pray tell, has been making that argument, and in response to what?
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I too wonder just where this comment by the OP comes from?
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)loss.
"The openness and brazenness of the LBGT agenda and the media flaunting of gay marriages all across the country cost Dems dearly and threatens to do so in the future."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025764803#post45
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)CTyankee
(68,291 posts)That is why "no can do" when it comes to more stringent regulation of guns.